Great American Interchange

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
True-color NASA mosaic of satellite images.

The Great American Interchange was an important paleozoogeographic event in which land and freshwater fauna migrated from North America via Central America to South America and vice versa, as the volcanic Isthmus of Panama rose up from the sea floor and bridged the formerly separated continents. The migration peaked dramatically around three million years (Ma) ago (in the Piacenzian, the first half of the Upper Pliocene).

It resulted in the joining of the Neotropic (roughly South America) and Nearctic (roughly North America) definitively to form the Americas. The interchange is visible from observation of both stratigraphy and nature (neontology). Its most dramatic effect is on the zoogeography of mammals but it also gave an opportunity for non-flying birds, arthropods, reptiles, amphibians and even freshwater fish to migrate.

Similar interchanges occurred earlier in the Cenozoic when the formerly isolated land masses of India[1] and Africa[2] made contact with Eurasia c. 50 and 30 Ma ago, respectively.

Contents

[edit] South America's endemic fauna

The sabertooth "marsupial" †Thylacosmilus

After the late Mesozoic breakup of Gondwana, South America spent most of the Cenozoic era as an island continent whose "splendid isolation" allowed its fauna to evolve into many forms found nowhere else on earth, most of which are now extinct.[3] Its endemic mammals initially consisted of marsupials, the closely related metatherian sparassodonts, xenarthrans, and a diverse group of native ungulates: notoungulates (the "southern ungulates"), litopterns, astrapotheres (e.g. Trigonostylops, Astrapotherium), and pyrotheres (e.g. Pyrotherium).

Marsupials may have traveled (via Gondwanan land connections) from South America through Antarctica to Australia and/or vice versa in the late Cretaceous or early Tertiary. One living S. American marsupial, the Monito del Monte, is believed to be more closely related to Australian marsupials than to other South American marsupials. A 61-Ma-old platypus-like monotreme fossil from Patagonia may represent another Australian immigrant. It appears that ratites (relatives of S. American tinamous) migrated by this route around the same time, more likely in the direction from S. America towards Australia/New Zealand.[4] Other taxa that may have dispersed by the same route (if not by flying or floating across the ocean) are parrots, chelid turtles and (extinct) meiolaniid turtles.

Marsupials present in South America included didelphimorphs (opossums) and several other small groups; larger predatory relatives of these also existed, like the borhyaenids and the sabertooth Thylacosmilus (which are now considered to be non-marsupial metatherians).[5] The relative inefficiency of the metatherians created openings for nonmammalian predators to play more prominent roles than usual (similar to the situation in Australia); sparassodonts shared the ecological niches for large predators with fearsome flightless "terror birds" (phorusrhacids), whose closest extant relatives are the seriemas.[6][7] Terrestrial ziphodont[note 1] sebecid crocodilians were also present at least through the middle Miocene.[8][9][10][11] Through the skies over late Miocene South America (6 Ma ago) soared the largest flying bird known, the teratorn Argentavis, with a wing span of 6 m or more, which may have subsisted in part on the leftovers of Thylacosmilus kills.[12]

Xenarthrans are a curious group of mammals that developed morphological adaptations for specialized diets very early in their history.[13] In addition to those extant today (armadillos, anteaters and tree sloths), a great diversity of of other kinds were present, including pampatheres, the ankylosaur-like glyptodonts, various ground sloths, some of which reached the size of elephants (e.g. Megatherium), and even aquatic sloths.

The notoungulates and litopterns had many strange forms, like Macrauchenia, a camel-like litoptern with a small proboscis. They also produced a number of familiar-looking body types that represent examples of parallel or convergent evolution: one-toed Thoatherium had legs like those of a horse, Pachyrukhos resembled a rabbit, Homalodotherium was a semi-bipedal clawed browser like a chalicothere, and horned Trigodon looked like a rhino. Both groups started evolving in the Lower Paleocene, possibly from condylarth stock, diversified, dwindled before the great interchange, and went extinct at the end of the Pleistocene. The pyrotheres and astrapotheres were also strange but were less diverse and disappeared earlier, well before the interchange.

The North American fauna was a pretty typical boreoeutherian one (supplemented with Afrotherian proboscids).

