Weblog Authoring Tools Market Share

February 16, 2005 | Category: Analysis / Strategy

Elise Bauer has posted a comprehensive analysis of Weblog Authoring Tools market share. As with RSS Aggregator market share stats, there are a lot of caveats. But much can be gleaned from Elise's post, which is a continuation of an analysis she did in August 2004. The data is gathered from what Elise calls "Google Share", which is a formula based on Google indexes of weblog authoring tools (focusing on US users).

Some Web 2.0 angles on this

- The top 3 tools are Blogger (35%), LiveJournal (20%), and TypePad (18%, with a comment by Elise that TypePad is underrepresented due to 30% of their users being "password-protected, non-indexed blogs"). The top 3 make up a staggering 73% - or nearly 3/4 - of the weblog authoring tool market! Note also that the top 3 are all browser-based authoring systems.

- What most surprised me is that Movable Type and Wordpress have reduced to 3% and 2% market share respectively. They were 7% and 4% respectively back in August 2004. So they've dropped share from 11% to only 5% of the total. Yet how much buzz and whuffie do those two systems enjoy among geeks? Much more than that.

This indicates that MT and Wordpress do not have a bright future as mainstream consumer tools. However as Elise commented, MT and Wordpress "may find a home in corporate deployments however, as these customers have the means and the need to host their own weblogs, rather than use a third party service."

- There's a really cool graphic called "Growth Share Matrix", which looks much like a planetary system. If so, then Blogger (owned by Google) is the Sun and LJ and TypePad are Jupiter and Saturn. So MT and Wordpress are Earth and Mars? :-)

- Elise comments that "Typepad continues to be an anomaly. Trailing only Blogger in both share and growth, Typepad - a fee-based service - is gaining share in a field of free services."

I attribute this to the customization features that TypePad offers. Both Blogger and LJ have very limited customization functionality, and MT and Wordpress are generally too difficult for average non-technical users to customize. So TypePad offers a unique service (combining customization with ease-of-use) that is obviously well valued in the market.

- Six Apart, which owns LiveJournal, TypePad and MT, has over 40% market share, making it "the number one provider of weblog tools and services". But both Microsoft and Google have potential to grow their share significantly, so SixApart will have their work cut out keeping that lead (assuming they don't get acquired themselves).

- I have to admit to some surprise that Blogger is so dominant in these stats (the conspiracy theorist in me may be inclined to point out that this analysis is based on Google's data, so... but nah!). Elise says that Blogger is "growing much faster than the average of all of the tools, and twice as fast as the Technorati Index", but TypePad isn't far behind in terms of growth.

Why does Blogger's growth and number 1 position surprise me? Because Google hasn't put any effort into developing or promoting Blogger this past year. What happens when they finally do start to "aggressively pursue" (using Elise's phrasing) this market?! Maybe The Sun metaphor I used will turn out to be appropriate in the long run...

Those are some initial thoughts (in two takes). Thanks Elise for posting such a detailed analysis. Interesting times...

Comments

# 1

I think Blogger's growth is mainly down to its pricing - last time I looked into it in any detail you had to pay for Typepad, and had to get an invite to join LiveJournal. When you're just starting out blogging you don't necessarily want to take on a financial commitment, and if you aren't doing anything too advanced then you'll probably never outgrow Blogger.

Posted by Adrian McEwen at February 16, 2005 10:13 PM

# 2

Search for Blog, what do you get as the number one result? Blogger. I'm willing to bet that's why it is number one despite no real marketing push from google.

Posted by ramanan at February 17, 2005 01:02 AM

# 3

The problem I have with this analysis is that it's comparing apples and oranges. Blogger, LiveJournal, and TypePad are all *hosted services*. They're for a different market than MT or WordPress. Most people don't have the time or the inclination to have their own hosting account.

Furthermore, marketshare doesn't really effect WordPress' future as a consumer tool. It doesn't have any sales pressures because it's open source. As long as there's an active developer community around it, it will continue to exist - and there's a very active WordPress developer community.

It's essentially like saying that Hotmail or Gmail are stealing marketshare from Outlook. Yes, many people use web-based email clients rather than desktop ones these days, but they're really not in the same market.

Posted by Jay Reding at February 17, 2005 06:29 AM

# 4

Yes the name 'Blogger', its price (free), its history as the first popular blog tool and its ease-of-use all contribute to its success. I just wonder how much more popular it will become if/when Google starts to stamp its brand on it.

Jay, it's all oranges. Some of the oranges are consumer-oriented ones (Blogger, TypePad), some of them are better suited to the enterprise or geeks (MT, Wordpress). But they're all still oranges... er, I mean weblog authoring tools - aren't they?

Posted by Richard MacManus at February 17, 2005 06:59 AM

# 5

The methodology being used is significantly flawed. Resulting in figures that are heavily favour blog hosting services.

Take Wordpress for example.

By searching for the URL, the results returned have to contain URL as plain text rather than a hyperlink. It is uncommon on a Wordpress blog to have "http://wordpress.org" as plain text. I was unable to reproduce the 5,000 results that were claimed in the report, 56,000 was the lowest I could get.

The common phrase that people running Wordpress use is "powered by wordpress", which returns over 3 million results.

It is similar for Movable Type if you search for "powered by movable type" it returns 1.5 million results. Significantly more than the 81,000 results under her methodology.

Yet blog hosting services it is more likely that individual blogs will be hosted under the main URL of the service. Which will likely inflate the results for hosting services. Although it is hard to be sure as she does not detail her methods exactly.

Posted by Richie g at February 17, 2005 10:28 AM

# 6

I think you may have a point Richie. Elise defined "Google Share" as basically the following:

1. The sum of the number of websites linking to a weblog tool URL, and

2. The number of websites containing the URL.

MT and Wordpress users are more likely to remove any trace of the URL - I myself only mention that I'm powered by MT in my 'About this Site' page.

See also:
http://www.platinax.co.uk/blogs/brian/archives/
2005/02/blog_metrics.html

The question is: how much is MT and Wordpress being underrepresented by?

Posted by Richard MacManus at February 17, 2005 11:52 AM

Post a comment
HTML is not enabled










Remember personal info?