... Now we learn that these will be further reduced in number to create an "executive washroom" for the exclusive use of top management and their guests. Should I take this as an incentive to claw my way further up the greasy pole so that I can sample its delights (very hard at my age)? Or stage an, er, sit-in to oppose such segregation?
Read what Lucy Kellaway, "agony-aunt" of the Financial Times (London), answered:
Neither. Sit tight and consider the benefits of the new arrangements. Two sorts of activity happen in a workplace toilet, neither of which is compatible with the presence of a top executive. The first is ridding the body of waste. This is best done alone or with people with whom you feel quite comfortable. To try to make small talk with a boss in the neighbouring cubicle - or at the next urinal along - must be one of the most stressful workplace events there is.
The second function of the office loo (at least for women) is as a venue for gossip. This is slightly risky as there is always the danger that a boss might be earwigging from behind a closed stall door. To have the loos declared free of top management is therefore a positive development for keen gossipers.
Symbolic implications make no sense