Polymath

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Leonardo da Vinci is regarded as an archetypal "Renaissance Man" and is one of the most recognizable polymaths.

A polymath (Greek polymathēs, πολυμαθής, "having learned much")[1] is a person whose knowledge is not restricted to one subject area. In less formal terms, a polymath (or polymathic person) may simply refer to someone who is very knowledgeable. Most ancient scientists were polymaths by today’s standards.[2]

The terms Renaissance Man and (less commonly) Homo Universalis (Latin for "universal man" or "man of the world") are related and used to describe a person who is well educated or who excels in a wide variety of subjects or fields.[3] This idea developed in Renaissance Italy from the notion expressed by one of its most accomplished representatives, Leon Battista Alberti (1404–72): that “a man can do all things if he will.” It embodied the basic tenets of Renaissance Humanism which considered man empowered, limitless in his capacities for development, and led to the notion that people should embrace all knowledge and develop their capacities as fully as possible. Thus the gifted men of the Renaissance sought to develop skills in all areas of knowledge, in physical development, in social accomplishments and in the arts.

Contents

[edit] Related terms

Hildegard of Bingen, a medieval polymath, shown dictating to her scribe in an illumination from Liber Scivias

A different name for the secondary meaning of polymath is Renaissance Man (a term first recorded in written English in the early twentieth century).[4] Other similar terms also in use are Homo universalis and Uomo Universale, which in Latin and Italian, respectively, translate as "universal person" or "universal man". These expressions derived from the ideal in Renaissance Humanism that it was possible to acquire a universal learning[5] in order to develop one's potential, (covering both the arts and the sciences[6] and without necessarily restricting this learning to the academic fields). When someone is called a Renaissance Man today, it is meant that he does not just have broad interests or a superficial knowledge of several fields, but rather that his knowledge is profound, and often that he also has proficiency or accomplishments in at least some of these fields, and in some cases even at a level comparable to the proficiency or the accomplishments of an expert.[7] The related term Generalist is used to contrast this general approach to knowledge to that of the specialist. The expression Renaissance man today commonly implies only intellectual or scholastic proficiency and knowledge and not necessarily the more universal sense of "learning" implied by the Renaissance Humanism. It is to note, however, that some dictionaries use the term Renaissance man as roughly synonymous with polymath in the first meaning, to describe someone versatile with many interests or talents,[8] while others recognize a meaning which is restricted to the Renaissance era and more closely related to the Renaissance ideals.

The term Universal Genius is also used, taking Leonardo da Vinci as a prime example again. The term seems to be used especially when a Renaissance man has made historical or lasting contributions in at least one of the fields in which he was actively involved and when he had a universality of approach. Despite the existence of this term, a polymath may not necessarily be classed as a genius; and certainly a genius may not display the breadth of knowledge to qualify as a polymath. Albert Einstein and Marie Curie are examples of people widely viewed as geniuses, but who are not generally considered to be polymaths.

[edit] Renaissance ideal

Many notable polymaths lived during the Renaissance period, a cultural movement that spanned roughly the fourteenth through the seventeenth century, beginning in Italy in the late Middle Ages and later spreading to the rest of Europe. They had a rounded approach to education which was typical of the ideals of the humanists of the time. A gentleman or courtier of that era was expected to speak several languages, play a musical instrument, write poetry, and so on, thus fulfilling the Renaissance ideal. The idea of a universal education was pivotal to achieving polymath ability, hence the word University was used to describe a seat of learning. At this time Universities did not specialise in specific areas, but rather trained their students in a broad array of science, philosophy and theology. This universal education, as such, gave them a grounding from which they could continue into apprenticeship to a Master of their field of interest. It is important to note that a university education was highly regarded. A person was not considered to need this broad knowledge to apprentice as a carpenter, but to apprentice in the sciences or philosophy it contributed hugely to their being able to comprehend the universe as it was understood at the time. During the Renaissance, Baldassare Castiglione, in his The Book of the Courtier, wrote a guide to being a polymath.

The Renaissance Ideal differed slightly from the "Polymath" in that it involved more than just intellectual advancement. Historically (roughly 14501600) it represented a person who endeavored to "develop his capacities as fully as possible" (Britannica, "Renaissance Man") both mentally and physically. Being an accomplished athlete was considered integral and not separate from education and learning of the highest order. Example: Leon Battista Alberti, who was an architect, painter, poet, scientist, mathematician, inventor, sculptor, and also a skilled horseman and archer.