[edit] Island-hopping ‘waif dispersers’

The invasions of South America started at least 31.5 Ma ago (late Eocene/early Oligocene), when cavimorph rodents arrived. Their subsequent vigorous diversification displaced some of S. America's small marsupials and gave rise to – among others – capybaras, chinchillas, viscachas, and New World porcupines. (The independent development of spines by New and Old World porcupines is another example of parallel evolution.) This invasion most likely came from Africa.[14] The crossing from West Africa to the northeast corner of Brazil was much shorter then due to continental drift, and may have been aided by island-hopping (e.g. via St. Paul's Rocks, if they were an inhabitable island at the time) and westward oceanic currents.[15] Crossings of the ocean were accomplished when at least one fertilised female (more commonly a group of animals) accidentally floated over on driftwood or mangrove rafts. (Island-hopping cavimorphs would subsequently colonize the West Indies as far as the Bahamas). Over time, some cavimorph rodents evolved into larger forms that competed with some of the native South American ungulates, which may have contributed to the gradual loss of diversity suffered by the latter after the early Oligocene.[3]

A little later (at least 25 Ma ago) primates followed, probably from Africa in a fashion similar to that of the rodents. Primates capable of migrating had to be small. With little effective competition they also diversified widely, giving rise to the New World monkeys. (Not long after arriving, monkeys apparently most closely related to titis island-hopped to Cuba, Hispaniola and Jamaica.) The South American cavimorph rodents and monkeys are both believed to be clades (i.e., monophyletic).

Tortoises also arrived in South America in the Oligocene. It was long thought that they had come from N. America, but a recent comparative genetic analysis concludes that S. American members of Geochelone are actually most closely related to African hingeback tortoises.[note 2][16] Tortoises are aided in oceanic dispersal by their ability to float with their heads up, and to survive up to six months without food or water.[16] S. American tortoises then went on to colonize the West Indies and Galápagos Islands. Skinks of genus Mabuya apparently floated across the Atlantic from Africa during the last 9 Ma.[17]

The earliest mammalian arrival from North America was a carnivorous procyonid that island-hopped from Central America prior to the formation of a land bridge, around 7 Ma ago. This was South America's first eutherian carnivore. South American procyonids then diversified into forms now extinct (e.g. the "dog-coati" Cyonasua, which evolved into the bear-like Chapalmalania). However, all extant procyonid genera appear to have originated in North America.[18] It has been suggested that the first S. American procyonids may have contributed to the extinction of sebecid crocodilians by eating their eggs, but this view has not been universally viewed as plausible.[a][11] The procyonids were followed to S. America by island-hopping sigmodontine rodents[19], peccaries and hog-nosed skunks.[20]

Similarly, megalonychid and mylodontid ground sloths island-hopped to North America by 9 Ma ago.[19] Megalonychids had colonized the Antilles previously, by the early Miocene.[21] (Megatheriid ground sloths had to wait for the formation of the isthmus, but then sent several lineages north.)

[edit] The Great American Biotic Interchange

Titanis walleri, the only known N. American terror bird.

The formation of the Isthmus of Panama led to the last and most conspicuous wave, the great interchange, around 3 Ma ago. This included the immigration of North American ungulates (including llamas, tapirs, deer and horses), proboscids (gomphotheres), carnivorans (including felids like cougars and saber-toothed cats, canids, mustelids, procyonids and bears) and a number of types of rodents[note 3] into South America.

In general, the initial net migration was symmetrical. Later on, however, the Neotropic species proved far less successful than the Nearctic. This misfortune happened both ways. Northwardly migrating animals often were not able to compete for resources as well as the North American species already occupying the same ecological niches; those that succeeded in becoming established did not diversify much. Southwardly migrating Nearctic species established themselves in larger numbers and diversified considerably more, and are thought to have caused the extinction of a large proportion of the South American fauna. (There were no extinctions in N. America obviously attributable to S. American immigrants.) Although terror birds were initially able to invade N. America (they may have island-hopped over as early as 5 Ma ago),[22] this success was temporary; all of the large Neotropic avian and metatherian predators ultimately disappeared. South America's native ungulates also fared very poorly, with only several of the largest forms, Macrauchenia and a few toxodontids, withstanding the northern onslaught. (Among the notoungulates, the mesotheriids and hegetotheriids did manage to survive into the Pleistocene.) Its small marsupials fared better, while the primitive-looking xenarthrans proved to be surprisingly competitive. The African immigrants, the cavimorph rodents and platyrrhine monkeys, generally held their own during the interchange, although the largest rodents (e.g. the dinomyids) seem to have disappeared. With the exception of the North American porcupine and several extinct porcupines and capybaras, however, they did not migrate past Central America.[note 4]

The presence of armadillos, opossums, and porcupines in North America today is explained by the Great American Interchange. Opossums and porcupines were among most successful northward migrants, reaching as far as Canada. While only one example each of xenarthrans, marsupials and cavimorph rodents currently lives in the United States, 32 species from these taxa are present in tropical Central America. Prior to the end-Pleistocene extinctions, most major groups of xenarthrans were established in North America (as a result of at least seven successful invasions of temperate North America, and at least six more invasions of Central America only). Among the megafauna, ground sloths were notably successful emigrants; Megalonyx spread as far north as the Yukon[23] and Alaska, and might have eventually reached Eurasia if the Quaternary extinction event had not intervened.

Generally speaking, however, the dispersal and subsequent explosive adaptive radiation of sigmodontine rodents throughout South America was much more successful (both spatially and by number of species) than any northward migration of S. American mammals. Other examples of N. American mammal groups that diversified conspicuously in S. America include canids and cervids, both of which currently have 4 genera in N. America, 2 or 3 in Central America, and 6 in S. America. Although Canis currently ranges only as far south as Panama, S. America still has more extant canid genera than any other continent.

