Feminism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  (Redirected from Feminist)
Jump to: navigation, search
International Women's Day rally in Dhaka, Bangladesh, organized by the National Women Workers Trade Union Centre on March 8, 2005
International Women's Day rally in Dhaka, Bangladesh, organized by the National Women Workers Trade Union Centre on March 8, 2005

Feminism comprises a number of social, cultural and political movements, theories and moral philosophies concerned with gender inequalities and equal rights for women.

According to some, the history of feminism consists of three waves.[1][2] The first wave was in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the second was in the 1960s and 1970s and the third extends from the 1990s to the present.[3] Feminist Theory developed from the feminist movement.[4][5] It takes a number of forms in a variety of disciplines such as feminist geography, feminist history and feminist literary criticism.

Feminism has altered aspects of Western society, ranging from culture to law. Feminist political activists have been concerned with issues such as a woman's right of contract and property, a woman's right to bodily integrity and autonomy (especially on matters such as reproductive rights, including the right to abortion, access to contraception and quality prenatal care); for protection from domestic violence; against sexual harassment and rape;[6][7] for workplace rights, including maternity leave and equal pay; and against other forms of discrimination.[8][9][10]

Throughout much of its history, most of the leaders of feminist social and political movements, as well as many feminist theorists, have been predominantly middle-class white women from western Europe and North America. However, at least since Sojourner Truth's 1851 speech to US Feminists, women of other races have proposed alternative feminisms. This trend accelerated in the 1960s with the Civil Rights movement in the United States and the collapse of European colonialism in Africa, the Caribbean, parts of Latin America and Southeast Asia. Since that time, women in former European colonies and the Third World have proposed alternative "post-colonial" and "Third World" feminisms as well.[11] Some Postcolonial feminists, such as Chandra Talpade Mohanty, are critical of Western feminism for being ethnocentric.[12] Black feminists, such as Angela Davis and Alice Walker, share this view.[13]

Since the 1980s, standpoint feminists have argued that the feminist movement should address global issues (such as rape, incest, and prostitution) and culturally specific issues (such as female genital mutilation in some parts of Africa and the Middle East and glass ceiling practices that impede women's advancement in developed economies) in order to understand how gender inequality interacts with racism, homophobia, lesbophobia, colonialism, and classism in a "matrix of domination."[14][15] Other feminists have argued that gendered and sexed identities, such as "man" and "woman", are social constructs meaning that some gender roles are socially conditioned rather than innate.[16][17][18]

Contents

[edit] History of feminism

A 1932 Soviet poster for International Women's Day.
A 1932 Soviet poster for International Women's Day.
Main article: History of feminism

Feminists have divided the movement's history into three "waves". The first wave refers to that of the nineteenth through early twentieth centuries, which dealt mainly with the Suffrage movement. The second wave (1960s-1980s) attempted to right legal and cultural inequalities. The third wave (1990s-present) is seen as both a continuation and a response to the perceived failures of the second wave.[3]

[edit] First-wave feminism

Main article: First-wave feminism

First-wave feminism refers to a period of feminist activity during the nineteenth century and early twentieth century in the United Kingdom and the United States. Originally it focused on the promotion of equal contract and property rights for women and the opposition to chattel marriage and ownership of married women (and their children) by their husbands. However, by the end of the nineteenth century, activism focused primarily on gaining political power, particularly the right of women's suffrage. Yet, feminists such as Voltairine de Cleyre and Margaret Sanger were still active in campaigning for women's sexual, reproductive, and economic rights at this time.[19]

In Britain the Suffragettes campaigned for the women's vote. In 1918 the Representation of the People Act 1918 was passed granting the vote to women over the age of 30 who owned houses. In 1928 this was extended to all women over eighteen.[20] In the United States leaders of this movement included Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony, who each campaigned for the abolition of slavery prior to championing women's right to vote. Other important leaders include Lucy Stone, Olympia Brown, and Helen Pitts. American first-wave feminism involved a wide range of women, some belonging to conservative Christian groups (such as Frances Willard and the Woman's Christian Temperance Union), others resembling the diversity and radicalism of much of second-wave feminism (such as Matilda Joslyn Gage and the National Woman Suffrage Association). In the United States first-wave feminism is considered to have ended with the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution (1919), granting women the right to vote.The term first wave, was coined retrospectively after the term second-wave feminism began to be used to describe a newer feminist movement that focused as much on fighting social and cultural inequalities as political inequalities.[19][21][22][23][24]

[edit] Second-wave feminism

Main article: Second-wave feminism
Original paperback cover from Betty Friedan's The Feminine Mystique (1963)
Original paperback cover from Betty Friedan's The Feminine Mystique (1963)

Second-wave feminism refers to a period of feminist activity beginning in the early 1960s and lasting through the late 1980s and, as Imelda Whelehan suggests, it was a continuation of the earlier phase of feminism involving the suffragettes in the UK and USA.[25] Second-wave feminism has existed continuously since that time and coexists with what is termed third-wave feminism. Second-wave feminists saw cultural and political inequalities as inextricably linked and encouraged women to understand aspects of their personal lives as deeply politicized as well as reflective of a sexist structure of power. With her essay "The Personal is Political", Carol Hanisch coined a slogan that became synonymous with the second wave.[6] If first-wave feminism focused on rights such as suffrage, second-wave feminism was largely concerned with other issues of equality, such as the end to discrimination.[19]

[edit] Women's Liberation in the USA

The phrase "Women’s Liberation" was first used in the United States in 1964[26] and first appeared in print in 1966.[27] By 1968, although the term Women’s Liberation Front appeared in the magazine Ramparts, it was starting to refer to the whole women’s movement.[28] Bra-burning also became associated with the movement.[29] One of the most vocal critics of the women's liberation movement has been bell hooks, who argues that the movement's glossing over of race and class was part of its failure to address "the issues that divided women". She has highlighted the lack of minority voices in the women's movement.[30]

[edit] The Feminine Mystique
Main article: The Feminine Mystique

Betty Friedan's The Feminine Mystique (1963) criticized the idea that women could only find fulfillment through childrearing and homemaking. According to Friedan's obituary in the The New York Times, The Feminine Mystique “ignited the contemporary women's movement in 1963 and as a result permanently transformed the social fabric of the United States and countries around the world” and “is widely regarded as one of the most influential nonfiction books of the 20th century.”[31] In the book Friedan hypothesizes that women are victims of a false belief system that requires them to find identity and meaning in their lives through their husbands and children. Such a system causes women to completely lose their identity in that of their family. Friedan specifically locates this system among post-World War II middle-class suburban communities. At the same time, America's post-war economic boom had led to the development of new technologies that were supposed to make household work less difficult, but that often had the result of making women's work less meaningful and valuable.[32]

[edit] Third-wave feminism

Main article: Third-wave feminism
Poster about the Anita Hill case
Poster about the Anita Hill case

Third-wave feminism began in the early 1990s, arising as a response to perceived failures of the second wave and also as a response to the backlash against initiatives and movements created by the second wave. Third-wave feminism seeks to challenge or avoid what it deems the second wave's essentialist definitions of femininity, which (according to them) over-emphasize the experiences of upper middle-class white women. A post-structuralist interpretation of gender and sexuality is central to much of the third wave's ideology. Third-wave feminists often focus on "micro-politics" and challenge the second wave's paradigm as to what is, or is not, good for females.[19][33][34][35] The third wave has its origins in the mid-1980s. Feminist leaders rooted in the second wave like Gloria Anzaldua, bell hooks, Chela Sandoval, Cherrie Moraga, Audre Lorde, Maxine Hong Kingston, and many other black feminists, called for a new subjectivity in feminism. They sought to negotiate prominent space within feminist thought for consideration of race-related subjectivities.[34][36][37]

In 1991, Anita Hill accused Clarence Thomas, a man nominated to the United States Supreme Court, of sexual harassment. Thomas denied the accusations and, after extensive debate, the United States Senate voted 52-48 in favor of Thomas.[34][36][37] In response to this case, Rebecca Walker published an article entitled "Becoming the Third Wave" in which she stated, "I am not a post-feminism feminist. I am the third-wave."[2]

Third-wave feminism also consists of debates between difference feminists, such as Carol Gilligan, who believe that there are important differences between the sexes (which may or may not be inherent, but which cannot be ignored), and those who believe that there are no essential differences between the sexes (social roles are due to conditioning).[38] Gilligan's book In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development (1982) criticized Lawrence Kohlberg's research on the moral development of children, which at that time showed that girls on average reached a lower level of moral development than did boys. She pointed out that the participants in Kohlberg's basic study were mostly male, and that Kohlberg's scoring method tended to favor a principled way of reasoning, which is more common to boys, over a relational ethics, which is more common to girls. Kohlberg revised his scoring methods as a result of Gilligan's critique, after which boys and girls scored unevenly.[38] In the opening chapter of her book, she demonstrates that female psychology has been considered inferior because it does not correspond with male psychology.[38]

[edit] Post-feminism

Main article: Post-feminism

Post-feminism describes a range of viewpoints reacting to feminism. The term was first used in the 1980s to signify a backlash against second-wave feminism. It now denotes a wide range of theories, some of which argue that postmodernism has destabilized the notion of a universal femininity, and take critical approach to previous feminist discourses, including challenges to the second wave's ideas.[39] Other post-feminists contend that feminism is no longer relevant to today's society.[40] Amelia Jones has written that the post-feminist texts which emerged in the 1980s and 1990s portrayed second-wave feminism as a monolithic entity and criticized it using generalizations.[41]

