The legal high naphyrone should be made illegal in the UK, the government's leading advisor on drugs said yesterday. He also recommended that the government introduce US-style legislation under which new compounds would be banned automatically if they are similar to existing illegal drugs.
Les Iversen, chairman of the UK government's Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD), said a new legal framework was needed because when novel drugs are made illegal, underground chemists and dealers simply replace them with new legal highs.
His call came as the ACMD recommended that naphyrone, a legal high that internet dealers have been selling in recent months, be controlled as a "class B" substance – meaning that possession and dealing would be punishable by up to five years and 14 years in prison respectively.
Little is known about the prevalence of naphyrone or its effects on the body. It has a close chemical resemblance to cathinones such as
Labels changed
Some websites sell naphyrone under the name NRG-1. But when researchers from Liverpool John Moores University, UK, bought 17 products advertised as legal highs from 12 UK-based websites, only one of 10 products sold as NRG-1 contained naphyrone, with the rest made up mainly of mephedrone and other banned cathinones.
Most internet retailers stopped selling mephedrone, also known as plant food or miaow miaow, when it was banned in April – but many began offering other legal highs in its place.
Iversen said that no sooner had the ban been introduced than naphyrone was being advertised as "the legal alternative to mephedrone" and "a research chemical 10 times more potent than cocaine".
Analogue gambit
In the US, the Federal Analog Act automatically bans compounds that are chemically similar or have similar effects to substances that are already banned for human consumption.
"Some of us on the ACMD think that this is a very attractive long-term approach to the problem that we ban one substance and another one will crop up the following week," said Iversen.
An ACMD working group will discuss this approach today with US Drug Enforcement Administration officials. The UK government is also looking at introducing laws like those in New Zealand that allow ministers to introduce a temporary ban on a substance while an investigation is carried out.
Iversen acknowledged that an analogue substances law might catch certain prescription medicines unless it was carefully framed or exceptions were included. For example, phenethylamines, the large chemical family into which cathinones and naphyrone fall, also include various medicinal treatments, including a weight-loss drug and a drug which is used against Parkinson's disease, depression and senile dementia.
If you would like to reuse any content from New Scientist, either in print or online, please contact the syndication department first for permission. New Scientist does not own rights to photos, but there are a variety of licensing options available for use of articles and graphics we own the copyright to.
Have your say
Only subscribers may leave comments on this article. Please log in.
Nanny
Thu Jul 08 18:25:21 BST 2010 by Dirk Bruere
Here we go again with Scientific Nanny getting her knickers in a twist trying to protect us from ourselves no matter what the cost.
Evidence Based?
Fri Jul 09 02:43:57 BST 2010 by james
The article states that "Little is known about the prevalence of naphyrone or its effects on the body".
What then is the rationale for banning the substance? Have we now moved beyond banning drugs which are show to be harmful to a position where a substance is banned because it might be like another banned drug?
What happens if a recreational drug is invented which has no harmful effects at all? on what grounds would that be made illegal?
Stop The War!
Fri Jul 09 09:50:47 BST 2010 by Forlornehope
Just legalise cannabis and put an end to all these "legal highs" being cooked up in small laboratories. While we're at it, decriminalise hard drugs and get the same results as Portugal. Not only will this save several billions each year spent on "the war on drugs" it will also provide at least £1 billion in revenue from legal cannabis sales. If fiscal problems can bring some sense to penal policy, perhaps they can also end this nonsensical drugs policy.
Stop The War!
Fri Jul 09 16:23:31 BST 2010 by Liza
Not to mention the small issue of preventing any more innocents to die in the war on drugs. The counter is at about 27,000 victims of narco killings in Mexico over the last 3 years, most of them innocent bystanders.
All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.
If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.