Protest Fox News Exclusion of Ron Paul From New Hampshire Forum
News Coverage
Read:
President Ron
Paul - Could He Really Win? (Part 1)
Heidi
Remembers President Ron Paul's Election Victory (Part 2) looking back at the Ron Paul Revolution 21 years
in the future in 2029.
Ron Paul supporters, be sure to vote in the new Free Market Hall of Fame “Issues, Programs & Politics Survey“ at http://www.freedomfest.com/halloffame Make sure you complete question #4 (If Ron Paul is not on the GOP ticket as President or Vice President, will you vote Republican, vote Democrat, consider a third party or stay at home in the general election.) Ron Paul supporters need to let both parties know they will not be taken for granted in the 2008 elections.
Making Progress! Los Angeles Times Weighs In & Includes Our Site & Rupert Murdoch's E-mail Address
Ron Paul Excluded from Fox New Forum - USA Daily
Take Action Now! Fox News Is Trying To Exclude Ron Paul From the Pre NH Primary Forum?
Please forward this URL to other Ron Paul supporters http://www.ronaldholland.com/protestfox.htmand you can now read some of the early e-mails to Fox News on this URL.
We need to send a message to Fox's Rupert Murdoch & his fellow Neocon buddies that he is not Musharraf and the US is not Pakistan, yet! Fox News cannot just stifle public opinion. debate and impact a primary election by excluding Ron Paul just because they don't like his message of freedom and liberty.
Cover them up with e-mails and they will just say it was a mistake or miscommunication. Be respectful as all of the email addresses below are just employees trying to keep their jobs with the world's largest media monopoly. One of them, Judge Napolitano is my choice for Ron Paul's VP running mate.
Rupert Murdoch E-mail
Address: rmurdoch@newscorp.com
***Note, Apparently Rupert doesn't want to hear anymore from Ron Paul supporters.
"Please amend your website by informing people that Murdoch's email has a spam filter on it which filters out any reference to Paul or the debate in the subject line and bounces it back. I then changed thesubject line, but left my comments in the body of the message the same and it went through. I changed the subject to an innocuous general topic such as "re: news and ratings" (or maybe try something like viewership and the news, etc., etc.).
The first email bounced back within
60 seconds, but the subsequent email went through and did not bounce back
(it has now been ten minutes- a lifetime in email protocol). I hope this
helps, but please pass this along onto your website ASAP.
Sincerely, an educated and fervent Ron Paul supporter,
Jeff Barnard in
La Porte, IN
And Now any mention of Paul inside the e-mail is filtered out.
Just thought you'd like to know
that Rupert's "spam" filter also filters any reference to Ron Paul or Forum or Debate in his
e-mails.
I remedied this by spelling Ronn Paull and Debbate, Forumm. All
mail
was returned to me until I spelled this way.
Keep up the good work.
Patrick Phillips
SF, California
ATTENTION: New Fox News Contact On the Debate
FOX News wants to know what you would ask the Republican presidential candidates when they debate in Myrtle Beach, S.C., on Thursday, Jan 10.
Please e-mail your question to debate@foxnews.com. Include your name, town, state and contact number for verification.
Please keep your question sharp, brief and to the point. And let us know which candidate you'd like us to ask.
I'm e-mailing them and demanding they stop excluding Ron Paul from the debate. - Ron Holland
Fox Media
& PR E-Mails:
jhorner@newscorp.com,
mwhiteman@newscorp.com,
teverett@newscorp.com,
rnolte@newscorp.com,
cfelenstein@newscorp.com,
mregan@newscorp.com,
alexandra.marinescu@fox.com,
brian.peterson@fox.com,
brian.lewis@foxnews.com,
irena.briganti@foxnews.com,
lou.d'ermilio@fox.com,
Chris.Bellitti@foxcable.com,
thomas.tyrer@fox.com
Fox News Contacts:
americasnewsroom@foxnews.com,
Andrew.Napolitano@FOXNEWS.COM,
Atlarge@foxnews.com,
beltway@foxnews.com,
Bigstory-weekend@foxnews.com,
bill.oreilly@foxnews.com,
brian.knoblock@foxnews.com,
Brit.Hume@foxnews.com,
bullsandbears@foxnews.com,
cash@foxnews.com,
Cavuto@foxnews.com,
colonelscorner@foxnews.com,
david.asman@foxnews.com,
Drmanny@foxnews.com,
Fatherjonathan@foxnews.com,
Feedback@foxnews.com,
Fncimag@foxnews.com,
Fncspecials@foxnews.com,
FNS@foxnews.com,
Forbes@foxnews.com,
foxnewsonline@foxnews.com,
Foxreport@foxnews.com,
friends@foxnews.com,
gretchen.carlson@foxnews.com,
Hannity@foxnews.com,
Hannityandcolmes@foxnews.com,
Heartland@foxnews.com,
Hemmer@foxnews.com,
ian.rae@foxnews.com,
Jamie@foxnews.com,
jane.skinner@foxnews.com,
JER@foxnews.com,
john.moody@foxnews.com,
kathy.ardleigh@foxnews.com,
kilmeade@foxnews.com,
Lineup@foxnews.com,
Lisonlaw@foxnews.com,
Martha@foxnews.com,
Myword@foxnews.com,
Newswatch@foxnews.com,
Ontherecord@foxnews.com,
Oreilly@foxnews.com,
redeye@foxnews.com,
shepard.smith@foxnews.com,
Special@foxnews.com,
steve.doocy@foxnews.com,
Studiob@foxnews.com,
thom.bird@foxnews.com,
todd.ciganek@foxnews.com,
viewerservices@foxnews.com,
yourcomments@foxnews.com,
yourwordlive@foxnews.com
Don't let Rupert Murdoch and the Neocons outfox Ron Paul!!!