One of the earliest uses of the term was in Susan Bolotin's 1982 article "Voices of the Post-Feminist Generation," published in New York Times Magazine. This article was based on a number of interviews with women who largely agreed with the goals of feminism, but did not identify as feminists.[42]

Some contemporary feminists, such as Katha Pollitt or Nadine Strossen, consider feminism to hold simply that "women are people". Views that separate the sexes rather than unite them are considered by these writers to be sexist rather than feminist.[43][44]

Christina Hoff Sommers, in her 1994 book Who Stole Feminism? How Women Have Betrayed Women, considers much of modern academic feminist theory and the feminist movement, which she says is aimed at the abolition of gender roles, to be gynocentric and misandrist. She labels this "Gender feminism" and proposes "Equity feminism"—an ideology that aims for full civil and legal equality. She argues that while the feminists she designates as gender feminists advocate preferential treatment and portray women as victims, equity feminism provides a viable alternative form of feminism.[45] These descriptions and her other work have caused Hoff Sommers to be described as an antifeminist by other feminists.[46][47]

Susan Faludi in her book Backlash: The Undeclared War Against American Women, argues that a backlash against second wave feminism in the 1980s has successfully re-defined feminism through its terms. She argues that it constructed the women's liberation movement as the source of many of the problems alleged to be plaguing women in the late 1980s. She also argues that many of these problems are illusory, constructed by the media without reliable evidence. According to Faludi, the backlash is also a historical trend, recurring when it appears that women have made substantial gains in their efforts to obtain equal rights.[48]

[edit] French feminism

Main article: French feminism

French feminism usually refers to a branch of feminist thinking from a group of feminists in France from the 1970s to the 1990s. French feminism, compared to Anglophone feminism, is distinguished by an approach which is at once more philosophical and more literary. Its writings tend to be effusive and metaphorical, rather than pragmatic. It is less concerned with immediate political doctrine, or "materialism", and generally focuses on theories of "the body".[49]

People of interest

[edit] Simone de Beauvoir

The Second Sex (1949) is a major feminist work by Simone de Beauvoir
The Second Sex (1949) is a major feminist work by Simone de Beauvoir
Main article: Simone de Beauvoir

The French author and philosopher Simone de Beauvoir wrote novels; monographs on philosophy, politics, and social issues; essays, biographies, and an autobiography. She is now best known for her metaphysical novels, including She Came to Stay and The Mandarins, and for her 1949 treatise The Second Sex, a detailed analysis of women's oppression and a foundational tract of contemporary feminism. It sets out a feminist existentialism which prescribes a moral revolution. As an existentialist, de Beauvoir accepts Jean-Paul Sartre's precept that existence precedes essence; hence "one is not born a woman, but becomes one". Her analysis focuses on the concept of The Other; that is, is the social construction of Woman as the quintessential Other that Beauvoir identifies as fundamental to women's oppression.[16] She argues that women have historically been considered deviant and abnormal. She submits that even Mary Wollstonecraft considered men to be the ideal toward which women should aspire. Beauvoir says that this attitude has limited women's success by maintaining the perception that they are a deviation from the normal—outsiders attempting to emulate "normality". For feminism to move forward, this assumption must be set aside.[16]

[edit] 1970s–present

French feminists approach feminism with a the concept of écriture féminine (which translates as female, or feminine, writing).[39] Helene Cixous argues that writing and philosophy are phallocentric and along with other French feminists such as Luce Irigaray emphasize "writing from the body" as a subversive exercise.[39] Julia Kristeva's work on the semiotic and abjection influenced feminist literary criticism in particular. However, as Elizabeth Wright points out, "none of these French feminists align themselves with the feminist movement as it appeared in the Anglophone world".[39][50] Bracha L. Ettinger contends that the specificity of the female body allows it to articulate a "matrixial trans-subjectivity" which has specific aesthetic and ethical implications.[51][52]

[edit] Feminist theory

Main article: Feminist theory
Related terms:
Feminist history,
Feminist geography,
Feminist sexology,
Feminist economics,
Psychoanalytic feminism,
Feminist philosophy,
Feminist anthropology,
Feminist film theory,
Feminist literary criticism

Feminist theory is the extension of feminism into theoretical or philosophical fields. It encompasses work in a variety of disciplines, including anthropology, sociology, economics, women's studies, literary criticism,[53][54] art history,[55] psychoanalysis[56] and philosophy.[57][58] Feminist theory aims to understand gender inequality and focuses on gender politics, power relations, and sexuality. While providing a critique of these social and political relations, much of feminist theory also focuses on the promotion of women's rights and interests. Themes explored in feminist theory include discrimination, stereotyping, objectification (especially sexual objectification), oppression, and patriarchy.[5][4]

Elaine Showalter describes the phased development of feminist theory. The first she calls "feminist critique", in which the feminist reader examines the ideologies behind literary phenomena. The second Showalter calls "gynocritics", in which the "woman is producer of textual meaning" including "the psychodynamics of female creativity; linguistics and the problem of a female language; the trajectory of the individual or collective female literary career [and] literary history". The last phase she calls "gender theory", in which the "ideological inscription and the literary effects of the sex/gender system" are explored".[59] This model has been criticized by Toril Moi who sees it as an essentialist and deterministic model for female subjectivity and for failing to account for the situation of women outside the West.[49]

[edit] Feminism's many forms

Several subtypes of feminist ideology have developed over the years; some of the major subtypes are listed below.

[edit] Liberal feminism

Betty Friedan in 1960
Betty Friedan in 1960
Main article: Liberal feminism

Liberal feminism asserts the equality of men and women through political and legal reform. It is an individualistic form of feminism, which focuses on women’s ability to show and maintain their equality through their own actions and choices. Liberal feminism uses the personal interactions between men and women as the place from which to transform society. According to liberal feminists, all women are capable of asserting their ability to achieve equality, therefore it is possible for change to happen without altering the structure of society. Issues important to liberal feminists include reproductive and abortion rights, sexual harassment, voting, education, "equal pay for equal work", affordable childcare, affordable health care, and bringing to light the frequency of sexual and domestic violence against women.[60]

People of interest
Organizations of interest
Closely aligned with

[edit] Radical feminism

Main article: Radical feminism

Radical feminism sees the capitalist sexist hierarchy as the defining feature of women’s oppression. Radical feminists believe that women can free themselves only when have done away with what they consider an inherently oppressive and dominating system. Radical feminists feel that there is a male-based authority and power structure and that it is responsible for oppression and inequality, and that as long as the system and its values are in place, society will not be able to be reformed in any significant way. Radical feminists see capitalism as one of the most important barriers to ending oppression. Most radical feminists see no alternatives other than the total uprooting and reconstruction of society in order to achieve their goals.[61]

Separatist feminism is one form of radical feminism. It does not support heterosexual relationships because its proponents argue that the sexual disparities between men and women are unresolvable. Separatist feminists generally do not feel that men can make positive contributions to the feminist movement and that even well-intentioned men replicate patriarchal dynamics.[62] Author Marilyn Frye describes separatist feminism as "separation of various sorts or modes from men and from institutions, relationships, roles and activities that are male-defined, male-dominated, and operating for the benefit of males and the maintenance of male privilege — this separation being initiated or maintained, at will, by women".[63]

People of interest

[edit] Sex-positive feminism

Susie Bright in 2007
Susie Bright in 2007
Main article: Sex-positive feminism

Both the sex-positive and sex-negative forms of present-day feminism can trace their roots to early radical feminism. Some feminists joined the sex-positive feminist movement in response to anti-pornography feminists, such as Catharine MacKinnon, Andrea Dworkin, Robin Morgan and Dorchen Leidholdt, who argued that heterosexual pornography was a central cause of women's oppression.[64] Sex-positive feminism, sometimes known as pro-sex feminism, sex-radical feminism, or sexually liberal feminism, is a movement that was formed in order to address issues of women's sexual pleasure, sex work, and inclusive gender identities. The initial period of intense debate and acrimony between sex-positive and anti-pornography feminists during the early 1980s is often referred to as the Feminist Sex Wars. Other, less academic, sex-positive feminists became involved not in opposition to other feminists, but in direct response to what they saw as patriarchal control of sexuality, such as the organization Feminists for Free Expression.

Ellen Willis's 1981 essay, "Lust Horizons: Is the Women's Movement Pro-Sex?" is the origin of the term, pro-sex feminism. In it, she argues against feminists making alliances with the political right in opposition to pornography and prostitution, as occurred, for example, during the Meese Commission hearings in the United States. Willis argues for a feminism that embraces sexual freedom, including men's sexual freedom, rather than one that condemns pornography, consensual BDSM, and in some cases sexual intercourse and fellatio.[65]

People of interest

[edit] Anarcha-feminism

Another offshoot of radical feminism is anarcha-feminism (also called anarchist feminism or anarcho-feminism), an ideology which combines feminist and anarchist beliefs. Anarcha-feminists view patriarchy as a manifestation of hierarchy, believing that the fight against patriarchy is an essential part of the class struggle and the anarchist struggle against the state.[66] Anarcha-feminists such as Susan Brown see the anarchist struggle as a necessary component of the feminist struggle. In Brown's words, "anarchism is a political philosophy that opposes all relationships of power, it is inherently feminist".[67] Recently, Wendy McElroy has defined a position (she describes it as "ifeminism" or "individualist feminism") that combines feminism with anarcho-capitalism or libertarianism, arguing that a pro-capitalist, anti-state position is compatible with an emphasis on equal rights and empowerment for women.[68] Individualist anarchist-feminism has grown from the US-based individualist anarchism movement.[69]

[edit] Black feminism

Angela Davis speaking at the University of Alberta on 28 March 2006
Angela Davis speaking at the University of Alberta on 28 March 2006
Main articles: Black feminism and Womanism

Black feminism argues that sexism, class oppression, and racism are inextricably bound together.[70] Forms of feminism that strive to overcome sexism and class oppression but ignore race can discriminate against many people, including women, through racial bias. Black feminists argue that the liberation of black women entails freedom for all people, since it would require the end of racism, sexism, and class oppression.[71] One of the theories that evolved out of this movement was Alice Walker's Womanism. It emerged after the early feminist movements that were led specifically by white women who advocated social changes such as woman’s suffrage. These movements were largely white middle-class movements and ignored oppression based on racism and classism. Alice Walker and other Womanists pointed out that black women experienced a different and more intense kind of oppression from that of white women.[13]

Angela Davis was one of the first people who articulated an argument centered around the intersection of race, gender, and class in her book, Women, Race, and Class.[72] Kimberle Crenshaw, a prominent feminist law theorist, gave the idea a name while discussing identity politics in her essay, "Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics and Violence Against Women of Color".

