|
|
|
One Percent of Population Commits Half the Homicides
The Mongrelization of America Increased Our Homicide Rate Ten Fold BLACKS KILL 180,000 WHITES IN UNPUBLICIZED MASS CARNAGE Take five minutes to complete the Poll on Exiling Blacks The media-suppressed Wichita massacre
The FBI reports that there were 806,316 homicides in the US between 1965 and 2004, of which 588,611 were committed by blacks, of which 179,808 were Whites murdered by blacks. Of the 806,316 homicides, 322,526 were not cleared, only 483,790 were cleared, and of those 179,808 Whites murdered by blacks, 43,541 were cleared and 136,267 were not cleared. In just four decades, American blacks killed almost as many Whites as were killed in WWII, four times as many Whites as were killed in Vietnam, and 60 times as many Whites as died in 911 or Iraq Had our murder rate been equivalent to Saudi Arabia's rate of only 0.4 homicides per 100,000 population, the US would have had only 44,800 murders, saving 761,516 American lives in just four decades In addition, American blacks are directly responsible for 30,000 ADDITIONAL traffic fatalities EACH YEAR
BLACKS 42,150 *TIMES* GREATER THREAT THAN MUSLIM TERRORISTS The ability of the biased news sources to deceive is incredible. Muslims who're here don't belong here and need to go home. You don't need to love Muslims to recognize that our media has been so anti-Muslim for so long that it's really difficult to put this problem with black homicide back into perspective. One way to assess the reality of Muslims versus blacks regarding violence is to compare their murder rates, as that's the ultimate form and proof of violent tendencies. The homicide rates in most Muslim countries average only 1 per 100,000 population, ONE EIGHTIETH of the highest homicide rate in the civilized [and most uncivilized] nations, in Washington, DC. In 1991, the homicide rate in Washington was 80.6, which was 201 TIMES higher than Saudi Arabia's rate of 0.4. The fact that Washington's homicide rate has gone down since then, if it really has, means that it's still FORTY TIMES HIGHER than most Arab nations and a hundred times higher than Saudi Arabia, and the only possible reason is blacks. Looking at the last century, here are the indisputable facts:
This means that the average American is 1,531,100 TIMES more likely to be killed by a black than by a Muslim. Put another way, the American black, per capita, whose genocidal rampage has gone almost completely unnoticed by the media, has PROVEN to be ONE AND A HALF MILLION TIMES MORE DEADLY than Muslims. If blacks think it's unfair to calculate this per capita,then let's do some simpler math that they may understand:
Even calculating it this way, American blacks are 42 THOUSAND more deadly than Muslims--excluding the ADDITIONAL 4 MILLION murders they'll commit in the 21st Century if drastic action isn't taken immediately. POVERTY DOESN'T CAUSE CRIME If poverty causes crime, then Washington, DC, with one of the highest per capita incomes of any US city, and per student education spending 5 times that of North Dakota, would have the lowest homicide rate in the country, or even the world. But it doesn't. Instead, in 1990, you were 350 times more likely to be a homicide victim in our nation's capitol than you were in North Dakota, and 14 times more likely than in poverty stricken Rwanda where the average income is less than $40 per month. Not a single African nation, where incomes average less than $50 per month, has a homicide rate that comes even close to our nation's capitol, a true testament to the wisdom of mongrelization. GUN CONTROL DOESN'T STOP CRIME Our nation's capitol, with the strictest gun control laws in the country, is also a monument to the failure of the "liberal" concept of "gun control". If gun control was really effective at preventing homicides, then North Dakota would have had a homicide rate 350 times higher than Washington, rather than the other way around. Not even the strictest gun control, the highest education spending, the highest per capita incomes, the