HYBRID-RPG

Rule # 560: His college gpa [will] = [[(his total SAT score) - 1000] / 100].

Rule # 561: A student's age = [2^[(his gpa) + #]], where # is # in C#, latter, meaning # be @ 3 @ C3; so, if his gpa is @ 3 @ C3, then his age = [2^6] = 64 years; but, if his gpa is @ 4 @ C1, then his age = [2^5] = 32 years: NOTE the C# in each of the two examples given: the C# determines the final [real] age of the student[s], but his gpa also plays a role in determining his final [real] age of the student[s]. The equation above could be rewritten as [2^(2*(his gpa))] or as [2^(2*(#))], but it would only be estimation and would NOT be accurate in all situation: to get a more accurate estimation for all situations, it is better to use the 1st above equation, rather than the 2nd equation given later, which is average and LESS accurate, but sometimes gives similar result[s], but is NOT accurate for all situation[s], regarding the student'[s]' [gpa and his C#], play a significant role in determining his age in years, when you've only his gpa @ C#.

Rule # 562: C2 PL = [(your total SAT score) / 100]; so, @ total score of 1400, your C2 PL = 14, which puts your IQ @ grade 14: a total SAT score of 1200 is @ 12 C2 PL, which [would] put[s] your IQ @ grade 12, IF you had a total SAT score of 1200.

Rule # 563: Private colleges and universities are academically easier but more expensive and more difficult to get in THAN state colleges and universities which are academically more difficult but cheaper and easier to get in THAN private ones. The [academic] reasons for this is that private colleges and universities have better libraries but are academically less challenging than state colleges and universities, the latter is because state colleges and universities have incompetant professors or/and TAs, bordering on stupidity and malpractive, along with lousy books [meaning badly written, as if written by idiot[s]: yes, Hemingway seems like an idiot: but, IF he isn't an idiot, THEN my professor picked his worst book to be assigned for the course: he seems to have the worst grammar on the planet earth: his grammar is as lousy as some art[s] by some artists, such as by that famous Spanish painter Pablo Picasso [MOST VILE painter and most disgusting painter and of worst quality [like hearing someone scratch a blackboard with their fingernails] [worst, i'd say][in my opinion] in history of art painting his paintings: Hemingway is on same league as Pablo Picasso: both seem to be idiots, but liked, becuase they are famous: i prefer Shakespear over Hemingway any day: I prefer reading Hero or/and Champions rpg rather than reading Hemingway, has the worst grammar that i've ever seen, damn: i prefer Dickens over Hemingway, any day], meaning the worst books are assigned for the course, [[probably] in [most] state colleges and universities, UNLESS my state colleges and universities [in 3 different states] would get a grade of [D] for quality or rating of 1], by me, NOT for all courses, but for most of the courses, where the books are also the worst that NO sane person would use such a book; and, IF the book turns out to be great, the professor @ the state college will ignore it, so that great book is useless, since it will NOT count towards your grade, since the material will be ignored by the professor, [the parts that the students like or/and understand], if the book happens to be great: only the idiotic parts of the books will be focused by the professors, to lower the students' grade[s] as much as possible.