People of interest

[edit] Socialist and Marxist feminisms

See also: Gender roles in Eastern Europe after Communism
Clara Zetkin and Rosa Luxemburg, 1910
Clara Zetkin and Rosa Luxemburg, 1910

Socialist feminism connects the oppression of women to Marxist ideas about exploitation, oppression and labor. Socialist feminists see women as being held down as a result of their unequal standing in both the workplace and the domestic sphere.[73] Prostitution, domestic work, childcare, and marriage are all seen as ways in which women are exploited by a patriarchal system which devalues women and the substantial work that they do. Socialist feminists focus their energies on broad change that affects society as a whole, and not just on an individual basis. They see the need to work alongside not just men, but all other groups, as they see the oppression of women as a part of a larger pattern that affects everyone involved in the capitalist system.[74]

Marx felt that when class oppression was overcome, gender oppression would vanish as well. According to socialist feminists, this view of gender oppression as a sub-class of class oppression is naive and much of the work of socialist feminists has gone towards separating gender phenomena from class phenomena.[75] Some contributors to socialist feminism have criticized these traditional Marxist ideas for being largely silent on gender oppression except to subsume it underneath broader class oppression.[76] Other socialist feminists, notably two long-lived American organizations Radical Women and the Freedom Socialist Party, point to the classic Marxist writings of Frederick Engels[77] and August Bebel[78] as a powerful explanation of the link between gender oppression and class exploitation.

In the late nineteenth century and early twentieth century both Clara Zetkin and Eleanor Marx were against the demonization of men and supported a proletarian revolution that would overcome as many male-female inequalities as possible.[79]

People of interest

[edit] Post-structural and postmodern feminism

Main article: Postmodern feminism
See also: French feminism, Deconstruction, Poststructuralism, and Postmodernism

Post-structural feminism, also referred to as French feminism, uses the insights of various epistemological movements, including psychoanalysis, linguistics, political theory (Marxist and post-Marxist theory), race theory, literary theory, and other intellectual currents for feminist concerns.[80] Many post-structural feminists maintain that difference is one of the most powerful tools that females possess in their struggle with patriarchal domination, and that to equate the feminist movement only with equality is to deny women a plethora of options because equality is still defined from the masculine or patriarchal perspective.[80][81]

Judith Butler at a lecture at the University of Hamburg.
Judith Butler at a lecture at the University of Hamburg.

Postmodern feminism is an approach to feminist theory that incorporates postmodern and post-structuralist theory. The largest departure from other branches of feminism, is the argument that gender is constructed through language.[82] The most notable proponent of this argument is Judith Butler. In her 1990 book, Gender Trouble, she draws on and criticizes the work of Simone de Beauvoir, Michel Foucault and Jacques Lacan. Butler criticizes the distinction drawn by previous feminisms between biological sex and socially constructed gender. She says that this does not allow for a sufficient criticism of essentialism. For Butler "woman" is a debatable category, complicated by class, ethnicity, sexuality, and other facets of identity. She suggests that gender is performative. This argument leads to the conclusion that there is no single cause for women's subordination and no single approach towards dealing with the issue.[17]

Donna Haraway, author of A Cyborg Manifesto, with her dog Cayenne
Donna Haraway, author of A Cyborg Manifesto, with her dog Cayenne

In A Cyborg Manifesto Donna Haraway criticizes traditional notions of feminism, particularly its emphasis on identity, rather than affinity. She uses the metaphor of a cyborg in order to construct a postmodern feminism that moves beyond dualisms and the limitations of traditional gender, feminism, and politics.[83] Haraway's cyborg is an attempt to break away from Oedipal narratives and Christian origin-myths like Genesis. She writes: "The cyborg does not dream of community on the model of the organic family, this time without the oedipal project. The cyborg would not recognize the Garden of Eden; it is not made of mud and cannot dream of returning to dust."[83]

A major branch in postmodern feminist thought has emerged from the contemporary psychoanalytic French feminism. Other postmodern feminist works highlight stereotypical gender roles, only to portray them as parodies of the original beliefs. The history of feminism is not important in these writings—only what is going to be done about it. The history is dismissed and used to depict how ridiculous past beliefs were. Modern feminist theory has been extensively criticized as being predominantly, though not exclusively, associated with Western middle class academia. Mainstream feminism has been criticized as being too narrowly focused and inattentive to related issues of race and class.[84]

People of interest

[edit] Postcolonial feminism and third-world feminism

Main article: Postcolonial feminism
Related terms:
Multiracial feminism,
Transnational feminism,
Postcolonialism,
Orientalism

Postcolonial feminists argue that oppression relating to the colonial experience, particularly racial, class, and ethnic oppression, has marginalized women in postcolonial societies. They challenge the assumption that gender oppression is the primary force of patriarchy. Postcolonial feminists object to portrayals of women of non-Western societies as passive and voiceless victims and the portrayal of Western women as modern, educated and empowered.[85]

Postcolonial feminism emerged from the gendered history of colonialism: colonial powers often imposed Western norms on colonized regions. In the 1940s and 1950s, after the formation of the United Nations, former colonies were monitored by the West for what was considered "social progress". The status of women in the developing world has been monitored by organizations such as the United Nations and as a result traditional practices and roles taken up by women—sometimes seen as distasteful by Western standards—could be considered a form of rebellion against colonial oppression.[86] Postcolonial feminists today struggle to fight gender oppression within their own cultural models of society rather than through those imposed by the Western colonizers.[87]

Taslima Nasrin: author, physician, and feminist human rights activist
Taslima Nasrin: author, physician, and feminist human rights activist

Postcolonial feminism is critical of Western forms of feminism, notably radical feminism and liberal feminism and their universalization of female experience. Postcolonial feminists argue that cultures impacted by colonialism are often vastly different and should be treated as such. Colonial oppression may result in the glorification of pre-colonial culture, which, in cultures with traditions of power stratification along gender lines, could mean the acceptance of, or refusal to deal with, inherent issues of gender inequality.[88] Postcolonial feminists can be described as feminists who have reacted against both universalizing tendencies in Western feminist thought and a lack of attention to gender issues in mainstream postcolonial thought.[89]

Third-world feminism has been described as a group of feminist theories developed by feminists who acquired their views and took part in feminist politics in so-called third-world countries.[11] Although women from the third world have been engaged in the feminist movement, Chandra Talpade Mohanty criticizes Western feminism on the grounds that it is ethnocentric and does not take into account the unique experiences of women from third-world countries or the existence of feminisms indigenous to third-world countries. According to her, women in the third world feel that Western feminism bases its understanding of women on "internal racism, classism and homophobia".[12] This discourse is strongly related to African feminism and postcolonial feminism. Its development is also associated with concepts such as black feminism, womanism,[36],[90][91] "Africana womanism",[92] "motherism",[93] "Stiwanism",[94] "negofeminism",[95] chicana feminism, and "femalism".

People of interest

[edit] Ecofeminism

Main article: Ecofeminism
See also: Environmentalism
Janet Biehl is one of the premier authors on social ecology
Janet Biehl is one of the premier authors on social ecology

Ecofeminism links ecology with feminism. Ecofeminists see the domination of women as stemming from the same ideologies that bring about the domination of the environment. Patriarchal systems, where men own and control the land, are seen as responsible for the oppression of women and destruction of the natural environment. Since the men in power control the land, they are able to exploit it for their own profit and success. In this same situation, women are exploited by men in power for their own profit, success, and pleasure. Women and the environment are both exploited as passive pawns in the race to domination. Those people in power are able to take advantage of them distinctly because they are seen as passive and rather helpless. Ecofeminism connects the exploitation and domination of women with that of the environment. As a way of repairing social and ecological injustices, ecofeminists feel that women must work towards creating a healthy environment and ending the destruction of the lands that most women rely on to provide for their families.[96]

Ecofeminism argues that there is a connection between women and nature that comes from their shared history of oppression by a patriarchal Western society. Vandana Shiva explains how women's special connection to the environment through their daily interactions with it have been ignored. She says that "women in subsistence economies, producing and reproducing wealth in partnership with nature, have been experts in their own right of holistic and ecological knowledge of nature’s processes. But these alternative modes of knowing, which are oriented to the social benefits and sustenance needs are not recognized by the [capitalist] reductionist paradigm, because it fails to perceive the interconnectedness of nature, or the connection of women’s lives, work and knowledge with the creation of wealth.”[97] Ecofeminists also criticize Western lifestyle choices, such as consuming food that has traveled thousands of miles and playing sports (such as golf and bobsledding) which inherently require ecological destruction.

