Wikipedia:Cleanup

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Shortcut:
WP:CLEAN
For CheckUser Requests (WP:RCU), see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations. For information on changing your username (WP:CHU), see Wikipedia:Changing username. For Cleanup Templates (WP:TC), see Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup.

Welcome to the Wikipedia Cleanup project. This project is intended as a resource for Wikipedia Cleanup information and discussion. Cleanup issues that this project covers may include wikification, spelling, grammar, tone, and sourcing.

List of pages requiring cleanup are automatically generated from the {{cleanup}} banners placed on articles. See Category:All pages needing cleanup and Category:Cleanup by month. Older articles with issues that have not been dealt with in some time may be found at Wikipedia:BACKLOG.

Resources for maintenance and collaboration
 v • d • e 
Cleanup Articles needing attention - Template messages - Copy to Wiktionary - Notability Sorting - English grammar - Copyediting - Spam - Wikify an article - Deorphan an article - Update an article
Categories General cleanup - Articles to be categorized - Underpopulated - Uncategorized categories
Create an article Most wanted - Requests 1 year+ - Requested articles - Short pages - Missing encyclopedic topics - Review anonymous article submissions
Referencing Fact-check - Articles lacking sources - Need more references - Original research
Stubs Advice - Stubs by topic - Most wanted - Short pages - Incomplete lists
Deletion Speedy - Articles - Categories - Redirects - Templates - Misc. pages - Stub templates and categories - Log - Discussion archives - Review
Polishing Peer review - Featured candidates - Fill a topic list
Translation into English Wikipedia:Translation - Existing pages - Spanish trans. of the week - Interwiki link checker
Images Requested pictures - Images for cleanup - Caption review - Images with missing articles
Controversy Neutrality - Article accuracy - Statement accuracy
To-do lists Articles - Projects - Books
Disambiguation Disambiguation - Manual of Style Disambiguation - Hatnotes - Templates
More Active wiki fixup projects - Open tasks - Articles to merge - Articles to split - Copyright violations - Requests - Backlogs - Expert request sorting - Missing names

All users are welcome to help in editing or fixing any page on these lists. Please remember to take the appropriate tag(s) off the page when you have completed cleaning an article. Please also document what you have done on the article's talk page for the reference of other editors.

Information on the cleanup process may be found at Wikipedia:Cleanup process. Other resources may be found at Wikipedia: Cleanup resources and Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup, for help on posting problems with Wikipedia pages, or for you to use as a guide.

As of 09:32, 3 February 2009 (UTC), 38,736 articles were tagged for cleanup, or 1.42% of the English Wikipedia's 2,724,732 articles.

Contents

[edit] Related Cleanup pages

General Cleanup lists:

Specific issue Cleanup lists:

Other Cleanup related projects include:

[edit] Volunteer to help Wikipedia:Cleanup

Due to the massive backlog of listings that have ballooned the Wikipedia:Cleanup lists to include thousands of articles, Wikipedia:Cleanup needs your help!

Feel free to add your name to the list of volunteers who are actively involved in this project! Adding your name will allow other editors to know that you are actively involved in this project as well as allow for better co-ordination between cleanup editors.

[edit] The Wikipedia Cleanup Legacy List

The manually maintained lists on this page (below) have to an extent been superseded by category lists that are automatically generated from the {{cleanup}} banners placed on articles. See Category:All pages needing cleanup and Category:Cleanup by month.

You may add cleanup requests here as well if you wish (though it is not necessary); see Wikipedia:Cleanup process for further information. Please only add articles to this list that are unlikely to be fixed without the help of Wikipedia cleanup volunteers. Editors are STRONGLY encouraged to try and perform clean-up themselves before posting articles to this list. Help in cleaning articles on this list is also greatly appreciated. [[Media:Media:Example.ogg[[Media:Media:Example.ogg]]]] Please keep in mind that the lists here constitute only a small fraction of the Wikipedia articles tagged as needing cleanup, and they may not always be maintained as new articles are tagged or old articles are fixed. The list is still active through a number of editors who do still regularly try to attend to this list. Assistance and participation of other editors is welcome.

You may report confusing/messy articles below and explain why they need to be cleaned-up (grammar, spelling, formatting, order, copyright issues, confusion, etc.). Be sure to cross post your entry on the article's own discussion page for the references of other editors who may not visit this page. Please do not add articles below simply because they are POV or are lacking sources. Make sure to sign your additions with the following format: --~~~~.

[edit] 2009

[edit] April, 2009

  • Web crawler - Has issues with excessive jargon. Needs to be normalized. Probably an easy job. --Lendorien (talk) 16:29, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
I'm working on it. It's a long haul, not hard but long. What should I do when I have a draft? SimonTrew (talk) 22:28, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] March, 2009

  • Symphonic black metal - This article has multiple issues.It doesnt have any citation,it contains original research and it's more like a personal essay.--Solinothe Wolf 22:40, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Hull House - The section on the neighborhood is full of redundancies and the citations could be cleaned up a bit throughout the article. Shsilver (talk) 19:40, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Samuel Zimmerman - This article is long and confusing, and needs to be cleaned up (perhaps written in simpler form). --Kyuko (talk) 03:41, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Fourier optics - This is an important topic, but it is utterly confusing for the layman. The intro is completely inaccessable and the article is even worse. Definitely needs to be rewritten in plain language. See talk page for details. More editors on this article would be helpful. tagged for 2 years. --Lendorien (talk) 14:33, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Christianity in Haiti - chaotic jumble of facts and ideas with the germ of an acceptable article buried somewhere within. Not a subject I know anything about but it clearly needs help. andy (talk) 08:44, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
  • United States civil service - this used to just forward to one of the laws that reformed civil service in US, so I dropped some information that was from other pages on Wikipedia (see talk page), but it needs severe help and writeup. It really needs lots of sources, and reorganization Jonverve (talk) 23:00, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Chicago Cubs futility theories I think there is a decent article in here somewhere, but it needs to be fixed up, as there are multiple problems with NPOV, prose/grammar, citations, and possible original research amongst others. I'm not even sure the title of the article is the best for the subject. I'm going to be working on it, but I put it up here because I wonder if I'm going to be putting in some effort for something that's going to get deleted. I don't know if this is the right spot to open up the discussion, and I don't want to be the one to do it, but should this article be put up for deletion? RMelon (talk) 20:04, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Open market operations Are the accounts of the private banks credited or debited when they buy the (presumably government) financial instruments? The lede sentence is ambiguous about the precise relations but implicitly states (given the context provided by the prior lede text) that when a private bank sells a government security its account is credited and when it buys one it is debited. 71.186.170.112 (talk) 05:12, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Pasquale Marino - Not enough quality/quantity for such a prestigious figure in Italian football, also some disorganised pieces of article that needs a bit of polishing up.
  • Ranger's Apprentice (series) - Needs major work. Possibly several merges, rewriting, reorganization, sourcing, etc. See talk page for details. More editors tackle this the better. --Lendorien (talk) 17:11, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Blue Lagoon Island - Unreferenced; tone editing, fact check. Orphan. See talk page. --Lendorien (talk) 17:00, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Evangel University- This is about a University found in Springfield Missouri. The article reads like a guide or advertisement and needs to be improved. There are no details of campus life, courses offered or other information. Article is also based on one source. Also there is a possiable point of view issue or issues.Magnum Serpentine (talk) 11:59, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Caliph - The article has several extra sections after the External Links section - probably the result of a merge attempt. I raised the issue on the talk page back in Nov 2008, but nothing got done so I've added a couple of cleanup tags to try to get things going. Unfortunately, I lack expertise in the subject matter so I'm hoping someone with a background in Islamic Studies or something similar will help out. Astronaut (talk) 17:25, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Panoramic photography - This article needs many citations, and needs a thorough copy-edit to make it readable. It's not my specialism so I'm unwilling to assert much 'expertise' here. Thanks. Baffle gab1978 (talk) 08:00, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Perry Kramer - I very much prefer removing things from this list to adding them, but this one is beyond my ability. The format makes my head hurt but I don't know the subject (not to mention most of the formatting code) well enough to know how to rearrange things. Yikes! -- edi(talk) 20:43, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Hmmm... almost exactly the same situation for Shawn Texas. Am I missing something? Is this an acceptable format for athletes? -- edi(talk) 14:43, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] February, 2009

