ADOLF GRUNBAUM

Born 1923

Temporally-Asymmetric Principles, Parity Between Explanation and Prediction, and Mechanism vs. Teleology
from Philosophy of Science" Vol. 29. No. 2, April 1962.

BRIEF BIOGRAPHY by Steve Bayne

Born in Cologne/Rhine Germany in 1923. Prof. Adolf Grunbaum first became seriously interested in philosophy at the age of twelve after being impressed by Aristotle's views on cause. Shortly afterwards he read Schopenhaur whose style of writing, by contrast with that of Kant and Hegel, he found much to his liking. By age 13 he had become sceptical of the claims of religion, and continued his pursuit of philosophy. At age 14 he arrived in the United States and, in 1943, graduated from Wesleyan University in Middletown Connecticut with high honors in both mathematics and philosophy. He served in the U.S. Army during WWII in a number of capacities. Among them was the role of interrogator. Among those he interrogatedm, suspected of collaborating with the Nazi regime, was the well known mathematician, who was said to have taught classes in Nazi uniform. In 1949, he received a Ph.D from Yale and married Thelma Braverman, whom he met in Brooklyn as a high school student. They have a daughter, Barbara, whose interest in photography led to a graduate degree from Rochester Institute of Technology. Along with Carl Hempel, who was called by his friends "Peter," Prof. Grunbaum built a Philosophy Department of great renown at the University of Pittsburgh. He shared with Hempel an enormous respect for Hans Reichenbach whose work was central to how logical positivists interpreted the revolution in physics. Reichenbach had been a student of Einstein, and Hempel had been a student of Reichenbach's. In 1963, Prof. Grunbaum published the work for which he is probably most well known, "Philosophical Problems of Space and Time. Besides Hempel, Grunbaum has been a close working partner of other well known philosophers such as Wilfrid Sellars, Ruth Marcus, Richard Gale, Wesley Salmon, Jose Alberto Coffa, Robert S. Cohen and many many others. In addition to his work on problems in the philosophy of physics, since the 1970s Grunbaum has contributed heavily to the examination of the work of Sigmund Freud. Despite the fact that, as a Jew, he experienced persecution in his native Germany and was compelled to flee he appreciatively accepted an invitation in 2002 to deliver the Leibniz Lectures at the University of Hannover. Hist-Analytic would like thank Prof. Grunbaum for supplying much of the material for this page, and for his permission to "webify" one his most important papers. Soon, perhaps, additional papers will be included along with it. Those who wish to pursue at greater length the details of Grunbaum's remarkable life and contributions to philosophy should consult his autobiography, which is to be found in Philosophy of Physics and Psychology: Essays in Honor of Adolf Grunbaum edited by A Jokic, Amherst, NY, Prometheus Press. 2005.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

See Grunbaum's Website (December 21, 2004)

[1] (With R.S. Cohen) (1942) An Outline of Trigonometry (Plane and Spherical). Boston, MA: Student Outlines Co.

[2] (1948) “Review of F.S.C. Northrop’s ‘The Logic of the Sciences and the Humanities,’ ” The Yale Law Journal 57(7) (June): 1332–1338.

[3] (1950) “Realism and Neo-Kantianism in Professor Margenau’s Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics,” Philosophy of Science 17(1) (January): 26–34.

[4] (1950) “Relativity and the Atomicity of Becoming,” The Review of Metaphysics IV(2) (December): 143–186. This article contains some serious distorting misprints.

[5] (1951) “Some Recent Writings in the Philosophy of Mathematics,” The Review of Metaphysics V(2) (December): 281–292.

[6] (1951) The Philosophy of Continuity. Ph.D. Thesis. Yale University. See also [148].

[7] (1952) “A Consistent Conception of the Extended Linear Continuum as an Aggregate of Unextended Elements,” Philosophy of Science 19(4) (October): 288–306.

[8] (1952) “Causality and the Science of Human Behavior,” American Scientist 40(4) (October): 665–676. See also [9], [12], [43], [47], [90], [96], [137], [189], [214], and [257].

[9] (1952) “Causality and the Science of Human Behavior,” in: Bobbs-Merrill Reprint Series in the Social Sciences, Item P-639, pp. 665–676. This is a reprint of the article in American Scientist (1952) [8].

[10] (1952) “Messrs. Black and Taylor on Temporal Paradoxes,” Analysis 12 (June): 144–148.

[11] (1952) “Some Highlights of Modern Cosmology and Cosmogony,” The Review of Metaphysics V(3) (March): 481–498.

[12] (1953) “Causality and the Science of Human Behavior,” in: H. Feigl and M. Brodbeck (eds.), Readings in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, pp. 766–778. This is a version of the article in American Scientist (1952) [8].

[13] (1953) “Comments on Power and Science,” The Review of Metaphysics VI(3) (March): 478–480.

[14] (1953) “Critique of H. Dingle’s Objection to the Bondi-Gold Cosmology,” Scientific American 189(6) (December): 6–8.

[15] (1953) “Relativity, Causality and Weiss’s Theory of Relations,” The Review of Metaphysics VII(1) (September): 115–123.

[16] (1953) “Review of Hans Reichenbach’s The Rise of Scientific Philosophy,” Scripta Mathematica XIX(1) (March): 48–54.

[17] (1953) “Some Remarks on Professor Ushenko’s Interpretation of Causal Law,” The Journal of Philosophy L(4) (February 12): 115–120.

[18] (1953) “Whitehead’s Method of Extensive Abstraction,” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science IV(15): 215–226.

[19] (1954) “E.A. Milne’s Scales of Time,” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science IV(16): 329–330.

[20] (1954) “Operationism and Relativity,” The Scientific Monthly 79(4) (October): 228–231. See also [41] and [58].

[21] (1954) “Review of H. Feigl and M. Brodbeck (eds.) Readings in the Philosophy of Science,” American Journal of Physics 22(7) (October): 498–499.

[22] (1954) “Review of R. Dugas’ Histoire de la Mécanique,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research XV(1) (September): 119–121.

[23] (1954) “Review of R. von Mises’ Positivism, A Study in Human Understanding,” Scripta Mathematica XX(1–2) (March–June): 75–76.

[24] (1954) “Science and Ideology,” The Scientific Monthly 79(1) (July): 13–19. See also [25].

[25] (1954) “Science and Ideology,” Humanist XIV(4) (July–August): 161–173. This is a version of the article in The Scientific Monthly (1954) [24].

[26] (1954) “The Clock Paradox in the Special Theory of Relativity,” Philosophy of Science 21(3) (July): 249–253. See also [32].

[27] (1955) “Logical and Philosophical Foundations of the Special Theory of Relativity,” American Journal of Physics 23(7) (October): 450–464. See also [45], [51], and [307].

[28] (1955) “Modern Science and Refutation of the Paradoxes of Zeno,” The Scientific Monthly 81(5) (November): 234–239.

[29] (1955) “Reply to Dr. Leaf,” Philosophy of Science 22(1) (January): 53.

[30] (1955) “Reply to Dr. Törnebohm’s Comments on ‘The Clock Paradox in the Special Theory of Relativity,’ ” Philosophy of Science 22(3) (July): 233.

[31] (1955) “Review of E. Nagel’s Sovereign Reason,” Science 121(3155) (June 17): 862.

[32] (1955) “The Clock Paradox in the Special Theory of Relativity,” in: Proceedings of the II International Congress of the IUHPS, vol. 3. Neuchâtel, Switzerland: Editions du Griffon, pp. 55–60. This is a version of the article in Philosophy of Science (1954) [26].

[33] (1955) “Time and Entropy,” American Scientist 43(4) (October): 550–572. See also [39].

[34] (1955) “Time and Ethics,” The Scientific Monthly 80(3) (March): 200–201.

[35] (1956) “Historical Determinism, Social Activism, and Predictions in the Social Sciences,” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science VII(27): 236–240. See also [303].

[36] (1956) “Relativity of Simultaneity within a Single Galilean Frame: A Rejoinder,” American Journal of Physics 24(8) (November): 588–590.

[37] (1956) “Review of H. Reichenbach’s The Direction of Time,” American Scientist 44 (October): 294A–300A.

[38] (1957) “Complementarity in Quantum Physics and Its Philosophical Generalization,” The Journal of Philosophy LIV(23) (November 7): 713–727. This paper was presented in the Symposium on Determinism in the Light of Recent Physics at the Meeting of The American Philosophical Association, Eastern Division, on December 29, 1957.

[39] (1957) “Das Zeitproblem,” Archiv für Philosophie 7(3/4): 165–208. This is a German translation of “Time and Entropy” in American Scientist (1955) [33].

[40] (With E.L. Hill) (1957) “Irreversible Processes in Physical Theory,” Nature 179 (June 22): 1296–1297.

[41] (1957) “Operationism and Relativity,” in: P.G. Frank (ed.), The Validation of Scientific Theories. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, pp. 84–94. This is a version of the article in The Scientific Monthly (1954) [20].

[42] (1957) “Remarks Concerning Moon and Spencer’s ‘On the Establishment of a Universal Time,’ ” Philosophy of Science 24(1) (January): 77–78.

[43] (1957) “Science and Man,” in: M. Mandelbaum, F.W. Gramlich, and A.R. Anderson (eds.), Philosophic Problems: An Introductory Book of Readings. New York: The Macmillan Co., pp. 328–338. This is a version of “Causality and the Science of Human Behavior” in American Scientist (1952) [8].

[44] (1957) “The Philosophical Retention of Absolute Space in Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity,” The Philosophical Review LXVI(4) (October): 525–534. See also [88].

[45] (1958) “Fundamental Philosophical Issues in the Special Theory of Relativity,” in: K. Sapper (ed.), Kritik und Fortbildung der Relativitätstheorie. Graz, Austria: Akademische Druck u. Verlagsanstalt, pp. 1–26. This is a revised version of “Logical and Philosophical Foundations of the Special Theory of Relativity” in American Journal of Physics (1955) [27].

[46] (1958) “Philosophical Principles in the Special Theory of Relativity” (in Hebrew), IYYUN 9(4) (October): 249–262.

[47] (1959) “Causality and the Science of Human Behavior,” in: R.S. Daniel (ed.), Contemporary Readings in General Psychology. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Co., pp. 328–336. This is a version of the article in American Scientist (1952) [8].

[48] (1959) “Conventionalism in Geometry,” in: L. Henkin, P. Suppes, and A. Tarski (eds.), Proceedings of the Symposium on The Axiomatic Method, with Special Reference to Geometry and Physics. Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland Publishing Co., pp. 204–222.

[49] (1959) “Remarks on Dr. Kubie’s Views,” in: S. Hook (ed.), Psychoanalysis, Scientific Method, and Philosophy. New York: New York University Press, p. 225.

[50] (1959) “The Falsifiability of the Lorentz-Fitzgerald Contraction Hypothesis,” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science X(37): 48–50.

[51] (1960) “Logical and Philosophical Foundations of the Special Theory of Relativity,” in: A. Danto and S. Morgenbesser (eds.), Philosophy of Science. New York: Meridian Books, pp. 399–434. This is a version of the article in American Journal of Physics (1955) [27].

[52] (1960) “The Duhemian Argument,” Philosophy of Science 27(1) (January): 75–87. See also [53] and [158].

[53] (1960) “The Duhemian Argument,” in: Bobbs-Merrill Reprint Series in Philosophy, Item Phil-90, pp. 75–87. This is a reprint of the article in Philosophy of Science (1960) [52].

[54] (1960) “The Falsifiability of the Lorentz-Fitzgerald Contraction Hypothesis: A Rejoinder to Professor Dingle.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science XI(42) (August): 143–145.