[edit] Partial list of polymaths

The following list provides examples of notable polymaths (in the secondary meaning only, that is, Renaissance men). Caution is necessary when interpreting the word polymath (in the second meaning or any of its synonyms) in a source, since there's always ambiguity of what the word denotes. Also, when a list of subjects in relation to the polymath is given, such lists often seem to imply that the notable polymath was reputable in all fields, but the most common case is that the polymath made his reputation in one or two main fields where he had widely recognized achievements, and that he was merely proficient or actively involved in other fields, but, once again, not necessarily with achievements comparable to those of renowned experts of his time in these fields. The list does not attempt to be comprehensive or authoritative in any way. The list also includes the Hakeem of the Islamic Golden Age (also known as the "Islamic Renaissance"), and other polymaths from other parts of the world.

The following people represent prime examples of "Renaissance Men" and "universal geniuses", so to say "polymaths" in the strictest interpretation of the secondary meaning of the word.

  • Galileo Galilei (1564–1642), "Italian scientist, physicist, and philosopher. Galileo was a true Renaissance man, excelling at many different endeavors, including lute playing and painting."[13]
  • Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749–1832) "Germany's greatest man of letters—poet, critic, playwright, and novelist—and the last true polymath to walk the earth"[14] "Goethe comes as close to deserving the title of a universal genius as any man who has ever lived".[15] "He was essentially the last great European Renaissance man."[16] His gifts included incalculable contributions to the areas of German literature and the natural sciences. He is credited with discovery of a bone in the human jaw, and proposed a theory of colors. He has a mineral named in his honor, goethite. He molded the aesthetic properties of the Alps to poetry, thus, changing the local belief from "perfectly hideous" and an "unavoidable misery," to grandeur of the finest most brilliant creation.
  • Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826). Jefferson, the third President of the United States, was "the walking, talking embodiment of the Enlightenment, a polymath whose list of achievements is as long as it is incredibly varied."[20]. At a dinner honoring Nobel laureates, John F. Kennedy famously said "I think this is the most extraordinary collection of talent, of human knowledge, that has ever been gathered together in the White House—with the possible exception of when Thomas Jefferson dined alone."[21]
  • Gottfried Leibniz (1646–1716); "Leibniz was a polymath who made significant contributions in many areas of physics, logic, mathematics, history, librarianship, and of course philosophy and theology, while also working on ideal languages, mechanical clocks, mining machinery..."[24] "A universal genius if ever there was one, and an inexhaustible source of original and fertile ideas, Leibniz was all the more interested in logic because it ..."[25] "Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz was maybe the last Universal Genius incessantly active in the fields of theology, philosophy, mathematics, physics, ...."[25] "Leibniz was perhaps the last great Renaissance man who in Bacon's words took all knowledge to be his province."[26]
  • Leonardo da Vinci (1452–1519)[33][34] "In Leonardo Da Vinci, of course, he had as his subject not just an ordinary Italian painter, but the prototype of the universal genius, the 'Renaissance man,' ..."; "prodigious polymath.... Painter, sculptor, engineer, astronomer, anatomist, biologist, geologist, physicist, architect, philosopher, actor, singer, musician, humanist."[35]

[edit] Renaissance ideal today

During the Renaissance, the ideal of Renaissance humanism included the acquisition of almost all available important knowledge. At that time, several universal geniuses seem to have come close to that ideal, with actual achievements in multiple fields. With the passage of time however, "universal learning" has begun to appear ever more self-contradictory. For example, a famous dispute between "Jacob Burckhardt (whose Die Kultur der Renaissance in Italien of 1860 established Alberti as the prototype of the Renaissance Man) and Julius von Schlosser (whose Die Kunstliteratur of 1924 expresses discontent with Burckhardt's assessments on several counts)" deals with the issue of whether Alberti was indeed a dilettante or an actual Universal Man;[36] while an 1863 article about rhetoric said, for instance: "an universal genius is not likely to attain to distinction and to eminence in any thing [sic]. To achieve her best results, and to produce her most matured fruit, Genius must bend all her energies in one direction; strive for one object; keep her brain and hand upon one desired purpose and aim".[37]

Since it is considered extremely difficult to genuinely acquire an encyclopaedic knowledge, and even more to be proficient in several fields at the level of an expert (see expertise about research in this area), not to mention to achieve excellence or recognition in multiple fields, the word polymath, in both senses, may also be used, often ironically, with a potentially negative connotation as well. Under this connotation, by sacrificing depth for breadth, the polymath becomes a "jack of all trades, master of none". For many specialists, in the context of today's hyperspecialization, the ideal of a Renaissance man is judged to be an anachronism, since it is not uncommon that a specialist can barely dominate the accumulated knowledge of more than just one restricted subfield in his whole life, and many renowned experts have been made famous only for dominating different subfields or traditions or for being able to integrate the knowledge of different subfields or traditions.