  • Money states that currency is the dominant form of money when the opposite is the case, non-currency money, even at the level of base national aggregates such as M1 far outweighs anything that could be called currency (within any boundaries based on current usage) as distinct from general money. Lycurgus (talk) 00:17, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Bat Boy: The Musical - I've done some major revisions, but the Synopsis section desperately needs to be condensed and rewritten by someone more bold than I. Some sourcing needed too. --Lendorien (talk) 21:54, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
  • List of the youngest mayors in the United_States - needs cleanup and needs administrator to have a look on the accuracy of the youngest mayor of Elkhart, Indiana. User --User talk:Mayorofrosharon 04:48, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Alice Academy - Article on a Japanese anime. Messy and unwikified. Needs to be looked over by an anime viewer as well as general cleanup (listed on and off since 2006) --Lendorien (talk) 16:01, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Humanity Declaration - Weasel worded accusation based on laughable inference that because they observe Shinto rites the Japanese monarch(s) reaffirm their "mythical" status. 72.228.150.44 (talk) 02:46, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Hidden Mickey - Mostly consists of a long trivia style list. Some effort should be made to remove the list or integrate it into prose text. Sourcing also needed. --Lendorien (talk) 15:20, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
  • John_L._Merkt - Listed for about 6 months. Article is an orphan and needs some addition fact checking. May not be notable. Possible candidate for deletion? --Lendorien (talk) 16:30, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Photographic developer - dense and waffly text, reading it is like wading through treacle; few refs. Needs expert attention and good referencing. Baffle gab1978 (talk) 19:31, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Samokov - Needs reliable sources and copyedit. The Rolling Camel (talk) 10:54, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Manav Sthali School - POV nightmare. Needs to be completely rewritten.-Binary TSO ???
  • Fekry Abaza general clean up.-Binary TSO ???
  • Heavy Metal 2000 - Plot is unfinished, needs work. 20 February 2009

[edit] January, 2009

  • Ski Jumping - A catastrophically written article that also lacks sources as well as info. The Rolling Camel (talk) 16:12, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Antonin Hajek - Needs a copyedit, more info and sources. The Rolling Camel (talk) 21:39, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Risk society - Needs to be rewritten. Has an essay tone. Has some souring, but it needs to be normalized into footnotes. Proper into needs to be written. See talk page for more details. --Lendorien (talk) 16:33, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
  • List of high schools in Indiana - Needs to uses consistant tables throughout. It's a patchwork mess of no tables, different types of tables, etc. --Lendorien (talk) 20:00, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Colin Calderwood - Probably an easy fix. Needs to be checked over for non-nuetral superlatives ("Rock at the heart fo the defense", "Horror tackle", etc) and general text edits. --Lendorien (talk) 17:55, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Route poisoning - Has been identified as inaccurate and as an ophan, this article has barely been touched since its creation in 2005. Desperately needs attention to deorphan it and correct the errors. Has been posted on the computing WP. --Lendorien (talk) 17:29, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Thai_lunar_calendar - I've done a lot of work on this long time listed article. Needs a look-over by another editor, preferably one who has some knowledge of how to format articles that use foreign languages heavily. Also needs to be checked for clarity.--Lendorien (talk) 16:58, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
  • SEIKIMA-II - Needs some significant cleanup. Lacks section headings, needs to eb wikified. See talk page for more details.—Lendorien (talk) 15:19, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
  • The Krypton Factor — May require page splits, more citations, more information, rewording and perhaps expert attention. --Marianian (talk) 10:24, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

[edit] 2008

[edit] December, 2008

  • Bangladesh M.H.M High School & College, Doha-Qatar needs significant sourcing work. I've done my best with the massive copyediting and other issues that were within my time and abilities, but I don't know enough about the subject area to deal with sourcing the article, since it refers to an expatriate school in a third country, there are a lot of things I just don't understand. The sources provided don't seem to match the article enough, and I can't find independant information, just what is on the school's website. Jo7hs2 (talk) 21:56, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Czesław Kiszczak and Prime Minister of the Republic of Poland need some reformating (possibly with reference to the Polish). Jackiespeel (talk) 17:26, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

[edit] November, 2008

  • No. 419 squadron RCAF - Needs cleanup, doesn't look like an article at all. Pevernagie (talk) 10:40, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Shorts - A long time tagged article, this one suffers from a monocultural point of view and lacks sources. Needs help from non north american editors to cover sociological conventiosn and history of other regions.—Lendorien (talk) 17:44, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Nautical tourism - Has been tagged for cleanup for 2 years. A stub with practically no edits but the creators, this desperately needs attention, expansion, sources, orphan fixing, etc.—Lendorien (talk) 16:23, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

- I worked on this site a little today. Plenty of information to expand it. Doctorfun (talk) 02:33, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Ender in Exile - Needs help, citations, general cleanup. ~Auzemandius {talk/contrib} 17:40, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
  • List of missiles by country, which is not a list anymore... It need major cleaning. Some people tried to fix its structure, but verifiability problems stopped those effort. Notably ComputerGeezer's work... Please help! --ŦħęGɛя㎥ 03:18, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Battle Dress Uniform makes no distinction between the generic term and the type of uniform of the US military that is currently being replaced by its successor.
  • Harpocrates - Needs WP:TONE cleanup. Concerns are addressed on the talk page. Probably could use more external citations as well. LH (talk) 02:04, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Texas United States House elections, 2006 - Not all districts have results or data in tables. Needs updating. - Requires research.—Lendorien (talk) 20:36, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
  • 2000 NHL Entry Draft - Moved but listed a while. Rounds 7–9 need to be formatted into the same table as the rest of the page. - Easy to do but time consuming.—Lendorien (talk) 18:46, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Shaba I - Article has some issues and has for 2 years. Needs a little expansion in the background section for context and some tonal edits. And sourcing of course. - Requires a bit of research.—Lendorien (talk) 17:25, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Tony Hutchinson - Grammer checking needed. Also needs extensive revision as it's entirely written in a In universe style. - Requires Mostly text edits. Extransive.—Lendorien (talk) 17:53, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Grammar and spellcheck on this completed today. ArcAngel (talk) 02:37, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Nova Zagora - Coordinates and map on the entry for Nova Zagora, Bulgaria page have errors that need to be corrected. 7 November 2008.
Done. The coordinates now work correctly and put the marker (Google Maps & Earth) in the center of the town's central park/square. Astronaut (talk) 18:40, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Revised article, added wikiproject. needs sourcing and some research to fact check.—Lendorien (talk) 17:04, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

[edit] October

  • Ruthenium (II) tris (bathophenantroline disulfonate) - Utterly confusing to the layman. Needs a lookover by a chemist. Orphaned as well.—Lendorien (talk) 18:32, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Simile - Lists of similies need to be pruned back with notable cited examples used instead of what's currently used as int he style of an encyclopedia.—Lendorien (talk) 14:39, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Boys in Red Tragedy - Grammar, citations/references could use some cleanup. Expansion of Aftermath and Reaction sections also wouldn't hurt.—Kuzwa (talk)
  • William Poole (American 19th cent. NYC bully or gangster) - Intro is short but establishes notability as a political leader. Unfortunately, the article says nothign about this and just contains text dumps of article quotes. Research needed to turn this into a proper stub.—Lendorien (talk) 19:06, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Johann Strauss I - Article is awkwardly written and sounds like a translation, will probably need a complete rewrite. ♪TempoDiValse♪ 23:29, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Podiatry - Some OR issues here. Parts need to be wikified, needs organizational help, soucing, and the difference/similarity between podiatry and chiropody need to be made clear.—Lendorien (talk) 14:16, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Baldur's Gate: Dark Alliance - an easy cleanup. Some sections need prosifying. Needs some editing to remove "you."—Lendorien (talk) 13:38, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Religion and politics - Has seen major cleanup in the past year. Needs review by those knowledgable and sourcing. See talk page for details.—Lendorien (talk) 14:47, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Safety climate - Completely unwikified, unsourced, possibly copied from somewhere.—Lendorien (talk) 17:51, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
  • I put this up for deletion. Not Wikipedia material. More like a training manual Doctorfun (talk) 00:23, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Final Destination / Final Destination 2 / Final Destination 3 share a common issue with overly detailed plot summaries and extended "cast" sections that further introduce plot information. Will attempt to trim the fat myself, but could use some help to make sure trimming fits in standards.—TRTX T / C 13:48, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Karl Michael Ziehrer Article is in bad need of copyediting and cleanup; sounds like a translation. ♪TempoDiValse♪ 23:29, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
  • The Fabric of Reality is a very confusing, poorly organised, collection of factoids. Perhaps it should be turned into an article, or perhaps pruned severly. Drpixie (talk) 11:26, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Diamond Shoal Light should have two confusing elements reconciled; the text only covers a short-lived lighthouse of 1891, while the infobox only mentions a 1966–2001 lighthouse. Chris the speller (talk) 16:11, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