[55] (1960) “The Role of A Priori Elements in Physical Theory,” in: L.W. Friedrich (ed.), The Nature of Physical Knowledge. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, pp. 109–128.

[56] (1961) “A Rejoinder to Feyerabend’s Comments on ‘Law and Convention in Physical Theory,’ ” in: H. Feigl and G. Maxwell (eds.), Current Issues in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., pp. 161–168.

[57] (1961) “Law and Convention in Physical Theory,” in: H. Feigl and G. Maxwell (eds.), Current Issues in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., pp. 140–155.

[58] (1961) “Operationism and Relativity,” in: P.G. Frank (ed.), The Validation of Scientific Theories. New York: Collier Books, pp. 83–92. This is a reprint of the article in The Scientific Monthly (1954) [20].

[59] (1961) “Professor Dingle on Falsifiability: A Second Rejoinder,” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science XII(46) (August): 153–157.

[60] (1961) “The Genesis of the Special Theory of Relativity,” in: H. Feigl and G. Maxwell (eds.), Current Issues in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., pp. 43–53. See also [107] and [139].

[61] (1962) “Discussion: The Structure of Science,” Philosophy of Science 29(3) (July): 294–305.

[62] (1962) “Geometry, Chronometry, and Empiricism,” in: H. Feigl and G. Maxwell (eds.), Scientific Explanation, Space, and Time. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. III. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 405–526. See also [82].

[63] (1962) “Prologue” and “Epilogue,” in: P.W. Bridgman’s (posthumous) A Sophisticate’s Primer of Relativity. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, pp. vii–viii; 165–191. See also [75].

[64] (1962) “Science and Man,” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 5(4) (Summer): 483–502. See also [91] and [96].

[65] (1962) “Temporally-Asymmetric Principles, Parity Between Explanation and Prediction, and Mechanism Versus Teleology,” Philosophy of Science 29(2) (April): 146–170. See also [78], [79], and [113].

[66] (1962) “The Falsifiability of Theories: Total or Partial? A Contemporary Evaluation of the Duhem-Quine Thesis,” Synthese XIV(1) (March): 17–34. For W.V.O. Quine’s comment on this paper, see Quine, W. (1976), “A Comment on Grünbaum’s Claim,” in: S.G. Harding (ed.), Can Theories Be Refuted? Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Co., p. 132. See also [80], [92], and [213].

[67] (1962) “The Nature of Time,” in: R.G. Colodny (ed.), Frontiers of Science and Philosophy. University of Pittsburgh Series in the Philosophy of Science, vol. I. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 147–188. See also [68].

[68] (1962) “The Nature of Time,” in: R.G. Colodny (ed.), Frontiers of Science and Philosophy. London: Allen and Unwin, pp. 147–188. This book is a British edition of [67].

[69] (1962) “The Relevance of Philosophy to the History of the Special Theory of Relativity,” The Journal of Philosophy LIX(21) (October 11): 561–574.

[70] (1962) “The Special Theory of Relativity as a Case Study of the Importance of the Philosophy of Science for the History of Science,” Annali di Matematica LVII(IV): 257–282. See also [81].

[71] (1962) “Whitehead’s Philosophy of Science,” The Philosophical Review LXXI(2) (April): 218–229.

[72] (1963) “Carnap’s Views on the Foundations of Geometry,” in: P.A. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. Library of Living Philosophers, vol. XI. La Salle, IL: The Open Court Publishing Co., pp. 599–684. See also [89] and [143].

[73] (1963) “Comments on Professor Roger Buck’s Paper ‘Reflexive Predictions,’ ” Philosophy of Science 30(4) (October): 370–372. See also [112].

[74] (1963) Philosophical Problems of Space and Time. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., 448 pages. A British edition was published by Routledge & Kegan Paul, London (1964). See also [114] and [140].

[75] (1963) “Prologue” and “Epilogue,” in: P.W. Bridgman’s (posthumous) A Sophisticate’s Primer of Relativity. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd., pp. vii–viii; 165–191. This book is a British edition of [63].

[76] (1963) “Space,” unpublished, but see [77].

[77] (1963) “Space and Time,” in: The Voice of America Forum Lectures. Philosophy of Science Series, vol. 12. Washington, DC: U.S. Information Agency. This is a lecture broadcast by The Voice of America on July 1. See also [97].

[78] (1963) “Temporally Asymmetric Principles, Parity between Explanation and Prediction, and Mechanism versus Teleology,” in: B. Baumrin (ed.), Philosophy of Science. The Delaware Seminar, vol. 1, 1961–1962. New York: Interscience Publishers, pp. 57–96. This is a version of the article in Philosophy of Science (1962) [65].

[79] (1963) “Temporally Asymmetric Principles, Parity Between Explanation and Prediction, and Mechanism Versus Teleology,” in: H.E. Kyburg, Jr. and E. Nagel (eds.), Induction: Some Current Issues. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, pp. 114–149. This is a version of the article in Philosophy of Science (1962) [65].

[80] (1963) “The Falsifiability of Theories: Total or Partial? A Contemporary Evaluation of the Duhem-Quine Thesis,” in: M.W. Wartofsky (ed.), Proceedings of the Boston Colloquium for the Philosophy of Science, 1961/1962. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. I. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Co., pp. 178–195. This is a version of the article in Synthese (1962) [66].

[81] (1963) “The Special Theory of Relativity as a Case Study of the Importance of the Philosophy of Science for the History of Science,” in: B. Baumrin (ed.), Philosophy of Science. The Delaware Seminar, vol. 2, 1962–1963. New York: Interscience Publishers, pp. 171–204. This is a version of the article in Annali di Matematica (1962) [70].

[82] (1964) “Geometrie, Zeitmessung und Empirismus,” Archiv für Philosophie 12(3–4): 179–303. This is a German translation of “Geometry, Chronometry, and Empiricism” in Scientific Explanation, Space, and Time (1962) [62].

[83] (1964) “Is a Universal Nocturnal Expansion Falsifiable or Physically Vacuous?” Philosophical Studies XV(5) (October): 71–79. Errata in this article are listed in Philosophical Studies XVI(3) (April 1965): 47–48.

[84] (1964) “Popper on Irreversibility,” in: M. Bunge (ed.), The Critical Approach to Science and Philosophy, Essays in Honor of Karl R. Popper, Book I. London: The Macmillan Co., pp. 316–331.

[85] (1964) “Questions for Brand Blanshard,” in: S. Rome and B. Rome (eds.), Philosophical Interrogations. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., p. 205. [86] (1964) “The Anisotropy of Time,” The Monist 48(2) (April): 219–247. See also [98] and [122].

[87] (1964) “The Bearing of Philosophy on the History of Science,” Science 143(3613) (March 27): 1406–1412.

[88] (1964) “The Philosophical Retention of Absolute Space in Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity,” in: J.J.C. Smart (ed.), Problems of Space and Time. New York: The Macmillan Co., pp. 313–317. This is a version of the article in The Philosophical Review (1957) [44].

[89] (1964) “Time, Irreversible Processes, and the Physical Status of Becoming,” in: J.J.C. Smart (ed.), Problems of Space and Time. New York: The Macmillan Co., pp. 397–425. This is a version of “Carnap’s Views on the Foundations of Geometry” in The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap (1963) [72].

[90] (1966) “Causality and the Science of Human Behavior,” in: R. Ulrich, T. Stachnik, and J. Mabry (eds.), Control of Human Behavior. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Co., pp. 3–10. This is a version of the article in American Scientist (1952) [8].

[91] (1966) “Science, Causality, and Man,” in: L.Z. Hammer (ed.), Value and Man, Readings in Philosophy. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., pp. 55–66. This is a version of “Science and Man” in Perspectives in Biology and Medicine (1962) [64].

[92] (1966) “The Falsifiability of a Component of a Theoretical System,” in: P.K. Feyerabend and G. Maxwell (eds.), Mind, Matter, and Method: Essays in Philosophy and Science in Honor of Herbert Feigl. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 273–305. This is a version of “The Falsifiability of Theories: Total or Partial? A Contemporary Evaluation of the Duhem-Quine Thesis” in Synthese (1962) [66].

[93] (1967) Modern Science and Zeno’s Paradoxes. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press. See also [104].

[94] (1967) “Modern Science and Zeno’s Paradoxes of Motion,” in: R.M. Gale (ed.), The Philosophy of Time. A Collection of Essays. New York: Anchor Doubleday Books, pp. 422–494. See also [105] and [123].

[95] (1967) “Relativity Theory, Philosophical Significance of,” in: P. Edwards (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 7. New York: The Macmillan Co., pp. 133–140.

[96] (1967) “Science and Man,” in: M. Mandelbaum, F.W. Gramlich, A.R. Anderson, and J.B. Schneewind (eds.), Philosophic Problems, An Introductory Book of Readings, 2nd ed. New York: The Macmillan Co., pp. 448–462. This is a version of “Causality and the Science of Human Behavior” in American Scientist (1952) [8] and “Science and Man” in Perspectives in Biology and Medicine (1962) [64].

[97] (1967) “Space and Time,” in: S. Morgenbesser (ed.), Philosophy of Science Today. New York: Basic Books, Inc., pp. 125–135. This is a version of the lecture in The Voice of America Forum Lectures (1963) [77].

[98] (1967) “The Anisotropy of Time,” in: T. Gold and D.L. Schumacher (eds.), The Nature of Time. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 149–177; 245–247; discussion on pp. 177–186. This is a revision of the article in The Monist (1964) [86].

[99] (1967) “The Denial of Absolute Space and the Hypothesis of a Universal Nocturnal Expansion: A Rejoinder to George Schlesinger,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 45(1) (May): 61–91.

[100] (1967) “The Status of Temporal Becoming,” Annals of The New York Academy of Sciences 138 (February 6): 374–395. See also [101], [108], and [132].

[101] (1967) “The Status of Temporal Becoming,” in: R.M. Gale (ed.), The Philosophy of Time. A Collection of Essays. New York: Anchor Doubleday Books, pp. 322–353. This is a version of the essay in Annals of The New York Academy of Sciences (1967) [100].

[102] (1968) “Are ‘Infinity Machines’ Paradoxical?” Science 159(3810) (January 5): 396–406.

[103] (1968) Geometry and Chronometry in Philosophical Perspective. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. See also [119] for a reprint of Chapter 3 of this book.

[104] (1968) Modern Science and Zeno’s Paradoxes. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd. This is a revised version of the book in [93].

[105] (1968) “Modern Science and Zeno’s Paradoxes of Motion,” in: R.M. Gale (ed.), The Philosophy of Time. A Collection of Essays. London: The Macmillan Co., pp. 422–501. This is a revised British edition of the 1967 essay [94].

[106] (1968) “Spatial and Temporal Congruence in Physics: Newton”; “Has the General Theory of Relativity Repudiated Absolute Space?” and “Is There a ‘Flow’ of Time or Temporal ‘Becoming?’ ” in: P.R. Durbin (ed.), Philosophy of Science: An Introduction. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., pp. 142–144; 151–157; 189–194.

[107] (1968) “The Genesis of the Special Theory of Relativity,” in: L.P. Williams (ed.), Relativity Theory, Its Origins & Impact on Modern Thought. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 107–114. This is a version of the article in Current Issues in the Philosophy of Science (1961) [60].

[108] (1968) “The Status of Temporal Becoming,” in: R.M. Gale (ed.), The Philosophy of Time. A Collection of Essays. London: The Macmillan Co., pp. 322–354. This is a revised British edition of the essay in Annals of The New York Academy of Sciences (1967) [100]. [109] (1969) “Are Physical Events Themselves Transiently Past, Present and Future? A Reply to H.A.C. Dobbs,” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 20(2) (August): 145–153.

[110] (1969) “Can an Infinitude of Operations be Performed in a Finite Time?” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 20(3) (October): 203–218.