Today, expertise is often associated with documents, certifications, diplomas, and degrees attributing to such, and a person who seems to have an abundance of these is often perceived as having more education than practical "working" experience. Autodidactic polymaths often combine didactic education and expertise in multiple fields with autodidactic research and experience to create the Renaissance ideal.

Many fields of interest take years of singleminded devotion to achieve expertise, often requiring starting at an early age. Also, many require cultural familiarity that may be inaccessible to someone not born and raised in that culture. In many such cases, it is realistically possible to achieve only knowledge of theory if not practical experience. For example, on a safari, a jungle native will be a more effective guide than an scientist who may be educated in the theories of jungle survival but did not grow up acquiring his knowledge first-hand.

However, those supporting the ideal of the Renaissance man today would say that the specialist's understanding of the interrelation of knowledge from different fields is too narrow and that a synthetic comprehension of different fields is unavailable to him, or, if they embrace the Renaissance ideal even more deeply, that the human development of the specialist is truncated by the narrowness of his view. What is much more common today than the universal approach to knowledge from a single polymath, is the multidisciplinary approach to knowledge which derives from several experts from different fields collaborating together.

[edit] Polymath and polyhistor compared

Many dictionaries of word origins list these words as synonyms or, as words with very similar meanings. Thomas Moore took the words as corresponding to similarly erudite "polys" in one of his poems "Off I fly, careering far/ In chase of Pollys, prettier far/ Than any of their namesakes are, / —The Polymaths and Polyhistors, Polyglots and all their sisters."[38]

According to the Oxford English Dictionary, the words mean practically the same; "the classical Latin word polyhistor was used exclusively, and the Greek word frequently, of Alexander Polyhistor", but polymathist appeared later, and then polymath. Thus today, regardless of any differentiation they may have had when originally coined, they are often taken to mean the same thing.

The root terms histor and math have similar meanings in their etymological antecedents (to learn, learned, knowledge), though with some initial and ancillarily added differing qualities. Innate in historíā (Greek and Latin) is that the learning takes place via inquiry and narrative. Hístōr also implies that the polyhistor displays erudition and wisdom. From Proto-Indo-European it shares a root with the word "wit". Inquiry and narrative are specific sets of pedagogical and research heuristics.

Polyhistoric is the corresponding adjective. The word polyhistory (meaning varied learning), when used, is often derogatory.

[edit] List of recognized polymaths

The following people have been described as "polymaths" by several reliable sources—fulfilling the primary definition of the term—although there may not be expert consensus that each is a prime example in the secondary meaning, as "renaissance men" and "universal geniuses" (see Some Renaissance Men above for prime examples of "renaissance men" or "universal geniuses").