Rule # 564: In this equation of [professor[s] vs student[s]] OR [student[s] vs professor[s]]: the optimum college course [#] = C4 = ~ [[y]*[dx]], where [y] = C3 PL, and where [dx] = difference in C2 PL, giving [[C3 PL]*[difference in C2 PL]] = optimum college course that ought to be taken by students; so, use Rule # 3 to figure out optimum college course [#] to take, depending on what grade you got @ particular C2 PL course, in math, science, or/and engineering, in the following way, ASSUMING THAT THE courses are properly and corrected numbered from least difficult to [the] most difficult, with course # related to C#, THEN once you have figured out the C2 PL for the course #, then subtract 10 from that C2 PL, let that # = DX, multiply that DX by [y] = 50, [is C3 PL], giving a course #, which is what you could take @ particular gpa or grade; so, if you can pass a 250 differential equation[s] course with a [C-] or grade of 2, which is normally @ the undergraduate level for most state colleges is @ the graduate level course @ Princeton University, which is NOT difficult to get good grades @ but is difficult to pay for and get in, if you have a lousy SAT score or lousy high school gpa; but, getting back to RULE # 3, using it to figure out the optimum course that you ought to be taking: divide that value of 5, taken from 15 C2 PL, since you've subtracted 10 from 15 C2 PL = a course # of 250 in a college outside of Princeton University, then dividing THAT gpa or grade of 4 by 2, [2 / 2] = 1, [D]; BUT, THEN, YOU MUST APPLY RULE # 3 FOR CONSERVATION OF MASS AND ENERGY, USING REVERSE MATH OPERATION, BY MULTIPLYING 5 by 2, [5 * 2], slightly different than normally done for C#, giving you difference of 10, add 10, THE original value THAT you subtracted, giving you 20 C2 PL, which you can get a grade of 1, [D], @ 5th year math course, which is @ PhD level @ Princeton University: NOTE that your grade or gpa goes down, but your C2 PL for course # goes up, from 250 to 500, # for which is different in Princeton course catalog: the #ing is a way to reference particular course # for particular C2 PL. A nice book for differential equations, that i would give a rating of 2 or [C-] [which is better than most math books for/on/[or/and][releated to] differential equation[s]] is the "Elementary Differential Equations and Applications" by author, [Derrick]: NOTE that the spelling of the author's name, sound like, IF you rearrange the letters, sounds like that SCI-FI movie, RREDICK: it could just be a coincidence, maybe. And, another good book on differential equations is the Schaum's series; but, the same publisher gives a book of less quality for book on [partial differential equations], but still @ rating 2 or [C-], slightly less than rating 3 or [B-] that i'd give for Schaum's Intro to Differential Equations. BUT, MOST MATH BOOKS I'D GIVE A RATING OF 1 or [D]: BADLY WRITTEN [without explanation[s]]OR/AND WRITTEN BY IDIOTS, THAT the reader[s] would need a high IQ, to make any real sense out of it. Another way of figuring out the optimum math course that the student ought to be taking is taking the square root of his C3 PL, which will give you the year # for that math course; so, if student is @ 49 C3 PL which is 20 C2 PL, then THE maximum of his ability is a 7th year math course, which he will eventually figure out, when he is doing his doctorate in math, meaning he ought NOT be rushing into that C#, since his prerequisites will be needed by him to help him figure out that C# book; although he might get a grade of 1 or [D] @ that level of difficulty for that C#.

Rule # 565: To turn equation from Rule # 566 into a shrinking equation is tricky.