[111] (1969) “Can We Ascertain the Falsity of a Scientific Hypothesis?” Studium Generale 22(11) (November 17): 1061–1093. See also [129] and [154].

[112] (1969) “Comments on Professor Roger Buck’s Paper ‘Reflexive Predictions,’ ” in: L.I. Krimerman (ed.), The Nature and Scope of Social Science. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, pp. 163–165. This is a version of the article in Philosophy of Science (1963) [73].

[113] (1969) “Explanation and Prediction are Symmetrical,” in: L.I. Krimerman (ed.), The Nature and Scope of Social Science. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, pp. 126–132. This is an excerpt from “Temporally-Asymmetric Principles, Parity Between Explanation and Prediction, and Mechanism Versus Teleology” in Philosophy of Science (1962) [65].

[114] (1969) Filosofski problemy prostranstva i vremeni. Moscow: Progress Publishers. This is a Russian translation, with revisions and additions, of Philosophical Problems of Space and Time (1963) [74].

[115] (1969) “Free Will and Laws of Human Behavior,” L’Age de la Science (2) (April/June): 105–127. Errata in this article are published in L’Age de la Science (4) 1970. See also [118], [126], [130], [135], [136], [144], [149], and [163].

[116] (With W.C. Salmon) (1969) “Introduction” to A Panel Discussion of Simultaneity by Slow Clock Transport in the Special and General Theories of Relativity, “The Context of these Essays,” Philosophy of Science 36(1) (March): 1–4.

[117] (1969) “Simultaneity by Slow Clock Transport in the Special Theory of Relativity,” Philosophy of Science 36(1) (March): 5–43. See also [124].

[118] (1969) “Libero arbitrio e norme del comportamento umano,” in: R. Campa (ed.), Le Implicazioni Politiche della Scienza. Rome, Italy: Edizioni della Nuova Antologia, pp. 87–123. This is an Italian translation of “Free Will and Laws of Human Behavior” in L’Age de la Science (1969) [115].

[119] (1968) “Reply to Hilary Putnam’s ‘An Examination of Grünbaum’s Philosophy of Geometry,’ ” in: R.S. Cohen and M.W. Wartofsky (eds.), Proceedings of the Boston Colloquium for the Philosophy of Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. V. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Co., pp. 1–150. This is a reprint of Chapter 3 of Geometry and Chronometry in Philosophical Perspective (1968) [103].

[120] (1969) “The Meaning of Time,” in: N. Rescher et al. (eds.), Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel, A Tribute on the Occasion of his Sixty-Fifth Birthday. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Co., pp. 147–177. See also [131], [159], and [188].

[121] (With M. Strauss) (1970) “Comments on Professor Schmutzer’s Paper ‘New Approach to Interpretation Problems of General Relativity by Means of the Splitting-Up-Formalism of Space-Time,’ ” in: P. Weingartner and G. Zecha (eds.), Induction, Physics, and Ethics. Proceedings and Discussions of the 1968 Salzburg Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Co., pp. 137–139.

[122] (1970) “Die Anisotropie der Zeit,” in: L. Krüger (ed.), Erkenntnisprobleme der Naturwissenschaften. Köln, Germany: Verlag Kiepenheuer & Witsch, pp. 476–508. This is a German translation of “The Anisotropy of Time” in The Monist (1964) [86].

[123] (1970) “Modern Science and Zeno’s Paradoxes of Motion,” in: W.C. Salmon (ed.), Zeno’s Paradoxes. New York: The Bobbs-Merrill Co., Inc., pp. 200–250. This is a version of the article in The Philosophy of Time. A Collection of Essays (1967) [94]. This book also contains the following article: “Modern Science and Refutation of the Paradoxes of Zeno,” pp. 164–175.

[124] (1970) “Simultaneity by Slow Clock Transport in the Special Theory of Relativity,” in: P. Weingartner and G. Zecha (eds.), Induction, Physics, and Ethics. Proceedings and Discussions of the 1968 Salzburg Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Co., pp. 140–166; discussion remarks on pp. 167–179. This is a version of the article in Philosophy of Science (1969) [117].

[125] (1970) “Space, Time and Falsifiability, Critical Exposition and Reply to ‘A Panel Discussion of Grünbaum’s Philosophy of Science,’ ” Philosophy of Science 37(4) (December): 469–588.

[126] (1970) “Svoboda voli i zakony chelovecheskogo povedeniya,” Voprosi Filosofii (6): 62–74. This is a Russian translation of “Free Will and Laws of Human Behavior” in L’Age de la Science (1969) [115].

[127] (1970) “Zeno’s Metrical Paradox of Extension,” in: W.C. Salmon (ed.), Zeno’s Paradoxes. New York: The Bobbs-Merrill Co., Inc., pp. 176–199.

[128] (1971) “Are Spatial and Temporal Congruence Conventional?” Letter-to-the-Editor, General Relativity and Gravitation 2(3): 281–284.

[129] (1971) “Can We Ascertain the Falsity of a Scientific Hypothesis?” in: M. Mandelbaum (ed.), Observation and Theory in Science. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Press, pp. 69–129. This is a version of the essay in Studium Generale (1969) [111].

[130] (1971) “Free Will and Laws of Human Behavior,” American Philosophical Quarterly 8(4) (October): 299–317. This is a version of the article in L’Age de la Science (1969) [115].

[131] (1971) “The Meaning of Time,” in: E. Freeman and W. Sellars (eds.), Basic Issues in the Philosophy of Time. La Salle, IL: The Open Court Publishing Co., pp. 195–228. This is a version of the essay in Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel, A Tribute on the Occasion of his Sixty-Fifth Birthday (1969) [120].

[132] (1971) “The Status of Temporal Becoming,” in: J. Zeman (ed.), Time in Science and Philosophy, An International Study of Some Current Problems. Prague, Czechoslovakia: Academia Publishing House, pp. 67–87. This is a version of the essay in Annals of The New York Academy of Sciences (1967) [100].

[133] (1971) “Why I Am Afraid of Absolute Space,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 49(1) (May): 96.

[134] (1972) “Abelson on Feigl’s Mind-Body Identity Thesis,” Philosophical Studies 23(1/2) (February): 119–121.

[135] (1972) “El libre albedrío y las leyes de la conducta humana,” in: G. Fernández Pardo and L.F.S. Natalicio (eds.), La ciencia de la conducta. México: Editorial Trillas, S.A., pp. 229–256. This is a Spanish translation of “Free Will and Laws of Human Behavior” in L’Age de la Science (1969) [115]. This Spanish translation is replete with errors.

[136] (1972) “Free Will and Laws of Human Behavior,” in: H. Feigl, W. Sellars, and K. Lehrer (eds.), New Readings in Philosophical Analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, pp. 605–627. This is a revised version of the article in L’Age de la Science (1969) [115].

[137] (1973) “Causality and the Science of Human Behavior,” in: A.C. Kamil and N.R. Simonson (eds.), Patterns of Psychology: Issues and Prospects. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co., pp. 18–25. This is a version of the article in American Scientist (1952) [8].

[138] (1973) “Geometrodynamics and Ontology,” The Journal of Philosophy LXX(21) (December 6): 775–800.

[139] (1973) “La Genesis de la Teoría Especial de la Relatividad,” in: L.P. Williams (ed.), La Teoría de la Relatividad. Madrid, Spain: Alianza Editorial, pp. 119–125. This is a Spanish translation of “The Genesis of the Special Theory of Relativity” in Current Issues in the Philosophy of Science (1961) [60].

[140] (1973) Philosophical Problems of Space and Time. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. XII. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Co. This is the second edition (884 pages) of [74]. See also [209].

[141] (1973) “Reply to J.Q. Adams’ ‘Grünbaum’s Solution to Zeno’s Paradoxes,’ ” Philosophia (Israel) 3(1) (January): 51–57.

[142] (1973) “The Ontology of the Curvature of Empty Space in the Geometrodynamics of Clifford and Wheeler,” in: P. Suppes (ed.), Space, Time and Geometry. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Co., pp. 268–295.

[143] (1974) “Carnap’s Views on the Foundations of Geometry,” in: La filosofia di Rudolf Carnap. Milan, Italy: Il Saggiatore, pp. 583–658. This is an Italian translation of the article in The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap (1963) [72].

[144] (1974) “Free Will and Laws of Human Behavior,” in: L. Goldberger and V.H. Rosen (eds.), Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Science: An Annual of Integrative and Interdisciplinary Studies, vol. III. New York: International Universities Press, Inc., pp. 3–39. This is a version of the article in L’Age de la Science (1969) [115].

[145] (1974) “Is the Coarse-Grained Entropy of Classical Statistical Mechanics an Anthropomorphism?” in: B. Gal-Or (ed.), Modern Developments in Thermodynamics. New York/Jerusalem: John Wiley & Sons, Inc./Israel Universities Press, pp. 413–428.

See also [150] and [156].

[146] (1974) “Popper’s Views on the Arrow of Time,” in: P.A. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Karl Popper, Book II. Library of Living Philosophers, vol. XIV. La Salle, IL: The Open Court Publishing Co., pp. 775–797.

[147] (1974) “Space, Time, and Matter: The Foundations of Geometrodynamics,” Introductory Remarks, in: K.F. Schaffner and R.S. Cohen (eds.), Proceedings of the 1972 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. XX. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Co., pp. 3–5.

[148] (1974) The Philosophy of Continuity. Ph.D. Thesis. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms. This is a microfilm version of the thesis in [6].

[149] (1975) “In Defense of Determinism,” in: P.R. Struhl and K.J. Struhl (eds.), Philosophy Now, 2nd ed. New York: Random House, Inc., pp. 211–228. This is a version of “Free Will and Laws of Human Behavior” in L’Age de la Science (1969) [115].

[150] (1975) “Is the Coarse-Grained Entropy of Classical Statistical Mechanics an Anthropomorphism?” in: L. Kubát and J. Zeman (eds.), Entropy and Information in Science and Philosophy. Prague, Czechoslovakia: Academia Publishing House, pp. 173–186. This is a version of the article in Modern Developments in Thermodynamics (1974) [145].

[151] (1976) “Ad Hoc Auxiliary Hypotheses and Falsificationism,” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27(4) (December): 329–362.

[152] (1976) “Can a Theory Answer More Questions than One of Its Rivals?” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27(1) (March): 1–23. See also [357].

[153] (1976) “Is Falsifiability the Touchstone of Scientific Rationality? Karl Popper Versus Inductivism,” in: R.S. Cohen, P.K. Feyerabend, and M.W. Wartofsky (eds.), Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. XXXIX. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Co., pp. 213–252. See also [195].

[154] (1976) “Is It Never Possible to Falsify a Hypothesis Irrevocably?” in: S.G. Harding (ed.), Can Theories Be Refuted? Essays on the Duhem-Quine Thesis. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Co., pp. 260–288. This is a version of “Can We Ascertain the Falsity of a Scientific Hypothesis?” in Studium Generale (1969) [111].

[155] (1976) “Is Preacceleration of Particles in Dirac’s Electrodynamics a Case of Backward Causation? The Myth of Retrocausation in Classical Electrodynamics,” Philosophy of Science 43(2) (June): 165–201. See also [161], [167], [174], [175], and [178].

[156] (1976) “Is the Coarse-Grained Entropy of Classical Statistical Mechanics an Anthropomorphism?” in: E. Laszlo and E.B. Sellon (eds.), Vistas in Physical Reality, Festschrift for Henry Margenau. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 11–29. This is a version of the article in Modern Developments in Thermodynamics (1974) [145].

[157] (1976) “Is the Method of Bold Conjectures and Attempted Refutations Justifiably the Method of Science?” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27(2) (June): 105–136.