  • Pythagoras (c.580–c.490 BC), a Greek mathematician and philosopher of 6th century BC who founded a school and a philosophical system, Pythagoreanism, named after him. Pythagoras was thought to be a polymath by his contemporaries.[42] He is sometimes credited with coining the term philosopher, literally a "lover of wisdom," and considered among the first to follow this vocation.[43]
  • Aristotle (384–322 BC); a Greek philosopher, a student of Plato and teacher of Alexander the Great. He wrote on many subjects, including physics, metaphysics, poetry, theater, music, logic, rhetoric, politics, government, ethics, biology and zoology. He numbers among the greatest polymaths of all time.[44][45] "Aristotle was an extraordinary polymath..."[46]
  • Xu Guangqi (1562-1633);[105] a Chinese bureaucrat, agricultural scientist, astronomer, and mathematician in the Ming Dynasty, who also helped in the translation of several classic Western texts into Chinese, including part of Euclid's Elements. Xu has been described as "a fascinating polymath who spread his interests far and wide for a specific purpose: statecraft."[105]
  • Athanasius Kircher (born 1601); "a 'polymath' if there ever was one. He studied a variety of subjects including... music, Egyptology, Sinology, botany, magnetism";[109] Athanasius Kircher: The Last Man Who Knew Everything (book title)[110]
  • Mikhail Lomonosov (1711–1765);[112] "Lomonosov was a true polymath—physicist, chemist, natural scientist, poet and linguist...."[113]
  • Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826); some sources describe him as "polymath and President," putting "polymath" first;[114] John F. Kennedy famously commented, addressing a group of Nobel laureates, that it was "the most extraordinary collection of talent, of human knowledge, that has ever been gathered together at the White House—- with the possible exception of when Thomas Jefferson dined alone."[115]
  • Edward Heron-Allen[citation needed] (1861–1943); "Heron-Allen is better described as a polymath..."[120] Not only was Heron-Allen a lawyer by trade, he also wrote, lectured on and created violins, was an expert on the art of chiromancy or palmistry, having read palms and analysed the handwriting of luminaries of the period. He wrote on musical, literary and scientific subjects ranging from foraminifera, marine zoology, meteorology, as a Persian scholar translated Classics such as the Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam and The Lament of Baba Tahir, also wrote on local geographic history, archeology, Buddhist philosophy, the cultivation, gourmet appreciation of and culture of the asparagus, as well as a number of novels and short stories of science fiction and horror written under his pseudonymn of "Christopher Blayre."
  • André Malraux[citation needed] (1901-1976); French novelist, art historian, adventurer and politician;" France's first minister of culture and polymath extraordinaire"[127]
  • John von Neumann (1903–1957); Physicist, mathematician, contributions to game theory, economics, pioneering computer scientist. "It isn't often that the human race produces a polymath like von Neumann, then sets him to work in the middle of the biggest crisis in human history..."[128] "Other luminaries would follow Einstein to New Jersey, including the dazzling Hungarian polymath, John von Neumann..."[129]
  • Herbert Simon[citation needed] (1916-2001); "Simon is a very distinguished polymath, famous for work in psychology and computer science, philosophy of science, a leader in artificial intelligence, and a Nobel Prize winner in Economics."[130]
  • Rabindranath Tagore (7 May 1861 – 8 August 1941) Tagore was a Bengali poet, Brahmo religionist, visual artist, playwright, novelist, and composer whose works reshaped Bengali literature and music in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. He became Asia's first Nobel laureate when he won the 1913 Nobel Prize in Literature.[131]

[edit] "'Polymath' sportsmen"

In Britain, phrases such as "polymath sportsman," "sporting polymath," or simply "polymath" are occasionally used in a restricted sense to refer to athletes that have performed at a high level in several very different sports. (One whose accomplishments are limited to athletics would not be considered to be a "polymath" in the usual sense of the word). Examples would include:

[edit] Fictional polymaths

Sherlock and Mycroft Holmes, Nero Wolfe, William of Baskerville, Gregory House of House M.D., Robert Goren of Law & Order: Criminal Intent, Citan Uzuki of Xenogears, Spider-Man, Henry McCoy (Beast of the X-Men), Buckaroo Banzai, Artemis Fowl II, Grand Admiral Thrawn of Star Wars, Ianto Jones of Torchwood, Dunstan Ramsay of Robertson Davies's novel Fifth Business, Professor Abraham Van Helsing of Bram Stoker's Dracula, Batman, Mister Peabody, Gil Grissom of CSI: Las Vegas, Agent Pendergast, Hannibal Lecter, Doc Savage, Spock of Star Trek, James Bond, The Lizard of Spider-Man, Jarod of The Pretender, Dess of Midnighters Trilogy by Scott Westerfeld, Albert Wesker of Resident Evil, Charlie of Heroes, Sam Beckett of Quantum Leap, MacGyver, Fox Mulder from the X-Files and many main characters in the novels of Robert A. Heinlein could fairly be described as polymaths.

Polymaths in fiction often have a certain eccentricity about their knowledge, e.g., Doctor Who: "He claims he's (a doctor) of everything."

In the film Phenomenon, John Travolta plays a character who has inexplicably and suddenly become a budding polymath-type individual, somewhat akin to the Charley in Flowers for Algernon.