Rule # 566: The variable M for material strength of skeleton of life forms in the equation below works differently for male humans and monsters: for male humans it goes from [starting @] 2 to [ending in] 1, as he goes from a low point character of himself to a veryy high point character of himself, as his point total increase, but when his size remains relatively similar to his original: the process is reverse, when he's or it's a monster, where M goes from 2 to 1, NOT because his or its points are decreasing, but BECAUSE his or its size is decreasing: the purspose of the variable M is to serve to determine the material strength of skeleton of life forms, for humans, mutants, and monsters. For the giant robot Godzilla character in the movie/storyline of [Godzilla vs robot Godzilla], since robot Godzilla is an inorganic metallic lifeform, with AI, use C3, rather than C2, in the equation below, to calculate the material strength of his skeleton, which is both partly exo-skeleton, as well, also, having an internal skeleton. The equation for material strength for skeleton or/and exo-skeleton is [C# / (M = 2)]: use C2, except when dealing with human females when you've to use C1, since her COM in terms of C# is much greater than her ideal male mate, even if her COM # is similar to that of his, where her minimum C1 DP has same # has her ideal male mate, whose @ C2 DP, will give estimation of the approximate or close to the correct result[s], but her STR will be slightly less than her ideal male mate, where her STR will be in terms of C2, referring to the # of C1 @ C2, which being the NEW magnitude for her STR, referring to the material strength of her skeleton, AFTER using the equation, as if she were a he, but slightly less, after used this way in the above equation for most types of living entities, including for fictional monsters, such as Godzilla or/and Gamara, latter is maximum D20 character @ 20 C1 DP; its C2 DP is proportional to the year that the movie came out; so, then, that mean that Gamera's full height or length be @ C3 @ HALF of its C2 DP, giving it a full height or length of 90 feet, IF it is @ or if you place it @ 50 C2 DP, since it has super power[s], its height that i've just given is LESS than it would be IF it had NO super power[s], which having super power[s], reduces its height to that of the given that shown in the movie/storyline, which is coincidentally correct to that of my tri-stat rpg @ C#, which IMPLIES that [some of] my idea[s] were stolen [in recent times, as well, also, in the recent centuries, as well, also, throughout history: assuming it is NOT just a series of coincidences, which such # of such coincidences in similarities, range in the hundreds, and fast approaching almost a thousand such coincidences] and paraphrased, latter maybe to prevent a time paradox OR/AND to escape charges of plagerism, by way of circular timeline, before I had chance to publish my idea[s], before I had chance to discover my idea[s], which were discovered during the 1990s; and, also, Gamera's skeleton is @ material strength of [(50 C2 DP) / 2] @ PL = 25 C2 PL material strength @ between cement and concrete, unless concret is @ 25 C2 PL, IF steel is @ 30 C2 PL: i'm NOT a materials engineer, so i'm NOT exactly sure what 25 C2 PL material strength be @; so, this is an estimate, which is coincidentally PROPORTIONAL TO [BUT NOT IN ALL RESPECTS] TO THAT OF the '86 MU TSR rpg, which consist of [a] flaw[s], one of them being when it comes to the actual material strength of adamentium, which is NOT that much stronger than iron, which was revealed in 1 THOR issue, which most may NOT be aware of, which MY THEORY STATED, BUT IT SEEMS THAT the MU comics or Stan Lee manage to steal my idea, by way of circular timeline, before I had chance to publish my idea on the material strength of the fictional element adamentium, which is LOT stronger IN THE '86 MU TSR rpg, THAN IN MU COMICS, compared to the '86 MU TSR rpg, which would NOT correct its error, maybe perhaps it thought IF the readers read it wrong then its the fault of the readers, rather than to correct the misunderstanding of the #, which you can figure out, IF you had access to my equation of C3 = C2^LOG10(C2), which would give you a 368 C3 PL material strength for a 40 C2 PL material strength, for iron, which is an example, meaning the # given in the '86 MU TSR rpg had a unitless unit, why readers misunderstood the magnitude of the #, where the #'s magnitude had differing and different units of magnitude in different parts of its rpg, referring to the '86 MU TSR rpg, meaning material strength was sometimes @ C2 and @ other times it was @ C3, similar paradigm, when it came to C# for psyche, which was @ C1 for mutants and C2 for gods; so, the female mutant character Jean Grey had her psyche in terms of a male mutant @ 20 C1 DP, but her Phoenix had her psyche in terms of C2, giving her a bigger #, which was NOT @ C1, but @ C2, WHY in a revised version of the '86 MU TSR rpg, Jean Grey as Dark Phoenix had 40 Psyche for 40 C1 DP from a male perspective, meaning psyche of Phoenix was @ 368 C2 DP, by 40^LOG10(40 C1 DP) = 368 C2 DP; but, that psyche # was given to her by Professor-X [my theory], indirectly, [my theory], by way of the Omicron Crstal of the Shi'Ar Empire, which may or may NOT be an actual magial crystal, IF it was a tachyon residue of either Professor-X's mind OR that of some other, which is another alternate theory; but, getting back to the material strength of the fictional element adamentium, correcting its actual estimate of its strength, WHY perhaps Stan Lee [directly or/and indirectly] put out the correction or that is [my] correction, in a THOR issue; but, i was NEVER given any credit it for figuring out the error[s] in the '86 MU TSR rpg, since it seems that he and others [who steal ideas from the future] did NOT want to reveal that it could be done: which these error[s] in the '86 MU TSR rpg, which i figured out, including its correction[s], which i discovered, both the flaw[s] and the correction[s], was later IMPLIED in MU comics by Stan Lee, by way of stories, such as when Spiderman's points got too high, MU would create [a] weird stor[y/ies] surrouding the MU character Spiderman; but, getting back to material strength of adamentium is NOT that much stronger than iron, SINCE if you convert its C3 to C2, by C3 = C2^LOG10(C2), then you get 1,002.7395 C3 PL material strength to be @ 54 C2 PL material strength. NOTE that robots gets HALF the C2 PL or DP that of living lifeforms, which would mean that C2 DP of robot Godzilla be @ HALF the C2 DP of Godzilla. The length of Godzilla be @ C3 in feet of its C2 DP, if it has NO other power[s] besides its STR and super size, with its STR based partly on its super size, but if it has other power[s], besides STR and super size, with its STR based partly on its super size, then its length is decreased to C3 of HALF his C2 DP. So, if Destroyah is @ 100 C2 DP, which is an estimate, NOT exact value, then its length be @ C3 of HALF its C2 DP, giving it a length of C3 @ 50 C2 PL @ length of 50^LOG10(50) = 770 ft. So, since a whale has NO power[s], it length will be @ C3 @ its 26 C2 DP, giving it a length of 100 ft.: its C2 DP is an estimate, since i'm NOT sure if its material strength of its skeleton is @ 13 C2 PL. The material strength of skeleton or that of its exo-skeleton ought to be @ C3 @ 10% of its C3 DP, with its length @ C3 @ its C3 DP; but, since Godzilla has other power[s] besides its super size, its size would be decreased to HALF its C2 DP: the more power[s] that either Godzilla has or the more power[s] that you give your Godzilla character, the LESS its length is from its C3 @ its C3 DP TO SOMETHTING [AMOUNT] LESS THAN its C3 @ its C3 DP. This is implied or/and shown by the monster Destroyah, as it gets bigger, it also gets weaker, which you will notice, IF you properly seen the movie, referring to the middle part of the movie, where the miniature monster ALMOST HAS black hole power[s] but does NOT quite have it, since it does NOT have sufficient C2 DP, which the % of black hole power[s] be @ [100 + %] @ C2 DP; so, @ 123 C2 DP, it would have 23% black hole power[s], meaning to have power to TEMPORARILY create a miniature black hole, with 23% of properties of a black hole, which decreases to nuclear blast power[s] @ its maximum size. And, also, NOTE THAT the bone is somewhat hallow and looks somewhat like swizz cheese, when looked @ under a microscope, meaning bone is NOT solid: same applies to teeth of sharks, where the same principal applies; so, based on that, the material strength of skeleton of the lifeform will be @ HALF of its or his C# DP, assuming it or he has NO hidden points, which is usually @ C2 DP; so, the material strength of skeleton of the lifeform will be HALF of its or his C2 DP, assuming it or he does NOT have any hidden points, which [having hidden points] requires use of RULE # 3: premise[s] results in a 10 C2 PL material strength for bones of the skeleton of man @ 20 C2 DP, assuming he has NO hidden points, which [having hidden points] requires use of R # 3: such as for martial arts, for low point characters. You can use this rule [Rule # 566] for monsters, such as Godzilla: its COM @ C# will be a combination of shape, size, and gender: same as if it were human: same applies that being COM @ C# being a combination of shape, size, and gender. So, IF AND WHEN Godzilla is @ 81 C2 DP, [@ approximately in 1981 movie/storyline of Godzilla], then material strength of his bones of his skeleton is @ 40.25 C2 PL material strength, depending on which version of Godzilla: you check accuracy of this with a series of [-1] modifiers.