[158] (1976) “The Duhemian Argument,” in: S.G. Harding (ed.), Can Theories Be Refuted? Essays on the Duhem-Quine Thesis. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Co., pp. 116–131. This is a version of the article in Philosophy of Science (1960) [52].

[159] (1976) “The Exclusion of Becoming From the Physical World,” in: M. ?apek (ed.), The Concepts of Space and Time: Their Structure and Their Development. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. XXII. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Co., pp. 471–500. This is a version of “The Meaning of Time” in Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel, A Tribute on the Occasion of his Sixty-Fifth Birthday (1969) [120].

[160] (1977) “Absolute and Relational Theories of Space and Space-Time,” in: J. Earman, C. Glymour, and J. Stachel (eds.), Foundations of Space-Time Theories. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. VIII. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 303–373.

[161] (With A.I. Janis) (1977) Comments and Criticism, “Is There Backward Causation in Classical Electrodynamics?” The Journal of Philosophy LXXIV(8) (August): 475–482.

[162] (1977) “How Scientific Is Psychoanalysis?” in: R. Stern, L.S. Horowitz, and J. Lynes (eds.), Science and Psychotherapy, vol. I, 2nd ed. New York: Haven Publishing Corp., pp. 219–254.

[163] (1977) “Is Freedom a Form of Determinism?” in: M. Lipman (ed.), Discovering Philosophy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc., pp. 421–431. This is a version of “Free Will and Laws of Human Behavior” in L’Age de la Science (1969) [115].

[164] (1977) “Is Psychoanalysis a Pseudo-Science? Karl Popper Versus Sigmund Freud, (I)” Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 31(3) (July–September): 333–353. See [170] for the second installment of this article.

[165] (1977) “Remarks on Miller’s Review of Philosophical Problems of Space and Time,” Isis 68(243): 447–448.

[166] (With A.I. Janis) (1977) “The Geometry of the Rotating Disk in the Special Theory of Relativity,” Synthese 34:281–299. See also [179].

[167] (With A.I. Janis) (1978) “Can the Effect Precede Its Cause in Classical Electrodynamics?” American Journal of Physics 46(4) (April): 337–341.

[168] (1978) “Hans Reichenbach’s Definitive Influence on Me,” in: M. Reichenbach and R.S. Cohen (eds.), Hans Reichenbach Selected Writings: 1909–1953, vol. 1. Vienna Circle Collection, vol. 4. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Co., pp. 65–67.

[169] (1978) “How Is Science Distinguished from Pseudo-Science? Two Views,” in: Proceedings of the Pennsylvania Academy of Science, vol. 52, pp. 96–98.

[170] (1978) “Is Psychoanalysis a Pseudo-Science? (II),” Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 32(1) (January–March): 49–69. This is the second installment of “Is Psychoanalysis a Pseudo-Science? Karl Popper versus Sigmund Freud” in Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung (1977) [164].

[171] (1978) “Poincaré’s Thesis that Any and All Stellar Parallax Findings are Compatible with the Euclideanism of the Pertinent Astronomical 3-Space,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 9(4): 313–318.

[172] (1978) “Popper vs Inductivism,” in: G. Radnitzky and G. Andersson (eds.), Progress and Rationality in Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. LVIII. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Co., pp. 117–142. See also [182].

[173] (1978) “Psychological Explanations for the Rejection or Acceptance of Scientific Theories,” Humanities in Society 1(4) (Fall): 293–304. See also [180], [185], and [186].

[174] (1978) “The Myth of Retrocausation in Classical Electrodynamics,” Epistemologia 1(2) (July–December): 353–396. This is a version of “Is Preacceleration of Particles in Dirac’s Electrodynamics a Case of Backward Causation? The Myth of Retrocausation in Classical Electrodynamics” in Philosophy of Science (1976) [155].

[175] (1979) “Der Mythos kausaler Rückkopplung in der klassischen Elektrodynamik,” Allgemeine Zeitschrift für Philosophie 4(1): 1–39. This is a German translation of “Is Preacceleration of Particles in Dirac’s Electrodynamics a Case of Backward Causation? The Myth of Retrocausation in Classical Electrodynamics” in Philosophy of Science (1976) [155].

[176] (1979) “Epistemological Liabilities of the Clinical Appraisal of Psychoanalytic Theory,” Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought 2(4): 451–526. See also [181] and [229].

[177] (1979) “Is Freudian Psychoanalytic Theory Pseudo-Scientific by Karl Popper’s Criterion of Demarcation?” American Philosophical Quarterly 16(2) (April): 131–141. See also [196].

[178] (With A.I. Janis) (1979) “Retrocausation and the Formal Assimilation of Classical Electrodynamics to Newtonian Mechanics: A Reply to Nissim-Sabat’s ‘On Grünbaum and Retrocausation,’ ” Philosophy of Science 46(1) (March): 136–160.

[179] (With A.I. Janis) (1979) “The Geometry of the Rotating Disk in the Special Theory of Relativity,” in: W.C. Salmon (ed.), Hans Reichenbach, Logical Empiricist. Synthese Library, vol. 132. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Co., pp. 321–339. This is a version of the article in Synthese (1977) [166].

[180] (1979) “The Role of Psychological Explanations of the Rejection or Acceptance of Scientific Theories,” in: J. Bärmark (ed.), Perspectives in Metascience: A Festschrift for Håkan Törnebohm. Göteborg, Sweden: University of Göteborg Press, pp. 95–115. This is a version of “Psychological Explanations for the Rejection or Acceptance of Scientific Theories” in Humanities in Society (1978) [173].

[181] (1980) “Epistemological Liabilities of the Clinical Appraisal of Psychoanalytic Theory,” Noûs XIV(3) (September): 307–385. This is an enlarged version of the essay in Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought (1979) [176].

[182] (1980) “Popper und der Induktivismus,” in: G. Radnitzky and G. Andersson (eds.), Fortschritt und Rationalität der Wissenschaft. Tübingen, Germany: J.C.B. Mohr, pp. 129–156. This is a German translation of “Popper vs Inductivism” in Progress and Rationality in Science (1978) [172].

[183] (1980) “Preface,” in: H. Mehlberg’s Time, Causality, and the Quantum Theory, vol. I. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 19. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Co., pp. xiii–xiv.

[184] (1980) “Psychoanalysis,” Commentary 70(5) (November): 21–23.

[185] (1980) “The Role of Psychological Explanations of the Rejection or Acceptance of Scientific Theories,” in: M.P. Hanen, M.J. Osler, and R.G. Weyant (eds.), Science, Pseudo-Science and Society. Waterloo, Ontario, Canada: Wilfrid Laurier University, pp. 29–53. This is a version of “Psychological Explanations for the Rejection or Acceptance of Scientific Theories” in Humanities in Society (1978) [173].

[186] (1980) “The Role of Psychological Explanations of the Rejection or Acceptance of Scientific Theories,” in: Science and Social Structure: A Festschrift for Robert K. Merton, April 24. Transactions of The New York Academy of Sciences, Series II, vol. 39, pp. 75–90. This is a version of “Psychological Explanations for the Rejection or Acceptance of Scientific Theories” in Humanities in Society (1978) [173].

[187] (With A.I. Janis) (1980) “The Rotating Disk: Reply to Grøn,” Foundations of Physics 10(5/6) (June): 495–498.

[188] (1980) “Tó ?ó??? ??? ??ó???,” Deucalion (32) (December): 343–382. This is a Greek translation of “The Meaning of Time” in Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel, A Tribute on the Occasion of his Sixty-Fifth Birthday (1969) [120].

[189] (1981) “Causality and the Science of Human Behavior,” in: O.A. Johnson (ed.), The Individual and the Universe: An Introduction to Philosophy. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., pp. 148–157. This is a version of the article in American Scientist (1952) [8].

[190] (1981) “How Valid is Psychoanalysis? An Exchange,” The New York Review of Books XXVIII(3) (March 5): 40.

[191] (1981) “The Placebo Concept,” Behaviour Research and Therapy 19(2): 157–167.

[192] (1982) “Can Psychoanalytic Theory Be Cogently Tested ‘On the Couch’?” Part I. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought 5(2): 155–255. See [193] for the second installment of this article. See also [203].

[193] (1982) “Can Psychoanalytic Theory Be Cogently Tested ‘On the Couch’?” Part II. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought 5(3): 311–436. This is the second installment of the article in Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought (1982) [192] See also [203].

[194] (1983) Comments and Criticism, “Is Object-Relations Theory Better Founded than Orthodox Psychoanalysis? A Reply to Jane Flax,” The Journal of Philosophy LXXX(1) (January): 46–51.

[195] (1983) “Es la falsabilidad la piedra de toque de la racionalidad científica? Karl Popper contra el inductivismo,” Cuadernos de Crítica 22:5–63. This is a Spanish translation of “Is Falsifiability the Touchstone of Scientific Rationality? Karl Popper Versus Inductivism” in Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos (1976) [153].

[196] (1983) “Es la teoria psicoanalítica freudiana pseudocientífica con el criterio de demarcación de Karl Popper?” Teorema (Madrid) XIII(1/2): 179–199. This is a Spanish translation of “Is Freudian Psychoanalytic Theory Pseudo-Scientific by Karl Popper’s Criterion of Demarcation?” in American Philosophical Quarterly (1979) [177].

[197] (1983) “Freud’s Theory: The Perspective of a Philosopher of Science,” Presidential Address to The American Philosophical Association (Eastern Division) on December 28, 1982, in: Proceedings and Addresses of The American Philosophical Association, vol. 57, no. 1 (September), pp. 5–31. See also [205], [211], [216], [237], [263], and [267].

[198] (1983) “Logical Foundations of Psychoanalytic Theory,” Erkenntnis 19(1–3) (May): 109–152. See also [199], [200], and [277].

[199] (1983) “Logical Foundations of Psychoanalytic Theory,” in: T. Millon (ed.), Theories of Personality and Psychopathology, 3rd ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., pp. 193–216. This is a reprint of the article in Erkenntnis (1983) [198].

[200] (1983) “Logical Foundations of Psychoanalytic Theory,” in: C.G. Hempel, H. Putnam, and W.K. Essler (eds.), Methodology, Epistemology, and Philosophy of Science, Essays in Honour of Wolfgang Stegmüller on the Occasion of His 60th Birthday, June 3rd 1983. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Co., pp. 109–152. This is a reprint of the article in Erkenntnis (1983) [198].

[201] (1983) “Psychoanalysis and Hermeneutics: An Ill-Conceived Marriage,” Dialectics and Humanism X(1): 135–145.

[202] (1983) “Retrospective Versus Prospective Testing of Aetiological Hypotheses in Freudian Theory,” in: J. Earman (ed.), Testing Scientific Theories. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. X. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 315–347.

[203] (1983) “The Foundations of Psychoanalysis,” in: L. Laudan (ed.), Mind and Medicine: Problems of Explanation and Evaluation in Psychiatry and the Biomedical Sciences. Pittsburgh Series in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol. 8. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 143–309. This is a revised version of “Can Psychoanalytic Theory Be Cogently Tested ‘On the Couch’?” Parts I and II in Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought (1982) [192] and [193].

[204] (1984) “Explication and Implications of the Placebo Concept,” in: G. Andersson (ed.), Rationality in Science and Politics, Festschrift for Gerard Radnitzky. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 79. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Co., pp. 131–158. See also [210], [219], [243], [261], [264], and [292].

[205] (1984) “Freudova teorija: pogled filozofa znanosti,” Filozofska Istrazivanja (Zagreb, Yugoslavia) 10(3): 295–309. This is an abridged version/Serbo-Croatian translation of “Freud’s Theory: The Perspective of a Philosopher of Science” in Proceedings and Addresses of The American Philosophical Association (1983) [197].