most intense federal scrutiny and hand wringing and out of control budgets the world has ever witnessed, nor the world's highest incarceration rate by far, made even a dent in any homicide rate anywhere in the US, particularly not in our nation's capitol. What DID work in Washington was to quietly reduce the percentage of the population who are blacks from 80% in 1991 to 60% in 1999, reducing its homicide rate from 80.6 to 35.8 per 100,000 population. But not even that 56% reduction in its homicide rate was enough to reduce its ranking as the world's murder capitol for very long, because by 2002 it was back again to the Murder Capitol of the World. BLACK CONTROL REDUCES CRIME, ELIMINATES NEED FOR GUN CONTROL There were 1,205,230 homicide victims in the US in the Twentieth Century, 95% of whom were killed by mamzers, mongrels, or offspring of mixed race parents. This mongrelization of America thus killed an EXTRA 1,144,969 Americans who would not have been killed had we followed the Torah, or God's Law which prohibits a mamzer from entering the congregation of the LORD, even to the tenth generation. Homicide rates in mongrelized cities like Washington, DC; New Orleans, Louisiana; Detroit, Michigan; and Gary, Indiana are 60 times higher than they were in the US in 1900, almost 400 times higher today than in non-mongrelized states like North Dakota and in countries with pure races like Japan, and 800 times higher today than non-mongrelized cities like Singapore. Every major US city with a high percentage of blacks has an extraordinarily high homicide rate, whereas cities like Mesa, Az., Honolulu, Hi., and San Jose, Ca., with almost no blacks, have rates equivalent to Ireland. But Ireland, with a population six times greater than Washington, DC, has a tenth as many homicides. And China, with almost 5 times the population of the US, has about half as many homicides. Even India, the only country with more homicides than us (because of their larger population) has a homicide rate one third of ours. All available data shows that overall, per 100,000 Americans, from city to city, state to state, and county to county, a 1% increase in the population who are blacks leads to the murder of one additional US citizen per 100,000 population per year.
FOUR MILLION LIVES AT STAKE: BLACK CONTROL CAN'T WAIT A simple projection of Twentieth Century US population and homicide growth rates into the Twenty First Century reveals that our continued failure to confront this monstrous genocidal catastrophe head on will cause an additional 4,150,690 homicides, a loss of life which CAN, and MUST, be prevented. This loss of American lives is 14 times greater than WWII, 83 times greater than Vietnam, and 1,300 TIMES greater than 911. Who's the biggest threat to the safety and security of most Americans: Sadam Hussein and Osama bin Ladin combined, or the 15% of Americans who are mamzers? Had the $50 billion which was spent to destroy Iraq been used instead to complete the plans our Forefathers had to exile the mamzers to Liberia, we would have saved:
A WORTHY GOAL IS A HOMICIDE RATE EQUIVALENT TO SINGAPORE OR SAUDI ARABIA If the solution to the problem is as easy as exiling all mamzers, what justification would there be for a just nation to permit a resident of Gary, Indiana to continue to be at a 400 TIMES greater risk of being murdered than a resident of North Dakota? Why should government policy not be based on achieving a homicide rate equivalent to Singapore, a rate half that of North Dakota? What do we as a nation gain which is worth more than 4 million fellow Americans' lives and multiple trillions of dollars, by permitting an alien, hateful, degenerate, amoral, ungrateful race to remain in our midst, particular when God commanded us numerous times to put them away? If it cost $50 billion to exile all the mamzers to Liberia, the cost per life saved would be $12,500, not even counting the $800 billion which would be saved each year in reduced social transfer payments.
WASHINGTON 800 *TIMES* MORE DANGEROUS THAN SINGAPORE!