[edit] September

  • Sudd requires cleanup. Has a overly technical tone, with some ESL issues. Needs expanded intro and intext citations.—Mathpianist93 (talk) 03:23, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Übel_Blatt Multiple grammatical errors in character section. I have fixed a portion of it, though it requires more experienced editors and people acquainted with the manga to clarify several discrepancies. Riwoz (talk) 01:39, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

[edit] August, 2008

  • Auditory masking is a quite informative article; however, there's lots of unnecessary text scattered throughout the article. e.g. "(Gelfand 2004)." is repeated many times for no reason, and "{{{author}}}, {{{title}}}, [[{{{publisher}}}]], [[{{{date}}}]]" appears in another place. 4.242.147.244 (talk) 19:29, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Those are citations. They probablyc ould be coverted to intext tho.—Lendorien (talk) 15:24, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
  • History of Shanghai is full of unnecessary details and generalizations that make the article confusing and tedious to read. It needs extensive re-writing. winstonho0805 (talk) 07:00, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
  • By some "six degrees of separation" type browsing, I find De'ang to have a clear case of copy-and-paste content and the like. Could do with a mass perge of copyrighted material etc. doktorb wordsdeeds 07:36, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Treasury, The Treasury and The Treasury (disambiguation). Some rearrangement/merging/repartitioning of entries needed. Jackiespeel (talk) 15:11, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Server (computing) - Confusing definition of the term, followed by other several disorderly definitions as the bulk of the article. There has to be a more encyclopedic way to present the subject. Kreachure (talk) 23:18, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
    • Upon review of the article, it is suggested that an authority on the subject replace the list of unneeded "Definitions of terms" and replace it with a history of the use of servers.
    • Just did some massive cleanup of the definitions, passing on for further review LaVieEntiere (talk) 06:47, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Vasileios Spanoulis Page has been hijacked many many times by Spanoulis' fans and i couldn't keep up with all the edits. It has turned into some kind of fanpage.Plus it contains many useless information and details.Page is also very long Lacks NPOV too. Just to tell you that i had to removed links to videos in youtube one of which was called "Vassilis Spanoulis is better than Ricky Rubio and Rudy Fernandez". Sergiogr ([[User

talk:Sergiogr|talk]]) 11:10, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

  • List of disaster films Contains many films which fall outside of this category. List seems to be a list of all films which contain disasters (using a very broad definition) rather than read as a list of films from the Disaster film genre. Needs much editing. Deckchair (talk) 15:11, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Wacky Races-intermittent POV-pushing and little sourcing
  • Alphabets derived from the Latin needs to be reorganized, to be brief. I have discussed other details on the talk page. -Nameneko (talk) 02:21, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
  • WPYA - Needs a quick fact checking as the text seems convoluted. The station really had that many callsign changes?—Lendorien (talk) 16:44, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Folk high school - The article—particularly the section on France—still needs quite a bit of sourcing. Also needs to be fact checked and possibly some text editing for normalization.—Lendorien (talk) 16:46, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Ashutosh Tewari - Has GAN potential but needs to have more specific information regarding the link between robotic surgery and the subject of the article.—Nishant M (talk) 10:53, 11 August 2008 (UTC)Nishant M

[edit] July

  • Anton Abele, a little help with organising the references.
    • Have changed the format of the references so they are now in order and relate to the article text. Have also made various style and grammar and spelling alterations to the text. The article could do with some more references.IrishPete (talk) 19:42, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Vazhithala, needs to be written more clearly with some geographic context and needs wikification
    • Cleaned up grammar, trimmed down unneeded info, added stub tag still in need of a picture and political stats etc Royall (talk) 14:3619 August 2008
  • Photoanimation This article about Ken Burns Effect-ish processes needs major reworking. TMC1221 (talk)
  • Taiyuan Cites no references. I corrected some grammar errors, but I'm sure there's stil much to be done. I think that the intro should be expanded, as well. IceUnshattered (talk)
  • West View Park has no references, needs to be wikified, and definitely needs copy editing.—Ultima Designs (talk) 01:18, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Science and technology in Canada - the second biggest article on wikipedia.—Allemandtando (talk) 17:42, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Nuevo Estadio Azul has no references, it's uncategorized, and is using bad grammar. Erik93 (talk) 04:20, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Big Stick Diplomacy It's high importance, and not much larger than a couple paragraphs. I've already started, but it could use some outside help. Leonard(Bloom) 21:25, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Academic disciplines is in some major need of revisions. Both in terms of the current bullet format which is making additions to various sections unsymmetrical, as well as major content issues. Currently there are few cited sources, and disciplines of all stripes are being added - including those that do not even have a wiki article. OpusDiabolus (talk) 11:17, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Stereotype needs dire work overall, drastically lacking citations, organization, POV, balance of information, and conciseness. Concentrates too much on ethnical discrimination rather than the overall topic itself. Recommended into splitting types of discrimination into sub-articles. Zanibas (talk) 07:35, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
  • The article on The Mars Volta has sections (especially those on their various albums) that are a real mess. There are multiple references to dates with no year given; grammar is often horrible; references are most often lacking. Perhaps someone with an overall knowledge of the band's oeuvre might be able to do some work on it.—StavinChain (talk) 11:56, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

[edit] June

[edit] May

  • Persepolis - Reads like written by someone who has English as a second language. Needs grammar checking. Lacks sources. Listed since 2006.—Lendorien (talk) 16:36, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Notting Hill - Seems ok, but refs are a mess and not in proper citation format.—Lendorien (talk) 15:43, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Rhyming slang could use a good re-write, also some copyediting, grammatical fixes, and general cleanup. Cheers,—Mizu onna sango15/水女珊瑚15 23:04, 27 May 2008 (UTC).
  • Chicken 65 The article has been edited and counter-edited by people wanting to lay claim to its legacy or something.. and one of the references quote is a blogspot.com post.. extremely irrelevant blog.. the dish however is not.. please ask me for help if needed.. in my opinion the whole article should be flushed.. made bare.—Bijun (talk) 17:36, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Tremulous The article is written a lot like a game guide, and needs more sources. ۩ Dracion ۩ ✎ ✉ 11:24, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Secretariat (horse) Honors and Retirement is not written like an encyclopedia article and needs more citations.
  • Edward Dunlop Character Summary contains false information in the Commands bit.—DestructoTalk to me 02:34, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Beatrix_of_the_Netherlands Article is entirely unsourced. PrinceOfCanada (talk) 03:32, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Jackie_Collins Article has been incorrectly sourced from unofficial biographies of the author. I will be editing it over the next few weeks Twiglet23 (talk) 15:58, 1 May 2008 (GMT)
  • Burlesque (album) is not written in an encyclopedic way. Lunakeet 13:40, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Butcombe is full of typos and grammatical errors. — Paul G (talk) 17:18, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April

  • Rainbow Boys The Character Summary needs to be edited for grammar and style; it may be easier to entirely rewrite the section with new descriptions.—75.111.175.177 (talk) 23:07, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
  • James Lowther, 1st Viscount Ullswater The conference links have ceased operating - probably other links to the given site need checking. Jackiespeel (talk) 17:54, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Education in Bulgaria - It needs to be more organized and wikified. Splee (talk) 10:02, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Benina International Airport - The section on the new airport sounds like an advert/news article. It needs to be cleaned. Jaw101ie (talk) 19:01, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
  • World War III (section) - The premise of the section Difficulty in determining a "World War" is relevant to the page, but the arguments are confused, and it drifts off the point. Deciding what is meant by "World War" is a pre-requisite to determining what (if any) events will be labelled as "World War III". Perhaps this section should just raise the question and refer to World War, which covers the ground more coherently. Swiveler (talk) 06:23, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Jesse Jackson, Jr. The article is a bit of a mess—some mis-spelled items, many POV statements, etc. Pyronite (talk) 22:13, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March