[edit] Reasons for success or failure

A north-south climatic asymmetry in the Americas. Tropical climate zones, which are warm year-round and moist at least part of the year (blue zones Af, Am and Aw) cover much of South America and nearly all of Central America, but very little of the rest of North America.

The eventual triumph of the Nearctic migrants was ultimately based on geography, which played into the hands of the northern invaders in two crucial respects. The first was a matter of climate. Obviously, any species that reached Panama from either direction had to be able to tolerate moist tropical conditions. Those migrating southward would then be able to occupy much of South America without encountering climates that were markedly different. However, northward migrants would have encountered drier and/or cooler conditions by the time they reached the vicinity of the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt. The challenge this climatic asymmetry (see map on right) presented was particularly acute for Neotropic species specialized for tropical rainforest environments, who had little prospect of penetrating beyond Central America.

Land areas over which ancestors of Neotropic (green) and Nearctic (red) species could wander via two-way migrations during the latter part of the Cenozoic. The smaller area available for Neotropic species to evolve in tended to put them at a competitive disadvantage during the interchange.

The second and more important advantage geography gave to the northerners is related to the land area available for their ancestors to evolve in. During the Cenozoic, North America was periodically connected to Eurasia via Beringia, allowing multiple migrations back and forth to unite the faunas of the two continents. Eurasia was connected in turn to Africa, which contributed further to the species that made their way to North America. South America, on the other hand, was connected to Antarctica and Australia, two much smaller continents, only in the earliest part of the Cenozoic, and this land connection does not seem to have carried much traffic (apparently no mammals other than marsupials and perhaps a few monotremes ever migrated by this route). Effectively, this means that northern hemisphere species arose over a land area roughly six times larger than was available to S. American species. This calculation may not be entirely fair, in that migrations between continents would have been more difficult and less frequent than migrations within S. America. Nevertheless, it is clear that N. American species were products of a larger and more competitive arena, where evolution would have proceeded more rapidly. They tended to be more efficient and brainier,[b] generally able to outrun and outwit their S. American counterparts. These advantages can be clearly seen in the cases of ungulates and their predators, where S. American forms were replaced wholesale by the invaders.

Against this backdrop, the ability of S. America's xenarthrans to compete effectively against the northerners represents a special case. The explanation for the xenarthrans' success lies in part in their idiosyncratic approach to defending against predation, based on possession of body armor and/or formidable claws. The xenarthrans did not need to be fleet-footed or quick-witted to survive. Such a strategy may have been forced on them by their low metabolic rate (the lowest among the therians).[24][25] Their low metabolic rate may in turn have been advantageous in allowing them to specialize on less abundant and/or less nutritious food sources.

[edit] End-Pleistocene extinctions

At the end of the Pleistocene epoch, about 12,000 years ago, three dramatic developments occurred in the Americas at roughly the same time (geologically speaking). Paleoindians invaded and occupied the New World, the last glacial period came to an end, and a large fraction of the megafauna of both North and South America went extinct. This wave of extinctions swept off the face of the Earth many of the successful participants of the Great American Interchange, as well as other species that had not migrated. All the pampatheres, glyptodonts, ground sloths, equids, proboscids,[26][27] dire wolves, lions and Smilodon species of both continents disappeared. The last of the South and Central American notoungulates and litopterns died out, as well as North America's giant beavers, dholes, native cheetahs, scimitar cats, and many of its antilocaprid, bovid, cervid, tapirid and tayassuid ungulates. Some groups disappeared over most or all of their original range but survived in their adopted homes, e.g. South American tapirs, camelids and tremarctine bears (cougars and jaguars may have been temporarily reduced to S. American ranges also). Others, such as capybaras, survived in their original range but died out in areas they had migrated to.

The near-simultaneity of the megafaunal extinctions with the glacial retreat and the peopling of the Americas has led to proposals that both climate change and human hunting played a role. Although the subject is contentious, a number of considerations suggest that human activities were pivotal. The extinctions did not occur selectively in the climatic zones that would have been most affected by the warming trend, and there is no plausible general climate-based megafauna-killing mechanism that could explain the continent-wide extinctions. The climate change took place worldwide, but had little effect on the megafauna in areas like Africa and South Asia, where megafaunal species had coevolved with humans. Numerous very similar glacial retreats had occurred previously within the ice age of the last several Ma without ever producing comparable waves of extinction in the Americas or anywhere else. Similar megafaunal extinctions have occurred on other recently populated land masses (e.g. Australia, Madagascar, New Zealand, and many smaller islands around the world, such as Cyprus, Crete, Tilos and New Caledonia) at different times that correspond closely to the first arrival of humans at each location. Additionally, on sizable islands far enough offshore from newly occupied territory to escape immediate human colonization, megafaunal species sometimes survived for thousands of years after they became extinct on the mainland; examples include meiolaniid turtles on Lord Howe Island and New Caledonia, ground sloths on the Antilles,[28] Steller's sea cows off the Commander Islands[29] and woolly mammoths on Wrangel Island[30] and Saint Paul Island.[31] The glacial retreat may have played a primarily indirect role in the extinctions by simply facilitating the movement of humans southeastward from Beringia down to N. America. The reason that a number of groups went extinct in N. America but lived on in S. America (while there are no notable examples of the opposite pattern) appears to be that the dense rain forests of the Amazon basin and the high peaks of the Andes provided environments that afforded a degree of protection from human predation.[note 5]