[edit] See also

[edit] References and notes

  1. ^ The term was first recorded in written English in the early seventeenth century Harper, Daniel (2001). "Online Etymology Dictionary". Retrieved on 2006-12-05.
  2. ^ 1 Introduction: Greek Science in Context
  3. ^ Encarta dictionary
  4. ^ Harper, Daniel (2001). "Online Etymology Dictionary". Retrieved on 2006-12-05.
  5. ^ Renaissance man (definition)
  6. ^ Renaissance man. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language: Fourth Edition. 2000
  7. ^ va=Renaissance man - Definition from the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary
  8. ^ Oxford concise dictionary
  9. ^ Paul Murdin (2000). "al-Biruni, Abu Raihan (973–1048)", Encyclopedia of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol.
  10. ^ Mr Koïchiro Matsuura. United Nations: Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, UNESCO.
  11. ^ Lynn Townsend White, Jr. (Spring, 1961). "Eilmer of Malmesbury, an Eleventh Century Aviator: A Case Study of Technological Innovation, Its Context and Tradition", Technology and Culture 2 (2), p. 97-111 [100-101].
  12. ^ Paul Lunde, Science in Al-Andalus, Saudi Aramco World, July 2004, pp. 20-27.
  13. ^ Eric W. Weisstein, Galileo Galilei (1564–1642)
  14. ^ Eliot, George (2004) [1871]. Gregory Maertz (ed.). ed.. Middlemarch. Broadview Press. ISBN.  Note by editor of 2004 edition, Gregory Maertz, p. 710
  15. ^ Google books
  16. ^ Google books
  17. ^ Review of Ibn al-Haytham: First Scientist, Kirkus Reviews, December 1, 2006.
  18. ^ Sami Hamarneh (March 1972). Review of Hakim Mohammed Said, Ibn al-Haitham, Isis 63 (1), p. 118–119.
  19. ^ Laurence Bettany (1995). "Ibn al-Haytham: an answer to multicultural science teaching?", Physics Education 30, p. 247–252.
  20. ^ Cormac O'Brien (2004). Secret Lives of the U.S. Presidents: What Your Teachers Never Told You. Quirk Books. ISBN 1931686572. , p. 15
  21. ^ William C. Spragens (1988). Popular Images of American Presidents. Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 031322899X. , p. 27
  22. ^ Liat Radcliffe, Newsweek (cf. The Polymath by Bensalem Himmich, The Complete Review).
  23. ^ Marvin E. Gettleman and Stuart Schaar (2003), The Middle East and Islamic World Reader, p. 54, Grove Press, ISBN 0802139361.
  24. ^ Shand, John (2005). Central Works of Philosophy, Volume 2: Seventeenth and Eighteenth Century. McGill-Queen's Press. ISBN. , ch. 3, "G. W. Leibnitz: Monadology," by Douglas Burnham; p. 61
  25. ^ a b Google books
  26. ^ Google books
  27. ^ "Newton beats Einstein in polls of scientists and the public". The Royal Society. Retrieved on 2006-10-25.
  28. ^ Alan Cook (2000), Review of Niccolo Guicciardini, Reading the Principia; The Debate on Newton's Mathematical Methods for Natural Philosophy from 1687 to 1736, Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 54 (1), p. 109–113.
  29. ^ Top 100 Events of the Millennium, Life magazine.
  30. ^ Caroline Stone, "Doctor, Philosopher, Renaissance Man", Saudi Aramco World, May-June 2003, p. 8–15.
  31. ^ Richard Covington, "Rediscovering Arabic Science", Saudi Aramco World, May/June 2007.
  32. ^ Charles F. Horne (1917), ed., The Sacred Books and Early Literature of the East Vol. VI: Medieval Arabia, pages 90–91. Parke, Austin, & Lipscomb, New York. (cf. Ibn Sina (Avicenna) (973–1037): On Medicine, c. 1020 CE, Medieval Sourcebook.)
  33. ^ Elmer, Peter; Nicholas Webb, Roberta Wood (2000). The Renaissance in Europe: An Anthology. Yale University Press. ISBN.  "The following selection... shows why this famous Renaissance polymath considered painting to be a science..."
  34. ^ p. 180
  35. ^ Johnston, Robert K.; J Walker Smith (2003). Life Is Not Work, Work Is Not Life: Simple Reminders for Finding Balance in a 24-7 World. Council Oak Books. ISBN.  p. 1
  36. ^ Muse.jhu
  37. ^ Google books
  38. ^ The Complete Poems of Sir Thomas Moore by Thomas Moore - Project Gutenberg
  39. ^ Wilhelmina Wright-Harp, Patricia A. Cole (Spring 2008), "A Mentoring Model for Enhancing Success in Graduate Education", Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders 35: 4–16 [4] 
