Andrew Sullivan
Tell us what you think of the new Times Online
It tells you something about the state of the American right that Rudy Giuliani is having a very hard time deciding whether to run for the Republican nomination in 2008. He either has the highest ratings of the plausible candidates among Republican voters, or near the highest.
His image will for ever be fused with the heroism of the response to 9/11. His legacy is the ravishing revival of New York City in the 1990s. Nobody doubts his effectiveness as a manager, or the charisma he brings to the political arena. No other Republican has his star power. And yet he has been inching only tentatively towards a real decision, and still hasn’t pulled the lever.
There are various plausible explanations for Giuliani’s equivocation. Some argue that the New York tabloids are sitting on a pile of sleaze to be hurled in his general direction once he hits the truly big time. It’s plausible. You don’t get to turn New York City around without knowing and persuading many unsavoury urban characters. It would not be a shock to discover that some of that rubbed off.
He’s also making a small fortune in the consultancy business and the speaking circuit — money he’d forfeit in a presidential run and clients who might not like the public scrutiny involved. Besides, he’s already a hero. Why ruin it with a campaign that would only expose all his faults, errors and flaws?
All of these factors might be at play in Giuliani’s mind. But the lukewarm response to him from the party’s base cannot be a plus. Here’s a quote of last week from a key leader of the religious right, Tony Perkins, head of the Family Research Council: “He’s the frontrunner but it’s kind of like here in DC, you drive over the Potomac [river] at night and it looks beautiful but if you get down near it you certainly wouldn’t want to take anything out of it and eat it. It’s polluted; it’s got problems.”
A more elevated expression of the base’s discomfort came from Terry Jeffrey last week. Jeffrey is an editor at Ronald Reagan’s favourite journal, Human Events and wrote a column for National Review, the leading conservative magazine, that politely described Giuliani as anathema to conservatism.
You might well rub your eyes. Giuliani is for low taxes, law and order (often at the expense of civil liberties) and strong defence. As a prosecutor, he went after white-collar crooks like Michael Milken and Marc Rich as well as mafia hoods. He has a sterling antiterrorist record. In 1995 he famously ejected the Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat from a concert at the Lincoln Center in New York because Arafat had not been formally invited. “Maybe we should wake people up to the way this terrorist is being romanticised,” Giuliani explained.
You’d think this record would count as “conservative”. You’d think this colourful, capable, intelligent man would be the Republican party’s dream candidate. He was Time magazine’s person of the year in 2001. He has been called “America’s mayor”.
After a presidency criticised for incompetence, Giuliani is a details-oriented, results-driven manager. Seconds after his inauguration, Americans would feel safer.
But read Terry Jeffrey’s ideological indictment: “Giuliani’s positions on abortion and marriage disqualify him as a conservative because they annihilate the link between the natural law and man-made laws. Indeed, they use man-made law to promote and protect acts that violate the natural law.”
Giuliani’s heretical positions on abortion and marriage are as follows: he believes that abortion should be legal and that gay couples should be able to enter civil unions (but not civil marriage). The evangelical base of the Republicans believes that any civil recognition of gay couples is an attack on the family and that any defence of the right to a legal abortion is anathema.
For good measure, Giuliani is also fine with embryonic stem-cell research and mellow on immigration. So he would be to the right of David Cameron (he’d shoot a hoodie before he hugged one), but he is far too far to the left for the vocal elements of the Republican base.
Then there’s the personal life. Giuliani has been married three times. He divorced his second wife while having an affair with a staffer whom he then married. It got ugly for a while. Worse: during his estrangement from his second wife, he lived in the house of a gay couple who were friends. He has also dressed in drag on several occasions. You can YouTube a clip of him in full drag being courted by Donald Trump in a department store. New Yorkers loved it. But it doesn’t go down too well in South Carolina.
Or does it? The polling is extremely clear: Giuliani, for all his heretical tendencies, is still ahead of every other Republican candidate. Moreover, a recent Gallup poll found only 23% of Republican voters deeming him “unacceptable” compared with 41% saying the same for John McCain. The salient question to ask is: if Giuliani is so abhorrent to conservatives, why is he polling so well?
We don’t know the answer to that yet. It’s hard to gauge a campaign’s viability before it has begun. My view is that the managers and spokesmen of the base may be misreading the real mood of the evangelical rank and file. They’re more pragmatic than their leaders. If Hillary Clinton is the alternative, many Republicans will overlook Giuliani’s social moderation.