Rule # 567: Here is a list of links THAT IMPLIES OR/AND USES [my] C1, C2, or/and C3 units of magnitude for point distribution[s]: the links are related to GURPS rpg:

http://www.io.com/~woodward/d7/ggodzilla.html ; and,

http://www.omnology.com/gurps-cha1.html .

The C1 unit is for IQ; and, C2 or C3 is for ST: Godzilla's ST is @ C3, while others' [humanoid mutants'] ST is @ C2: when ST is @ C2, its C3 will be right next to it in paranthesis, such as if ST is @ 25 [meaning @ C2, in DP form, but is NOT @ DP: since GURPS is making a mistake, then its C3 be @ [C3: 150, by lowering DLS from 25 to 20, increasing DPL from 25 to 30 @ C2, which is @ 30^LOG10(30) = 152 C3 PL]. The latter also applies to HT, which is probably END, and also applies to DEX, in the same way, such as if DX is 15 [@ C2], which ought to be @ 17.5 or 21.5 C2, based on its C# @ C3, then [[first it's C3 is written incorrectly, but assume its DP is @ 20, then subtract 2 from 20, giving him a 18 C2 LS, by [20 - 2], gives him a [20 + 2] C2 PL = 22 C2 PL = approximately 60 C3 PL, by 22^LOG10(22) = approximately 60 C3 PL; but, GURPS does it wrong, since it has stolen by idea[s], by way of circular timeline before i had chance to publish my idea[s], and paraphrased it incorrectly, WHY i can tell right away it's based on my ideas, and it has written its C3 value incorrectly, off slightly from its correct value[s], since it [GURPS rpg] does NOT and is NOT truely written in my tri-stat rpg form @ C#, which is why its C# is off slightly, for its stats. But, oddly its point total is in my C3 DP form, similar to the point total of Champions or/and Hero written by Steve Long, his characters' point totals is/are @ C3 DP, since Steve Long also worked for GURPS rpg, long time ago. The 100 point character EVE simply represents the point total of her ideal man: she has NO real power[s], except her beauty: her power[s] are wrong, based on her point total: she has NO mutant power[s], such as freezing a living object to stone: since, it effects only men, since men are attracted to her beauty.