  • Delta Upsilon - Needs to be completely revised. Contians huge lists of members that need to be prosified (in the style used in Alpha Phi Alpha. See the talk page for suggestions for cleanup.—Lendorien (talk) 15:57, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Chain Reaction (film) - This article is not even fully completed. If someone who has seen the movie could clean it up. As it stands the article lacks sources or even a complete plot summary.—Black Rabite (talk) 10:13 14 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Aureal Semiconductor - Article has a lot of messy external links. Needs copy editing + sourcing. Structure could use a cleanup. Tagged since 2006. Probably an easy fixer upper.—Lendorien (talk) 15:17, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Anna-Maria Ravnopolska-Dean - Major rewrite candidate, reads like it is a resume for the artist.—ScaldingHotSoup (talk) 18:53, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February

[edit] February 15–29

  • Rights of Man - This article is extremely cluttered, needs better segways from section to section, some rewriting and possibly expert attention. Also lacks any sources.—Lendorien (talk) 16:43, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Pancharatna Kritis - Needs to be rewritten in a more encyclopedic style, wikifying, copy editing, and a lot of work. Contains all of the lyrics of the piece. These need to be removed or moved to wikisource. POV issues as well. No sourcing and orphaned. Desperately in need of attention. I've started work on it, but help needed.—Lendorien (talk) 00:45, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Chinatown patterns in North America - Completely unsourced, smacks of OR.—Lendorien (talk) 23:58, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Identity (social science) - large portions are unwikified. May contain copyvio. No intext refs, confusing.—Lendorien (talk) 23:53, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
  • George Seton, 5th Earl of Winton is in dire need of help from someone who is familiar with British history. Travellingcari (talk) 16:49, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Ben Macpherson needs cleaning up and a check of sources a lot of incorrect information

[edit] February 1–15, 2008

  • I did a little grammer checking at the start of it, but since I havent the show, someone who has may want to look at its plot {*TEE DUB*} (talk) 18:50, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
  • I did a little plot work too, but I only saw up to that part.-Sakuraluver(talk)
  • Dragan Radulović, see the talk page, I've identified some sources but language is an issue. Not sure which language of the former Yugoslavia it is, however. Travellingcari (talk) 15:48, 19 February 2008 (UTC) for real!!!!!!!!!!!

[edit] January 2008

  • Paul Tillich - maximally baffling heavy theology that may be OR. Needs stiff editing to make this accessible to the lay reader. 86.145.94.229 (talk) 04:47, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Transcendental argument for the non-existence of God "Criticisms" section reads like a colloquial forum.
  • Equivalence principle has a section "The equivalence principle and the nature of mass" that needs to be looked at by an expert. There are no citations, the English is poor, and it's lacking in any technical information needed to explain and justify the theory that it's talking about. I'd do it myself, but I've never heard of this theory before and so have no idea where to begin. Dbutler1986 (talk) 10:08, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 2007

[edit] December 2007

  • Statistical survey - This page is written like class notes.
  • Mary Anderson (stage actress) - A large part of this article is taken word for word from a single source. Although the source is cited, this section should be summarized instead, especially since it is not set off in quotes and is in first person. CClio333 04:33, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
  • The Second Sex - The verbosity of this article, particularly the section Content of The Second Sex, makes it very confusing. It appears to be an essay or thesis but is so under-referenced that one cannot tell where the information and commentary is coming from. As a general reader I lack the knowledge base to sort out opinion from quotation from original research.Trilobitealive (talk) 01:41, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Union College, Tellippalai, Tamil Eelam - It's very hard to make sense of this article. AecisBrievenbus 22:35, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Mirror TV - The article reads like an ad. AecisBrievenbus 15:16, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Mod (computer gaming) There is a massive and unnecessary list. Marlith 20:11, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

  • Links through Special:Linksearch/translate.google.com should probably be replaced with direct links. Language icons should be added after the links instead. Sample change: [1]—User:Docu
  • OvBB Article needs to reflect the recent domain ownership change. It no longer is under Jonathan Freeman's ownership. (1and1 now owns it.)—Iyeru42 (talk) 12:20, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
    • Image Caption needs the Project forums link removed, unless you wish to change it to one of the demos.—Iyeru42 (talk) 17:04, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Falling of Blossoms is completely in Engrish. Needs proper grammar, and all that. Rogutaan (talk) 01:31, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Baldur's Gate: Dark Alliance isn't that bad, but still could sound more professional. Marlith T/C 03:38, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Royal Military College of Canada needs cleanup. It used to be a good one but like any University or school article, every student adds it own little piece. It is now hard to read and confusing (i.e. languages, traditions, alumni) and there are a lot of irrelevant chapters (i.e. diversity, collectibles, ethics). Please Help!
  • Magnetosphere particle motion - Article has a discursive conversational physics textbook style, not an encyclopedia article style. It also lacks a proper time and place in order to intro to lead intot he article in a way a layman can understand.—Lendorien 19:25, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Businesses and organizations in Second Life - The page seems to have become a target for Second Life-related organizations to promote themselves. I have declined to speedily delete the page, as I believe it is salvageable; but it needs a severe pruning. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 10:44, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

[edit] September 2007

  • History of baseball in the United States - Section on Negro Leagues contains very few facts and doesn't read like an encyclopedia entry at all. Really the whole article needs a major overhaul, almost no references.—Youjane1 14:33, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Nomad - Article needs attention to check accuracy and possibly expand to provide more accurate definition. Also needs sources.—Lendorien 14:23, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Sukyo Mahikari - Religious article needs thorough cleanup to make encyclopedic. Needs wikification and copy editing for tone and pov issues. Significant sections unsourced.—Lendorien 14:31, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Arguments for and against drug prohibition - reads like a debate, some arguments are very weak e.g. Needs to be gone over for NPOV. Also contains serious sourcing issues. The article uses three different methods of sourcing. Needs to be converted to footnote intext references for entirety of article. Sections may need to be merged or reorganized. A very messy article.—Lendorien 19:43, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Assiti Shards series - This article has serious neutrality and OR issues. It needs to be deeply cut, perhaps even a deep revert. Completely lacks sources and has a fancruft tone.—Lendorien 19:43, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Lean Construction Worded like an advertisement. Deals with a specific construction technique by a limited group of firms. Promotes its superiority. Uses extensive external linking directly to for-profit organizations. 4.230.162.237 02:51, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Clinical_depression#Hypomania Urgent attention of an expert needed ! I (doctor) consider it factually wrong. Anxiety and panic are mostly not part of hypomania. Hypomania belongs to bipolar disorder not unipolar depression. And more and more. Chaotic written too.—jmak 08:23, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Moisture absorber - Pooly written (informal style ...), unreferenced. - Mike Rosoft 10:54, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Translation - Has some readability issues. Also seems to be the subject of an editing skirmish between people who are in the field. The result is an article that reads like a textbook and is not very accessible to the non-expert. Man It's So Loud In Here 16:55, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] August 2007

[edit] 11–31 August, 2007

  • Bezant Confusing and internal contradictions.
  • Irish Property Bubble - Terribly formatted and very poor writing and content.Referencing could be fixed up as well. Olockers 10:30, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Radu Duda, Prince of Hohenzollern-Veringen - Allegations of heavily POV and non-nuetrality. May need copy editing for tone and research to provide better balance. Subject of an edit war. Needs to be reviewed. Please see talk page for more details.—Lendorien 18:41, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Banasthali Vidyapith - Marked as an article which reads like an advertisement. It's based (with apparent permission) off the school's promotional brochure. Needs tone editing, wikification, cropping and possible expansion to include info usually found in university articles.—Lendorien 14:51, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Big Brother Australia series 3 - Needs tone checking and sourcing.—Lendorien 14:51, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Lalitaditya Muktapida - Article is not entirely thematically coherent at the moment. It needs to be reviewed by someone with a background in the subject to straighten things out.—Lendorien 14:51, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Alan Ladd - his filmography is completely unorganised. Reginmund 18:55, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Turned filmography into a list, titles still needs to wikified and the list needs to be pruned from non-notable entries as it is pretty long.—Sus scrofa 00:35, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
Turns out the movies were already wikified, but a lot were redlinks, so those were fixed. ArcAngel (talk) 02:55, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Last Words - The article needs to be put into proper sections and some general clean up may also be needed.—Credema 17:57, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Book 3 (Inheritance trilogy) may need to be updated. I had heard that a release date had been released for the third book. I believe it was set for early March, 2008, unless I heard false information.
  • Campus SuperStar is too long. Too many information thrown in on the article which are not required. Please post discussion on talk page before any major cleanup is done.Cocoma 22:21, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Project SuperStar is too long. Too many information thrown in on the article which are not required. Cocoma 22:32, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 1–10 August, 2007

  • Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq grammar, repeated sentences, sections read like it was written by some teenager unfamiliar with the language. As the general's place in Pakistani history is important, I would like someone with academic knowledge to review, since the article has changed since the last time I read it. Mac
  • This looks ok now, I have done a little editing and removed some of the bias.—Seth J. Frantzman 13:50, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Abduction phenomenon is a godawful mess; see Talk:Abduction phenomenon#Numerous massive problems Eleland 04:27, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Jealousy is based upon an inaccurate/limited definition of the word "jealousy." Does not cover any of the other meanings of the word beyond that in a romantic context. Includes poorly organized, non-encylopaedic content. Entire 3rd paragraph is such high-level summary that it reads like a elementary school project - was worse than useless, far below the quality I've come to expect from Wikipedia. Punctuation is poor -I'm sure I could go on, but overall, I felt this was a very disappointing article.
  • Feminism and the Oedipus complex - Messy stylistically; the section on Deutsch reads like it was automatically translated or translated badly, & other sections are haphazard & unclear. All sections need more detail and a generally more thorough, professional treatment to be useful. PoetrixViridis 04:07, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Uyghur people - Sloppily written, with poor grammar and illogical constructions; some sections are written in a juvenile tone; many unsupported statements; general pov Bacrito 15:36, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Big Brother (UK) - Article reads like a fan site. Poor grammar, no sources. Just plain low-standards. Dalejenkins | The Apprentice (UK)'s FA plea-please have your say! 18:16, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
  • I had a try at going through bits of the grammar and giving some bits references but it really needs a total rewrite! Groovychick3291 20:18, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Digital Entertainment Network - Article needs to be broken down, it is currently just a block o text. Grammar needs to be improved. Basically, the whole article needs improvement.—Credema 03:46, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 2007

[edit] 21–31 July 29, 2007

  • Spa bath - article could benefit from some copy editing (grammar, style, further wikification)—Sietse 16:43, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Deathbowl '98 - Written so badly that it's nearly incoherent; completely unreferenced
  • List of colleges and universities in South Carolina - Alot of wrong information. some public colleges listed as private. Needs cleanup
  • Amedeo Guillet needs cleanup by someone familiar with Italian military history. Some text editing, organization and sources needed.—Lendorien 21:10, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Perpetua: An article about an early Christian martyr that mostly just needs some improvements in readability. Sources also needed.—Lendorien 21:10, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Pallava: Organization is poor. English is muddled. There seems to be some original research mixed in there, although that might just be an artifact of poor composition. Probably needs a solid fact-check. Justin Bacon 15:57, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Promotional model NeedsSome text editing, wikifying + sources.—Lendorien 21:10, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Hollard Group - Has weird links to non-existent article, POV- seems to be a promo taken from the company literature. Frankie816 14:57, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Center for Talented Youth - This is terribly written, it is full of typos and has more fandom than information. It seems like someone wrote the article who did not know how to write, because of that there are no links and bad HTML. Marlith 03:35, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Frame of reference - very long paragraphs, particularly in the lead. Needs fact checking and sources + probably expert attention.—Lendorien 13:26, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Nursing Informatics - needs copy editing, sources and probably expert attention.—Lendorien 13:26, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Kshatriya - needs extensive editing for grammar, to remove redundancy, and generally to make it encyclopedic.—Whateley23 20:58, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Cave diving - Needs to be completely re-organised. Too much of some info, others are lacking. Lacks proper headings. History section is particularly scrappy (ricjl)

[edit] 11–20 July, 2007

  • Tejano music - Needs repair of many links, and several paragraphs are opinionated talk-page like material.—Whoistheroach 14:40, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Talking to Dragons - Abnormally massive paragraph with potentially useless information.
  • Steven Pienaar - Has been playground for vandals. Somebody with knowledge of subject may be needed to verify current version, which needs work even if completely accurate. Moonriddengirl 13:15, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
  • phantom voltage - Good introduction to this particular term, and is written adequately; however, formatting, citations, and organization need work to be more wiki-ish. Lots of possibly wikify-able terms, aren't. 65.112.197.16 21:23, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Tucker Max - This article has many grammatical errors and is poorly written. The article seems to be biased and makes claims that contradict the sources. 21:47, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Bassmasters Classic - Lack of third-party sources. Rjgodoy 08:27, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Nexus:_The_Kingdom_of_the_Winds - This article is poorly organized, badly written, and has a LOT of unnecessary material...lneely42
  • Deleted a LOT of material from this page following the Wikipedia Video Game Article guideline. Also spent some time rewriting several portions of the article correcting grammar, spelling, and poor writing. Some portions I have decided to leave alone for the time being, especially the Controversy section... I think it could be left, but rewritten to be neutral, as the controversy is an integral part of the game... lneely42 06:18, 14 July 2007 (CST)
  • Sardar Amir Azam - De-PoV& wikify. Half of article is unsourced.—Lendorien 18:59, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
  • John Tunnard - apart from needing wikifying, extremely subjective account that looks like original research. Needs sources and rewrite to cull out tone issues that make it read like a college textbook discussion.—Lendorien 18:59, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Stingless bee - Needs sources.—Lendorien 18:59, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Hip hop & Hip hop music - Both appear to replicate the content of each other. Hip hop music has two styles of referencing, includes a list of sources, and a limited number of Harvard refs. The article is full of opinion, not neutral and very long. Confused re-directs/merger requests. Escaper2007 11:18, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Vasileios Spanoulis - The formatting of this article is very sloppy and the layout makes for a very confusing read, but it has potential given the amount of quality information about this international NBA player compared to many others. MichaelProcton 04:46, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Hanover Shoe Farms has a cleanup tag on it but I cannot find the reason why on this page. I made recent edits to it to clean it up but I'm not sure if I fixed the problem. COuld somebody give me a hand? I'm new to wikipedia. Barn Cat 18:36, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
I will definitely try to help, but most of the help I can offer is to clean up the language. It currently sounds very stilted. Sean Montgomery 14:23, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Mitotic inhibitor - Recently I have created and expanded the stub 'mitotic inhibitor'. This article is of great importance to cancer treatment and research, but I am very inexperienced in writing for wikipedia and therefore I believe the article needs extensive rewrite, seeing as it does not meet the quality of other wikipedia pages I have seen. I would be grateful if soeone were to help me format the page and expound upon the subject. Dancanm 14:46, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Kentucky-Louisville rivalry - Alot of grammatical errors, along with poor layout and spelling. Kycowboyntv 23:51, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Quarantine - Based on the 1911 Britanica article, this article is out of date, poorly written (with too much emphasis on the 19th century) and needs sourcing.—Lendorien 15:57, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 1–10 July, 2007

  • Strawberry Shortcake-Majority of the article is unsourced and probably contains original research and whatever sources are there are questionable. Storm05 16:12, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Nihonjinron - An article that looks like it's in the middle of major editing but hasn't been edited in almost a month. It has a section named 'Comment to be repositioned' and other stuff that should've been done on the talk page. Haridan 07:04, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Pseudo.com - Notable internet pioneer firm, however page lacks a lead, a lot of the information is in non-encyclopedic form, and the bulk of the people mentioned are red-links.—Cerejota 03:29, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keith Olbermann - Poorly organized, headings not parallel. Hobo-nc 03:26, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Non-synchronous transmissions - Article needs serious improvements. It repeats information, it has no illustrations to explain the text, and it is written in an unencyclopedic manner. It also promotes the American Trucker Association, & Professional Truck Driver's Association school at the Houston Community College N.E. campus in northeast Houston, TX (USA)! Why? — CZmarlin 02:26, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Ranger's Apprentice (series) - A large amount of spelling and grammatical errors. Way to many for me to fix on my own. The content at parts can also sound very unprofessional
  • Bob Clampett - very subjective text in the lower sections - e.g. he wrote some of the 'most outrageuous and funniest cartoons'.
  • Focus III - this reads like a review, and is incredibly positively biased.
  • Edith Pringle: Aussie pol activist. Needs sourcing.—Lendorien 16:48, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Mii (Jungle de Ikou!) - This article is about a cartoon featuring a ten year old girl <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:MarkS/XEB/live.css&action=raw&ctype=text/css&dontcountme=s">with large breasts. The writers of this article do not deserve good faith; the depraved tone is hideously unencyclopedic. A gx7 02:49, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Fay B. Kaigler Children's Book Festival - Seems to me someone just typed it straight from a book or typed it. Considered deletion tag, but I think it's salvageable. Wikified a bit of it and added categories, but it's massive. Hourick 22:15, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Akatsuki (Naruto) - A former GA article that was demoted due to too much in-universe material and a large amount of trivia. User:Artist Formerly Known As Whocares 19:40 (Eastern Standard Time), 3 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Shuriken School - It has little information, has no illustrations, and is written in an unencyclopedic manner. It needs some serious improving. Thomas Yen 16:32, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Ranger's Apprentice (series) - A large amount of spelling and grammatical errors. Way to many for me to fix on my own. The content at parts can also sound very unprofessional. Scabloo 04:23, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Knights of the Dinner Table - Character bios could possibly be moved to Characters from Knights of the Dinner Table to make room for info about the publication itself. Also needs sourcing. See talk page.—Lendorien 16:49, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] June 2007