[edit] South American invasions of North America exclusive of Central America

Extant or extinct (†) North American taxa whose ancestors migrated out of South America during the last 10 Ma:[note 6]

[edit] South American invasions that failed to penetrate beyond Central America

Extant or extinct (†) Central American taxa whose ancestors migrated out of South America during the last 10 Ma:[note 6]

[edit] North American invasions of South America

Extant or extinct (†) South American taxa whose ancestors migrated out of North or Central America during the last 10 Ma:[note 6]

[edit] See also

[edit] Notes

  1. ^ Ziphodont (lateromedially compressed, recurved and serrated) teeth tend to arise in terrestrial crocodilians because, unlike their aquatic cousins, they are unable to dispatch their prey by simply holding them underwater and drowning them; they thus need cutting teeth with which to slice open their victims.
  2. ^ North American gopher tortoises are most closely related to the Asian genus Manouria.
  3. ^ Of the 6 families of North American rodents that did not originate in South America, only beavers and mountain beavers failed to migrate to S. America. (However, introduced beavers have become serious pests in Tierra del Fuego.)
  4. ^ Of the 11 extant families of South American cavimorph rodents, 5 are present in Central America; only 2 of these, Erethizontidae and Caviidae, ever reached North America. (The nutria/coypu has been introduced to a number of N. American locales.)
  5. ^ A number of recently extinct North American (and in some cases also South American) taxa such as tapirs, equids, camelids, saiga antelope, proboscids, dholes and lions survived in the Old World, probably mostly for different reasons – tapirs being a likely exception, since their Old World representative survived only in the rainforests of Southeast Asia. (Cheetahs in the broadest sense could be added to this list, although the New and Old World forms are in different genera.) Old World herbivores may in many cases have been able to learn to be vigilant about the presence of humans during a more gradual appearance (by development or migration) of advanced human hunters in their ranges. In the cases of predators, the Old World representatives in at least some locations would thus have suffered less from extinctions of their prey species. In contrast, the musk ox represents a rare example of a megafaunal taxon that recently went extinct in Asia but survived in remote areas of arctic N. America (its more southerly-distributed relatives such as Harlan's musk ox and the shrub ox were less fortunate).
  6. ^ a b c This listing currently has fairly complete coverage of nonflying mammals. but only spotty coverage of other groups. Crossings may have been made before 10 Ma ago by some fish, arthropods, waif-dispersing amphibians and reptiles, and flying bats and birds. Taxa listed as invasive did not necessarily cross the isthmus themselves; they may have evolved in the adopted land mass from ancestral taxa that made the crossing.
  7. ^ While all megalonychid ground sloths are extinct, extant two-toed tree sloths are from the same family. Three-toed tree sloths, in contrast, are not closely related to any of the groups of extinct ground sloths.
  8. ^ Not to be confused with the South American gray fox.
  1. ^ An alternative explanation blames climatic and physiographic changes associated with the uplift of the Andes.[11]
  2. ^ According to data on the EQ (encephalization quotient, a measure of the brain to body size ratio adjusted for the expected effect of differences in body size) of fossil ungulates compiled by H. Jerison[48], North American ungulates showed a trend towards greater EQs going from the Paleogene to the Neogene periods (average EQs of 0.43 and 0.64, respectively), while the EQs of South American ungulates were static over the same time interval (average EQ unchanged at 0.48).[3]
  3. ^ It has been proposed that monkeys invaded Central America in at least three and probably four waves, as follows: (1) an initial invasion by A. pigra and S. oerstedii ~ 3 Ma ago; (2) an invasion by A. palliata (giving rise to A. coibensis), A. geoffroyi and C. capucinus ~ 2 Ma ago; an invasion by A. zonalis and S. geoffroyi ~ 1 Ma ago; a most recent invasion by A. fusciceps. The species of the first wave have apparently been out-competed by those of the second, and now have much more restricted distributions.[49]
  4. ^ Salamanders may have dispersed to South America more than 10 Ma ago. Nevertheless, the salamander fauna of S. America, which is restricted to the tropical region, consists of only 2 clades, and has fewer species and is far less diverse than that of much smaller Central America. Salamanders are believed to have originated in northern Pangea, perhaps not long before it separated to become Laurasia[35], and are not present anywhere else in the southern hemisphere (see the world salamander distribution map). In contrast, caecilians have a mostly Gondwanan distribution.
  5. ^ Hippidion, a relatively short-legged equid that developed in South America after invading from North America about 2.5 Ma ago, has traditionally been thought to have evolved from pliohippines.[50][51] However, recent studies of the DNA of Hippidion and other New World Pleistocene horses indicate that Hippidion is actually a member of Equus, closely related to the domestic horse, E. caballus.[50][51] Another invasion of South America by Equus occurred about one Ma ago, and this lineage, traditionally viewed as the subgenus Equus (Amerhippus), appears indistinguishable from E. caballus.[51] Both these lineages went extinct at the end of the Pleistocene, but E. caballus was reintroduced from Eurasia by Europeans in the 16th century.
  6. ^ Not to be confused with the American mastodon (†Mammut americanum), a proboscid from a different family whose remains have been found no further south than Honduras.[52]
  7. ^ Condors apparently reached South America by the late Miocene or early Pliocene (4.5 – 6.0 Ma ago), several million years before the formation of the isthmus.[46] Condor-like forms in North America date back to the Barstovian stage (middle Miocene, 11.8 – 15.5 Ma ago).[45]