If you send me copies of your reasoned, polite and respectful emails to the Fox contacts, I'll publish as many as possible on our website at http://www.ronaldholland.com/protestfox.htm Send copies of your e-mails to me at skironholland@yahoo.com
Thanks,
Ron Holland,
Note, I'm just a freedom loving American who supports Ron Paul but I'm in no
way involved with or speak for the official Ron Paul Campaign. For more
information on the campaign go to http://www.ronpaul2008.com
or http://www.lewrockwell.com
Your e-mails to Fox will be posted below:
I didn't mention him explicitly
by name, because I am sure they have set up filters for the words Ron Paul
by now.
Happy New Years
---
Thomas F. Shehan III
Washington and Lee University '08
C. 540-461-0992
###
I assure you that Fox News is making a SERIOUS mistake excuding Pon Paul and any other candidate from the upcoming Rebublican Debate. As I am sure you are aware, this man just happens to be running for PRESIDENT. I cannot even fathom why a NEWS organization would even think about not including someone in a Presidential debate that is...well...running for President. I thought the reason for Presidential Debates was to inform the American Citizens on the issues that each candidate represent, so that we as individuals can make an informed decision on who we will support for President. I will also assure this: Fox News will lose a large number of viewers if this decision remains the same. Seeing as you are the Chairman of Fox News, I suggest you do what is right and change the decision that has been made, by whoever it was that felt they had the authority to make it. Shame on Fox News for censoring the views of many Americans.
-Jessica Boyd
Bloomington, MN
###
I am aware that you as an organization have planned to exclude Ron Paul
from your upcoming debate. This is not a surprise to me. As a voter I have been
disenfranchised by people like you for my entire voting life of 21 years. I
just want to remind you of these universal truths. One, the truth always wins.
Two, You can fool some of us some of the time, but not all of us. Three, when
the truth is known there are always consequences. I just want to remind you
that some justice takes many years, like the Neurenburg Trials - they are still
hunting those people and their money!!
--
Russell from Seattle
###
Dear Journalists,
I voted for Bush in 2000 and 2004. Perhaps I voted for Bush in 2004 because I watched too much Fox News. I voted for Bush in 2000 because he spoke to Republican ideals. I voted for Bush in 2004 because, again, I was loyal to "protecting" the USA. Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me. I am ashamed.
Are you loyal to the USA? Fox News flies the USA flag. Read the US Constitution and check your conscience. http://www.usconstitution.net/
Don't be part of the problem, be part of the solution.
Respectfully,
Mike Robinson
Annapolis MD
###
Good Afternoon
I'll keep this brief because I know you're keeping up with communications. I don't know if you have the
right to exclude Ron Paul from a debate, but I know it's a morally bankrupt action detrimental to our nation. Therefore,
I will never knowingly listen, watch, or read anything originated by The News Corp. Too bad, I was a loyal viewer of Fox News Sunday Morning with Chris Wallace.
Sincerely
Michael Kelly
###
Dear
Sir, or Madam
Government employees, police, military swear to uphold the constitution
when they take their jobs. Don't you have the moral necessity to do the same?