Rule # 568: The idea of DC [Zero Hour] [may also] be stolen from me, before i had chance to publish it, by way of circular timeline: NOTE THE writing of my rules in my tri-stat rpg @ C#, from end to beginning, in the revised version, backward becoming forward, a paradox, which [this] is used in the DC comics of Zero Hour.

Rule # 569: As time moves forward, it sends out information about itself backward, which the previous time can pick up on, creating an alternate universe of itself, which also explains why my equation for rate of technology of C2^LN(C2) works only upto the year 1862, after which the equation does NOT work; so, the conclusion must be that this rule that i just mentioned must apply, causing an increase in the rate of technology, due to paradox of circular timeline[s] taking place within our [this] universe, which may be one of many universe[s], with the larger universe being like a fractal, with our universe being one of its fractal pieces, like a jig-saw piece to a jig-saw puzzle: example: a simple diagram of this is and/which looks like a pair of inverse matrixes: one of many possibilities, where the idea of randomness comes into play:

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9: the original universe: if humans never existed: [concept] origin of [DC concept of] hypertime, which was probably stolen from me, by way of circular timeline, before i had chance to publish it [my theory];

4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4: our universe, somewhere in between these two extremes; and,

9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0: the final universe: similar to the tv series Smallville.

Rule # 570: Another one of my theories seem to be stolen and pharaphrased, by circular timeline, before I had chance to publish my idea [theory], that being the idea of [dark matter] which is simply the rest of the UNobserved universe, which is probably shaped liked a [giant oyster], with the observable universe being ITS pearl: its creator [the [this] giant oyster] is the other 90% of the missing universe, INCLUDING its space-time dimensions: this theory of mine seems to be implied in the sci-fi book Langoliers: the author probably stole my idea, by way of circular timeline, before i had chance to publish my idea [theory], in similar manner that H G Well probably stole my equation for rate of technology @ C2^LN(C2), by way of circular timeline, before i could publish my idea [theory] and claim credit, himself, for it, in form of a sci-fi novel, which its equation, just mentioned, dictated the type of TL for a particular type of culture he would encounter in his time travel journeys, where the society of the Morlocks being of industrial age, as for similar to which century that of 19th or 20th, depending on which version of the story you came across, the most recent version, seemed more a little more advanced and more primitive @ the same time, a mixture of two extremes, which even now is taking place TODAY that of wolves type personality in humans vs the sheep like personality in humans, such as humans paying college tuition for subjects for which they do NOT need to pay, where the government[s] ought to be paying, but the foolish humans go about paying college tuition, which is just 1 example of mass human stupidity, another being paying insurance, government[s] ought to be paying the bills by taxes, which is what the public pays, but the public is taxes TWICE, 1st by taxes THEN 2nd time by insurance and other types of fees upon the public, 3rd health care cost[s] ought to be payed by government, which is acting more and more like the mafia, hording resources for itself, without regard to common sense NOR regard to morality, which leads to the conclusion that because American democracy is MOST corrupt on the planet for any nation, THEN because of this THAT American democracy must be full of shit, with most of its citizens being and having sheep personality, [or, idiotic, or fear riddled: you see, more and more of it and this, as USA becomes more and more of a police state, where the police become more and more like thugs in government uniform, example being USA killing civilians [slowly or quickly] and calling it collateral damage, but if its enem[y/ies] does the same, then it's terrorism, which sounds like hypocracy, similar to the [DC] anti-matter universe, where Synestro was from, where criminals are THE police, and [with] most citizens [are] treated as criminals, who want to live in common sense, a variant version of it being [DC] Bizzaro world], like cattle to the slaughterhouse, [[my] analogy used in the sci-fi novel The Time Machine, within context of its story], making the rich richer, making poor poorer, laws of physics taking on human form in THE form of personality types in humans, colleges do NOT make people smart NOR smarter, it gives them paper credentials, like paper money, and the consumer [the public] has NO way of knowing the quality of the product they are buying until it is TOO late, and they [the public] are NOT entitled to $ back, if they [the public] feel cheated out of thier $, for whatever reason[s], which is form of theft, by the rich, capitalism, which uses politics to legally steal $ from the public, which [most of it] is like sheep, while the elite are likes wolves, creating a feudal system, pushed to extremes in the sci-fi novel The Time Machine; and, for the equation of C2^LN(C2) for rate of technology, which was accurate upto year 1862, AFTER WHICH the equation did NOT apply: the reason being is explained in previous rule that of Rule # 569.