[edit] References

  1. ^ Karanth, K. Praveen (2006-03-25). "Out-of-India Gondwanan origin of some tropical Asian biota". Current Science (Indian Academy of Sciences) 90 (6): 789-792. http://www.ias.ac.in/currsci/mar252006/789.pdf. Retrieved on 2008-12-29. 
  2. ^ Hedges, S. Blair (2001-01-02). "Afrotheria: Plate tectonics meets genomics". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (National Academy of Sciences) 98 (1): 1-2. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=33345. Retrieved on 2008-12-29. 
  3. ^ a b c Simpson, George Gaylord (1980). Splendid Isolation: The Curious History of South American Mammals. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN 0300024347. 
  4. ^ Briggs, J. C. (August 2003). "Fishes and Birds: Gondwana Life Rafts Reconsidered". Syst. Biol. 52 (4): 548–553. doi:10.1080/10635150390218385. ISSN: 1063-5157. http://www.jstor.org/sici?sici=1063-5157(200308)52%3A4%3C548%3AFABGLR%3E2.0.CO%3B2-L. Retrieved on 2008-04-05. 
  5. ^ Naish, Darren (29 June 2008). "Invasion of the marsupial weasels, dogs, cats and bears... or is it?". Tetrapod Zoology. http://scienceblogs.com/tetrapodzoology/2008/06/borhyaenoids_intro.php. Retrieved on 2008-12-7. 
  6. ^ Naish, Darren (2006-10-27). "Terror birds". Tetrapod Zoology. http://darrennaish.blogspot.com/2006/10/terror-birds.html. Retrieved on 2008-03-29. 
  7. ^ Alvarenga, H. M. F.; Höfling, E. (2003). "Systematic Revision of the Phorusrhacidae (Aves: Ralliformes)" (PDF). Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia (São Paulo: Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo) 43 (4): 55–91. ISSN 0031-1049. http://www.scielo.br/pdf/paz/v43n4/17491.pdf. Retrieved on 2008-03-29. 
  8. ^ Paolillo, A.; Linares, O. J. (2007-06-05). "Nuevos Cocodrilos Sebecosuchia del Cenozoico Suramericano (Mesosuchia: Crocodylia)" (PDF). Paleobiologia Neotropical (Caracas: Laboratorio de Paleobiología) 3: 1-25. http://www.paleobio.labb.usb.ve/Paleobio03.pdf. Retrieved on 2008-09-28. 
  9. ^ Busbey, Arthur B. III (1986-03-07). "New Material of Sebecus cf. huilensis (Crocodilia: Sebecosuchidae) from the Miocene La Venta Formation of Colombia". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 6 (1): 20-27. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4523070. Retrieved on 2008-09-28. 
  10. ^ Salas-Gismondi, R.; et al. (2007), "Middle Miocene Crocodiles From the Fitzcarrald Arch, Amazonian Peru", in Díaz-Martínez, E.; Rábano, I., 4th European Meeting on the Palaeontology and Stratigraphy of Latin America, Madrid: Instituto Geológico y Minero de España, pp. 355-360, ISBN 978-84-7840-707-1 
  11. ^ a b c Gasparini, Zulma (September 1984). "New Tertiary Sebecosuchia (Crocodylia: Mesosuchia) from Argentina". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 4 (1): 85-95. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4522967. Retrieved on 2008-09-29. 
  12. ^ Palmqvist, Paul; Vizcaíno, Sergio F. (2003-09-30). "Ecological and reproductive constraints of body size in the gigantic Argentavis magnificens (Aves, Theratornithidae) from the Miocene of Argentina". Ameghiniana 40 (3): 379-385. http://webpersonal.uma.es/de/ppb/Argentavis.pdf. Retrieved on 2008-12-11. 
  13. ^ Möller-Krull, Maren; Delsuc, Frédéric; Churakov, Gennady; Marker, Claudia; Superina, Mariella; Brosius, Jürgen; Douzery, Emmanuel J. P.; Schmitz, Jürgen (2007-09-17). "Retroposed Elements and Their Flanking Regions Resolve the Evolutionary History of Xenarthran Mammals (Armadillos, Anteaters, and Sloths)". Molecular Biology and Evolution 24 (11): 2573-2582. doi:10.1093/molbev/msm201. http://mbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/24/11/2573. Retrieved on 2008-12-14. 
  14. ^ J. J. Flynn, A. R. Wyss (1998). "Recent advances in South American mammalian paleontology". Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13 (11): 449–454. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01457-8. 