Please participate too; be sure Mr. Paul is allowed to address the public
via television, thereby supporting the constitution. Jon Powell
###
The jig is up FOX News--it's becoming increasingly difficult
to conceal the fraud! With your exclusion of Ron Paul from
your 1/6/08 Republican forum, you have made it painfully clear that your
true aim in "fair and balanced" news reporting is nothing short
of an attempt at strong-arming public opinion towards your establishment-puppet
candidates. The moneyed vultures that control your station
(this nation, & this planet) seek only for the continued subjugation
of our citizenry, the perpetual subversion of truth and liberty, and the
swindling of the wealth and freedoms of American poor and middle-classes.
Perhaps we Paulities are overreacting? Or maybe, just
maybe, we are the few aware of the unabated progression towards
American totalitarianism--a movement whose orchestration your
organization is complicit in. Get a conscience--get a
soul--get a life & then get a new populace to force-feed your
pablum to.
Thomas Braun
###
To Fox News,
First I would like to thank you for your work. All of you
have very influential jobs and responsibilities. You report on the
affairs of our culture and world. You have tremendous influence.
Millions of people watch your network each week. Many people watch
your shows who agree with you or disagree with you. That is the beauty of
American journalism and free speech. I also appreciate your slogan
"Fair and Balance", "You Decide", & "No Spin
Zone".
So it is with this presupposition that I am confused as to why Ron Paul
was not invited to the "Fox News Forum on Jan 6? I very rarely
vote in presidential elections. Because I didn't think presidential
candidates were speaking for me. It seemed like many of the candidates
were saying the same thing with no real relevance. But when I heard
different perspectives on views and policies from Ron Paul, it made me
think and lured me into this 2008 election process. My opinion of Ron Paul
is that he is a highly intellectual thinker who respects the constitution.
He knows how to agree to disagree in a respectful way. I believe this
is beneficial to the American people. I think it is healthy to invite Ron Paul
to the forum to exchange ideas and to also represent a possible different
perspective. This will make America stronger!
I am not sure of all of the reasons your company didn't invite Ron Paul,
but would you please reconsider this
decision and invite him. I am positive he would show up if
the invitation was extended to him. I would like for my kids to watch and
make an educated and informed decision for themselves about the candidates.
If Ron
Paul wasn't there it would present an unfair assessment of all
the candidates and all their views.
Thank you for reading my email, my channel will be tuned to Fox
January 6, 2008
--
"Wow! I Feel Better!!!"
James Wilson
ifeelbetter.gnld.net
###
Sent: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 8:45 am
Subject: Please INCLUDE Ron Paul in NH Debate
By ignoring Ron Paul you are simply reinforcing the impression
that Fox is no different than the rest of the special interest, driveby
media.
Please include Congressman Paul in the debate.
Thank you.
Respectfully,
Karl Lang
Springfield MO
###
Some years ago, I sent a complimentary email to the San Diego Fox affiliate to thank them for covering both sides of the gun control issue during a protest organized by Handgun,Inc.I was one of many who came to this gathering to show our support for the individual right to keep and bear arms.
Now I find that Fox has decided to invite only the GOP candidates who are advocates of big government instead of including Dr. Ron Paul who, as the sole defender of the Constitution, has views of our nation closely coincident with those of our Founders. The so-called 'top tier' candidates have proven track records that indicate they have no faith in the American people and wish to keep us as chattels of a huge federal government. Please reconsider your exclusion of Dr. Paul so that other Americans can see that there is a vast difference in his thinking on the role of government, one that corresponds to the vision he shares with our Founders.
Steve Allison
Grantsville, WV
###
I support Ron Paul for President and I would like for FOX News to give him honorable mention.
why do you exclude and make snide remarks about him. He is a Congressman, that has never voted
for a pay increase.He would make attempt to balance the budget,
Sir I am eighty years old and have seen lots of president come and go, and before i pass to
on to a better life, I would like to see one here in the goo old USA.
We butted in to Pakistan business and you can see what happened, you have carried it
on of your programs around the clock.
I do like FOX news, try and be a little balanced as you claim
Thank you Sir/Mam
Paul T Caple
Pompano Beach, FL
Yes, I'm independent and will vote for Mr Paul
###
Hello,
I have watched Fox News for the last 8 years or so, and enjoy watching your programming.
However, I must say that I am so disturbed by recent
events, that I will have to completely boycott Fox
News and any of its subsidiaries or parent
companies. Furthermore, I will ensure that all of my
friends who watch Fox News (all several hundred of them) are aware of what you are doing and I
will do everything in my power to persuade
them to join this boycott.
The reason for my defection from Fox is this: I
have recently learned of the decision by Fox to leave out Ron
Paul from its NH presidential
round table discussion this week. I am
greatly disturbed by this turn of events.