  40. ^ Glaser, Joel S. (June 2008), "Romancing the Chiasm: Vision, Vocalization, and Virtuosity", Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology 28 (2): 131–43 
  41. ^ The Egyptian Building Mania, Acta Divrna, Vol. III, Issue IV, January, 2004.
  42. ^ Greek (Polymaths) Mathematician
  43. ^ Pythagoras c. 570 B.C.–c. 500 B.C.
  44. ^ BBC - Polymaths
  45. ^ "He was a remarkable polymath. He made major contributions to logic, metaphysics, the natural sciences (above all biology), psychology, ethics, literary criticism..");Moore, A. W. (2001). The Infinite. Routledge. ISBN.  p. 34
  46. ^ Heater, Derek (2004). A Brief History Of Citizenship. New York University Press. ISBN. , "Aristotle was an extraordinary polymath, although only two of his great range of works, which were probably in origin lectures, interest us here."p. 16
  47. ^ Ancient Greek Influences in Science
  48. ^ Cambridge Histories Online : Academic epistemology
  49. ^ MEASURING THE WORLD: Eratosthenes' Measurement of the Earth's Circumference, Random House, Inc. Academic Resources
  50. ^ Eratosthenes
  51. ^ Definition of Polymath.
  52. ^ History of Cartography
  53. ^ Mair, Victor H. (2001). The Columbia History of Chinese Literature. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 0231109849. Page 251.
  54. ^ Yan, Hong-sen. (2007). Reconstruction Designs of Lost Ancient Chinese Machinery. Dordrecht: Springer. ISBN 1402064594. Page 127.
  55. ^ Dillon, Michael. (1998). China: A Historical and Cultural Dictionary. Surrey: Routledge Curzon Press. ISBN 0700704396. Page 378.
  56. ^ Krebs, Robert E. (2003). The Basics of Earth Science. Westport: Greenwood Press of Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc. ISBN 0313319308. Page 31.
  57. ^ Unal, Ali (2007), Islamic Perspectives on Science: Knowledge and Responsibility, Tughra Books, p. 8, ISBN 1597840696 
  58. ^ Ziauddin Sardar, Merryl Wyn Davies (2004), The No-nonsense Guide to Islam, Verso Books, p. 87, ISBN 1859844545 
  59. ^ Bio-Bibliographies, United States National Library of Medicine.
  60. ^ Bosworth, C. E. (March 1963), "A Pioneer Arabic Encyclopedia of the Sciences: Al Khwarizmi's Keys of the Sciences", Isis 54 (1): 97–111 [111] 
  61. ^ Janin, Hunt (2005), The Pursuit Of Learning In The Islamic World, 610-2003, McFarland, p. 54, ISBN 0786419547 
  62. ^ Lawrence S. Cunningham, John J. Reich (2005), Culture and Values: A Survey of the Humanities, Thomson Wadsworth, p. 190, ISBN 0534582273 
  63. ^ a b c Karima Alavi, Tapestry of Travel, Center for Contemporary Arab Studies, Georgetown University.
  64. ^ Adamson, Peter (2006), Al-Kindi, Oxford University Press, p. 17, ISBN 0195181425 
  65. ^ a b c d e Ziauddin Sardar (1998), "Science in Islamic philosophy", in Edward Craig, Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 8, Routledge, pp. 561–5, ISBN 0415073103, http://www.muslimphilosophy.com/ip/rep/H016.htm, retrieved on 2 October 2008 
  66. ^ van Sertima, Ivan (1985), African Presence in Early Europe, Transaction Publishers, pp. 159-61, ISBN 0887386644 
  67. ^ Andalusian Feast
  68. ^ Sergienko, Alexander V. (2006), Quantum Communications and Cryptography, CRC Press, p. 3, ISBN 0849336848 
  69. ^ a b c d Ziauddin Sardar, Merryl Wyn Davies (2004), The No-nonsense Guide to Islam, Verso Books, pp. 87–8, ISBN 1859844545 
  70. ^ Will Durant (cf. Innovations in Islamic Sciences, Foundation for Science Technology and Civilisation)
  71. ^ Turner, Howard R. (1997), Science in Medieval Islam: An Illustrated Introduction, University of Texas Press, p. 135, ISBN 0292781490 
  72. ^ S. M. Deen (2007), Science Under Islam: Rise, Decline and Revival, Lulu Press, p. 111, ISBN 1847999425
  73. ^ Encyclopædia Britannica Article on al-Farabi
  74. ^ Philosophers: al-Fārābi
  75. ^ Abu Al-Nasr Al-Farabi: The Second Teacher
  76. ^ King, Anya (2008), "The Importance of Imported Aromatics in Arabic Culture: Illustrations from Pre-Islamic and Early Islamic Poetry", Journal of Near Eastern Studies (University of Chicago Press) 67 (3): 175–89 :