Rule # 571: The amount of damage that a storm [hurricane] can do is HALF of its C2 PL; D = [(storm's C2 PL)/2]; so, a hurricane on earth @ 40 C2 PL can do a 20 C2 PL damage, meaning destroy an object made of 20 C2 or 49 C3 material strength, by 20^LOG10(20 C2 PL) = 49 C3 PL: this implies or/and states that the # of hours for a storm is [2^(C2/5)]; so, then a 25 C2 PL storm be @ 32 hours long; then, category # for hurricanes be @ [30 + (3*X)] @ C2 PL; so, a category 1 hurricane be @ 33 C2 PL or Power Level; while, category 5 hurricane be @ 45 C2 PL @ 1,401 kilometers or miles in radius or diameter; but, tornadoes are between 16 and 25 C2 PL; while, hurricanes are between 36 and 49 C2 PL: a hybrid version of a tornadoe and hurricane will be between 25 and 36 C2 PL. The maximum C2 PL for a storm will be @ 10% that of the planet's C2 DP; so, if earth, which has a mass of [5.9742*(10^24)] = X, be @ C1 DP of [10*[[LOG10(X)]^(1/2)]] = [10*4.977] = 49.775 C1 DP = 758 C2 DP, would have a maximum size storm @ 75.8 C2 PL, be @ maximum radius or diameter of 11,710 kilometers or miles, which is a catetory 15.26 storm: by square root of [C2^LN(C2 PL)], which is NOT always so; but, can apply to the Red Spot of Jupiter, by taking 10% of Jupiter's C2 DP, and changing the stat from DP to PL, but leaving the # the same, where if a similar but smaller planet be @ 770 C2 DP: the maximum size storm it can have be @ 77 C2 PL, which be @ square root of [77^LN(77 C2 PL)]: 12,510 kilometers or miles in radius or diameter. So, then, a category 4 hurricane be @ 42 C2 PL be @ 1,080 kilometers or miles in radius or diameter, by square root of [42^LN(42 C2 PL)]. So, this briliant nobel prize winning equation ought to also work on and for the sun or/and even also a neutron star: so, the [our] sun @ 1,070 C2 DP @ 55 C1 DP, by [10*5.5], [based on its mass @ [2*(10^30) kg] can have a maximum storm @ 107 C2 PL, by the above equation, its maximum size nuclear storm be @ 55,142 kilometers or miles in radius or diameter. The planet Jupiter has mass of [1.9*(10^27) kg] = X, which has an approximate [NOT exact, but approximate C1 DP of, but for exact C1 DP, use Rule # 3] C1 DP of [10*[[LOG10(X)]^(1/2)]] = [10*5.22] = 52.2 C1 DP; so, then, its C2 DP = 892 C2 DP; so, then maximum size storm be @ 89.2 C2 PL, giving it a maximum size of square root of 89.2^LN(89.2 C2 PL) = 23,956 kilometers or miles in radius or diameter; but, since the Red Spot is a SUBSET of the maximum size storm on Jupiter, ADD a [-1] modifer, giving the maximum size for the Red Spot of Jupiter @ [[-1 + [89.2^(1/2)]]^2] = 8.44^2 = 71.3 C2 PL, for maximum size [storm] for the Red Spot of Jupiter, giving it a maximum radius or diameter of 8,984 kilometers or miles in radius or diameter. The mass of saturn is @ [5.6851*(10^26)] = X, giving it a C1 DP of [10*[[LOG10(X)]^(1/2)]] = [10*5.172] = 51.72 C1 DP = 864.5 C2 DP, giving it a maximum size storm of 86.45 C2 PL, giving such a storm a maximum radius or diameter of 20,824 kilometers or miles.