However, feminist and social ecologist Janet Biehl has criticized ecofeminism for focusing too much on a mystical connection between women and nature and not enough on the actual conditions of women.[98]

People of interest

[edit] Individualist feminism

Wendy McElroy: Canadian individualist anarchist, anarcho-capitalist and sex-positive feminist.
Wendy McElroy: Canadian individualist anarchist, anarcho-capitalist and sex-positive feminist.

Individualist feminism is defined in opposition to, what writers such as Wendy McElroy and Christina Hoff Sommers term, political or gender feminism.[99][45] Some individualist feminists trace the movement's roots to the classical liberal tradition.[100] It is closely linked to the libertarian ideas of individuality and personal responsibility for both women and men. Some other feminists believe that it reinforces patriarchal systems because it does not view the rights or political interests of men and women as being in conflict nor does it rest upon class or gender analysis.[101] Individualist feminists attempt to change legal systems in order to eliminate class privileges and gender privileges and to ensure that individuals have equal rights, including an equal claim under the law to their own persons and property. Individualist feminism encourages women to take full responsibility for their own lives. It also opposes any government interference into the choices adults make with their own bodies, because it contends such interference creates a coercive hierarchy (such as patriarchy).[102][103]

People of interest

[edit] Feminism and society

Main article: Feminist movement
Woman Suffrage Headquarters, Cleveland, 1912
Woman Suffrage Headquarters, Cleveland, 1912

The feminist movement has effected change in Western society, including women's suffrage; the right to initiate divorce proceedings and "no fault" divorce; and the right of women to make individual decisions regarding pregnancy (including access to contraceptives and abortion); and the right to own property.[10][9]

[edit] Civil rights

Feminism has effected many changes in Western society, including women's suffrage, broad employment for women at more equitable wages, the right to initiate divorce proceedings and the introduction of "no fault" divorce, the right to obtain contraception and safe abortions, and access to university education.

According to studies by the United Nations, when both paid employment and unpaid household tasks are accounted for, on average women work more than men. In rural areas of selected developing countries women performed an average of 20% more work than men, or an additional 102 minutes per day. In the OECD countries surveyed, on average women performed 5% more work than men, or 20 minutes per day.[104] At the UN's Pan Pacific Southeast Asia Women's Association 21st International Conference in 2001 it was stated that "in the world as a whole, women comprise 51 percent of the population, do 66 percent of the work, receive 10 percent of the income and own less than one percent of the property".[105]

[edit] Language

See also: Gender-neutrality in languages with grammatical gender and Gender-neutrality in languages without grammatical gender

Gender-neutral language is a description of language usages which are aimed at minimizing assumptions regarding the biological sex of human referents. The advocacy of gender-neutral language reflects, at least, two different agendas: one aims to clarify the inclusion of both sexes or genders (gender-inclusive language); the other proposes that gender, as a category, is rarely worth marking in language (gender-neutral language). Gender-neutral language is sometimes described as non-sexist language by advocates and politically-correct language by opponents.[106]

[edit] Heterosexual relationships

The increased entry of women into the workplace beginning in the twentieth century has affected gender roles and the division of labor within households. Sociologist Arlie Russell Hochschild in The Second Shift and The Time Bind presents evidence that in two-career couples, men and women, on average, spend about equal amounts of time working, but women still spend more time on housework.[107][108]

Feminist criticisms of men's contributions to child care and domestic labor in the Western middle class are typically centered around the idea that it is unfair for women to be expected to perform more than half of a household's domestic work and child care when both members of the relationship also work outside the home. Several studies provide statistical evidence that the financial income of married men does not affect their rate of attending to household duties.[109][110]

In Dubious Conceptions, Kristin Luker discusses the effect of feminism on teenage women's choices to bear children, both in and out of wedlock. She says that as childbearing out of wedlock has become more socially acceptable, young women, especially poor young women, while not bearing children at a higher rate than in the 1950s, now see less of a reason to get married before having a child. Her explanation for this is that the economic prospects for poor men are slim, hence poor women have a low chance of finding a husband who will be able to provide reliable financial support.[111]

Although research suggests that to an extent, both women and men perceive feminism to be in conflict with romance, studies of undergraduates and older adults have shown that feminism has positive impacts on relationship health for women and sexual satisfaction for men, and found no support for negative stereotypes of feminists.[112]

[edit] Culture

[edit] Women's writing

Women's writing came to exist as a separate category of scholarly interest relatively recently. In the West, second-wave feminism prompted a general reevaluation of women's historical contributions, and various academic sub-disciplines, such as women's history and women's writing, developed in response to the belief that women's lives and contributions have been underrepresented as areas of scholarly interest.[113] Virginia Balisn et al. characterize the growth in interest since 1970 in women's writing as "powerful".[113] Much of this early period of feminist literary scholarship was given over to the rediscovery and reclamation of texts written by women. Studies such as Dale Spender's Mothers of the Novel (1986) and Jane Spencer's The Rise of the Woman Novelist (1986) were ground-breaking in their insistence that women have always been writing. Commensurate with this growth in scholarly interest, various presses began the task of reissuing long-out-of-print texts. Virago Press began to publish its large list of nineteenth and early-twentieth-century novels in 1975 and became one of the first commercial presses to join in the project of reclamation. In the 1980s Pandora Press, responsible for publishing Spender's study, issued a companion line of eighteenth-century novels written by women.[114] More recently, Broadview Press has begun to issue eighteenth- and nineteenth-century works, many hitherto out of print and the University of Kentucky has a series of republications of early women's novels. There has been commensurate growth in the area of biographical dictionaries of women writers due to a perception, according to one editor, that "[m]ost of our women are not represented in the 'standard' reference books in the field".[113]

[edit] Feminist science fiction

In the 1960s the genre of science fiction combined its sensationalism with political and technological critiques of society. With the advent of feminism, questioning women’s roles became fair game to this "subversive, mind expanding genre".[115] Two early texts are Ursula K. Le Guin's The Left Hand of Darkness (1969) and Joanna Russ' The Female Man (1970). They serve to highlight the socially constructed nature of gender roles by creating utopias that do away with gender.[116] Both authors were also pioneers in feminist criticism of science fiction in the 1960s and 70s, in essays collected in The Language of the Night (Le Guin, 1979) and How To Suppress Women's Writing (Russ, 1983). Other major works of feminist science fiction have been The Handmaid's Tale by Margaret Atwood[117] and Kindred by Octavia Butler.

[edit] Riot grrrl feminism

Kathleen Hanna was the lead singer of Bikini Kill a riot grrrl band formed in 1990.
Kathleen Hanna was the lead singer of Bikini Kill a riot grrrl band formed in 1990.
Main article: Riot Grrrl

Riot grrrl (or riot grrl) is an underground feminist punk movement that started in the 1990s and is often associated with third-wave feminism (it is sometimes seen as its starting point). However, riot grrrl's emphasis on universal female identity and separatism often appears more closely allied with second-wave feminism than with the third wave.[118] Riot grrrl bands often address issues such as rape, domestic abuse, sexuality, and female empowerment. Some bands associated with the movement are: Bikini Kill, Bratmobile, Excuse 17, Free Kitten, Heavens To Betsy, Huggy Bear, L7, and Team Dresch. In addition to a music scene, riot grrrl is also a subculture; zines, the DIY ethic, art, political action, and activism are part of the movement. Riot grrrls hold meetings, start chapters, and support and organize women in music.[119]

People of interest

[edit] Religion

Main article: Feminist theology
See also: God and gender and Difference feminism

Feminist theology is a movement that reconsiders the traditions, practices, scriptures, and theologies of religions from a feminist perspective. Some of the goals of feminist theology include increasing the role of women among the clergy and religious authorities, reinterpreting male-dominated imagery and language about God, determining women's place in relation to career and motherhood, and studying images of women in the religion's sacred texts.[120]

[edit] Christian feminism

Main article: Christian feminism
Related terms:
New feminism

Christian feminism is a branch of feminist theology which seeks to interpret and understand Christianity in light of the equality of women and men. Because this equality has been historically ignored, Christian feminists believe their contributions are necessary for a complete understanding of Christianity. While there is no standard set of beliefs among Christian feminists, most agree that God does not discriminate on the basis of biologically-determined characteristics such as sex. Their major issues are the ordination of women, male dominance in Christian marriage, and claims of moral deficiency and inferiority of abilities of women compared to men. They also are concerned with the balance of parenting between mothers and fathers and the overall treatment of women in the church.[121][122]

[edit] Islamic feminism

Mukhtaran Bibi, Glamour Magazine Woman of the Year 2005
Mukhtaran Bibi, Glamour Magazine Woman of the Year 2005
Main article: Islamic feminism

Islamic feminism is concerned with the role of women in Islam and aims for the full equality of all Muslims, regardless of gender, in public and private life. Islamic feminists advocate women's rights, gender equality, and social justice grounded in an Islamic framework. Although rooted in Islam, the movement's pioneers have also utilized secular and Western feminist discourses and recognize the role of Islamic feminism as part of an integrated global feminist movement.[123] Advocates of the movement seek to highlight the deeply rooted teachings of equality in the Quran and encourage a questioning of the patriarchal interpretation of Islamic teaching through the Quran, hadith (sayings of Muhammed), and sharia (law) towards the creation of a more equal and just society.[124]