    "the polymath historian al-Masşudi"

  77. ^ Julie Scott Meisami, Paul Starkey (1998), Encyclopedia of Arabic Literature, Routledge, p. 514, ISBN 0415185718
  78. ^ John L. Esposito (2004), The Oxford Dictionary of Islam, Oxford University Press, p. 195, ISBN 0195125592
  79. ^ a b Hiram Woodward (2004), "Review of Indian esoteric Buddhism: A social history of the Tantric movement by Ronald M. Davidson", Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 35: 329–54
  80. ^ Michael Psellos
  81. ^ Pythagoras in The Renaissance: The Case of Marsilio Ficino
  82. ^ Reading Michael Psellos - BRILL
  83. ^ Sample Chapter for Gaisser, J.H.: The Fortunes of Apuleius and the Golden Ass: A Study in Transmission and Reception.
  84. ^ a b Shen Kua, Science and Its Times, Thomson Gale.
  85. ^ Turner, Howard R. (1997), Science in Medieval Islam: An Illustrated Introduction, University of Texas Press, p. 53, ISBN 0292781490 
  86. ^ "a...polymath".Omar Khyam, The Iconoclast, New English Review, 1 May 2007
  87. ^ Omar Khayyam and Max Stirner
  88. ^ Walter H. Maurer (1971). Review of Pramana-Naya-Tattvalokalamkara of Vadi Devasuri by Hari Satya Bhattacharya by Hari Satya Bhattacharya, Philosophy East and West 21 (1) p. 98–99.
  89. ^ John E. Cort (November 1999). Review of Hemacandra, R. C. C. Fynes, The Lives of the Jain Elders, The Journal of Asian Studies 58 (4), p. 1166–1167.
  90. ^ Avempace, Encyclopædia Britannica, 2007
  91. ^ Norman Calder, Jawid Ahmad Mojaddedi, Andrew Rippin (2003), Classical Islam: A Sourcebook of Religious Literature, Routledge, p. 166, ISBN 0415240336 :

    "The remarkable thirteenth-century polymath Nasir al-Din al-Tusi"

  92. ^ Carr, Brian (1996), Morals and Society in Asian Philosophy, Routledge, p. 9, ISBN 0700703454 
  93. ^ Nasir Al-Din Al-Tusi
  94. ^ S. J. Badakhchani, Nasir al-Din Tusi (1201–1274), Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  95. ^ Julie Scott Meisami, Paul Starkey, Encyclopedia of Arabic Literature: K-Z, Routledge, ISBN 0415185726 :

    "ibn al-Nafis was an important physician and polymath of the seventh/thirteenth century."