[edit] 21–30 June, 2007

  • Object composition - A new section about Aggregation in COM was included, which may be confusing or unclear for some readers. Rjgodoy 05:37, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Valley_High_School_(Des_Moines,_Iowa) - Lots of <br /> tags, inconsistent formatting. Bassgoonist 19:24, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Video CD - Large sections contain grammar errors as if parts were machine-translated into English. 67.66.92.222 19:03, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Lawrence Dimick - This article is clumsily written, with halting grammar. The headings make it unclear whether the section "fictional biography" is missing entirely (other than the heading itself) or made up of subsections that merely relate the plot of Reservoir Dogs. The entire article is written with overly basic sentences; this may seem like an odd complaint, but read the article and you'll see what I mean. Minaker 06:38, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Louis Briffa - Unwikified, possibly copied from somewhere. - Mike Rosoft 10:07, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Amapola Cabase - reads like a promotional, and contains many runon paragraphs with not much sense of order. Squalk25 16:27, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Thompson (band) - Doesn't look to be written by native English speaker. Odd grammatical mistakes littered throughout. Also may contain OR and copyright violations. Milton 22:19, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Children's street culture - From the first sentence to the end section is poorly written, with many off topic and lists too long.GreaterWikiholic 04:05, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Zbigniew Brzezinski - This long article has good content; it needs a serious copyeditor to lift its quality. Lightwiki 23:56, 22 June 2007 (UTC).
  • Abdul Baqi Purani - almost unreadable; possibly translated from Pakistani. David Mestel(Talk) 16:46, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
  • First-Person Shooter - Most of the article is pretty good, but a few sections need a bit of help. GreaterWikiholic 16:48, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Kumon method - Promotional - Mike Rosoft 17:33, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Gabe Saporta - Unreferenced claims. - Mike Rosoft 17:38, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 11–20 June, 2007

  • Chiastic_structure - Needs one or more good examples, attention from an expert.—Biggus Dictus 19:03, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
  • HSV SS Group A - Needs more wikifying and cleanup from someone who knows his/her cars. Mvuijlst 17:47, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Sinitta - terrible, terrible article......needs a lot of help—Paul75 00:04, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Des'ree - Reads like a press release—Paul75 00:05, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Looks to have been cleaned up way back in Aug 2007. Astronaut (talk) 20:38, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] 1–10 June, 2007

  • Shredderman Rules - Parts of the plot are poorly-written. Groudon199 19:25, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Question Mark & the Mysterians - Article contains lots of minor editing mistakes, but is also written largely in the first-person active voice.—Migozared 03:44, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Ocean's Thirteen - This article violates NPOV and needs a serious grammar clean up.
  • Makam Habib Noh - Article reads like a hagiography. AecisBrievenbus 14:33, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Jean Houston "Contributions in perspective" section is written like an essay. 24.25.219.142 08:32, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Barrow-in-Furness Badly written and unreferenced with way too much unnecessary information. Poor compared to similar sized UK settlements. Kijog 22:55, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Tholus, Mensa (geology), Rupes, Macula (planetary geology), Linea - short articles about planetary features, originally proposed for deletion after being moved to Wiktionary; I believe that they could be expanded or merged somewhere. - Mike Rosoft 11:59, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Parlour music - Article is completely unsourced. May need text edits.—Lendorien 17:09, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Jarboe - List of albums needs cleanup. Biographical info was cut as copy vio, but a user readded it claiming to be the artist in question's assistant. It IS copy vio fromt he artist's website. Someone with a bit more knowledge of policy needs to take care of this.—Lendorien 16:59, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
  • The Great Doheny - Written in an uncyclopedic style.Crazyvideomaniac 22:10, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Antitrust - "History of antitrust in the United States" section reads as biased, selective, and overly authorial. Needs editing, citations, and general clean-up. This is a major article.—72.43.165.29 20:09, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
  • SWAT Kats - No citations.—Astrovega 14:29, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Yeoman - No intro, dictionary like sections, written poorly, could be shortened. Seems more like what you'll find in an entymology dictionary than an encyloclopedia. GreaterWikiholic 00:05, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Lauren London - The article already has an Unreferenced tag, but could also benefit from a general cleaning up of the Early Life and Career section. Arrow 00:28, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Santa Sangre - Tone not encyclopedic—PhageRules1 20:47, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  • I fixed most of the grammar and added a spoiler warning, but the article is still very lacking, especially in sources. JoeyETS 00:57, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] May 2007

[edit] May 25–31, 2007

  • Tom Natsworthy - Had a complete rewrite by me but i need someone who knows more to help-needs lots of content addition.—Camelcast 09:14, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Razorback - lots of fantastic claims here. Are any of them true?—Rebent 06:29, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Article reads well enough to me. Issue seems to be lack of references, not messiness. Matt 19:35, 29 June 2007 (UTC).
  • Pre-qualification. Some of the information is incorrect, specifically regarding the social security number not being needed. That is absolutely incorrect.
  • European Irish - Legitimate topic, but seems to have been created as an advertisement for the europeanirish.com website. - Mike Rosoft 13:45, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Hells Angels is really poorly written, controversy aside. There are all sorts of grammatical errors and odd syntaxes. I'd be bold, but I don't know enough abuot the subject to figure out what some of the article is trying to say—xAlpha 23:00, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Maybe a "subject matter expert"? What subject would that be? It may just need to be re-written - both the article and talk are a bit out of control.Lightwiki 01:53, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Timebase correction repeats a lot of the same information and is poorly organized.
  • Multimedia Fusion has mostly bad English grammar, there are misspelled words, and it just doesn't look gay.
  • Cleaned up formatting and grammer a bit. Program functionality needs verified.—Mortal 23:57, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Very fan focused - unencyclopedic character. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 13:34, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] May 22–24, 2007

  • Royal visits to Australia contains incorrect links and confusing third person pronouns such as a he which can refer to a few people. It's also a long article requiring organization.
  • I added sections and an area for references, however, I haven't read through or improved the content at all. -Sparky 11:03, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Town School, San Francisco. Reads poorly, short, mission statement uncyclopedic, it is a stub.GreaterWikiholic 04:47, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Briarpatch. Looks like bits have been cut out. Beyond that, general lack of NPOV, unencyclopedic tone, and, frankly, patent nonsense.—Hiddekel 22:23, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Sacramento High School contains unencyclopedic lists that may require cleanup.Rjgodoy 07:31, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Simon Necronomicon Tone changes between it being an ancient book translated in the 1970s, a book written on its own merits in the 1970s, and a hoax version of the Lovecraft Necronomicon written in the 1970s. I thought I could possibly fix it, but it's just too much. Might even want to just delete the nonsense and add it as a footnote to the Necronomicon page. 69.64.10.249 14:01, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Filippino Lippi: (Renaissance painter) - I'm still relatively new at all this, but it seems to me that this article is completely lacking in references. I would tag it, but am still uncomfortable with taking such liberties. There also seems to me some NPOV violations, given a lack of critical reference in such sentences as this, "His first works greatly resemble those of Botticelli's, but with less sensitivity and subtlety" and "Eventually Lippi's style evolved into a more personal and effective one...." I hope a more experienced editor might have time to take a look and decide if those issues need tagging.—Moonriddengirl 14:12, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Tagged for tone, cleanup and sources—Lendorien 20:46, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
  • KZ 7 - Needs linking. Rjgodoy 05:20, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Pontarlier - The history bit about aviation seems almost like an auto-translation. Badly written.—Frokor 16:12, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