[206] (1984) The Foundations of Psychoanalysis: A Philosophical Critique. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. See also [228], [230], [261], [299], [305], and [308].

[207] (1984) “The Hermeneutic Construal of Psychoanalytic Theory and Therapy: An Ill-Conceived Paradigm for the Human Sciences,” in: J.T. Cushing, C.F. Delaney, and G.M. Gutting (eds.), Science and Reality: Recent Work in the Philosophy of Science. Essays in Honor of Ernan McMullin. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 54–82.

[208] (1985) “A warrant for psychoanalysis?” The Times Higher Education Supplement (London) (June 21): 14.

[209] (1985) An excerpt from Philosophical Problems of Space and Time, in: Z. Popov and Z. Bojadgiev (eds.) Ideas of Time. Sofia, Bulgaria: Science and Art Publishing House, pp. 462–476. This is a Bulgarian translation from the book in [140].

[210] (1985) “Explication and Implications of the Placebo Concept,” in: L. White, B. Tursky, and G.E. Schwartz (eds.), Placebo: Theory, Research, and Mechanisms. New York: The Guilford Press, pp. 9–36. This is a slightly different version of the article in Rationality in Science and Politics, Festschrift for Gerard Radnitzky (1984) [204].

[211] (1985) “La teoria di Freud nella prospettiva di un filosofo della scienza,” in: P. Repetti (ed.), L’anima e il compasso. Rome, Italy: Edizioni Theoria, pp. 87–138. This is an Italian translation of “Freud’s Theory: The Perspective of a Philosopher of Science” in Proceedings and Addresses of The American Philosophical Association (1983) [197].

[212] (1985) “Some Reflections on the Intellectual Contributions of German Jewry,” in: Jews in Germany Under Prussian Rule. A Historical Exhibition at the University of Pittsburgh, pp. 1–15.

[213] (1985) “The Falsifiability of Theories: Total or Partial? A Contemporary Evaluation of the Duhem-Quine Thesis,” in: R.S. Cohen and M.W. Wartofsky (eds.), A Portrait of Twenty-Five Years, Boston Colloquium for the Philosophy of Science 1960-1985. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Co., pp. 1–18. This is a reprint of the article in Synthese (1962) [66].

[214] (1986) “Causality and the Science of Human Behavior,” in: H. Hall and N.E. Bowie (eds.), The Tradition of Philosophy. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co., pp. 307–313. This is a version of the article in American Scientist (1952) [8].

[215] (1986) “Homenaje a Alberto Coffa,” Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofía (Argentina) XII(2) (July): 242–245. This is a Spanish translation of “Alberto Coffa: In Memoriam,” an oral presentation given at Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, January 19, 1985. See also [231].

[216] (1986) “Ist die Psychoanalyse rational oder kausalistisch begründet?” in: H. Lenk (ed.), Zur Kritik der wissenschaftlichen Rationalität. Freiburg, Germany: Verlag Karl Alber GmbH, pp. 351–394. This is a somewhat shortened, German translation of “Freud’s Theory: The Perspective of a Philosopher of Science” in Proceedings and Addresses of The American Philosophical Association (1983) [197].

[217] (1986) “L’impresa psicoanalitica: una valutazione,” Nuova Civiltà delle Macchine IV(3/4; 15/16): 123–130. This is an Italian translation of “The Psychoanalytic Enterprise: An Assessment,” an oral presentation given at the International Congress, “Rationality in Science and in Politics,” Locarno, Switzerland, June 14, 1986.

[218] (1986) “Précis of The Foundations of Psychoanalysis: A Philosophical Critique” and “Author’s Response” to 40 Reviewers: “Is Freud’s Theory Well-Founded?” Behavioral & Brain Sciences 9(2) (June): 217–228; 266–284. See also [232], [233], [256], and [261].

[219] (1986) “The Placebo Concept in Medicine and Psychiatry,” Psychological Medicine (England) 16:19–38. This is an enlarged, revised version of “Explication and Implications of the Placebo Concept” in Rationality in Science and Politics, Festschrift for Gerard Radnitzky (1984) [204]. See also [243] and [261].

[220] (1986) “What Are the Clinical Credentials of the Psychoanalytic Compromise Model of Neurotic Symptoms?” in: T. Millon and G.L. Klerman (eds.), Contemporary Directions in Psychopathology Toward the DSM-IV. New York: The Guilford Press, pp. 193–214.

[221] (1987) “God and the Holocaust,” Free Inquiry 8(1) (Winter 1987/1988): 23.

[222] (1987) Psychoanalyse in wissenschaftstheoretischer Sicht - Zum Werk Sigmund Freuds und seiner Rezeption. Konstanz, Germany: Universitätsverlag Konstanz GmbH. This is the text of the author’s six lectures inaugurating the Series of “Konstanz Dialogues,” which he presented at the University of Konstanz, Germany, June 21–July 7, 1983.

[223] (1987) “Psychoanalysis and Theism,” The Monist 70(2) (April): 152–192. A revised version of this essay appeared as Chapter 7 in Validation in the Clinical Theory of Psychoanalysis (1993) [283]. See also [262].

[224] (1987) “The Place of Secular Humanism: Current American Political Culture,” Vital Speeches of the Day LIV(2) (November 1): 42–47. See also [225] and [239].

[225] (1987) “Secular Humanism in American Political Culture,” Free Inquiry 8(1) (Winter 1987/1988): 21–25. This is a truncated version of “The Place of Secular Humanism: Current American Political Culture” in Vital Speeches of the Day (1987) [224].

[226] (1988) “Are Hidden Motives in Psychoanalysis Reasons but Not Causes of Human Conduct?” in: S.B. Messer, L.A. Sass, and R.L. Woolfolk (eds.), Hermeneutics and Psychological Theory: Interpretive Perspectives on Personality, Psychotherapy, and Psychopathology. Rutgers Symposia on Applied Psychology, vol. 2. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, pp. 149–167.

[227] (1988) “A Rejoinder to Richard Bernstein,” in: S.B. Messer, L.A. Sass, and R.L. Woolfolk (eds.), Hermeneutics and Psychological Theory: Interpretive Perspectives on Personality, Psychotherapy, and Psychopathology. Rutgers Symposia on Applied Psychology, vol. 2. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, pp. 175–181.

[228] (1988) Die Grundlagen der Psychoanalyse, Eine Philosophische Kritik. Stuttgart, Germany: Philipp Reclam jun. GmbH & Co. This is a German translation of The Foundations of Psychoanalysis: A Philosophical Critique (1984) [206].

[229] (1988) “Epistemological Liabilities of the Clinical Appraisal of Psychoanalytic Theory,” in: N. Dazzi and M. Conte (eds.). La Verifica Empirica in Psicoanalisi: Itinerari Teorici e Paradigmi di Ricerca, Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino. This is an Italian translation of the essay in Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought (1979) [176].

[230] (1988) I Fondamenti della Psicoanalisi: Una Critica Filosofica. Milan, Italy: Il Saggiatore (Mondadori). This is an Italian translation of The Foundations of Psychoanalysis: A Philosophical Critique (1984) [206].

[231] (1988) “In Memoriam: J. Alberto Coffa,” in: A. Grünbaum and W.C. Salmon (eds.), Limitations of Deductivism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. xvii–xx. This is a transcription of the oral presentation given at Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, January 19, 1985 [215].

[232] (1988) “Précis of The Foundations of Psychoanalysis: A Philosophical Critique,” in: P.C. Clark and C. Wright (eds.), Mind, Psychoanalysis and Science. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd., pp. 3–32. This is a reprint of the Précis in Behavioral & Brain Sciences (1986) [218].

[233] (1988) Psicoanalisi: Obiezioni e risposte. Rome, Italy: Armando Editore. This is an Italian translation of the Précis of The Foundations of Psychoanalysis: A Philosophical Critique (1986) [218] with an Introduction by M. Pera.

[234] (1988) “The Role of the Case Study Method in the Foundations of Psychoanalysis,” in: H. Vetter and L. Nagl (eds.), Die Philosophen und Freud, Wiener Reihe, Themen der Philosophie, vol. 3. Vienna, Austria: R. Oldenbourg Verlag, pp. 134–174. See also [235] and [261].

[235] (1988) “The Role of the Case Study Method in the Foundations of Psychoanalysis,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 18(4) (December): 623–658. This is a reprint of the article in Die Philosophen und Freud (1988) [234].

[236] (With W.C. Salmon, eds.) (1988) The Limitations of Deductivism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

[237] (1989) “Freud’s Theory: The Perspective of a Philosopher of Science,” in: L. Spurling (ed.), Freud and the Impact of Psychoanalysis. Sigmund Freud, Critical Assessments, vol. IV. London: Routledge: 168–198. This is a reprint of the Address in Proceedings and Addresses of The American Philosophical Association (1983) [197].

[238] (1989) “La Cattiva Scienza,” Prometeo 7(26) (June): 10–17.

[239] (1989) “Secular Humanism in American Political Culture,” in: R. Basil, M.B. Gehrman, and T. Madigan (eds.), On the Barricades: Religion and Free Inquiry in Conflict. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books: 52–61. This is a truncated version of “The Place of Secular Humanism: Current American Political Culture” in Vital Speeches of the Day (1987) [224].

[240] (1989) “Soviet Atheism and Psychoanalysis under Perestroika,” Free Inquiry 9(2) (Spring): 52–53.

[241] (1989) “The Degeneration of Popper’s Theory of Dermarcation,” in: F. D’Agostino and I.C. Jarvie (eds.), Freedom and Rationality, Essays in Honor of John Watkins. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 117. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 141–161. See also [242].

[242] (1989) “The Degeneration of Popper’s Theory of Dermarcation,” Epistemologia XII(2) (July–December): 235–260. This is a reprint of the article in Freedom and Rationality, Essays in Honor of John Watkins (1989) [241]. See also [358].

[243] (1989) “The Placebo Concept in Medicine and Psychiatry,” in: M. Shepherd and N. Sartorius (eds.), Non-Specific Aspects of Treatment. World Health Organization. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Hans Huber Publishers: 7–38. This is a reprint of the article in Psychological Medicine (England) (1986) [219].

[244] (1989) “The Pseudo-Problem of Creation in Physical Cosmology,” Philosophy of Science 56(3) (September): 373–394. See also [245], [246], [253], [260], [326], and [333].

[245] (1989) “The Pseudo-Problem of Creation in Physical Cosmology,” Epistemologia XII(1): 3–31. This is a reprint of the article in Philosophy of Science (1989) [244].

[246] (1989) “The Pseudo-Problem of Creation in Physical Cosmology,” Free Inquiry 9(4) (Fall): 48–57. This is a version of the article in Philosophy of Science (1989) [244].

[247] (1989) “Why Thematic Kinships Between Events Do NOT Attest Their Causal Linkage,” in: J.R. Brown and J. Mittelstrass (eds.), An Intimate Relation: Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science. A Festschrift for Robert E. Butts. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 116. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 477–494. See also [248] and [255].

[248] (1989) “Affinità tematiche come connessioni causali: riflessioni su una fallacia logica,” Iride 2:5–21. This is an Italian translation of “Why Thematic Kinships Between Events Do NOT Attest Their Causal Linkage” in An Intimate Relation: Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science. A Festschrift for Robert E. Butts (1989) [247].

[249] (1990) “Creation in Physical Cosmology: Pseudo-Problem or Superior Truth?” Nuova Civiltà delle Macchine VIII(4): 114–123. An Italian translation of this article, “La Creazione nella Cosmologia Fisica: Pseudo-Problem o una Verità Superiore?” appears on 13–23.