  96. ^ Dr. Abu Shadi Al-Roubi, Ibnul-Nafees As a Philosopher, Encyclopedia of Islamic World.
  97. ^ Brand, Peter; Lino Pertile (1999). The Cambridge History of Italian Literature. Cambridge University Press. ISBN.  "Leon Battista Alberti), more versatile than Bruni, is often considered the archetype of the Renaissance polymath." p. 138
  98. ^ Norman Calder, Jawid Ahmad Mojaddedi, Andrew Rippin (2003), Classical Islam: A Sourcebook of Religious Literature, Routledge, p. 83, ISBN 0415240336 
  99. ^ John O. Hunwick, Razaq Abubakre, R. S. O'Fahey(2003), Arabic literature of Africa, Brill Academic Publishers, p. 17
  100. ^ Chase F. Robinson (2002), Islamic Historiography, Cambridge University Press, p. 169
  101. ^ Alexander D. Knysh(1999), Ibn 'Arabi in the Later Islamic Tradition: The Making of a Polemical Image in Medieval Islam, State University of New York Press, p. 213
  102. ^ Kültür Bakanlığı web sitesi
  103. ^ Nasuh Al-Matrakî, A Noteworthy Ottoman Artist-Mathematician of the Sixteenth Century
  104. ^ a b c Irfan Habib (1992), "Akbar and Technology", Social Scientist 20 (9-10): 3-15 [3-4]
  105. ^ a b "Scientists Fete China's Supreme Polymath," by Richard Stone. Science, 2 November 2007, page 733
  106. ^ Julie Scott Meisami, Paul Starkey(1998), Encyclopedia of Arabic Literature, Routledge, p. 509
  107. ^ William Gervase Clarence Smith, Science and technology in early modern Islam, c.1450-c.1850, XIV International Economic History Congress, Helsinki, Finland, 21-25 August 2006
  108. ^ A. K. Bag (2005), "Fathullah Shirazi: Cannon, Multi-barrel Gun and Yarghu", Indian Journal of History of Science 40 (3), pp. 431-436.
  109. ^ Barfield, Owen A. (1999). A Barfield Reader. Wesleyan University Press. , p. 47
  110. ^ Findlen (ed), Paula (2004). Athanasius Kircher: The Last Man Who Knew Everything. Routledge (U. K.). ISBN. , p. 209: "the Jesuit polymath Athanasius Kircher"
  111. ^ Jehlen, Myra; Michael Warner (1997). The English Literatures of America,. Routledge. ISBN.  p. 667
  112. ^ Glenn Cross, Anthony (1997). By the Banks of the Neva: Chapters from the Lives and Careers of the British in Eighteenth-century Russia. Cambridge University Press. pp. 474. ISBN 9780521552936. http://books.google.com/books?id=xtvANl4zfCIC&pg=PA228&lpg=PA228&dq=lomonosov+polymath+-%22who+made+important+contributions+to+literature%22&source=web&ots=luEHKqBbrA&sig=JLfb6nxqV29gsJuxb_7hUVMIY5g&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=4&ct=result#PPA228,M1. 
  113. ^ Chorley, Richard J.; Robert P Beckinsale (1991). The History of the Study of Landforms Or the Development of Geomorphology. Routledge. ISBN. : "Lomonosov was a true polymath—physicist, chemist, natural scientist, poet and linguist...."p. 169
  114. ^ Kennedy, Barbara A. (2006). Inventing the Earth: Ideas on Landscape Development Since 1740. Blackwell Publishing. ISBN.  "Jefferson, Thomas). Polymath and third President of the USA."p. 132
  115. ^ Rees, Nigel (2003). Cassell's Humorous Quotations. Sterling Publishing Company. ISBN.  p. 392. Note that Jefferson is identified as "American Polymath and President."
  116. ^ Newsome, David (1999). The Victorian World Picture. Cambridge University Press. ISBN.  "Coleridge was unquestionably a polymath, with a universal knowledge unequalled by any thinker of his day." p. 259
  117. ^ Elizabeth Campbell Denlinger (2005). Before Victoria: extraordinary women of the British Romantic era. Columbia University Press. ISBN. , p. 135: "Somerville was the most celebrated woman scientist of her time. A polymath, she wrote on astronomy, mathematics, physics, chemistry, mineralogy, and geology, among other subjects..."
  118. ^ [1]. Accessed 10 January 2007.
  119. ^ http://www.phoenixmasonry.org/the_builder_1916_august.htm Accessed 10 January 2007.
  120. ^ R.B. Russell, Tartarus Press.
  121. ^ Slovakia - Basagic’s Collection of Islamic Manuscripts in the University Library of Bratislava
  122. ^ Indopedia - Bosnian language
  123. ^ Eulogy
  124. ^ Filipino Information Manager
  125. ^ Sons of the Province
  126. ^ Prodigy
  127. ^ Malraux laid to rest in the Pantheon of heroes | Independent, The (London) | Find Articles at BNET.com
  128. ^ Howard Rheingold (2000). Tools for Thought: the history and future of mind-expanding technology. MIT Press. ISBN. , p. 66
  129. ^ Rebecca Goldstein (2005). Incompleteness: The Proof and Paradox of Kurt Godel. W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN. , p. 19
  130. ^ Brown, James Robert (1999). Philosophy of Mathematics: An Introduction to a World of Proofs and Pictures. Routledge. ISBN. , p. 51
  131. ^ http://www.time.com/time/asia/asia/magazine/1999/990823/tagore1.html
  132. ^ The genius of Dr Raziuddin Siddiqi
  133. ^ Cox, Richard (2002). Encyclopedia of British Football. Routledge. ISBN.  p. 15
  134. ^ Brian Viner (2006-10-12). "Sporting polymath is a full-time post for which only obsessives need apply: It is hard to get the head round the idea that one man excelled in so many sports". The Independent. Retrieved on 2006-10-12.: "I read a book by Mick Collins called All-Round Genius: The Unknown Story of Britain's Greatest Sportsman. It is about a man called Max Woosnam, who...toured Brazil with the famous Corinthians football team in 1913... won an Olympic gold medal for tennis, played golf off scratch, scored a century at Lord's, and made a 147 break on the snooker table."
  135. ^ The great allrounder - C.B Fry
  136. ^ Charles Fry - Up with the Gods by Iain Wilton

[edit] Further reading

Personal tools