I thought your network was "fair and
balanced". How can it claim such a thing when it is ACTIVELY
participating in BLATANT censorship. Dr.
Paul has likely raised more money in this quarter
than any other republican candidate, and he consistently ranks 4th or 5th
in the NH
polls. source: http://www.usaelectionpolls.com/2008/new-hampshire.html
Either of these should be enough to ensure his
inclusion in this discussion. Taken together, there should be NO DOUBT
that he would be
included. But yet your network has left him
out in the cold. What gives? Anyone who chooses to ignore Dr. Paul
from this point on does
so at their own peril (financially, politically,
etc.). We as Ron Paul supporters have
a rather large disposable income, and we will not
hesitate to direct our flow of cash from you to
someone else.
Therefore, I DEMAND that Ron Paul be included in this discussion, or I will be forced to continue this
boycott.
Most Sincerely,
Travis Wickline
Nashville, TN
P.S. Did I mention that at the time of this
writing, I have already posted my boycott on the net, and I have received 417
responses in the
last hour alone from people who are joining this
cause. Ok, Fox News, it is time to sink or swim, cause the water is rising Fast.
###
Dear Fox News representatives and consultants,
My name is Riley Fraas, a registered Republican and
resident of Merrimack, New Hampshire. I have enjoyed watching Fox News for many years now, based on its
fair and balanced news coverage. However, I was
appalled to find out that at a Fox News Forum on January
6, (to be held in New Hampshire just before its primary)
Congressman Ron Paul will be excluded while five other Republican candidates for president
are invited, (including Fred Thompson, who is
consistently polling below Ron Paul in New
Hampshire: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/nh/new_hampshire_republican_primary-193.html)
Has Fox News determined that Ron
Paul is too conservative? Too principled? I
would urge you to reconsider and make sure the Congressman receives an
invitation to the
debate. This way New Hampshire Republicans can make an informed decision between several candidates
based on their distinctive traits and principles.
Thanks!
Riley Fraas
Merrimack,
NH
###
Hello,
I am sending this email to protest the exclusion of certain candidates in the Fox weekend roundtable debate forum in New Hampshire. You should be ashamed that Fox is attempting to impose their political views onto the election process. The actions of your employer have been condemned by the New Hampshire GOP, major newspapers, and across the blogosphere.
It would be one thing if there was an arbitrary cutoff, but Fox is including Fred Thompson who is polling much lower, and has raised much less money. You have also made it a point to exclude the one candidate who’s Q4 fundraising kept up with Hillary and Obama. This only emphasizes how ridiculous the exclusion is.
Right now Fox is abusing their position as a neutral news organization. They are using their political views to eliminate certain candidates before a single vote has been cast. I’m asking you to personally contact the people in charge of the debate forum to request they include *all* candidates.
Thank
you.
###
Dear Mr.Fergus Cullen,
I am appalled that the Republican Party of the great State of New
Hampshire would be a party to excluding any candidates in a forum
designed to inform New Hampshire voters of the candidates'
positions. You cannot wash your hands of this deal that reeks to high
heaven of manipulation at the highest levels. Even as a conservative, I am
starting to tune out Fox News and the Republican Party as well.
Charles Earl Barnett
Dear Mr. Murdoch,
Your exclusion of Ron Paul,
a proven popular force among New Hampshire voters, in the upcoming New Hampshire
candidates forum, is about as crass a manipulation of the election process as I
have seen. No votes have even been taken, yet, you have decided to deny
the voters of New Hampshire this opportunity to see all the
candidates together just prior to the actual vote there. Sir, you need to
be divested of any news programs under your control, as you obviously wish to
use them to manipulate the American political process like some third world
dictator.
Charles Earl Barnett
###
Note: List this message in the FCC filing for public review. I have been very disapointed
with amount of questions given to Dr. Paul, except that it is laughable
that your network claims to be "Fair and Balanced". Your'e networks
are loosing so much credibility by the way you have handled Dr. Paul's
and your sponsors are not well served by your actions. But more importantly
Fox and newscorp is doing a DISSERVICE to the American people by excliding
Dr. Ron Paul. You can't ignore the 400lb.gorilla
carrying the Constitution. Dr. Paul's meteoric rise in this campaign and
his accomplishments have made him a 1st tier candidate. Though he polls
low nationally the results are not science. Dr. Paul has won the majority
of Straw Polls across the country and his campaign has raised $4 million
dollars in one day, a record. And broke this record on December 15th by
raising $6 million. He receives more donations from active military voters.