[250] (1990) “ ‘Meaning’ Connections and Causal Connections in the Human Sciences: The Poverty of Hermeneutic Philosophy,” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 38(3) (September): 559–577. See also [252] and [295].

[251] (1990) “Pseudo-creation of the Big Bang,” Nature 344(6269) (April 26): 821–822. See also [269] and [271].

[252] (1990) “ ‘Sinn’ - Zusammenhänge und Kausalbeziehungen in den Humanwissenschaften: Die Armut der hermeneutischen Philosophie,” in: L. Nagl, H. Vetter, and H. Leupold-Löwenthal (eds.), Philosophie und Psychoanalyse Symposium der Wiener Festwochen. Frankfurt, Germany: Nexus Verlag GmbH: 121–136. This is a German translation of “ ‘Meaning’ Connections and Causal Connections in the Human Sciences: The Poverty of Hermeneutic Philosophy” in Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association (1990) [250].

[253] (1990) “The Pseudo-Problem of Creation in Physical Cosmology,” in: J. Leslie (ed.), Physical Cosmology and Philosophy. Philosophical Issues Series, P. Edwards (ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.: 92–112. This is a reprint of the article in Philosophy of Science (1989) [244].

[254] (1990) “The Psychoanalytic Enterprise in Scientific Perspective,” in: C.W. Savage (ed.), Scientific Theories. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. XIV. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press: 41–58. See also [273].

[255] (1990) “Why Thematic Kinships Between Events Do NOT Attest Their Causal Linkage,” Epistemologia XIII(2) (July–December): 187–207. This is a reprint of the article in An Intimate Relation: Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science (1989) [247].

[256] (1991) “Author’s Response, Etiology and Therapy in Psychoanalytic Theory,” Behavioral & Brain Sciences 14(4) (December): 729–732. This is a continuation of Commentary and Response in Behavioral & Brain Sciences (1986) [218].

[257] (1991) “Causality and the Science of Human Behavior,” in: J. Robertson (ed.), Readings in Introductory Psychology. Acton, MA: Copley Publishing Group: 36–42. This is a reprint of the article in American Scientist (1952) [8].

[258] (1991) “Creation as a Pseudo-Explanation in Current Physical Cosmology,” Erkenntnis 35(July): 233–254. See also [259] and [329].

[259] (1991) “Creation as a Pseudo-Explanation in Current Physical Cosmology,” in: W. Spohn (ed.), Erkenntnis Orientated. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 233-254. This reprint of the article in Erkenntnis (1991) [258] is part of a special volume in honor of Rudolf Carnap and Hans Reichenbach.

[260] (1991) “Die Schöpfung als Scheinproblem der physikalischen Kosmologie,” in: A. Bohnen and A. Musgrave (eds.), Wege der Vernunft, Festschrift zum Siebzigsten Geburtstag von Hans Albert. Tübingen, Germany: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck): 164–191. This is a German translation of a revised version of “The Pseudo-Problem of Creation in Physical Cosmology” in Philosophy of Science (1989) [244].

[261] (1991) Kritische Betrachtungen zur Psychoanalyse, A. Grünbaum (ed.). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag. This book contains a German translation of the Précis of The Foundations of Psychoanalysis: A Philosophical Critique entitled “Eine zusammenfassende Darstellung von Die Grundlagen Der Psychoanalyse: Eine philosophische Kritik,”: 3–31 (1986)

[218]. It also contains the German translations of the following articles: “The Placebo Concept in Medicine and Psychiatry” entitled “Der Plazebobegriff in Medizin und Psychiatrie,”: 326–357 (1986) [219]; “The Role of the Case Study Method in the Foundations of Psychoanalysis” entitled “Die Rolle der Fallstudienmethode in den Grundlagen der Psychoanalyse,”: 289–325 (1988) [234].

[262] (1991) Psicoanalisi e Teismo. Naples, Italy: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane. This is an Italian translation of “Psychoanalysis and Theism” in The Monist (1987) [223] with an Introduction by A. Pagnini.

[263] (1991) “Teorija Freida i filosofija nauki,” Voprosi Filosofii (4): 90–106. This is a Russian translation of a slightly shortened version of “Freud’s Theory: The Perspective of a Philosopher of Science” in Proceedings and Addresses of The American Philosophical Association (1983) [197].

[264] (1991) “The Placebo Concept in Medicine and Psychiatry,” in: D. Cicchetti and W.M. Grove (eds.), Thinking Clearly about Psychology, vol. 1: Matters of Public Interest, Essays in honor of Paul E. Meehl. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press: 140–170. This is a version of “Explication and Implications of the Placebo Concept” in Rationality in Science and Politics, Festschrift for Gerard Radnitzky (1984) [204].

[265] (1992) “Agassi-Grünbaum Exchange on Popper and Psychoanalysis,” Popper Newsletter 4(1&2) (March): 12–14.

[266] (1992) “Big Bang Doesn’t Equate With Start of Time,” Letter-to-the-Editor, The New York Times (May 13): A 14.

[267] (1992) “Freud’s Theory: The Perspective of a Philosopher of Science,” in: R.B. Miller (ed.), The Restoration of Dialogue: Philosophy, Psychology and Clinical Practice. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press: 366–387. This is a reprint of the Address in Proceedings and Addresses of The American Philosophical Association (1983) [197].

[268] (1992) “In Defense of Secular Humanism,” Free Inquiry 12(4) (Fall): 30–39. See also [288].

[269] (1992) “Perché il Big Bang non è la creazione,” Il Sole-24 Ore 20 (May 3): 24. This is an Italian translation of “Pseudo-creation of the ‘Big Bang’ ” in Nature (1990) [251].

[270] (1992) “Pluralism & the Church,” Letter-to-the-Editor, Commentary 94(4) (October): 7–8.

[271] (1992) “Pseudo-Creation of the ‘Big Bang,’ ” Free Inquiry 13(1) (Winter 1992/1993): 14–15. This is a reprint of the article in Nature (1990) [251].

[272] (1992) “Review of Nigel MacKay, Motivation and Explanation: An Essay on Freud’s Philosophy of Science,” Isis 83(1) (March): 175–176.

[273] (1992) “The Psychoanalytic Enterprise in Scientific Perspective,” in: W.R. Shea and A. Spadafora (eds.), Interpreting the World, Science and Society. Canton, MA: Science History Publications: 145–166. This is a reprint of the article in Scientific Theories (1990) [254].

[274] (1992) “This ‘Bang’ Wasn’t as Big as You Make It,” Letter-to-the-Editor, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (April 29): 12. A misprint “Correction” appeared in the April 30, 1992: 2.

[275] (1992) “Two Major Difficulties for Freud’s Theory of Dreams,” in: T. Gelfand and J. Kerr (eds.), Freud and the History of Psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press: 193–213. A revised version of this essay appeared as Chapter 10 in Validation in the Clinical Theory of Psychoanalysis (1993) [283].

[276] (1993) “A New Critique of Freud’s Theory of Dreams,” in: F. Stadler (ed.), Scientific Philosophy: Origins and Developments. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 169–191.

[277] (1993) “A pszichoanalízis logikai alapjai,” in: C. Szummer and F. Eros (eds.), Filozófusok Freudról És a Pszichoanalízisrol. Budapest, Hungary: Cserépfalvi Kiadása: 139–158. This is a Hungarian translation of “Logical Foundations of Psychoanalytic Theory” in Erkenntnis (1983) [198].

[278] (1993) “Creation in Cosmology,” in: N.S. Hetherington (ed.), Encyclopedia of Cosmology, Scientific, Philosophical and Historical Foundations. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc.: 126–136.

[279] (1993) La Psychanalyse À l’Épreuve. Collection Tiré à Part. Paris, France: Éditions de l’Éclat. See also [304] and [308].

[280] (1993) “Memory Playing False,” Letter-to-the-Editor, Times Literary Supplement (London) (November 19): 17.

[281] (1993) “Narlikar’s ‘Creation’ of the Big Bang Universe Was a Mere Origination,” Philosophy of Science 60(4) (December): 638–646. See also [353].

[282] (1993) “Seymour Cain’s Jeremiad: A Rejoinder,” Free Inquiry XIV(1) (Winter 1993/1994): 58–62. This issue also includes Cain’s paper “In Response to Grünbaum’s Defense,” a critique of “In Defense of Secular Humanism.”

[283] (1993) Validation in the Clinical Theory of Psychoanalysis, A Study in the Philosophy of Psychoanalysis. Madison, CT: International Universities Press, pp. 257–309.

[284] (1994) “A Brief Appraisal of Freud’s Dream Theory,” Dreaming 4(1) (March): 80–82. See also [309].

[285] (1994) Autobiographical Statement, in: Wesleyan University 50th Reunion, Class of ‘44, June 2–5, 1994. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press: 29–34.

[286] (1994) “Does Psychoanalysis Have a Future? Doubtful,” The Harvard Mental Health Letter 11(4) (October): 3–6. This is an invited “Insights” article.

[287] (1994) “ ‘Freud’s Permanent Revolution:’ An Exchange,” A Response to Thomas Nagel, The New York Review of Books XLI(14) (August 11): 54–55.

[288] (1994) “In Defense of Secular Humanism,” in: P. Kurtz and T.J. Madigan (eds.), Challenges to the Enlightenment, In Defense of Reason and Science. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books: 102–129. This is a reprint of the article in Free Inquiry (1992) [268].

[289] (1994) Letter-to-the-Editor, Psychoanalytic Books 5(1): 154–167. This is a reply to Louis Berger’s review of Validation in the Clinical Theory of Psychoanalysis (1993) [283].

[290] (1994) “Psychoanalytic Theory and Therapy After 100 Years, and Its Future,” Keynote Address at the Awards Ceremony of the Prix Latsis Universitaires. Geneva, Switzerland: Fondation Latsis Internationale:1–34. Later, considerably modified versions of this Address are [312], [313], [315], [316], [317], and [352].

[291] (1994) “Some Comments on William Craig’s ‘Creation and Big Bang Cosmology,’ ” Philosophia Naturalis 31(2): 225–236. See also [331].

[292] (1994) “The Placebo Concept in Medicine and Psychiatry,” in: G. Graham and G.L. Stephens (eds.), Philosophical Psychopathology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press: 285–324. This is a reprint of the article in Rationality in Science and Politics, Festschrift for Gerard Radnitzky (1984) [204].

[293] (1995) “A Short Reminiscence of F.S.C. Northrop,” in: F. Seddon (ed.), An Introduction to the Philosophical Works of F.S.C. Northrop. Problems in Contemporary Philosophy, vol. 27. Lewiston, NY: The Edwin Mellen Press: viii–x.

[294] (1995) “Le Erronee Interpretazioni Teologiche della Cosmologia Fisica Recente,” in: E. Agazzi (ed.), Il Tempo nella Scienza e nella Filosofia. Proceedings of the Conference Il Tempo nella Scienza e nella Filosofia in Naples, October 12–14, 1992. Naples, Italy: Guida Editori:167–211.

[295] (1995) “Les carences de la philosophie herméneutique de la psychanalyse,” Psychothérapies 15(2): 55–64. This is a French translation/revised version of “ ‘Meaning’ Connections and Causal Connections in Human Sciences: The Poverty of Hermeneutic Philosophy” in Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association (1990) [250].

[296] (1995) “Origin versus Creation in Physical Cosmology,” in: L. Krüger and B. Falkenburg (eds.), Physik, Philosophie und die Einheit der Wissenschaften. Festschrift for Erhard Scheibe. Heidelberg, Germany: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag: 221–254. See also [297].

[297] (1995) “Proishojzdenie protiv tvorenija v fizicheskoi kosmologii,” Voprosi Filosofii (2): 48–60. This is a Russian translation of “Origin versus Creation in Physical Cosmology” in Physik, Philosophie und die Einheit der Wissenschaften. Festschrift for Erhard Scheibe (1995) [296].