DE-NIGGERIZING AMERICA INCREASES QUALITY OF LIFE Your quality of life can be easily calculated by just knowing the percentage of the population in your community, county, city, or state who are Blacks and Mexicans. With the Niggerizertm, you can easily determine to within 5% what to expect the homicide rate and education quality in your community to be. For example, if you lived in Washington, DC, and knew that 61.4% of the population of 572,000 Washingtonians were Blacks, the Niggerizertm would tell you to expect there to be 239 homicides per year. This is a homicide rate of 41.8 per 100,000 population, precisely that reported on Table No. 285 in the 2002 US Statistical Abstract. Conversely, if you lived in a rural state like New Mexico and wondered why it is that you were 12 times more likely to be a homicide victim than a resident of a rural state like North Dakota, even though there are few Blacks in either state, the Niggerizertm will easily provide the answer. Once you know that only 2.6% of the 1,819,000 New Mexicans are Blacks, but that 22.5% of them are Mexicans, you can use the Niggerizertm to calculate that there will be 134 homicide victims in New Mexico each year. Go to Table No. 285 of the 2002 US Statistical Abstract to confirm that this homicide rate of 7.4 is correct. Be careful not to include Other Hispanic in your estimate for the percent of New Mexico residents who are Mexicans. If you're a Washingtonian who has been wondering which story from media and politicians to believe about why your homicide rate was 47% higher a decade ago, forget all of the absurd claims about their needing more of your tax dollars and note only that the percentage of Washingtonians who are Blacks was also 47% higher then. With a population then which was 90% Blacks, you can use the Niggerizertm to calculate that the homicide rate then should have been 61.4, precisely as reported on Table No. 132 of the 1996 US Statistical Abstract. MOST BLACK MURDERERS NEVER BROUGHT TO JUSTICE To add insult to injury, after four decades of affirmative action, the clearance rate of homicides in the US plunged from 94% to 63%, leaving us with 250,000 murderers who were never arrested, making us the only industrialized nation with twice as many murderers roaming free than there are homicides annually in the entire world. The low incarceration rate of mamzers relative to the rate at which they commit crimes is proof that the majority of murderers who were never brought to justice are mamzers. Leaving them free to murder, again and again, is an act of sheer genocide.
A comparison of homicide rates by race reveals that it's almost exclusively homicides perpetrated by Blacks, Mexicans, and Puerto Ricans which were never "cleared". Of the 17,261 homicides committed by Blacks in 1993, 8,584 or half of them were never cleared, and of the 6,000 homicides committed by Mexicans/Puerto Ricans, 1,200 or 20% of them were never cleared. The total number of homicides committed by Other Hispanics and Whites which were never cleared was 501, less than 5% of all the homicides which were never cleared.
EACH NEW GUN CONTROL LAW KILLED 25 AMERICANS The Bureau of Justice Statistics reports that the homicide rate between 1957, before the very first gun control law was ever conceived of, was 4 per 100,000 population, and that by 1991, following the passage of more than 22,000 ill-conceived gun control laws, it had almost tripled, to 9.8. This represents a 3.1 fold increase in the number of homicides, from 8,060 to24,700, and other BJS sources report that the rate in 1980 was 10.7, or 2.7 times higher than the pre-gun-control rate. The US Statistical Abstract reports the rate for men between the ages of 25 and 44 to be 21.7 (Table 130), for black males between 15 to 24 to be 157.6 (Table 131), and for New York and Washington, DC, for all races and ages, to be 11.3 and 61.4, respectively (Table 132). These are all record high homicide rates, with the average in 1991 being 9 times higher than the US rate in 1903, 2.5 times higher than the world average, ten times higher than the current rates in Denmark, Hong Kong, Israel, Ireland, or Poland, and 20 times higher than Cyprus, England/Wales, the Slovak Republic, and Singapore. Had the downward trend in the US which had begun in 1933 merely continued, rather than suddenly reversing in 1960 and almost tripling by 1991, the homicide rate in the US in 2000 would have been lower than 1.4, equivalent to China, much lower than France, but still 2-3 times higher than England. This simple reversal of an encouraging long term trend is responsible for an extra 550,000 homicides in the US, and it's the gun lobbyists who are the prime murder suspects.