He is a force to be
reckoned with. I have never been politically active but I have come
to believe Dr. Paul has a philosophy, at odds with Newscorp, is the right
prescription for Americans. Newscorp is to serve the public intersests
and not dictate their propaganda to us. You receive FCC licenses for the
privilege to give a service. Your sponsors would be served well by respectfully
giving Dr. Paul equal time and questions with the other
candidates.
Have great 2008
Ralph Zavala
###
Dear Sir/Madam,
I understand from several sources that you are not going to include Dr. Ron Paul
in a pre-Primary Presidential debate that your network has planned. If this is
the case, Fox News Mr. Rupert Murdoch & his
fellow NeoCon buddies can expect more viewers departing the Fox News Channel.
(Does Glenn Beck ring a bell?) Fox News cannot
stifle public opinion and debate and impact a primary election by excluding Dr.
Ron Paul
just because they don't like his message of freedom and liberty. Even George
Will has indicated he expects Dr. Paul to come in ahead of two or three of the
"national candidates" (sic), whoever they are, in New Hampshire. Here in South Carolina we
will gladly paint Mr. Murdoch as the 21st century Butcher Tarleton, as we
already know Dr. Paul is the 21st century Thomas Jefferson!
In prayer for the return of the Constitutional Republic,
Edward Eichelberger
Greer, South Carolina
Native Pennsylvanian
Born Again Southron
###
It is my
understanding that you may exclude Ron Paul
from the NH roundtable on the 6th of January. Could you please help me
understand the reasoning for this? Bob K
###
Dear Fox News,
I am a very loyal Fox News
Junkie. I am shocked, however, by your decision to exclude Ron Paul
from the Pre NH Primary Debate. Despite the constant whining from the
left, I have always defended your "We Report, You Decide" philosophy
as a reality. Should I now begin to wonder?
Ron Paul should not
be excluded simply because his opinions fall outside of the mainstream.
When Fox
News first came on the scene, many thought your opinions fell
outside the mainstream. Are you aware that in a Zogby Blind Poll, Ron Paul
was the winner? His message should be allowed in the arena of ideas.
As a Baptist Minister, I am very sensitive to the
censorship of one's message.
Rev. Donald R. Holmes
###
To whom it may concern:
I was exceedingly aggravated to hear that the next Republican debate will not include Dr. Ron Paul. It is absurd that you would profess to be a fair and balanced network while simultaneously excluding a candidate from your debates! The hypocrisy! Dr. Paul is doing better in the polls than some of the candidates that you did opt to invite and has raised more money this quarter than any other candidate- 20 million, I believe. You ought to be ashamed of yourselves. You are doing a disservice not only to the profession of journalism but also to the American people and to our democracy as a whole.
What is it about Dr. Paul that so frightens you? Why do you feel compelled to silence a man with such a powerful and unifying message? In a time when mistrust of government and the mainstream media run deep you will be doing nothing except reinforcing the people's negative perceptions of you. What a sham!
I am compelled to point out to you that irregardless of your efforts to censor Dr. Paul his message is out there. The movement is growing. I assure you, no one believes the "he has no chance of winning" line any more. We know BS when we see it. Should you bar Dr. Paul from the debates all you will achieve is the universal contempt of his ever multiplying number of devotees. "We the people" have had enough of the mainstream media outlets attempting to select our front runners for us.
In conclusion, I shall be complaining to your sponsors about this and there is already a movement under way to boycott not only your station and all of its sister branches but also any and all products advertised by the aforementioned media outlets. We've raised 6 million dollars for Ron Paul in a single day so we are accustomed to putting our money where our (collective) mouth is. Try us!
Hopeful that whatever tiny shred of journalistic integrity and impartiality still in you prevails,
Cristina Lombardi
Long Island, NY
###
To everyone that works for the News Corp,
I am voting republican in 2008 and that is why I don't understand why you would
exclude congressman
Ron Paul from the round table discussion that is coming up in
January, he IS a republican. I am a contributor to his campaign you know
the campaign that raised over $10,000,000 in TWO days!!!!
If your reasoning for not including him is because he is behind in the national
polls, I suggest you look at the fact that he has won straw poll after straw
poll, and has a base of supporters like no other candidate has seen... Isn't
America supposed to be FOR the people BY the people? Well then the PEOPLE are
speaking!! why are you dismissing Ron Paul and all of the many many supporters he
has by excluding him from the debates?
You are basically saying that the Main Stream Media has final say in who will
be president. I agree there a many "blind" Americans that will
eat whatever "you" feed them but does that make it right? Your news
outlet is NOT fair and balanced, it CREATES the imbalance that has make this
country what it has become... if you can honestly say at the end of the day
that you are doing your BEST to be "fair and balanced" than so be it.