  15. ^ Fratantoni, D. M.; Johns, W. E., Townsend, T. L., Hurlburt, H. E. (2000-08). "Low-Latitude Circulation and Mass Transport Pathways in a Model of the Tropical Atlantic Ocean" (abstract). Journal of Physical Oceanography 30 (8): 1944–1966. doi:10.1175/1520-0485(2000)030<1944:LLCAMT>2.0.CO;2. http://ams.allenpress.com/perlserv/?request=get-abstract&doi=10.1175%2F1520-0485(2000)030%3C1944:LLCAMT%3E2.0.CO%3B2&ct=1. 
  16. ^ a b Le, M.; Raxworthy, C. J., McCord, W. P., Mertz, L. (2006-05-05). "A molecular phylogeny of tortoises (Testudines: Testudinidae} based on mitochondrial and nuclear genes". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 40: 517-531. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2006.03.003. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6WNH-4JWFGYC-1&_user=4430&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000059594&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=4430&md5=17737ababb8f6b572a3a44a520001dc6. 
  17. ^ Carranza, S.; Arnold, N. E. (2003-08-05). "Investigating the origin of transoceanic distributions: mtDNA shows Mabuya lizards (Reptilia, Scincidae) crossed the Atlantic twice". Systematics and Biodiversity (Cambridge University Press) 1 (2): 275–282. doi:10.1017/S1477200003001099. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=168963. Retrieved on 2008-04-04. 
  18. ^ K.-P. Koepfli, M. E. Gompper, E. Eizirik, C.-C. Ho, L. Linden, J. E. Maldonado, R. K. Wayne (2007). "Phylogeny of the Procyonidae (Mammalia: Carvnivora): Molecules, morphology and the Great American Interchange". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 43 (3): 1076–1095. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2006.10.003. 
  19. ^ a b Marshall, L. G.; Butler, R. F.; Drake, R. E.; Curtis, G. H.; Tedford, R. H. (1979-04-20). "Calibration of the Great American Interchange" (abstract). Science (AAAS) 204 (4390): 272–279. doi:10.1126/science.204.4390.272. PMID 17800342. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/204/4390/272. Retrieved on 2008-04-15. 
  20. ^ Webb, S. D. (1976). "Mammalian Faunal Dynamics of the Great American Interchange". Paleobiology (Paleontological Society) 2 (3): 220–234. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2400220. Retrieved on 2008-04-15. 
  21. ^ Morgan, Gary S. (2002), Late Rancholabrean Mammals from Southernmost Florida, and the Neotropical Influence in Florida Pleistocene Faunas, in Emry, Robert J., "Cenozoic Mammals of Land and Sea: Tributes to the Career of Clayton E. Ray", Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology (Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press) 93: 15–38, http://www.sil.si.edu/smithsoniancontributions/Paleobiology/sc_RecordSingle.cfm?filename=SCtP-0093 
  22. ^ McFadden, B.; Labs-Hochstein, J.; Hulbert, R.C., Jr.; Baskin, J.A. (2007). "Revised age of the late Neogene terror bird (Titanis) in North America during the Great American Interchange". Geology 35 (2): 123–126. doi:10.1130/G23186A.1. 
  23. ^ McDonald, H. G.; Harington, C. R.; De Iuliis, G. (September 2000). "The Ground Sloth Megalonyx from Pleistocene Deposits of the Old Crow Basin, Yukon, Canada" (PDF). Arctic (Calgary, Alberta: The Arctic Institute of North America) 53 (3): 213–220. http://pubs.aina.ucalgary.ca/arctic/Arctic53-3-213.pdf. Retrieved on 2008-08-16. 
  24. ^ Elgar, M. A.; Harvey, P. H. (1987). "Basal Metabolic Rates in Mammals: Allometry, Phylogeny and Ecology". Functional Ecology (British Ecological Society) 1 (1): 25–36. doi:10.2307/2389354. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2389354. Retrieved on 2008-04-18. 
  25. ^ Lovegrove, B. G. (2000-08). "The Zoogeography of Mammalian Basal Metabolic Rate". The American Naturalist (The University of Chicago Press) 156 (2): 201–219. doi:10.1086/303383. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3079219. Retrieved on 2008-04-19. 
  26. ^ Graham, R. W. (2001), "Late Quaternary Biogeography and Extinction of Proboscideans in North America", in Cavarretta, G.; Gioia, P.; Mussi, M. et al., The World of Elephants - Proceedings of the 1st International Congress, Rome October 16-20 2001, Rome: Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, pp. 707-709, ISBN 88-8080-025-6, http://www.cq.rm.cnr.it/elephants2001/pdf/707_709.pdf 