Men like John Lott warned these gun lobbyists that outlawing guns would increase crime years ago. The fact that 22,000 illegal gun control laws never saved lives and instead caused a long term downward trend to suddenly reverse itself vindicates their claims. All crime rates did increase after the gun control laws were passed, causing an extra 2.1 million burglaries, 6.1 million larcenies, 1.3 million auto thefts, 1 million aggravated assaults, and 572,000 robberies, each year. On average, each new gun control law killed 25, imprisoned 12, burglarized 1,909, enabled 5,545 larcenies, stole 1,182 cars, left 909 citizens powerless to defend themselves against assault, and removed the fear of getting shot from 520 robbers. EVERY EXTRA $13 MILLION EDUCATION DOLLARS KILLS ONE AMERICAN Mostly because of American blacks, education spending as a percent of U.S. GDP increased from 4% to 8%, causing us to spend an extra $7 trillion for education. This colossal and mistaken effort, which passed the point of diminishing returns in 1959, was followed by a 98 point drop in SAT scores, our dead last placement in 17 of 34 TIMSS subjects, and 550,000 extra homicides. For every 13 million extra dollars which were spent in this futile attempt to educate the uneducable, one American was murdered. NIGGER CONTROL vs. GUN CONTROL In 1994, there was a 350 fold difference in murder rates across the nation, with a rate of 70 per 100,000 population in the nation's capitol Washington, and 0.2 in the almost exclusively White North Dakota. All large cities with a high population of blacks had high homicide rates, up to 40 times higher than Mesa, Arizona with almost no Blacks. This can only be explained by Washington having one of the highest percentage of Blacks of any US city. Los Angeles with a population of 3.7 million had 247 murders in 2000, a rate of 6.7, which can only be explained by the population being 40% Hispanic. With a homicide rate of 79.4, Gary, Indiana, with a population of Blacks even greater than Washington, DC, leads the nation in homicides, beating even the nation's capitol at 70. State to state and city to city, homicide rates track closely to the populations of blacks and Hispanics, with blacks committing homicide at a rate of 52 per 100,000 blacks, Hispanics at 27 per 100,000 Hispanics, and Whites at 0.7 per 100,000 Whites. So how can homicide rates greater than 70, like those in Gary and Washington, which are 40% higher than the average rate at which blacks commit homicide, be explained? The only answer can be that homicides per 100,000 population by race are as follows:
If Whites in this country actually DO commit murder at a rate MUCH ,MUCH higher than their genetic brethren in Ireland or Denmark or Norway, then WHY? The mere presence of BLACKS? However, I don't believe this is true, as there are 3,916 blacks in North Dakota, and their presence there wasn't enough to raise ND's homicide rate much higher than 0.2 (although if these 3,916 blacks are between the age of 14-24 and commit homicide at the national average of 1 per 1,000 blacks, then they alone would have killed 3-4 people). The following is based on the assumption (which may be faulty) that the presence of blacks doesn't raise the homicide rate of Whites, but that a large concentration of blacks causes an unusually large spate of genocide of their own kind, plus a significant spill over to other races. When Washington's homicide rate was 80.6, it was not ALL blacks. It was "only" 80% blacks, 10% Hispanics, 5% Whites, and 5% Asians. So the actual homicide rate of the blacks themselves had to have been higher than 80.6. 0.5 x 5% + 0.5 x 5% + 30 x 10% + X x 80% = 80.6 2.5 + 2.5 + 3 + .8X = 80.6 .8X = 72.6 X = 90.75 So the ACTUAL homicide rate amongst blacks when they're concentrated together like they are in DC and Gary and Detroit and New Orleans is 90.7 (or at least this is what it was in DC). BUT--let's look at New Orleans, whose homicide rate at 85.8 in 1994 was even HIGHER than DC, yet the percentage of blacks was only 62% (and 4% Hispanic, 2% Asian, and 38% White). 0.5 x 38% + 0.5 x 2% + 30 x 4% + X x 62% = 85.8 0.19 + 0.01 + 1.2 + .62X = 85.8 .62X = 84.4 X = 136.1 SO, in New Orleans, blacks actually committed homicide at a rate of 136.1, almost 50% greater than in DC, making DC blacks seem quite tame by comparison. The $64,000 question is: for what reason do you believe blacks in New Orleans are 50% more violent than those in DC, who're 18 TIMES more violent than blacks in Mozambique, who're 10 TIMES more violent than Saudi Arabians, who're TWICE as violent as North Dakotans, who're TWICE as violent as Singaporeans? Whites?
If you enjoy this open discussion web site, you are welcome to in any amount to enable it to expand |
|
|
Modified Wednesday, August 08, 2007 Copyright @ 2007 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party
|