People of interest

[edit] Jewish feminism

Main article: Jewish feminism

Jewish feminism is a movement that seeks to improve the religious, legal, and social status of women within Judaism and to open up new opportunities for religious experience and leadership for Jewish women. Feminist movements, with varying approaches and successes, have opened up within all major branches of Judaism. In its modern form, the movement can be traced to the early 1970s in the United States. According to Judith Plaskow, who has focused on feminism in Reform Judaism, the main issues for early Jewish feminists in these movements were the exclusion from the all-male prayer group or minyan, the exemption from positive time-bound mitzvot, and women's inability to function as witnesses and to initiate divorce.[125]

People of interest

[edit] Regional feminist movements

See also: Feminism in France and Gerwani

[edit] Iran

Nobel Laureate Shirin Ebadi at the WSIS Press Conference (Tunis, 2005)
Nobel Laureate Shirin Ebadi at the WSIS Press Conference (Tunis, 2005)

Perhaps the most notable figure of the women's movement during the Iranian revolution and in post-revolution Iran was Shirin Ebadi. She won the Nobel Prize for advocating democracy and human rights, especially the rights of women and children. Ebadi in collaboration with figures like Simin Behbahani, Mehrangiz Kar, Elaheh Koulaei, Shahla Sherkat, Jila Bani Yaghoob, Mahboubeh Abbas-Gholizadeh, Azam Taleghani, Shahla Lahiji, and others directed the women's movement in Iran in the late 20th century and at the turn of the new millennium.[126]

In 1992, Shahla Sherkat founded Zanan (Women) magazine, which focused on the concerns of Iranian women and tested the political waters with its edgy coverage of reform politics, domestic abuse, and sex. It is the most important Iranian women's journal published after the Iranian revolution, systematically criticizing the Islamic legal code. It argues that gender equality is Islamic and that religious literature has been misread and misappropriated by misogynists. Mehangiz Kar, Shahla Lahiji, and Shahla Sherkat, the editor of Zanan, leads the debate on women's rights and demanded reforms.[127] On August 27, 2006, a new women's rights campaign was launched in Iran. The "One Million Signatures" campaign aims to end legal discrimination against women in Iranian laws by collecting a million signatures. The supporters of this campaign include many Iranian women's rights activists and also international activists as well as many Nobel laureates.[128]

[edit] India

Main article: Feminism in India

With the rise of feminism across the world, a new generation of Indian feminists has emerged. Women have developed themselves according to the situations and has become advanced in various fields. They have become independent in respect of their reproductive right.[129] Contemporary Indian feminists are fighting for: individual autonomy, rights, freedom, independence, tolerance, cooperation, nonviolence and diversity, domestic violence, gender, stereotypes, sexuality, discrimination, sexism, non-objectification, freedom from patriarchy, the right to an abortion, reproductive rights, control of the female body, the right to a divorce, equal pay, maternity leave, breast feeding, prostitution, and education. Medha Patkar, Madhu Kishwar, and Brinda Karat are feminist social workers and politicians who advocate women's rights in post-independent India.[129] Writers such as Amrita Pritam, Sarojini Sahoo and Kusum Ansal advocate feminist ideas in Indian languages. Rajeshwari Sunder Rajan, Leela Kasturi, Sharmila Rege, and Vidyut Bhagat are Indian feminist essayists and critics writing in English.

[edit] Japan

Japanese feminism as an organized political movement dates back to the early years of the 20th century, when Kato Shidzue pushed for birth-control availability as part of a broad spectrum of progressive reforms. Shidzue went on to serve in the National Diet following the defeat of Japan in World War II and the promulgation of the Peace Constitution by US forces.[130] Other figures such as Hayashi Fumiko and Ariyoshi Sawako illustrate the broad socialist ideologies of Japanese feminism, that seeks to accomplish broad goals rather than celebrate the individual achievements of powerful women.[130][131]

[edit] Norway

Feminism in Norway has its political origins in the movement for women's suffrage. Women's issues were first articulated in the public sphere by Camilla Collett (1813-1895), widely considered the first Norwegian feminist. Originating from a literary family, she wrote a novel and several articles on the difficulties facing women of her time, and in particular forced marriages. Amalie Skram (1846-1905) also gave voice to a woman's point of view with her naturalist writing.[132]

The Norwegian Association for Women's Rights was founded in 1884 by Gina Krog and Hagbart Berner. The organization raised issues related to women's rights to education and economic self-determination, and above all, universal suffrage. Women's right to vote was passed by law, June 11, 1913 by the Norwegian Parliament. Norway was the second country in Europe after Finland to have full suffrage for women.[132]

[edit] Poland

Main article: Feminism in Poland

The development of feminism in Poland and Polish territories[133] has traditionally been divided into seven successive "waves".[134]

The 1920s saw the emergence of radical feminism in Poland. Its representatives, Irena Krzywicka and Maria Morozowicz-Szczepkowska, advocated women’s independence from men. Krzywicka and Tadeusz Żeleński both promoted planned parenthood, sexual education, rights to divorce and abortion, and equality of sexes. Krzywicka published a series of articles in Wiadomości Literackie in which she protested against interference by the Roman Catholic Church in the intimate lives of Poles.[134]

After the Second World War, the Polish Communist state (established in 1948) forcefully promoted women’s emancipation at home and at work. However, during Communist rule (until 1989), feminism in general, and second-wave feminism in particular, were practically absent. Although feminist texts were produced in the 1950s and afterwards, they were usually controlled and generated by the Communist state.[135] After the fall of Communism, the Polish government, dominated by ‘pro-Catholic’ political parties, introduced a de facto legal ban on abortions. Since then some feminists have adopted argumentative strategies borrowed from the American ‘Pro-Choice’ movement of the 1980s.[134]

[edit] Feminism and political movements

[edit] Feminism and socialism

Main article: The left and feminism
Related terms:
Feminism & the Sandinista revolution,
Gender roles & Post Communism

Some strands of early twentieth century feminism allied with socialism. In 1907 there was an International Conference of Socialist Women in Stuttgart where suffrage was described as a tool of class struggle. Clara Zetkin of the Social Democratic Party of Germany called for women's suffrage to build a "socialist order, the only one that allows for a radical solution to the women's question".[136][137][138]

In Britain, the women's movement was allied with the Labour party. In America, Betty Friedan emerged from a radical background to take command of the organized movement. Radical Women, founded in 1967 in Seattle is the oldest (and still active) socialist feminist organization in the U.S.[139] During the Spanish Civil War, Dolores Ibárruri (La Pasionaria) led the Communist Party of Spain. Although she supported equal rights for women, she opposed women fighting on the front and clashed with the anarcho-feminist Mujeres Libres.[140]

Revolutions in Latin America brought changes in women's status in countries such as Nicaragua where Feminist ideology during the Sandinista Revolution was largely responsible for improvements in the quality of life for women but fell short of achieving a social and ideological change.[141]

[edit] Feminism and fascism

In Nazi Germany and the other fascist states of the 1930s and 1940s,[142] the political agenda illustrated the disastrous consequences for women of an antifeminist state ideology. In Germany there was a rapid dissolution of the gains made during the prewar period. In Francisco Franco's Spain, the right-wing Catholic conservatives undid the gains of the Republic. Fascist society emphasized virility, were very hierarchical, and subordinated women to men.[138]

[edit] Feminism and science

Feminists has been critical of scientific discourse, arguing that the field has historically been biased towards a masculine perspective.[8] Evelyn Fox Keller argues that the rhetoric of science reflects a masculine perspective, and she questions the idea of scientific objectivity. Primatologist Sarah Blaffer Hrdy notes the prevalence of masculine-coined stereotypes and theories, such as the non-sexual female, despite "the accumulation of abundant openly available evidence contradicting it".[143] Some natural and social scientists have examined feminist ideas using scientific methods.

[edit] Feminism and the biology of gender

Related terms:
Biology of gender

Modern feminist science is based on the view that many differences between the sexes are based on socially constructed gender identities rather than on biological sex differences. For example, Anne Fausto-Sterling's book Myths of Gender explores the assumptions embodied in scientific research that purports to support a biologically essentialist view of gender.[144] However, in The Female Brain, Louann Brizendine argues that brain differences between the sexes are a biological reality with significant implications for sex-specific functional differences.[145] Steven Rhoads' book Taking Sex Differences Seriously illustrates sex-dependent differences across a wide scope.[146]

Carol Tavris, in The Mismeasure of Woman, uses psychology and sociology to critique theories that use biological reductionism to explain differences between men and women. She argues rather than using evidence of innate gender difference there is an over-changing hypothesis to justify inequality and perpetuate stereotypes.[147]

[edit] Feminism and evolutionary biology

Related terms:
Evolutionary biology

Sarah Kember—drawing from numerous areas such as evolutionary biology, sociobiology, artificial intelligence, and cybernetics in development with a new evolutionism—discusses the biologization of technology. She notes how feminists and sociologists have become suspect of evolutionary psychology, particularly inasmuch as sociobiology is subjected to complexity in order to strengthen sexual difference as immutable through pre-existing cultural value judgments about human nature and natural selection. Where feminist theory is criticized for its "false beliefs about human nature," Kember then argues in conclusion that "feminism is in the interesting position of needing to do more biology and evolutionary theory in order not to simply oppose their renewed hegemony, but in order to understand the conditions that make this possible, and to have a say in the construction of new ideas and artefacts."[148]