Moreover, there is a growing sense even among hardline conservatives that they may have overreached badly these past few years. Their stridency on abortion, gays, stem-cell research and end-of-life issues has begun to lose them many voters in the suburbs, the Midwest and the Mountain West. They are worried that the thumping loss in the midterm elections of 2006 was not a blip but the turning of a tide against them.
If they believe that, maybe Giuliani is the perfect antidote. Maybe he could rid the Republicans of their metastasising image as a Southern, intolerant and corrupt machine, and rebuild a more national and inclusive Republican party.
Or maybe, of course, his candidacy could be the final coup de grâce for a coalition already sinking under its own divisions. We don’t know yet — and neither does Rudy. So we wait for him, as he waits for others, and as the 2008 campaign waits for no one.
Andrew Sullivan is an author, academic and journalist. He holds a PhD from Harvard in political science, and is a former editor of The New Republic. His 1995 book, Virtually Normal: An Argument About Homosexuality, became one of the best-selling books on gay rights. He has been a regular columnist for The Sunday Times since the 1990s, and also writes for Time and other publications.
Our Feedback Editor answers your queries and shines light on the mysteries of newspaper production
Send us your views on the issues and stories of the day - visit our Debate section here
Rachel Campbell-Johnston at Tate Britain for the new Hogarth exhibition
Cancer can and will be beaten
2003
£27,999
Inside M25
2005
£26,995
The Midlands
2006
£96,995
SE England
1997
£29,995
Inside M25
£30-39,999
London
£60-70K + benefits/bonus
North Yorkshire
£
£83K + benefits
Wellingborough Homes
Northamptonshire
£35-40K
Langley Grammar School
Berkshire
A much improved character cottage
£
£595,000
Two bedroom Victorian conversion
£
£275,000
Residential development site with planning permission
£
£1,500,000
Prestigious apartment close to Regents Park
£
£1,000,000
Graythwaite Manor Hotel - now under new ownership
Winter breaks from £40
Stunning, spacious 3-bed villa on West Coast
POA
4-bed ski chalet
POA
Luxury private villa in beautiful Kalami Bay
POA
Contact our advertising teamfor advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy. To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here © Copyright Times Newspapers Ltd
I happen to support Rudy's views on abortion, gay rights (although I'm in favor of gay marriage, not just civil unions) and gun control. However, I would vote for him just because of the way he spit in the face of the loathsome Yasser Arafat and told Saudi Prince Alaweed where he could shove his $10 million check following the attacks on 9/11.
Tessa, Huntington, NY,
"Giuliani is for low taxes, law and order (often at the expense of civil liberties)"
What a joke and baseless accusation. Please name the "civil liberties" you refer to.
darwin, Norfolk , VA
Barack Obama is well to the right of Cameron.
Russell, London,
Because they don't know what New Yorkers do about his treatment of his ex wife, involvement with questionable characters (Bernie Kerik, etc) and many bad decesions that made 9/11 worse, like putting the Emergency Cammand Center in the World Trade Center in a building that stored diesel fuel. See what his numbers are for the city and compare them with those from outsider NY.
Rick Christel, New York, New York
Giuliani is polling so well despte his awfulness because this is the same country that elected the even more horrible George W. Bush to office.
Understand now?
Frederick, New York City, USA
So, Rudy Giuliani is to the right of David Cameron? Surely that can't be very difficult?
Herbert Thornton, Victoria, Canada
Guiliani would be a disaster as president. Three marriages? Pro-choice? Pro gay marriage? If he gets the GOP nomination in 08 it would signal a complete refuation of the core principles of the Republican party. A Guiliani candidacy would lead the rank and file, i.e., evangelical Christians, to stay home as they did in 2006. The result? Madame President Hillary Clinton. For the sake of our country, we can only hope.
freedomfighter, pittsburgh, PA
Well Eric, you are no George Orwell and most of us in the rest of the World do think that the New Yorkers are bright, sophisticated and intellectual in a way that the rest of you are not. In fact many of you on the religious right look and sound quite as scary as the fundamental Islamists you have provoked and stirred up by your ridiculous antics over the past many years. If the Republicans miss out on Guiliani and let in the awful lesser Clinton, then they deserve to stay in the wilderness for ever.
Frankland Macdonald Wood, Sansepolcro 52037, Italy
9/11. that's leadership.
jeff, chicago, usa
Basically I am an Independent and a political junkie. Now that Rudy has declared his candidacy, I've gotta say that I hope he will be our next President given the field of hopefuls in both parties at this point in time. Hillary? PU. Obama? Not a chance. It's too early in the game to be picking winners, but if I was voting today (or tomorrow or next week.) Unless it would be Rudy Guiliani without breaking a sweat.
Edie Goldman, Carmel, CA