Saturday, May 19, 2007

Home About Us Join FSC Contact Us renewals Events Search
Contact Congress
Volunteer
Register To Vote
Letter Writing Campaigns
Contribute
Reward For Info
Tell A Friend
Banners
Addiction to Porn
First Amendment
utah litigation
Fourth Amendment
2257
.XXX TLD
Ethics & Best Practices
Secondary Effects
Press Releases
Headlines
Reports
News Links
News Links
Case Law
Free Speakers
Free Speech X-Press



Membership Services Media Center Legislative Center Court Cases Consumer Resources Attorney Referral Service

Press Releases Back to previous page Printer friendly version Send to a friend
2257: Judge Miller's Status Conference


April 30, 2007 - On Wednesday, April 25th, Colorado Federal District Court Judge Walker Miller held a status conference with the Free Speech Coalition and Government attorneys.  The conference was requested by FSC attorneys, in cooperation with government litigators after Judge Miller’s ruling of March 30, 2007 dismissing some causes of action and allowing others to proceed in light of the Adam Walsh Act amendments to 18 U.S.C. § 2257 enacted on July 27, 2006. 

[Updated 2257 FAQ]

Result of the status conference:
We are awaiting the Court’s minute order.  Upon issuance of that Order, it will be posted on our website along with attorney comments.  It is expected that the Judge will dissolve portions of the preliminary injunction which ordered the Government not to inspect secondary producers.  That does not mean that inspections of secondaries are likely in the foreseeable future. 

What Does This Mean For Secondary Producers?
Our litigation team has stated the following:  “We have no reason to anticipate imminent inspections of secondary producers.  The reasoning underlying Judge Miller’s preliminary injunction remains valid; that is, prior to July 27, 2006, there was no statutory authority for record-keeping by secondary producers.  We are awaiting regulations which will announce the Department of Justice’s position on what secondary producers’ responsibilities are under the July 27, 2006 amendments.”

FSC Board Chair and First Amendment attorney Jeffrey J. Douglas adds, “We are all confident that no court would allow a retroactive obligation to be placed upon secondary producers for which there was no lawful authority when they acquired the images.  Furthermore, until the new regulations are finalized, how can any secondary know what their obligations are?  For instance, they cannot comply with the regulations applicable to primary producers – actual inspection of the original ID is impossible for a secondary producer.”

Should there be any indication that the Government is claiming such authority, the Free Speech Coalition will immediately seek another court order.  FSC will provide regular updates on the status of 2257 as the case unfolds through our weekly XPRESS newsletter, e-mail alerts and posting on our websites.

###

The Free Speech Coalition
is the national trade organization to the adult entertainment industry.  Its mission is to safeguard the industry from oppressive governmental regulation and to promote good business practices within the industry.
 













Privacy PolicyTerms and ConditionsContact UsSite MapFrequently Asked Questions

Copyright © 2006, The Free Speech Coalition except where otherwise noted. All rights reserved worldwide.