[edit] Men and feminism

Main article: Men and feminism
Anti-suffragists in 1911
Anti-suffragists in 1911

The relationship between men and feminism has been complex. Men have taken part in significant responses to feminism in each 'wave' of the movement. There have been positive and negative reactions and responses, depending on the individual man and the social context of the time.[149] These responses have varied from pro-feminism to masculism[150][151][152] to anti-feminism. In the twenty-first century new reactions to feminist ideologies have emerged including a generation of male scholars involved in gender studies,[153][154] and also men's rights activists who promote of male equality (rights to equal treatment in family, divorce and anti-discrimination law).[46]

Historically a number of men have engaged with feminism. Philosopher Jeremy Bentham demanded equal rights for women in the eighteenth century. In 1866, philosopher John Stuart Mill (author of “The Subjection of Women”) presented a women’s petition to the British parliament; and supported an amendment to the 1867 Reform Bill. Others have lobbied and campaigned against feminism. Today, academics like Michael Flood, Michael Messner and Michael Kimmel are involved with men's studies and pro-feminist.[153][155][46][156][157]

Other men have campaigned against feminism. During the suffragettes' campaign anti-suffragists numbered 160 in 1902 in Britain.[158] In New York, the New York State Association Opposed to Woman Suffrage was founded in 1897, and by 1908 it had over 90 members.[159]

A number of feminist writers maintain that identifying as a feminist is the strongest stand men can take in the struggle against sexism. They have argued that men should be allowed, or even be encouraged, to participate in the feminist movement.[160][30] Other female feminists argue that men cannot be feminists simply because they are not women. They maintain that men are granted inherent privileges that prevent them from identifying with feminist struggles, thus making it impossible for them to identify with feminists.[161] Fidelma Ashe has approached the issue of male feminism by arguing that traditional feminist views of male experience and of "men doing feminism" have been monolithic.[162][163] She explores the multiple political discourses and practices of pro-feminist politics, and evaluates each strand through an interrogation based upon its effect on feminist politics.[163][162]

[edit] Other concepts

[edit] Pro-feminism

Main article: Pro-feminism

Pro-feminism is the support of feminism without implying that the supporter is a member of the feminist movement. The term is most often used in reference to men who are actively supportive of feminism and of efforts to bring about gender equality. The activities of pro-feminist men's groups include anti-violence work with boys and young men in schools, offering sexual harassment workshops in workplaces, running community education campaigns, and counseling male perpetrators of violence. Pro-feminist men also are involved in men's health, activism against pornography including anti-pornography legislation, men's studies, and the development of gender equity curricula in schools. This work is sometimes in collaboration with feminists and women's services, such as domestic violence and rape crisis centers. Some activists of both genders will not refer to men as "feminists" at all, and will refer to all pro-feminist men as "pro-feminists".[153][149]

[edit] Anti-feminism

Main article: Anti-feminism

Antifeminism is opposition to feminism in some or all of its forms.[164] . Feminists such as Camille Paglia, Christina Hoff Sommers, Jean Bethke Elshtain and Elizabeth Fox-Genovese have been labeled "anti-feminists" by other feminists.[165][166] Patai and Koertge argue that in this way the term "anti-feminist" is used to silence academic debate about feminism.[167] Paul Nathanson and Katherine K. Young's books Spreading Misandry and Legalizing Misandry explore what they argue is feminist-inspired misandry.[168] Christina Hoff-Sommers argues feminist misandry leads directly to misogyny by what she calls "establishment feminists" against (the majority of) women who love men in Who Stole Feminism: How Women Have Betrayed Women.[45] "Marriage rights" advocates criticize feminists like Shelia Cronan who take the view that marriage constitutes slavery for women, and that freedom for women cannot be won without the abolition of marriage.[169]