I feel sorry for you as a person, and what your moral fiber consists of...
If you do NOT believe what your doing is honest & fair by just going along
with "FOX news" because that's where you get your paycheck from
sounds more like a form of prostitution to me! "you don't believe in your
cause but you do it anyway..."
I was actually working on a military supply ship in the Persian gulf up until
about 3 months ago, then I walked away because I could no longer be a part of
an organization that was sending bombs and munitions to Iraq that were
tipped with depleted uranium!!! http://www.rense.com/general66/equals.htm
when I unearthed this little nugget of information I got sick to my stomach. http://www.thewe.cc/weplanet/news/depleted_uranium_iraq_afghanistan_balkans.html
When you look at the irony of the whole situation, we were over there "Iraq"
to rid Saddam
Hussein of weapons of mass destruction and yet we are USING WMDs
"DEPLETED URANIUM" IN Iraq!!! amazing... though I am not going to drag
this on and on I did want to leave you with this, We NEED change... The people
of America are waking up, slowly yes, but they ARE waking up, a perfect
indicator is for one is Google Video's list for MOST VIEWED videos are
the following: ZEITGEIST, The Movie America:
Freedom to Fascism
If you do nothing else today I suggest you google them and watch them if you
haven't already... and THEN you will see who is behind the curtain...And if you
decide not to, and decide to go on living in a comatose state, I say GOD BLESS
AMERICA! and that is your right!
Though if that is your choice I have 2 words for you,
"SLEEP WELL"
Micah Sanders
###
Dear Mr. Holland,
Due to the exclusion of Ron Paul in the New Hampshire debates, I will
be contacting all of the advertisers of FOX and informing them that I will
never purchase their products. I will encourage all of my friends and family to
do the same.
Even if Fox were to change their minds and include Ron
Paul in the New Hampshire debate, they would continue to cut his response time to questions
asked, limit his overall time and pose questions to him designed to denigrate
him. For this reason I will maintain this boycott permanently.
I respect the personal property rights of Fox in
choosing to report news as they please. I do not respect their
Stalin-like attempts to subvert the political process. In that vein I do not
respect the advertisers for their lack of due-diligence in properly
investigating the venues in which they advertise. To that extent I hope
to negatively impact the sales of these companies in the same fashion
that Fox News hopes to
negatively impact the the personal integrity of Ron Paul and the conditions related to his campaign for President.
To change the way things are done in the future and
not take responsibility for what has been done in the past creates the
opportunity for what has been done in the past to repeat itself. For my part, I
will not allow this to occur.
Sincerely,
Ed Karasinski
###
Given Ron Paul’s support in
New Hampshire and his recent historic
fundraising success, it is outrageous that Dr. Paul would be excluded.
Dr. Paul has consistently polled higher in New Hampshire than
some of the other candidates who have been invited. Tom Huff
###
I find it abhorrent that Dr. Ron Paul
has been excluded from the New Hampshire debate that FOX is sponsoring.
This is just another example of how the news media is attempting to
manipulate this election. Ron Paul has accumulated as much funding as the
other candidates – and has received these funds from average citizens – not
special interest groups / corporations...
He also has a strong base of supporters that are apparently not a part of the
phone polls that the news media (FOX) holds up as the reason he should not be
included... Shame on you!
The so-called “Media Proclaimed” front runners are all the same – more vanilla.
I truly hope that Dr. Paul circumvents your methods and has a good
showing in the “Live Free or Die” state...
Paul Ensign
###
To Fox News and all affiliates:
All of Dr. Ron Paul's supporters, and myself, strongly protest the exclusion of Dr. Ron Paul from the forum of republican candidates hosted by Fox News in New Hampshire on January 6, 2008. This censorship is undemocratic and is not becoming of Fox News. It is a shameful act.
We urge you to reconsider your faux pas and invite Dr. Ron Paul to the forum, otherwise your network may become better known as "FAUX NEWS". If this is not done very quickly, we will be contacting all your sponsors through our extensive network of supporters in Meet Up groups, Gigg it, and other internet forums.
Please invite Dr. Ron Paul to the
January 6 forum in New Hampshire and announce this correction very
shortly.
Respectfully,
Thomas Alajaji,
###
Dear Mr. Horner,
It appears you are taking messages while Teri Everett is on vacation. I didn't want to leave you in a position to not be aware of what has been sent to your colleagues at FOX:
It appears to me, from this attitude towards some candidates (Ron Paul), that we live in a controlled democracy where the right to run for public office is limited to some elite candidates, where others, regardless of the injustice leveled against them in an unlevel playing field by media, are not allowed to fully participate.