[298] (1995) “The Poverty of Theistic Morality,” in: K. Gavroglu, J. Stachel, and M.W. Wartofsky (eds.), Science, Mind and Art: Essays on Science and the Humanistic Understanding in Art, Epistemology, Religion and Ethics, in Honor of Robert S. Cohen. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 165. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 203–242. See also [344].

[299] (1996) A pszichoanalízis alapjai. Budapest, Hungary: Osiris Kiadó. This is a Hungarian translation of The Foundations of Psychoanalysis: A Philosophical Critique (1984) [206].

[300] (1996) “Empirical Evaluations of Theoretical Explanations of Psychotherapeutic Efficacy: A Reply to John D. Greenwood,” Philosophy of Science 63(4) (December): 622–641.

[301] (1996) “Energy Conservation and Theological Misinterpretations of Current Physical Cosmology,” in: J-L.Greffe, G. Heinzmann, and K. Lorenz (eds.), Henri Poincaré: Science and Philosophy. Congrès International, Nancy, France, 1994. Berlin, Germany/Paris, France: Akademie Verlag/Albert Blanchard: 209–230.

[302] (1996) “Freud, in full view,” The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (January 7): B1 and B4.

[303] (1996) “Historical Determinism, Social Activism, and Predictions in the Social Sciences,” in: S. Sarkar (ed.), Logical Empiricism and the Special Sciences, vol. 4. Science and Philosophy in the Twentieth Century. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc.: 252–256. This is a reprint of the article in The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (1956) [35].

[304] (1996) “Is Psychoanalysis Viable?” in: W. O’Donohue and R.F. Kitchener (eds.), The Philosophy of Psychology. London: Sage Publications: 281–290. A French translation of this essay appeared as the introduction in La Psychanalyse Á l’Épreuve (1993) [279]. A Japanese translation appeared as part of a prefatory chapter in The Foundations of Psychoanalysis (1996) [308].

[305] (1996) Les Fondements de la Psychanalyse. Paris, France: Press Universitaires de France. This is a French translation of a revised edition of The Foundations of Psychoanalysis: A Philosophical Critique (1984) [206]. The Introduction is a translation of “Is Psychoanalysis Viable?” in The Philosophy of Psychology (1996) [304].

[306] (1996) Letter-to-the-Editor, The New Republic (January 29): 5. This is a reply to Jonathan Lear’s article “The Shrink is In.”

[307] (1996) “Logical and Philosophical Foundations of the Special Theory of Relativity,” in: S. Sarkar (ed.), Logical Empiricism and the Special Sciences, vol. 4. Science and Philosophy in the Twentieth Century. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc.: 98–112. This is a reprint of the article in American Journal of Physics (1955) [27].

[308] (1996) The Foundations of Psychoanalysis: A Philosophical Critique (in Japanese). Tokyo, Japan: Sangyo-Tosho Publishing Co. This is a Japanese translation of The Foundations of Psychoanalysis: A Philosophical Critique (1984) [206], equipped with a new prefatory chapter, a modified version and translation of “Is Psychoanalysis Viable?” in The Philosophy of Psychology (1996) [304].

[309] (1996) “The Liabilities of Freudian Psychoanalysis,” in: A. Zucker (ed.), Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.: 311–320. This is a reprint of “A Brief Appraisal of Freud’s Dream Theory” in Dreaming (1994) [284].

[310] (1996) “Theological Misinterpretations of Current Physical Cosmology,” Foundations of Physics 26(4) (April): 523–543. See also [325], [334], and [356].

[311] (1997) “Is the Concept of ‘Psychic Reality’ a Theoretical Advance?” Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought 20(2): 245–267. This is an invited paper presented at the Meeting of the International Psychoanalytic Association in San Francisco, CA, August 1, 1995.

[312] (1997) “One Hundred Years of Psychoanalytic Theory and Therapy: Retrospect and Prospect,” in: M. Carrier and P. Machamer (eds.), Mindscapes: Philosophy, Science, and the Mind. Pittsburgh, PA/Konstanz, Germany: University of Pittsburgh Press/University of Konstanz Press: 323–360. This is a paper presented at the Third Biennial Meeting of the Pittsburgh-Konstanz Colloquium in Philosophy of Science in Konstanz (May 1995). This is a modified version of the Keynote Address at the Awards Ceremony of the Prix Latsis Universitaires (1994) [290]. See also [354].

[313] (1997) “Psychoanalytic Theory and Therapy After 100 Years, and Its Future,” in: M. Mandl (ed.), Proceedings of the 40th Congress of the Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie (German Psychological Society), München, 1996. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe: 59–71. This is a modified version of the Keynote Address at the Awards Ceremony of the Prix Latsis Universitaires (1994) [290].

[314] (1997) “Robert E. Butts, In Memoriam,” Erkenntnis 47:1–2.

[315] (1997) “Sto let psihoanaliza: itogi i perspectivy,” Voprosi Filosofii (7): 85–98. This is a Russian translation of “A Century of Psychoanalysis,” a modified version of the Keynote Address at the Awards Ceremony of the Prix Latsis Universitaires (1994) [290].

[316] (1997) “Un siècle de psychanalyse: critique rétrospective et perspectives,” L’unebévue (10): 25–38. This French translation of “A Century of Psychoanalysis: Critical Retrospect and Prospect” is a modified version of “Psychoanalytic Theory and Therapy After 100 Years, and Its Future,” the Keynote Address at the Awards Ceremony of the Prix Latsis Universitaires (1994) [290].

[317] (1998) “A Century of Psychoanalysis: Critical Retrospect and Prospect,” in: M.S. Roth (ed.), Freud: Conflict and Culture. New York: Alfred A. Knopf: 183–195. This is a modified version of the Keynote Address at the Awards Ceremony of the Prix Latsis Universitaires (1994) [290]. See also [318], [323], [327], [328], [335], [339], [347], and [354].

[318] (1998) “A Century of Psychoanalysis: Critical Retrospect & Prospect,” Newsletter of University of Pittsburgh, University Center for International Studies, Center for West European Studies, February: 1; 7–8. This is a drastically shortened version of the article in Freud: Conflict and Culture (1998) [317].

[319] (1998) “Freud in Conflict,” Letter-to-the-Editor, The New York Times Book Review: December 27.

[320] (1998) “Freud’s Theorie der Wunscherfüllung beim Traum: Ein Artefakt seines widerlegten neurobiologischen Traummodells,” in: B. Boothe, R. Wepfer, and A. von Wyl (eds.), Über das Wünschen: Ein seelisches und poetisches Phänomen wird erkundet. Göttingen, Germany: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht: 148–169.

[321] (1998) Letter-to-the-Editor, University Times 31(6) (November 12): 2–3. This is a reply to Dr. Joseph Schachter.

[322] (1998) “Made-to-Order Evidence,” in: F.C. Crews (ed.), Unauthorized Freud, Doubters Confront a Legend. New York: Viking: 76–84.

[323] (1998) “Sto lat psychoanalizy: krytyczna retrospekcja i perspektywy,” Swiat Psychoanalizy (2): 47–63; translated by Z. Rosinska and L. Zielinski. This is a Polish translation/version (“One Hundred Years of Psychoanalysis”) of “A Century of Psychoanalysis: Critical Retrospect and Prospect” in Freud, Conflict and Culture (1998) [317].

[324] (1998) “The Failure of Freud’s Explanation of Counter-Wish Dreams,” in: D. Anapolitanos, A. Baltas, and S. Tsinorema (eds.), Philosophy and the Many Faces of Science. Proceedings of the May 1992 International Athens Philosophy of Science Conference. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.: 273–285.

[325] (1998) “Theological Misinterpretations of Current Physical Cosmology,” Philo 1(1) (Spring/Summer): 15–34. This is a substantially revised version of the article in Foundations of Physics (1996) [310].

[326] (1998) “The Pseudo-Problem of Creation in Physical Cosmology,” in: J. Leslie (ed.), Modern Cosmology and Philosophy. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books: 98–118. This is a reprint of the article in Philosophy of Science (1989) [244].

[327] (1998) “Un secolo di psicoanalisi: bilancio e prospettive,” KOS (152) (May): 26–31. This is an Italian translation of “A Century of Psychoanalysis: Critical Retrospect and Prospect” in Freud: Conflict and Culture (1998) [317].

[328] (1999) “A Century of Psychoanalysis: Critical Retrospect & Prospect,” xsss. This is a reprint of the article in Newsletter of University of Pittsburgh, University Center for International Studies, Center for West European Studies (1998) [318].

[329] (1999) “Creation As a Pseudo-Explanation in Current Physical Cosmology,” http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/adolf_grunbaum/explanation.html. This is a reprint of the article in Erkenntnis (1991) [258].

[330] (1999) “My Exodus to Secular Humanism,” Free Inquiry 19(4) (Fall): 25.

[331] (1999) “Some Comments on William Craig’s ‘Creation and Big Bang Cosmology,’ ” http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/adolf_grunbaum/comments.html. This is a reprint of the article in Philosophia Naturalis (1994) [291].

[332] (1999) “The Hermeneutic Versus the Scientific Conception of Psychoanalysis: An Unsuccessful Effort to Chart a Via Media for the Human Sciences,” in: D. Aerts, J. Broekaert, and E. Mathijs (eds.), Einstein Meets Magritte, an Interdisciplinary Reflection: The White Book of Einstein Meets Magritte. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 219–239. See also [340], [343], [355], and [359].

[333] (1999) “The Pseudo-Problem of Creation in Physical Cosmology,” http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/adolf_grunbaum/problem.html. This is a reprint of the article in Philosophy of Science (1989) [244].

[334] (1999) “Theological Misinterpretations of Current Physical Cosmology,” http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/adolf_grunbaum/theological.html. This is a reprint of the article in Philo (1998) [325].

[335] (1999) “Un secolo di psicoanalisi: bilancio e prospettive,” http://www.pol-it.org/ital/9grunbau.htm or http://www.pol-it.org//ital/9grunbau.htm. This is a reprint of the Italian translation of “A Century of Psychoanalysis: Critical Retrospect and Prospect” in KOS (1998) [327].

[336] (2000) “A New Critique of Theological Interpretations of Physical Cosmology,” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (March): 1–43. See also [346].

[337] (2000) “Does Freudian Theory Resolve ‘The Paradoxes of Irrationality?’ ” in: B. Elevitch (ed.), Proceedings of the 20th World Congress of Philosophy. Philosophy of Mind and Philosophy of Psychology, vol. 9. Bowling Green, OH: Philosophy Documentation Center: 203–218. See also [338], [341], and [349].

[338] (2000) “Does Freudian Theory Resolve ‘The Paradoxes of Irrationality?’ ” Introduction: http://www.pol-it.org/ital/adolf.htm Chapter II: http://www.pol-it.org/ital/adolf2.htm Chapter III: http://www.pol-it.org/ital/adolf3.htm Endnotes: http://www.pol-it.org/ital/adolf4.htm This is a reprint of the paper in Proceedings of the 20th World Congress of Philosophy (2000) [337].

[339] (2000) “Ein Jahrhundert Psychoanalyse: Ein kritischer Rückblick – ein kritischer Ausblick,” Forum der Psychoanalyse 16:285–296. This is a German translation of “A Century of Psychoanalysis: Critical Retrospect and Prospect” in Freud: Conflict and Culture (1998) [317]. An Errata list appeared in Forum der Psychoanalyse (2001) 17(2) (June).