[edit] References

  1. ^ Humm, Maggie. 1995. The Dictionary of Feminist Theory. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, p. 251
  2. ^ a b Walker, Rebecca, 'Becoming the Third Wave' in Ms. (January/February, 1992) pp. 39-41
  3. ^ a b Krolokke, Charlotte and Anne Scott Sorensen, 'From Suffragettes to Grrls' in Gender Communication Theories and Analyses:From Silence to Performance (Sage, 2005)
  4. ^ a b Chodorow, Nancy J., Feminism and Psychoanalytic Theory (Yale University Press: 1989, 1991)
  5. ^ a b Gilligan, Carol, 'In a Different Voice: Women's Conceptions of Self and Morality' in Harvard Educational Review (1977)
  6. ^ a b Echols, Alice, Daring to Be Bad: Radical Feminism in America, 1967-1975’’ (University of Minnesota Press,1989) ISBN 978 0816617876
  7. ^ Cornell, Drucilia, At the Heart of Freedom: Feminism, Sex, and Equality (Princeton UP,1998) p. X, ISBN 978069102896-5
  8. ^ a b Feminist Theory and the Body: A Reader ed. by Janet Price and Margrit Shildrick (Edinburgh University Press, 1999) ISBN 9780748610891
  9. ^ a b Butler, Judith, 'Feminism in Any Other Name', differences vol. 6, numbers 2-3, pp. 44-45
  10. ^ a b Messer-Davidow, Ellen, Disciplining feminism: from social activism to academic discourse (Duke University Press, 2002), ISBN 9780822328437
  11. ^ a b Narayan, U. (1997): Dislocating Cultures: Identities, Traditions, and Third-World Feminism (New York:Routledge)
  12. ^ a b Mohanty, C (1991): "Introduction" page 7 in Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism (Indiana: Indiana University Press) pp.1-50
  13. ^ a b Walker, Alice, In Search of Our Mothers' Gardens (Phoenix, 2005), ISBN 9780753819609
  14. ^ Hill Collins, P. (2000): Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (New York: Routledge)
  15. ^ Harding, Sandra, The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies (Routledge, 2003), ISBN 9780415945011
  16. ^ a b c de Beauvoir, Simone The Second Sex (Vintage Books, 1973)
  17. ^ a b Butler, Judith, "Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity" (Routledge, 1999), ISBN 9780415924993
  18. ^ Candace West and Don H. Zimmerman, 'Doing Gender' in Gender and Society, Vol. 1, No. 2(June, 1987) pp. 125-151
  19. ^ a b c d Freedman, Estelle B., No Turning Back: The History of Feminism and the Future of Women (London: Ballantine Books, 2003)
  20. ^ Phillips, Melanie, The Ascent of Woman: A History of the Suffragette Movement (Abacus, 2004), ISBN 9780349116600
  21. ^ DuBois, Ellen Carol, Harriot Stanton Blatch and the Winning of Woman Suffrage (Yale University Press, 1997) ISBN 9780300065620
  22. ^ Flexner, Eleanor, Century of Struggle: The Woman's Rights Movement in the United States (The Belknap Press, 1996), ISBN 9780674106539
  23. ^ Wheeler, Marjorie Spruill, ed., One Woman, One Vote: Rediscovering the Woman Suffrage Movement (NewSage Press, 1995) ISBN 9780939165260
  24. ^ Stevens, Doris, Jailed for Freedom: American Women Win the Vote (NewSage Press, 1995), ISBN 9780939165252
  25. ^ Whelehan, Imelda, Modern Feminist Thought (Edinburgh UP, 1995), ISBN 9780748606214
  26. ^ Sarachild, Kathie. Consciousness-Raising: A Radical Weapon, in Sarachild, K, Hanisch, C, Levine, F, Leon, B, Price, C (eds.) Feminist Revolution. Random House N.Y. 1978 pp. 144-150.
  27. ^ Mitchell, Juliet, 'Women: The longest revolution' in New Left Review, 1966, Nov-Dec, pp. 11-37
  28. ^ Hinckle, Warren and Marianne Hinckle. Women Power. Ramparts 1968 February 22-31
  29. ^ Freeman, Jo. The politics of women's liberation. David McKay N.Y. 1975
  30. ^ a b hooks, bell, Feminist theory from margin to center (South End Press, 1984)
  31. ^ Fox, Margalit, 'Betty Friedan, Who Ignited Cause in 'Feminine Mystique,' Dies at 85' in The New York Times February 5, 2006.
  32. ^ Friedan, Betty, The Feminine Mystique (W.W. Norton and Company Inc., 1963), ISBN 9780393084361
  33. ^ Henry, Astrid, Not My Mother's Sister: Generational Conflict and Third-Wave Feminism (Indiana University Press, 2003), ISBN 9780253217134
  34. ^ a b c Gillis, Stacy, Gillian Howie & Rebecca Munford (eds), Third Wave Feminism: A Critical Exploration (Palgrave Macmillan, 2007), ISBN 9780230521742
  35. ^ Faludi, Susan, Backlash: The Undeclared War Against Women (Vintage, 1993), ISBN 9780099222712
  36. ^ a b c Walker, Rebecca, To Be Real: Telling the Truth and Changing the Face of Feminism (Anchor, 1995) ISBN 9780385472625
  37. ^ a b Heywood, Leslie; Jennifer Drake eds., Third Wave Agenda: Being Feminist, Doing Feminism (University of Minnesota Press, 1997), ISBN 9780816630054
  38. ^ a b c Gilligan, Carol. In a Different Voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982
  39. ^ a b c d Wright, Elizabeth, Lacan and Postfeminism (Icon Books, 2000), ISBN 9781840461829
  40. ^ Modleski, Tania. Feminism without Women: Culture and Criticism in a “Postfeminist” Age. New York: Routledge, 1991, 3.
  41. ^ Jones, Amelia. “Postfeminism, Feminist Pleasures, and Embodied Theories of Art,” New Feminist Criticism: Art, Identity, Action, Eds. Joana Frueh, Cassandra L. Langer and Arlene Raven. New York: HarperCollins, 1994. 16-41, 20.
  42. ^ Rosen, Ruth. The World Split Open: How the Modern Women's Movement Changed America. New York: Viking, 2000, 275, 337.
  43. ^ Pollitt, Katha, Reasonable Creatures: Essays on Women and Feminism (Vintage, 1995) ISBN 9780679762782
  44. ^ Strossen, Nadine, Defending Pornography: Free Speech, Sex, and the Fight for Women's Rights (Prentice Hall & IBD, 1995), ISBN 9780684197494
  45. ^ a b c Hoff Sommers, Christina, Who Stole Feminism? How Women Have Betrayed Women (Touchstone/Simon & Schuster, 1995)
  46. ^ a b c Flood, Michael (7 July 2004). "Backlash: Angry men's movements", in Stacey Elin Rossi, ed.: The Battle and Backlash Rage On. N.p.: XLibris, 273. ISBN 1-4134-5934-X
  47. ^ Uncovering the Right -- Female Anti-Feminism for Fame and Profit. Retrieved on 2007-12-21.
  48. ^ Faludi, Susan, Backlash: The Undeclared War Against American Women (Three Rivers Press, 2006)
  49. ^ a b Moi, Toril, French Feminist Thought: A Reader (Blackwell Publishers, 1987)m ISBN 9780631149736
  50. ^ Moi, Toril, ed., The Kristeva Reader (Basil Blackwell, 1986)
  51. ^ Special Issue on Bracha L. Ettinger, Theory, Culture and Society, Vol.21 n.1, 2004. ISSN 0263-2764.
  52. ^ Ettinger, Bracha L., The Matrixial Borderspace. (Articles from 1994-1999, forwarded by Judith Butler with introductions by Griselda Pollock and Brian Massumi) University of Minnesota Press, 2006. ISBN 0-8166-3587-0.
  53. ^ Vanda Zajko & Miriam Leonard (eds.), Laughing with Medusa. Oxford University Press, 2006.
  54. ^ Mica Howe & Sarah A. Aguiar (eds.), He Said, She Says. Fairleigh Dickinson University press & London: Associated University Press, 2001.
  55. ^ Griselda Pollock, Encounters in the Virtual Feminist Museum: Time, Space and the Archive. Routledge, 2007.
  56. ^ Bracha Ettinger, The Matrixial Borderspace (Essays from 1994-1999), University of Minnesota Press, 2006.
  57. ^ Brabeck and Brown, 1997
  58. ^ Penny Florence & Nicola Foster (eds.), Differential Aesthetics. London: Ashgate, 2000.
  59. ^ Showalter, Elaine. 'Toward a Feminist Poetics: Women’s Writing and Writing About Women' in The New Feminist Criticism: Essays on Women, Literature and Theory (Random House, 1988), ISBN 9780394726472
  60. ^ hooks, bell. "Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center" Cambridge, MA: South End Press 1984
  61. ^ Echols, Alice. "Daring to be Bad" University of Minnesota Press 1990
  62. ^ Sarah Hoagland, "Lesbian Ethics."
  63. ^ Marilyn Frye, "Some Reflections on Separatism and Power." In Feminist Social Thought: A Reader, Diana Tietjens Meyers (ed.) (1997) New York: Routledge, pp. 406-414.
  64. ^ (McElroy, 1995).
  65. ^ Ellen Willis, Lust Horizons: The 'Voice' and the women's movement, Village Voice 50th Anniversary Issue, 2007. This is not the original "Lust Horizons" essay, but a retrospective essay mentioning that essay as the origin of the term. Accessed online 7 July 2007. A lightly revised version of the original "Lust Horizons" essay can be found in No More Nice Girls, p. 3–14.
  66. ^ Farrow, Lynne, Quiet Rumours: An Anarcha-feminist Reader (AK Press, 2003), ISBN 9781902593401
  67. ^ Brown, Susan. "Beyond Feminism: Anarchism and Human Freedom" 'Anarchist Papers 3' Black Rose Books (1990) p. 208
  68. ^ Wendy McElroy, XXX: A Woman's Right to Pornography.
  69. ^ "Feminism: Anarchist" by Judy Greenway. 2000. Routledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and Knowledge. Kramara, Cheris & Spender, Dale eds. Routledge. p. 712
  70. ^ Defining Black Feminist Thought, retrieved on May 31, 2007.
  71. ^ A Black Feminist Statement - 1974, retrieved on May 31, 2007.
  72. ^ List of Books written by Black Feminists, retrieved on May 31, 2007.
  73. ^ Monstrous Domesticity by Faith Wilding, retrieved on May 31, 2007.
  74. ^ Ehrenreich, Barbara. "What is Socialist Feminism" WIN Magazine, 1976
  75. ^ Marx, Karl, Capital translated by B. Fowkes (Penguin Classics, 1990), ISBN 9780140445688
  76. ^ 'Feminism and Class Politics: A Round-Table Discussion' Clara Connolly, Lynne Segal, Michele Barrett, Beatrix Campbell, Anne Phillips, Angela Weir, Elizabeth Wilson in Feminist Review, No. 23, Socialist-Feminism: Out of the Blue (Summer, 1986), pp. 13-30
  77. ^ Engels, Fredrich, The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State, translated by A. West, (Lawrence & Wishart Ltd, 1972), ISBN 9780853152606
  78. ^ Bebel, August, Woman under Socialism (University Press of the Pacific, 2004), ISBN 9781410215642
  79. ^ Stokes, John, Eleanor Marx (1855-1898): Life, Work, Contacts, and: Socialist Women: Britain, 1880s to 1920s (Ashgate, 2000), ISBN 9780754601135
  80. ^ a b Johnson, Barbara. The Feminist Difference: Literature, Psychoanalysis, Race and Gender, Harvard University Press, 2000
  81. ^ Irigaray, Luce. "When Our Lips Speak Together" in Feminist Theory and the Body: A Reader ed. by Janet Price & Margrit Shildrick, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1999
  82. ^ Butler, Judith, "Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity" (Routledge, 1999), p.7, ISBN 9780415924993
  83. ^ a b Harraway, Donna, 'Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century' in Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature (Routledge, 1991), pp.149-181 [1]
  84. ^ Mary Joe Frug, "A Postmodern Feminist Legal Manifesto (An Unfinished Draft)," Harvard Law Review, Vol. 105, No. 5. (Mar., 1992), pp. 1045-1075