-Cleaned up the grammar a little but still some incoherent phrases that I didn't get.jtimshel 20:34, 30 July 2007

[edit] May 17–21, 2007

  • Shekhar Suman - Unwikified, with too many POVs and/or may be inaccurate content too. Quork 14:30, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Sam & Dave - In dire need of help. POV, colloquial writing, poor formatting, makes no attempt to follow standards.—FuriousFreddy 23:54, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Canvey Island - Reads like a travel guide. AecisBrievenbus 23:29, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Sasha and Zamani - Improper citation, conflicting information, poorly written. -Lott 09:08, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Smooth jazz - Numerous Wikipedia policy concerns, including WP:RS, WP:V and in turn WP:N as well as WP:NPOV, WP:NOR, WP:NOT#DIR and WP:EL. The article though is about a major jazz genre with worldwide radio coverage, and so is notable and in my view, not eligible for AfD, but notability isn't established in the article due to no citations or references. Also alerted to cleanup taskforce, where detailed information on the articles problems are here: Wikipedia:Cleanup Taskforce/Smooth jazz.—tgheretford (talk) 16:10, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Annitya - Unwikified, poorly referenced, appears to consist of religious claims stated as a fact. - Mike Rosoft 20:44, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Richard McKeon - There are no citations, and the article is not well written, especially the end.
  • Gaby Hoffmann - The article is incredibly confusing, digressing wildly. - Echtoran (talk) 10:52, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] May 1–15, 2007

  • Tonya Kay - article reads like a resume or a press release, has an overly detailed list of articles and appearances. Blade 05:54, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Alternative hip hop - Supplies little fact and much opinion and while it cites its sources for this information, it doesn't read like an encyclopedia entry at all. Does not go into great detail regarding examples, history, etc.
  • Lan Mandragoran - Article on a character from The Wheel of Time - the page was really disorganized so I grouped topics, but within each topic the text needs to be changed to flow better.—zandperl 20:37, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
  • The Buckaroos - notable band, but the content seems to be too much promotional. - Mike Rosoft 08:22, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
  • I did some serious restructuring and removed a lot of promo material. Have tagged for WP:LoCE to have a look at. Cricketgirl 18:55, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
  • TeleForm - I nominated this for deletion as advertising, but it appears to be notable; needs a complete rewrite though. EliminatorJR Talk 23:31, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Evaluation - grammar and formatting both need cleaning up a bit. Some clunky and sweeping statements need tidying up too. Rob 15:04, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Contributions by John leo (talk · contribs) - most pages created by the user need cleanup, possibly merging and/or renaming. - Mike Rosoft 11:29, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Bobobo-bo Bo-bobo and Bobobo-bo Bo-bobo (character) - These articles are in desperate need of cleanup and I refuse to be the one to do it (I don't have the time nor the patience to handle such jobs). I suggest more than one person tackles these articles (I'm sure the other Bobobo articles need cleanup too) to avoid going insane. // DecaimientoPoético 00:33, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Tat Tvam Asi - The article sounds too religious and needs a bit of de-biasing. Willie the Walrein-talk to me 16:45, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
  • VATSIM - Information is not up to date, needs a review Enti342 09:25, 8 May 2007 (EST)
  • Logical_framework_approach - Formating shabby, hard to read, requires general tidying Onetwothreesix 19:33, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Culture#Belief_systems - There's no theme here, making the section disorganized. It covers differences between Eastern and Western culture; Abrahamic religion, Eastern religion and philosophy, folk religion, the American Dream, and marriage. Why this grab bag of topics? -Kris Schnee 05:51, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
  • John Mensah - POV fancruft. AecisBrievenbus 00:08, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Floating timeline - A fair bit of information their, but it needs to be more organized and presented in a clearer way. -Kraw Night 06:15, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] April 2007

[edit] April 25–30, 2007

  • Did some stuff. Still needs referencing. Filmography needs roles filled in.—Shoejartalk/edits 02:50, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
  • I tried to improve the formatting, but the sidebars are just too big! Kweeket 07:20, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
  • What exactly is the problem with the sidebars? Or has it been fixed?—Burgercat 18:25, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Reduced thumbnail size. That might fix it, it looked fine on my browser though.—Burgercat 02:46, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Kurdish calendar - Messy, grammar errors, and probably inaccurate information.
  • Roman Ungern von Sternberg the article doesn't site a single reference or source. Definitely needs a clean up. Olockers 19:35, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Politics of Ethiopia - Most of what is said in the chapter "Political developments" is also said in the chapter "Current politics." This needs to be sorted, probably by merging the two sections. AecisBrievenbus 22:36, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] April 24, 2007

  • Nexus:_The_Kingdom_of_the_Winds - This article is full of inaccuracies, spelling and grammar errors. The users who frequent the talk page can't decide on whether or not to keep the section about corrupt administrators in the game. INBN 23:48, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Cleaned up some spelling and grammar errors.—Burgercat 10:46, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Cal Madow – probably relevant, but currently a SPAM and POV page. Béka 22:06, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Looks like it may contain copy vio.—Lendorien 15:34, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] April 17–22, 2007

  • Cleaned it up a bit - 27 May 2007.
  • Annobón - section on Fauna and Flora has been written very badly. Needs rewriting, prefereably by someone who understands the subject. also this contains profanityBazonka 16:04, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
  • France Gall - errors in grammar, non-NPOV statements, inappropriate tone at times, confusingly structured, unverified statements. -Spikedcandy 16:33, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Have had a go at a major edit of this page, moving around sections as suggested on the Talk page and rewriting poor grammar or poorly written sections.Faubourgienne 16:57, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Anathema - Sections repeat material, some material (pop culture) seems of nonencyclopedic nature. → Aethralis 18:00, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Motor oil - This article needs help with basic grammar, spelling, proper headings, and encyclopedic tone. Charles Gaudette 10:30, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
  • I have corrected the tense (and other things), but the name issue should still be discussed. Alekjds talk 23:03, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Desposyni Article has quotations from primary sources but few secondary sources and references. Most of the content seems to be copied verbatim from a religious group's website. Ovadyah 23:22, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] April 13–16, 2007

  • Channel 4 programming is a new article that combines material lifted from Channel 4 (which was becoming too big) and material merged from the former List of Channel 4 television programmes. It is divided into genres of programming some of which are highly specific with others being vague and mixed-up. It also contains content from many different editors, describing specific programmes individually, which tends to make the prose seem very disjointed. It generally needs a tidier structure, but given the amount of content, is a pretty big endeavour. It is also separately tagged as requiring references.—Fursday 00:02, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Emil Krebs - Wall of text that appears to have been translated. Alksub 21:57, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Yes, it appears to have been computer-translated from the German WP article.[1 Schmitty120 14:32, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Supernatural - This is an important article, but unfortunately it contains many forward claims that require attribution to reliable sources, chief among them a strong support of methodological naturalism in science. It lacks references for many of its other claims, which I have marked with "citation needed" tags. It uses numerous weasel words. "Competing Explanations and Criteria of Preference" as well as the end of "Alleged instances of supernaturalization" have a naturalistic POV and should be cut down unless reliable sources can be found to support their statements. See what I wrote under "Unsourced." Good day.Schmitty120 19:35, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] April 1–12, 2007