It would appear that our media has become little more than a controlled source of news similar to what someone would expect of a "banana republic".
Are you afraid of Paul's message?
Denise Holmes
Chicago, Ill.
###
Dear Rupert Murdoch & fellow neocons if applicable,
I used to watch Fox News for it's unbiased and honest reporting of both sides of any issue. There have been what I thought were "oversights" in your reporting in the past that I overlooked giving you and Fox News the benefit of the doubt thinking you were just not informed or ill informed whichever the case may be. But, in light of your exclusion of Ron Paul from the Pre NH primary debate, I have now come to the conclusion that you and your company are a biased and bought media that will sellout just like the others.
WHAT ARE YOU AFRAID OF?!! DOES TRUTH, LIBERTY AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS SCARE YOU?!!
I'm sure this will not be the only email you will receive on this subject. Ron Paul truth and liberty supporters are far and wide and growing! Truth being the operative word. I will continue to watch Fox news specifically for an explanation of your actions as I can no longer trust your reporting on anything else.
Disappointedly,
Clint Jones
###
Myself and other members of the
Republican National Commitee that are working diligently as Volunteers
here in Virginia to elect Ron Paul (He received more signatures than All
of the other candidates for the Feb. 12 Primary here in Virginia), find
it utterly shocking that Fox News would Exclude Dr. Paul from the NH
Primary Debate. To us he is more credible than Any of the other
(Business As Usual) candidates. I am hoping Fox
News will have a change of heart and include Dr. Paul and his message of
Liberty and Freedom. If thats not the case then we will seek more
Credible news sources.
Bob Kline
###
Mr. Murdoch,
I was very disappointed to discover that congressman Ron Paul
is to be excluded from the upcoming (January 6th) Republican presidential
debate to be held on the Fox News channel. While I normally appreciate Fox's
approach to the covering the news, I find this decision dumbfounding in the
light of the Fox stated core of value of, "We report, you decide."
Removing the voice of an intelligent, articulate and experienced (not to
mention, well funded) candidate such as Dr. Paul from the political discourse
is a clear contradiction to those values that your organization claims to
uphold.
I am asking that you speak to those members of your team who are responsible
for the organization of this particular debate and instruct them to immediately
extend an invitation to Dr. Paul.
Thank you for your time,
Michael DeGeus
###
Dear Fox employees,
My name is Thomas Fitzgerald, I am an active duty naval officer living in Suffolk, VA
and a registered Republican in my home state of west Virginia. I have
watched Foxnews as my primary source of news for the last five or six years,
mostly because I was tired of the liberal media bias shown by your big
competitor CNN. I have always smirked a little at your "Fair and
Balanced" slogan as I knew that your coverage on the whole was neither
fair nor balanced, but it does help counter the overall liberal media bias.
I would like to ask you to live up to your slogan and invite Representative
Ron Paul (R-Texas) to your New Hampshire GOP
Forum this Sunday. I understand what the polls say, but even if you want
to ignore the fact that there are a lot of people all over our country who are
excited supporters of Ron Paul and that his campaign is raising money
on a scale that rivals (or in many cases exceeds) that of the so called top
tier candidates, then consider inviting him so at least there will be someone
there that is offering real ideas.
To me the fact that we the people have allowed our government to become the
single largest debtor this planet has ever known is an utter
embarrassment. The only candidate from either party who is even
attempting to address and rectify this problem is Ron Paul. I have,
over the past several months, switched my TV news viewing more and more to MSNBC,
CNN, and CSPAN, especially after witnessing the utter disrespect your network
coverage continually heaps upon Ron Paul.
You attempt to be a voice for conservative minded people, but yet here is a
true conservative, both fiscally and socially, who doesn't just spout off
soundbites about cutting taxes and trying to reduce government spending, he has
been steadfastly trying to accomplish those things for 20 years.
Is membership in the Council for Foreign Relations a prerequisite for
attendance? I, like thousands of other Americans, will be exercising my
freedom, by boycotting your sponsors and I will be letting them know it.
I realize that your corporation is free to do what it wants in this matter, but
I think it is in your best interest to reverse your course and repair this
travesty you've created.
I also would like to pass along my sincere displeasure with Bill Kristol.
He continually says totally uninformed opinions that only serve to make him
(and you) look like a buffoon.