  27. ^ a b Prado, J. L.; Alberdi, M. T.; Azanza, B.; Sánchez, B.; Frassinetti, D. (2001), "The Pleistocene Gomphotheres (Proboscidea) from South America: diversity, habitats and feeding ecology", in Cavarretta, G.; Gioia, P.; Mussi, M. et al., The World of Elephants - Proceedings of the 1st International Congress, Rome October 16-20 2001, Rome: Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, pp. 337-340, ISBN 88-8080-025-6, http://www.cq.rm.cnr.it/elephants2001/pdf/337_340.pdf, retrieved on 2008-07-25 
  28. ^ Steadman, D. W.; Martin, P. S.; MacPhee, R. D. E.; Jull, A. J. T.; McDonald, H. G.; Woods, C. A.; Iturralde-Vinent, M.; Hodgins, G. W. L. (2005-08-16). "Asynchronous extinction of late Quaternary sloths on continents and islands". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (National Academy of Sciences) 102 (33): 11763–11768. doi:10.1073/pnas.0502777102. http://www.pnas.org/content/102/33/11763.abstract. Retrieved on 2009-01-24. 
  29. ^ Anderson, Paul K. (July 1995). "Competition, Predation, and the Evolution and Extinction of Steller’s Sea Cow, Hydrodamalis Gigas". Marine Mammal Science (Society for Marine Mammalogy) 11 (3): 391-394. doi:10.1111/j.1748-7692.1995.tb00294.x. http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/119963340/abstract. Retrieved on 2008-11-02. 
  30. ^ Vartanyan, S. L.; Garutt, V. E.; Sher, A. V. (1993). "Holocene dwarf mammoths from Wrangel Island in the Siberian Arctic". Nature 362: 337-349. doi:10.1038/362337a0. 
  31. ^ Guthrie, R. Dale (2004). "Radiocarbon evidence of mid-Holocene mammoths stranded on an Alaskan Bering Sea island". Nature 429: 746-749. doi:10.1038/nature02612. 
  32. ^ a b Castaneda, O. C.; Miller, W. (July 2004). "Late Tertiary Terrestrial Mammals from Central Mexico and Their Relationship to South American Immigrants". Revista Brasileira de Paleontologia (Sociedade Brasileira de Paleontologia) 7 (2): 249-261. http://www.sbpbrasil.org/revista/edicoes/7_2/miller.pdf. Retrieved on 2009-01-29. 
  33. ^ M. Culver, W. E. Johnson, J. Pecon-Slattery, S. J. O'Brien (2000). "Genomic Ancestry of the American Puma (Puma concolor)" (PDF). Journal of Heredity 91 (3): 186–197. doi:10.1093/jhered/91.3.186. PMID 10833043. http://www.coryi.org/Florida_panther/Miscellaneous_Panther_Material/Genomic%20ancestry%20of%20the%20American%20puma.pdf. 
  34. ^ R. E. Ricklefs (2002). "Splendid isolation: historical ecology of the South American passerine fauna". Journal of Avian Biology 33 (3): 207–211. doi:10.1034/j.1600-048X.2002.330301.x. http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/120770689/abstract?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0. 
  35. ^ a b c Feller, A. E. and Hedges, S. B. (June 1998). "Molecular Evidence for the Early History of Living Amphibians". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 9 (3): 509–516. doi:10.1006/mpev.1998.0500. 
  36. ^ Taplin, L. E.; Grigg, G. C. (1989). "Historical Zoogeography of the Eusuchian Crocodilians: A Physiological Perspective". American Zoologist (Oxford University Press) 29 (3): 885-901. doi:10.1093/icb/29.3.885. http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/29/3/885. Retrieved on 2008-09-29. 
  37. ^ Parra-Olea, G., Garcia-Paris, M. and Wake, D. B. (2004). "Molecular diversification of salamanders of the tropical American genus Bolitoglossa (Caudata: Plethodontidae) and its evolutionary and biogeographical implications". Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 81 (3): 325–346. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2003.00303.x. http://repositories.cdlib.org/postprints/159/. Retrieved on 2008-01-11. 
  38. ^ Slowinski, J. B. and Keogh J. S. (April 2000). "Phylogenetic Relationships of Elapid Snakes Based on Cytochrome b mtDNA Sequences". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 15 (1): 157–164. doi:10.1006/mpev.1999.0725. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/ap/fy/2000/00000015/00000001/art00725. Retrieved on 2007-12-29. 
  39. ^ Slowinski, J. B., Boundy, J. and Lawson, R. (June 2001). "The Phylogenetic Relationships of Asian Coral Snakes (Elapidae: Calliophis and Maticora) Based on Morphological and Molecular Characters" (abstract). Herpetologica 57 (2): 233–245. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3893186. Retrieved on 2007-12-29. 