  • I removed the redundant information...and there was lot of that. Kweeket 23:00, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Libri Prohibiti - Needs to be wikified, have Czech-language names etc. corrected (diacritics), and also restructured - perhaps trimmed a bit. - Mike Rosoft 17:02, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  • North-West Frontier Province - The geography section reads like a travel ad, while the history section contains a copypasted lecture. I couldn't retrieve where the lecture ends and the proper article continues. AecisBrievenbus 22:55, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Australian Survivor - Overlong and filled with trivia and POV comments.—Nick Dowling 01:58, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Rudolf Bahro - Large blocks of text, masses of data thrown into an article.—themcman1 13:58, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
  • List of characters in Ed, Edd n Eddy - The article cannot differentiate between fact and fiction. The only part of the article that does this is the lead. Needs to be rewritten to conform with WP:WAF. Squirepants101 20:03, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Template:R_with_possibilities—Wording is difficult to understand; writing style does not match other Wikipedia messages. I know this isn't the Simple English version of Wikipedia, but this Template is really confusing.—hadley 15:33, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Confessions_of_a_Teenage_Drama_Queen - stumbled on the site as suggested by SuggestBot for it being a stub, but turns out the plot section is one run-on sentence followed by another. EvokeNZ 06:40, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
  • I did what I could for the poor thing.—The Streetsweeper 08:42, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Quality control - completely uncited, seems like the bulk of the history is OR/speculation. style issues. over half the text is on quality assurance, which has its own article. (though there is a merge discussion on the two). Ripe 15:48, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Strategic planning - Needs general cleanup and removal of bias. Has formatting issues throughout, and questionable quality as well.—Whereizben - Chat with me - My Contributions 12:54, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] March 2007

[edit] March 21–31, 2007

  • I took a jab at it. A lot of the work simply required naturalization of the English grammer, so that's done. I can't say anything about the informational content itself. Still needs sourcing.—Lendorien 17:26, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Rock the Vote - Much of the article is straight copy-paste, tenses are mixed, and sections need to be added.—Xenoveritas 15:41, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Conservatism in Canada - General cleanup in several areas, including factual accuracy, citations, clarity and organization. Hipsterlady 21:47, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Fender_Stratocaster - Article begins well but loses organization and the running order jumps around. D. Miller
  • Dolphins-Jets rivalry - Lots of information (perhaps too much), but unencyclopedic tone throughout much of the article; too much for me to rewrite on my own. Could use some copyediting too, perhaps.—Highway99 06:30, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Ronson's Lighters - Not much content; loosely organized. I did a bit of copyediting, but this article needs to be revised and expanded.—DoorsAjar 08:41, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Ribesal - Real topic, but extremely badly written, unreferenced, and unwikified.—Mike Rosoft 22:12, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Environmental issues in Ethiopia - Good info, but sounds like it's written by a non-native speaker, lots of redundancies and some grammar/spelling errors
  • I cleaned up the sentence structure, spelling and grammar issues for the most part.—Nswinton 17:03, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] March 11–20, 2007

  • Noelle Pikus Pace - This article is poorly written and from a first person perspective. The person is real and seems notable but the text of the article needs much attention. Sadly more than I hace this morning. JBEvans 10:55, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
  • General Hospital - This article is in need of some basic cleanup and reformatting. If left untended, it will essentially turn into a recap/fansite page. I don't have a problem with posting storyline-type information, but it needs to be brought up to WP Quality standards. Also, fans keep adding new couple and supercouple pages for practically every set of characters, most of which is in blatant violation of WP:NOR. I would think most of the "couple" pages are good candidates for deletion. A few, like Luke and Laura Spencer are definitely Notable for their contribution to the modern Soap Opera, but most are frivolous and unnecessary.—66.91.225.99 02:34, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Rachel Stevens - The article seems to have too many sections, and become very messy and untidy to look at. Blacksilkandy 22:05, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Library - Could probably be divided up into several articles: one section has a request for development.—Jackiespeel 19:09, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Rancho San Joaquin Middle School - Seems a little one-sided, don't you think. It is only talking about one humanities teacher, Kay Gee, there are other humanities teachers and other teachers there who deserve to have their name on their as well, not just her. Please do something about it, I didn't want to touch it, but I might fix it a bit... just a bit.
  • Shady Side Academy - May read too much like a promotional.—Mike Rosoft 13:56, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Innovation Relay Centre Network - Reads like promotional, but perhaps it can be salvaged. - Mike Rosoft 19:33, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] March 1–11, 2007

  • Intermolecular force - Citations need to be added.
  • Varalaru - History of Godfather - Many grammatical and clarity errors. Much of the content essential to a good article on a film is there, but it is also confusing to read. Most of the spelling errors have been addressed, but the original author(s) may not be familiar enough with English (no criticism intended). A good copy editor is essential, and familiarity with the film may be beneficial. The article will benefit from much paring of excessive detail, and significant citing. Also, many, many incidences of what appears to be original research, or at least, personal interpretation. :—  Jim Dunning  talk  :  03:30, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Country pop - No sources, informal and awkward style (incl. unnecessarily long, if not run-on, sentences), poor grammar.
  • The Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard and Nantucket Steamship Authority - This article is organized poorly.
  • Privatization - Most of this article suffers from a total lack of sources. Furthermore, it has relatively little information on its actual subject; actual facts about privatization are overwhelmed by information about arguments pro and con. Even discussions of actual privatizations tend to overemphasize information about the arguments surrounding it relative to other facts, which is a serious information bias. Elliotreed 19:35, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Praieira revolt - This article needs cleanup. Needs more context and details. It's badly in need of sourcing and a general reorginaziation of the info. It reads like a philosophical essay rather than an article and is light on any real meat.—Lendorien 00:57, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Sathya Sai Baba movement - Possibly many problems with the article. The only serious contributor to the article (user:Andries) is or will be banned by the Wikipedia:arbitration committee. See talk:Sathya Sai Baba movement for a description of the possible problems. Andries 19:43, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Animal cell article: needs more info, I was looking up information for my science test tomorrow and there was only the definitions of the three main parts of the cell.

[edit] February 2007

[edit] 16–28 February, 2007

  • Jauhar - This article seems to have been patched together from other Wikipedia material and original work from a non-native English speaker. Even if the grammatical errors were fixed, this article could still probably stand to be completely rewritten, referenced, and generally wikified. - Lukeonia1 09:10, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Libertà condizionata - Same as above. Both articles were created by the same user, and are plagued with basic structural problems. Appears to be talking about the parole system in Italy - someone with knowledge of that would have an easier time cleaning this up. -Cue the Strings 17:23, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Tom Monaghan - This article has a severe lack of references, and have some NPOV issues as well.—Kristjan Wager 13:09, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Adult Theater - Needs lots of cleanup, including fixing references etc Rtcoles 21:09, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Rupert Lowe This article has a lot of information, but it is poorly structured. The tone is too conversational and there are numerous uncited POV assertions.+
  • The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock - I put in a cleanup-reminder tag about halfway through the article. The first half of the article is good, but the second half needs a grammar, spelling, and style check, along with wikification. - Im.a.lumberjack 23:44, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Mariavite Church thorough/comprehensive but slightly POV/over-favourable. Jackiespeel 17:07, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
  • RMI-IIOP It assumes too much background knowledge. It has no general discussion about what this protocol is, what various forms it takes, what it's used for, it's history etc. I already know a little bit about them and use them but came here to learn something more and went away without the info I was looking for. Dougher 04:27, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Geophagy - Screwy formatting and wikification, and an over-emphasis on cultural issues at the expense of medical content.
  • Muv-Luv - This article is written in a very confusing way. The character information appears to be the central feature rather than the main story itself. Apparently, the information came from a Japanese source, so it needs a cleanup to meet up the standards of an article written in English. Thank you, Minako-Chan* 14:37, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 1–15 February, 2007

[edit] January 2007

  • Psychological warfare- Poorly written, reads like a bad high school paper. Tagged this as suggested on the talk page.
  • Muraqabah - Doesn't use sections, is a guide on meditating or something (possibly shouldn't be in Wikipedia?), I'm not also sure this is WP:N. Maybe someone should nominate it for deletion, but at the very least it needs substantial work.—SLi 19:08, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Nat Tarnopol - Either an unwikified textdump or perhaps a copyvio. AecisBravado 19:33, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Water cannon - No references.—RedHillian 04:21, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Special Assessment Tax (mistakenly created at First article) - unwikified, possibly copied from somewhere. - Mike Rosoft 22:38, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Yellow Pages - other countries and regions section needs to be cleaned up re. URLs, layout and general content.
  • Cooperative and others (many here, notably Co-operative economics and Co-operative Federalism/Cooperative federalism mess) - Mixed usage in text within most of those articles (cooperative versus co-operative) and mixed usage between articles makes for confusing in-text links. This would require someone with admin powers to complete some of the needed moves, but otherwise it just needs someone with a lot of time to comb through and correct the spellings to how the article is titled. Gave me a hard-on. Buona fortuna! --Rkitko 08:10, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Cleanup"
Personal tools