Thank you,
T.J. Fitzgerald
###
Dear Fox News
As a Canadian who watches your program, I was dismayed to find out that you have not invited Ron Paul to the New Hampshire Forum. Watching the election as it unfolds, Ron Paul is the only refreshing campaign among the others who are all saying the same things. A forum needs a wide assortment of views to be put forward and without Ron Paul, your forum will be like tasting 5 different variations of chocolate….after a few licks of the same flavor you’re begging for some vanilla. The American public (and the Republic) are owed the opportunity to here his views as his popularity is a world wide phenomena….one of your slogans is ‘We report…You Decide’….you might want to change it to “We don’t want you to vote for Ron Paul’
Mike Staffieri
###
Shame on you if the rumors are true that you would exclude him from the debate. He is one of the few candidates with guts & truly (truly) bold ideas, though those ideas simply ask that we abide by our own humble constitution. And, from a news perspective, he's certainly earned his spot.
Geof Narlee
East Walpole, MA
###
Hey, why not try to pressure the New HampshireGOP into excluding Fox News from the debate. You know, get another broadcaster that will not try to manipulate the outcome.
Just a thought :)
Dan Lindsay
Westminster, MD
###
I was saddened to hear that Ron Paul will be excluded from the candidates
forum to be broadcast by Fox News on January 6, 2008
in New Hampshire. I believe Ron Paul should be included. Is there
anything that can be done which will enable him to be included?
Sincerely,
Jeff Rappaport, CEO
Merlock, L.L.C.
###
Dear Mr Murdoch,
It is with deep concern I read the US
press reports about Fox's omission of Dr Ron Paul from the
forum of Republican candidates to be broadcast by Fox News on January
6, 2008.
I would like to say the following:
· The balance of any debate is the extremes of any opinion that are, not only tolerated, but freely expressed.
· The tenets of Freedom and Liberty demand that anyone with a singular passion can express themselves and do so without fear of censure or omission.
· Each citizen in the land of the free and the brave have the constitutional rights to self determination and freedom of expression.
· The US news media has the responsibility to inform and report news and opinion free from editorial input.
Mr Murdoch, your adopted country extends
you these same freedoms, support and embrace them. This liberty and freedom is
the envy of the world.
Sincerely Yours
ark Thompson, Australia citizen
A friend of the United States of America
####
Sean,
Please set aside any animosity you may have for Ron Paul and
work to include him in the debate in NH. You have
the weight with the network to make this happen. I also believe you
have the weight with the network to have Ron Paul
"excluded" as well. I ask this politely of you as one American
to another. I understand that his ratings are not as high as other
candidates, but I would like for his message to be heard. I am aware that
you carry a load of acrimony for him, but try and put that aside for the sake
of balance in reporting.
Let Ron Paul be
heard. Worts and all, nobody is perfect. He may have some
uncommon approaches, but he has some really good ideas about how
to run our country.
Rex Harris
Box
Springs, GA
###
Dear Mr. Murdoch
As an average
and representative American, when I watch Fox News report on
the events of the day, not only do I feel that the news is a sham, but the
election process as well. Your exclusion of Dr. Paul from the debates
does not surprise me, it disgusts me. I find it hard to believe that you still
have advertisers. Keep on with the vision. Keep doing exactly what you are
doing. It amuses me to imagine you with polls that state for your
advertisers that you actually have viewers. I wonder how long that will work.
Carry on. I am starting to find this farce amusing. It wakes people up.
Susan Maple
###
I hear Ron Paul is being banned from the Fox Presidential debate. Is this what you call "Fair and Balanced"? I am so disappointed in you!
David Allen
###
Thanks to Fox's exclusion
of Ron Paul he will gain
valuable publicity and more voters. Fox will find that because the
internet is more inclusionary than the news media the big story of this
election will be how the internet helped Ron Paul win the presidential election.
All our troops will come home to protect our own borders,our civil
liberties will be restored and the
news media will slink to the background. Thank you Fox.
Doug Ward
Grover
Beach,Ca
###
Mr. Murdoch, Friends, and Family
Having watched some of the shenanigans of Fox reporters and commentators, it is no wonder that Ron Paul supporters are angry, suspicious, and skeptical. You have not treated Dr. Paul with the same degree of courtesy and respect that you have afforded to virtually every other candidate. Your plans to exclude Dr. Paul from your Jan. 6th NH Forum appears to be yet another indication of your bias against Dr. Paul. It would be difficult to come up with a “credible” rationale for excluding Dr. Paul from the NH Forum particularly since most pundits are predicting that Paul will have a double-digit showing in the NH primary and is quite likely to finish ahead of three “major” candidates—Thompson, Huckabee, and Giuliani.
Charles Brown,
Parker, TX
###