  40. ^ Place, A. J., Abramson, C. I. (2004). "A Quantitative Analysis of the Ancestral Area of Rattlesnakes". Journal of Herpetology 38 (1): 152–156. doi:10.1670/103-03N. 
  41. ^ Parkinson, C. L. (1999). "Molecular Systematics and Biogeographical History of Pit Vipers as Determined by Mitochondrial Ribosomal DNA Sequences". Copeia 3: 576–586. doi:10.2307/1447591. http://www.jstor.org/sici?sici=0045-8511%2819990802%293%3A1999%3A3%3C576%3AMSABHO%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Z&origin=crossref. 
  42. ^ Sanchez, Fabiola (2008-08-22). "Saber-toothed Cat Fossils Discovered in Venezuela". Associated Press. http://www.livescience.com/animals/080822-ap-cat-fossils.html. Retrieved on 2008-08-30. 
  43. ^ Orozco, José (2008-08-22). "Sabertooth Cousin Found in Venezuela Tar Pit -- A First". National Geographic News. National Geographic Society. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/08/080822-scimitar-cat.html. Retrieved on 2008-08-30. 
  44. ^ Emslie, Steven D. (22 June 1988). "The Fossil History and Phylogenetic Relationships of Condors (Ciconiiformes: Vulturidae) in the New World". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology (Society of Vertebrate Paleontology) 8 (2): 212-228. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4523192. Retrieved on 2008-12-07. 
  45. ^ a b Emslie, Steven D. (July 1988). "An early condor-like vulture from North America". The Auk (American Ornithologists Union) 105: 529-535. http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/Auk/v105n03/p0529-p0535.pdf. 
  46. ^ a b Stucchi, Marcelo; Emslie, Steven D. (February 2005). "A New Condor (Ciconiiformes, Vulturidae) From The Late Miocene/Early Pliocene Pisco Formation, Peru". The Condor (Cooper Ornithological Society) 107 (1): 107–113. doi:10.1650/7475. http://www.bioone.org/perlserv/?request=get-abstract&doi=10.1650%2F7475. Retrieved on 2008-12-08. 
  47. ^ Dacosta, J. M.; Klicka, J. (2008-02-21). "The Great American Interchange in birds: a phylogenetic perspective with the genus Trogon". Molecular Ecology (Wiley InterScience) 17: 1328–1343. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03647.x. http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/119411407/abstract?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0. Retrieved on 2008-07-21. 
  48. ^ Jerison, Harry J. (1973). Evolution of the Brain and Intelligence. New York and London: Academic Press. ISBN 0123852501. 
  49. ^ Ford, S. (2006). "The Biogeographic History of Mesoamerican Primates". in Estrada, A.; Garber, P.A.; Pavelka, M.S.M.; Luecke, L.. New Perspectives in the Study of Mesoamerican Primates. New York: Springer. pp. pp. 100–107. doi:10.1007/b136304. ISBN 978-0-387-25854-6. http://www.springerlink.com/content/xjt1852715606p45/. 
  50. ^ a b Weinstock, J.; et al. (2005). "Evolution, systematics, and phylogeography of Pleistocene horses in the New World: a molecular perspective". PLoS Biology 3 (8): e241. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030241. http://biology.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.0030241. Retrieved on 2008-11-27. 
  51. ^ a b c Orlando, L.; Male, D.; Alberdi, M. T.; Prado, J. L.; Prieto, A.; Cooper, A.; Hänni, C. (2008). "Ancient DNA Clarifies the Evolutionary History of American Late Pleistocene Equids". Journal of Molecular Evolution 66: 533–538. doi:10.1007/s00239-008-9100-x. http://www.springerlink.com/content/g0wq5302763l76nm/. Retrieved on 2008-11-27. 
  52. ^ Polaco, O. J.; Arroyo-Cabrales, J.; Corona-M., E.; López-Oliva, J. G. (2001), "The American Mastodon Mammut americanum in Mexico", in Cavarretta, G.; Gioia, P.; Mussi, M. et al., The World of Elephants - Proceedings of the 1st International Congress, Rome October 16-20 2001, Rome: Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, pp. 237-242, ISBN 88-8080-025-6, http://www.cq.rm.cnr.it/elephants2001/pdf/237_242.pdf, retrieved on 2008-07-25 

[edit] External links

Personal tools