[340] (2000) “Ermeneutica Versus Concezione Scientific della Psicoanalisi: Uno Sforzo Inutile di Stabilire Una Via Media per le Scienze Umane,” Introduction: http://www.pol-it.org/ital/grunba_it.htm Chapter II: http://www.pol-it.org/ital/grunba2_it.htm Chapter III: http://www.pol-it.org/ital/grunba3_it.htm Chapter IV: http://www.pol-it.org/ital/grunba4_it.htm Chapter V: http://www.pol-it.org/ital/grunba5_it.htm This is an Italian translation of “The Hermeneutic Versus the Scientific Conception of Psychoanalysis: An Unsuccessful Effort to Chart a Via Media for the Human Sciences” in Einstein Meets Magritte, an Interdisciplinary Reflection: The White Book of Einstein Meets Magritte (1999) [332].

[341] (2000) “La Teoria Freudiana Risolve ‘I Paradossi dell’Irrazionalita’?” Chapter I: http://www.pol-it.org/ital/adolf_it.htm Chapter II: http://www.pol-it.org/ital/adolf2_it.htm Chapter III: http://www.pol-it.org/ital/adolf3_it.htm Notes: http://www.pol-it.org/ital/adolf4_it.htm This is an Italian translation of “Does Freudian Theory Resolve ‘The Paradoxes of Irrationality?’ ” in Proceedings of the 20th World Congress of Philosophy (2000) [337].

[342] (2000) “Reply to Symposium on the Grünbaum Debate,” Psychoanalytic Dialogues 10(2) (March): 335–342.

[343] (2000) “The Hermeneutic Versus the Scientific Conception of Psychoanalysis: An Unsuccessful Effort to Chart a Via Media for the Human Sciences,” Chapter I: http://www.pol-it.org//ital/grunba.htm Chapter II: http://www.pol-it.org//ital/grunba2.htm Chapter III: http://www.pol-it.org//ital/grunba3.htm Chapter IV: http://www.pol-it.org//ital/grunba4.htm Chapter V: http://www.pol-it.org//ital/grunba5.htm Endnotes: http://www.pol-it.org//ital/grunba6.htm This is a reprint of the article in Einstein Meets Magritte, an Interdisciplinary Reflection: The White Book of Einstein Meets Magritte (1999) [332].

[344] (2000) “The Poverty of Theistic Morality,” http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/adolf_grunbaum/poverty.html. This is a reprint of the essay in Science, Mind and Art: Essays on Science and the Humanistic Understanding in Art, Epistemology, Religion and Ethics, in Honor of Robert S. Cohen (1995) [298].

[345] (2001) “A Century of Psychoanalysis: Critical Retrospect and Prospect,” International Forum of Psychoanalysis 10(2) (June): 105–112. This is a reprint of the article in Freud: Conflict and Culture (1998) [317].

[346] (2001) “A New Critique of Theological Interpretations of Physical Cosmology,” in: M. Rédei and M. Stöltzner (eds.), John von Neumann and the Foundations of Quantum Physics, Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 2000, no. 8. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 269–288. This is a lecture presented at the Institute Vienna Circle, Vienna, Austria, June 7, 1999. It is a much condensed and revised version of the article in The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (2000) [336].

[347] (2001) “Critique of Freud’s Notions of Mental Illness,” in: A-T. Tymieniecka and E. Agazzi (eds.), Life - Interpretation and the Sense of Illness within the Human Condition, Analecta Husserliana, The Yearbook of Phenomenological Research, vol. LXXII. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 57–70. This is a version of “A Century of Psychoanalysis: Critical Retrospect and Prospect” in Freud: Conflict and Culture (1998) [317].

[348] (2001) “David Malament and the Conventionality of Simultaneity: A Reply,” http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/documents/disk0/00/00/01/84/index.html. This is a prepublished essay and will appear as a chapter in Adolf Grünbaum, Philosophy of Science in Action, vol. 1, to be published by Oxford University Press, New York.

[349] (2001) “Does Freudian Theory Resolve ‘The Paradoxes of Irrationality’?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research LXII(1) (January): 129–143. This is a reprint of the paper in Proceedings of the 20th World Congress of Philosophy (2000) [337].

[350] (2001) “Freud and the Interpreters,” Letter-to-the-Editor, The New York Review of Books XLVII(1) (January 11): 56.

[351] (2001) La Mia Odissea Dalla Filosofia Alla Psicoanalisi. Rome, Italy: Di Renzo Editore; translated by A. Carotenuto.

[352] (2001) “L’inconscient à l’épreuve,” Sciences et Avenir (July/August): 42–49; translated by A. Barberousse. This is a shortened version of “One Hundred Years of Psychoanalytic Theory and Therapy: Retrospect and Prospect” in Mindscapes: Philosophy, Science, and the Mind (1997) [312].

[353] (2001) “Narlikar’s ‘Creation’ of the Big Bang Universe Was a Mere Origination,” http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/adolf_grunbaum/narlikar.html. This is a reprint of the article in Philosophy of Science (1993) [281].

[354] (2002) “Critique of Psychoanalysis,” in: E. Erwin (ed.), The Freud Encyclopedia, Theory, Therapy, and Culture. New York/London: Routledge:117–136. This is a revised, enlarged version of the essay in Mindscapes: Philosophy, Science, and the Mind (1997) [312].

[355] (2003) “The Poverty of the Semiotic Turn in Psychoanalytic Theory and Therapy,” in: A. Wiercinski (ed.), Between Suspicion and Sympathy, Paul Ricoeur’s Unstable Equilibrium, a Festschrift in Honor of Paul Ricoeur’s 90th Birthday. International Institute for Hermeneutics, Hermeneutic Series, vol. 3. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: The Hermeneutic Press: 602–619. This is a somewhat enlarged version of “The Hermeneutic Versus the Scientific Conception of Psychoanalysis: An Unsuccessful Effort to Chart a Via Media for the Human Sciences” in Einstein Meets Magritte, an Interdisciplinary Reflection: The White Book of Einstein Meets Magritte (1999) [332].

[356] (2003) “Theological Misinterpretations of Current Physical Cosmology,” in: R.M. Gale and A.R. Pruss (eds.), The Existence of God. Hants, U.K.: Dartmouth Publishing Co.: 327–346. This is a reprint of the article in Philo (1998) [334].

[357] (2004) “Can a Theory Answer More Questions than One of Its Rivals?” in: A. O’Hear (ed.), Karl Popper: Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers. Vol. III: Philosophy of Science 2, Part 4: Verisimilitude. London: Routledge: 55–77. This is a reprint of the article in The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (1976) [152].

[358] (2004) “The Degeneration of Popper’s Theory of Demarcation,” in: A. O’Hear (ed.), Karl Popper: Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers. Vol. II: Philosophy of Science 1, Part 3: Demarcation. London: Routledge: 392–411. This is a reprint of the article in Epistemologia (1989) [242].

[359] (2004) “The Hermeneutic Versus the Scientific Conception of Psychoanalysis,” in: J. Mills (ed.), Psychoanalysis at the Limit: Epistemology, Mind, and the Question of Science. New York: State University of New York Press: 139–160. This is a reprint of the article in Einstein Meets Magritte, an Interdisciplinary Reflection: The White Book of Einstein Meets Magritte (1999) [332].

[360] (Forthcoming) “Critique of Psychoanalysis,” in: S. Strack (ed.), Handbook of Personology and Psychopathology, Festschrift for Ted Millon. New York: John Wiley & Sons. This is a reprint of the essay in The Freud Encyclopedia, Theory, Therapy, and Culture (2002) [354].

[361] (2004) “Critique of Psychoanalysis,” in: A. Casement (ed.), Who Owns Psychoanalysis? London: Karnac Books Ltd.: 263-305. This is a reprint of the essay in The Freud Encyclopedia, Theory, Therapy, and Culture (2002) [354].

[362] (2004) “Das Elend der Theistischen Moral,” in: B. Boothe and P. Stoellger (eds.), Moral als Gabe: Zur Ambivalenz von Moral und Religion. Würzburg, Germany: Königshausen und Neumann: 143-175. This is a German translation of an enlarged version of “The Poverty of Theistic Morality” in Science, Mind and Art: Essays on Science and the Humanistic Understanding in Art, Epistemology, Religion and Ethics, in Honor of Robert S. Cohen (1995) [298].

[363] (Forthcoming) “Das Elend der Theistischen Moral,” in: E. Dahl, Brauchen wir Gott? Moderne Texte zur Religionskritik. Stuttgart, Germany: S. Hirzel. This German translation of “The Poverty of Theistic Morality” is a reprint of the article in Moral als Gabe: Zur Ambivalenz von Moral und Religion (2003) [362].

[364] (Forthcoming) Podstawy psychonanlizy. Krytyka filozoficzna. Krakow, Poland: Universitas Publishing House; translated by E. Olender-Dmowska and Z. Rosinska. This is a Polish translation of The Foundations of Psychoanalysis: A Philosophical Critique (1984) [206].

[365] (Forthcoming) “Freud’s Theory: The Perspective of a Philosopher of Science,” in: R.T. Hull (ed.), Centenary Celebration volume of the Presidential Addresses of The American Philosophical Association, 1901–2000. This is a much enlarged, revised version of the author’s Presidential Address in Proceedings and Addresses of The American Philosophical Association (1983) [197].

[366] (Forthcoming) “Novaya kritika teologicheskih interpretatsii fizicheskoi kosmologii,” Voprosi Filosofii (12). This is a Russian translation of “A New Critique of Theological Interpretations of Physical Cosmology” in The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (2000) [336]. [367] (Forthcoming) Philosophy of Science in Action, vols. 1 & 2. New York: Oxford University Press.

[368] (Forthcoming) “Wesley Salmon’s Intellectual Odyssey and Achievements,” Philosophy of Science. Proceedings of PSA 2002, the Symposium on Wesley C. Salmon 1925–2001: A Symposium Honoring His Contributions to the Philosophy of Science.

[369] (2005) “Does Leibniz’s Principle of Sufficient Reason License His Primordial Existential Question ‘Why Is There Something Contingent Rather than Nothing’?” in: G. Wolters and M. Carrier (eds.), Homo Sapiens und Homo Faber. Zur Epistemischen und Technischen Rationalität in Antike und Neuzeit, Festschrift für Jürgen Mittelstrass. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter: 147-156.

[370] (Forthcoming) “Cosmology and Theology”

[371] (Forthcoming) “Autobiographical-Philosophical Narrative,” in: A. Jokic (ed.), Philosophy of Physics and Psychology: Essays in Honor of Adolf Grünbaum. Proceedings of the international conference, “The Adolf Grünbaum Symposium in Honor of the Works of Professor Adolf Grünbaum,” Santa Barbara, CA, October 2002. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books. (This volume will also contain a reprinting of item 373 below.)

[372] (2004) “Why is There Something Rather Than Nothing? An Ill-Conceived Question Whose Theistic Answer Fails,” in: W. Löffler and P. Weingartner (eds.), Knowledge and Belief - Wissen und Glauben. Proceedings of the 26th International Wittgenstein Symposium, Kirchberg, Austria, August 2003. Vienna, Austria: Osterreichischer Bundesverlag/Holder-Pichler-Tempsky: 287-297.

[373] (2004) “The Poverty of Theistic Cosmology,” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55(4): 561-613.

[374] (2004) “Quelques Objections Fondamentales” Le Nouvel Observateur, hors-série, October/November, p. 11.

[375] (2004) “Nishcheta teisticheskoi kosmologii.” Voprosy Filosofii, August(8): 99-114. This is the Russian translation by D.G. Lakhuti of the first of three parts of “The Poverty of Theistic Cosmology” in The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 2004.

[376] (2005) “Theological Misinterpretations of Current Physical Cosmology,” in L.N. Oaklander and R.C. Hoy (eds.) Metaphysics: Classic and Contemporary Readings. 2d ed. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth Publishing: 525-539. [356].