  85. ^ Mills, S (1998): "Postcolonial Feminist Theory" page 106 in S. Jackson and J. Jones eds., Contemporary Feminist Theories (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press) pp.98-112
  86. ^ Mohanty, Chandra Talpade, 'Under Western Eyes' in Feminist Review, No. 30 (Autumn, 1988), pp. 61-88
  87. ^ Bulbeck, Chilla, Re-orienting Western Feminisms: Women's Diversity in a Postcolonial World (Cambridge University Press, 1997), ISBN 9780521580304
  88. ^ Greenwald, A: "Postcolonial Feminism in Anthills of the Savannah", 2002
  89. ^ Mills, S (1998): "Postcolonial Feminist Theory" page 98 in S. Jackson and J. Jones eds., Contemporary Feminist Theories (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press) pp.98-112
  90. ^ Ogunyemi, C. O. (1985): "Womanism: The Dynamics of the Black Female Novel in English", Signs 11(1) pp63-80
  91. ^ Kolawale, M. (1997): Womanism and African Consciousness (Africa World Press)
  92. ^ Hudson-Weems, C. (1993), Africana womanist: Reclaiming ourselves (Troy, MI: Bedford)
  93. ^ Acholonu, C. O. (1995): Motherism: The Afrocentric Alternative to Feminism (Owerri, Nigeria: Afa Publications)
  94. ^ Ogundipe-Leslie, M. (1994): Re-Creating Ourselves: African Women & Critical Transformations (Africa World Press)
  95. ^ Nnaemeka, O. (1995): "Feminism, Rebellious Women, and Cultural Boundaries", Research in African Literatures
  96. ^ MacGregor, Sherilyn. "Beyond Mothering Earth: Ecological Citizenship" Vancouver: UBC Press 2006
  97. ^ Shiva, Vandana, Staying Alive: Women Ecology and Development (Zed Books Ltd, 1989), ISBN 9780862328238
  98. ^ Biehl, Janet, Rethinking Ecofeminist Politics (South End Press, 1991), ISBN 9780896083929
  99. ^ McElroy, Wendy, Liberty for Women: Freedom and Feminism in the Twenty-First Century (Ivan R Dee, 2002), ISBN 9781566634359
  100. ^ Mary Wollstonecraft by Wendy McElroy[2]
  101. ^ Good Will Toward Men by Wendy McElroy [3]
  102. ^ ifeminists.net. Retrieved on 2007-08-22.
  103. ^ McElroy, Wendy, ed. Liberty for Women: Freedom and Feminism in the Twenty-First Century (Ivan R Dee Inc., 2002), ISBN 9781566634359
  104. ^ [url=http://hdr.undp.org/reports/global/2004/pdf/hdr04_HDI.pdf] Section 28: Gender, Work Burden, and Time Allocation in United Nations Human Development Report 2004
  105. ^ [4]
  106. ^ "Gender Neutral Language." University of Saskatchewan Policies, 2001. http://www.usask.ca/policies/2_03.htm. Accessed March 25, 2007.
  107. ^ Hochschild, Arlie Russell, The Second Shift (Penguin, 2003), ISBN 9780142002926
  108. ^ Hochschild, Arlie Russell, The Time Bind: When Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Work (Owl Books U.S, 2003), ISBN 9780805066432
  109. ^ Scott J. South and Glenna Spitze, "Housework in Marital and Nonmarital Households," American Sociological Review 59, no. 3 (1994):327-348
  110. ^ Sarah Fenstermaker Berk and Anthony Shih, "Contributions to Household Labour: Comparing Wives' and Husbands' Reports,", in Berk, ed., Women and Household Labour
  111. ^ Luker, Kristin, Dubious Conceptions: The Politics of the Teenage Pregnancy Crisis. Harvard University Press (1996)
  112. ^ [5] Laurie A. Rudman & Julie E. Phelan, "The Interpersonal Power of Feminism: Is Feminism Good for Romantic Relationships?" Sex Roles, Vol. 57, No. 11-12, Dec 2007.
  113. ^ a b c Blain, Virginia, Isobel Grundy, and Patricia Clements, eds. The Feminist Companion to Literature in English. New Haven and London: Yale UP, 1990
  114. ^ Sandra M. Gilbert, "Paperbacks: From Our Mothers' Libraries: women who created the novel." New York Times, May 4, 1986.
  115. ^ Clute, John (1995). The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction. "Martin's Griffin", 424.
  116. ^ Elyce Rae Helford, in Westfahl, Gary. The Greenwood Encyclopedia of Science Fiction and Fantasy: Greenwood Press, 2005: 290.
  117. ^ Sturgis, Susanna. Octavia E. Butler: June 22, 1947February 24, 2006: The Women's Review of Books, 23(3): 19 May 2006.
  118. ^ Rosenberg, Jessica, Gitana Garofalo, 'Riot Grrrl: Revolutions from within' in Signs, Vol. 23, No. 3, Feminisms and Youth Cultures (Spring, 1998)
  119. ^ Schilt, Kristen, '"A Little Too Ironic": The Appropriation and Packaging of Riot Grrrl Politics by Mainstream Female Musicians' in Popular Music and Society, Vol. 26, 2003
  120. ^ Bundesen, Linda, The Feminine Spirit: Recapturing the Heart of Scripture (Jossey Bass Wiley, 2007), ISBN 9780787984953
  121. ^ Haddad, Mimi, "Egalitarian Pioneers: Betty Friedan or Catherine Booth?" Priscilla Papers, Vol. 20, No. 4 (Autumn 2006)
  122. ^ Anderson, Pamela Sue and Beverley Clack, eds., Feminist philosophy of religion: critical readings (London: Routledge, 2004)
  123. ^ II International Cogress on Islamic Feminism
  124. ^ Al-Ahram Weekly | Culture | Islamic feminism: what's in a name?
  125. ^ Plaskow, Judith. "Jewish Feminist Thought" in Frank, Daniel H. & Leaman, Oliver. History of Jewish Philosophy, Routledge, first published 1997; this edition 2003.
  126. ^ Fathi, Asghar Women and the Family in Iran (Brill, 1985) ISBN 9789004074262
  127. ^ Women's movement: Zanan magazine
  128. ^ About "One Million Signatures Demanding Changes to Discriminatory Laws"
  129. ^ a b Chaudhuri, Maitrayee, Feminism in India (Zed, 2005), ISBN 9781842776029
  130. ^ a b Buckley, Susan, Broken Silence: Voices of Japanese Feminism (University of California Press, 1997), ISBN 9780520085140
  131. ^ Mackie, Vera, Feminism in Modern Japan Citizenship, Embodiment and Sexuality (Curtin University of Technology, 2003), ISBN 9780521820189
  132. ^ a b Andersn, Arlow W., Rough Road to Glory: The Norwegian-American Press Speaks Out on Public Affairs 1875 to 1925 (Balch Institute Press, 1990), ISBN 978944190022
  133. ^ The modern state of Polish did not exist, until 1918
  134. ^ a b c Łoch, Eugenia (ed.) 2001. Modernizm i feminizm. Postacie kobiece w literaturze polskiej i obcej. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu M.Curie-Skłodowskiej
  135. ^ Śleczka, Kazimierz, 1997. "Feminizm czy feminizmy". In: Zofia Gorczyńska, Sabina Kruszyńska, Irena Zakidalska (eds.). Płeć, kobieta, feminizm. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego
  136. ^ Rossi, Elisabetta. L'emancipazione femminile in Russia prima e dopo la rivoluzione In difesa del marxismo Nr. 5 (English trans. The Emancipation of Women in Russia before and after the Russian Revolution In Defence of Marxism 8 March 2004)
  137. ^ Badia, G. Zetkin femminista senza frontiere. Erre emme edizioni 1994
  138. ^ a b Duby, George and Perrot, Michelle (eds.) A history of women in the west. Vol. 5 Harvard 1994
  139. ^ [http://www.redletterpress.org/rwmanifesto.html/ The Radical Women Manifesto: Socialist Feminist Theory, Program, and Organizational Structure, Red Letter Press, 2001
  140. ^ Ibárruri, Dolores, Speeches & Articles 1936-1938 (New York, 1938)
  141. ^ Parpart et al. Theoretical Perspectives on Gender and Development. 2000 op. cit.
  142. ^ Bridenthal, Renate et al. (eds.) When biology became destiny: Women in Weimar and Nazi Germany. New Feminist Library New York Monthly Review 1984
  143. ^ Blaffer Hrdy, Sarah. {{{title}}}. Pantheon, 1999. 
  144. ^ Fausto-Sterling, Anne Myths of Gender:Biological Theories About Men and Women (Basic Books Inc., 1992), ISBN 978978
  145. ^ Brizendine, Louann The Female Brain (Bantam Press, 2007), ISBN 9780593058077
  146. ^ Rhoads, Steven, Taking Sex Differences Seriously (Encounter Books, 2004), ISBN 9781893554931
  147. ^ Tavris, Carol. {{{title}}}. Simon & Schuster, 1992. 
  148. ^ Kember, Sarah. (2001). "Resisting the New Evolutionism," Women: A Cultural Review, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 1-8.
  149. ^ a b Lingard, Bob, and Peter Douglas, Men Engaging Feminisms: Pro-feminism, Backlashes and Schooling (Open University Press, 1999), ISBN 9780335198177
  150. ^ Digby, Tom, and Sandra Lee Bartky, Men Doing Feminism (Thinking Gender) (Routledge, 1998), ISBN 9780415916257
  151. ^ Farrell, Warren, Steven Svoboda and James P. Sterba, Does Feminism Discriminate Against Men?: A Debate (Oxford UP, 2007), ISBN 9780195312836
  152. ^ Porter, David L., Between Men and Feminism (Routledge, 1992), ISBN 9780415069885
  153. ^ a b c Michael S. Kimmel, “Who’s Afraid of Men Doing Feminism?,” from Men Doing Feminism, Tom Digby, ed. New York: Routledge, 1993, 57-68
  154. ^ Schacht, Steven P. , and Doris W. Ewing, Feminism and Men: Reconstructing Gender Relations (New York UP, 1998), ISBN 9780814780770
  155. ^ Michael S. Kimmel, “Introduction,” in Against the Tide: Pro-Feminist Men in the U.S., 1776-1990, A Documentary History. Boston: Beacon 1992, 1-51.
  156. ^ Messner, Michael, Power at Play: Sports and the Problem of Masculinity, Beacon Press; Reissue edition 1995, ISBN 978-0-8070-4105-5
  157. ^ Messner, Michael, Taking the Field: Women, Men, and Sports, University of Minnesota Press, 2002, ISBN 978-0-8166-3449-1
  158. ^ Loss of Woman's Aid Is America's Waste, newspaper clipping, 13 March 1902
  159. ^ New York State Association Opposed to Woman Suffrage Thirteenth Annual Report, 1908
  160. ^ Harry Brod, “To Be a Man, or Not to be a Man — That Is the Feminist Question,” in Men Doing Feminism, Tom Digby, ed. (NY: Routledge, 1993), 197-212.
  161. ^ Russ Ervin Funk, “The Power of Naming: Why Men Can’t Be Feminists,” in Feminista!: The Journal of Feminist Construction 1, no. 4.
  162. ^ a b Ashe, F. The New Politics of Masculinity (NY: Routledge, 2007).
  163. ^ a b Ashe, Fidelma, 'Deconstructing the Experiential Bar' in Men and Masculinities, Vol. 7, No. 2, 187-204 (2004)
  164. ^ "Anti-feminist." The Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd ed. 1989
  165. ^ Judith Stacey, Is Academic Feminism an Oxymoron?, Signs, Vol. 25, No. 4, Feminisms at a Millennium. (Summer, 2000), pp. 1189-1194
  166. ^ Elizabeth Kamarck Minnich, Review: 'Feminist Attacks on Feminisms: Patriarchy's Prodigal Daughters', Feminist Studies, Vol. 24, No. 1. (Spring, 1998), pp. 159-175
  167. ^ Patai, Daphne; Noretta Koertge. Professing Feminism: Education and Indoctrination in Women's Studies. ISBN 0739104551. 
  168. ^ Nathanson, P. and K. K. Young, Legalizing Misandry: From Public Shame to Systemic Descrimination Against Men (McGill-Queen's University Press)
  169. ^ Poloma M. M., Garland T. N. (1971). "The Married Professional Woman: A Study in the Tolerance of Domestication". Journal of Marriage and the Family 33 (3): 531-540.

[edit] See also

[edit] External links

Wikiquote has a collection of quotations related to:
Look up Feminism in
Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
Wikiversity
At Wikiversity, you can learn about:
Wikimedia Commons has media related to:

Personal tools