|
|
|
"IQ" vs. Standardized Tests
"When Wechsler was developing his IQ test, he found that out of 105 tests assessing skills in solving maze-puzzles, involving the most heterogeneous populations throughout the world, 99 showed an incontrovertible male superiority. (Wechsler resolved this type of problem by eliminating all those tests that resulted in findings of significant sex differences.)" Leonardo_member@newsguy.com in 9miftl0239r@drn.newsguy.com So the IQs of men and women were "equalized" by throwing out 94% of the test? Take five minutes to complete the Poll on Exiling Blacks
Did the "liberals" in education [read: jews] achieve their goal of establishing racial and "gender" "equality" by using only 6% of the "IQ" test questions to measure "IQ", and then widely publicize that "men and women have equal IQs"? If Gallup's poll on "gender issues" is any indication, then it's been a raving success: 29% of men and 43% of women believe women are more intelligent than men, and 40% of both men and women believe they are of "equal intelligence". Are they correct, or are the 28% of men and 14% of women who believe men are more intelligent correct? It's a major moral dilemma for this putative Christian nation, one that prides itself on truth, honesty, and Christian charity, that there's no hard scientific or statistical evidence to support the beliefs of almost three quarters of American men and 6 out of 7 of American women that women are "equally" or more intelligent than men. After more than a decade of research, this author is familiar with only two tests on which females outperformed males in intelligence, and that's a small advantage 9 and 13 year old girls have over boys on the math portion of the politically motivated National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) test, and the verbal portion of the equally politically biased American College Testing (ACT) test. By age 17 years, though, boys outperform girls by a very large margin on NAEP, there are no other tests which duplicate the results of the verbal portion of ACT, and boys outperform girls by very wide margins on all the other ACT tests (math, rhetorical skills, algebra, reading, social studies, arts/literature, science reasoning, natural science, and composite). There's no section of the TIMSS test on which girls ever outperformed boys, and their scores were so low on TIMSS physics that their responses were statistically significant on only 45% of the test, and they scored lower than if they'd just guessed at the answers on the rest. Boys outperform girls by wide margins on both the verbal and math sections of the SAT. This difference between men and women in academic skills carries over to free enterprise where a very exhaustive Census Bureau study highlights the four fold advantage men have over women in critical thinking, decision skills, earning ability, corporate management, people skills:
Unless "intelligence" is something that can't be measured, and unless all who believe men aren't more intelligent than women accept as a fact an entity that can't be quantified or measured or proven, then it simply cannot be correct that women are more than or equally intelligent to men. Thus, 6 out of 7 American women and three quarters of American men hold a belief that cannot be substantiated by any facts, proof that the brainwashing of our students has been a remarkable success. The other evidence of the remarkable success of this brainwashing is the fact that this page has been on the internet for more than a decade in one form or another--and in all that time not one single woman, even those claiming to be PhD's, asked one single logical question about:
Instead, virtually every input from a girl or woman has been an emotional tirade which attempted to discredit the messenger rather than understand that their equality boat has a great big hole in it and has already sunk. The usual charge is "you must really hate women", which belies this author's role in creating and organizing standardized tests, administering and funding them, collating the results, and publishing the test scores. If this author "hates women", then consider how much MORE the federal and state governments around the world who paid for, administered, tested, and publicized the results of so many different tests, must "hate women". All this author has done is peek at the test results and put them on a few web pages. Biased jew-controlled businesses like the Gallup Organization present their data in such a distorted fashion that it is difficult to sort it all out. Almost all standardized tests (with the exception of TIMSS which did report Israel's scores separately) exclude jews as a separate race. Feminazis would not view it as "sexist" or "racist" or "anti-semitic" to merely note the significant differences in intelligence by race and sex, and particularly by race and sex of jews, had this brainwashing not been a raving success. TIMSS, where Israel (which is mostly if not all jews) scored a mere 466 in TIMSS math, provides an excellent opportunity to fill in the gaps caused by Wechsler's distortion of his "IQ tests", Gallup's biased polling strategy, and the failure of almost all news sources to separate the data by race and sex. SAT math scores by race and sex are correlated with TIMSS math scores by race and sex to establish that jew boys score 458 in SAT Math, jew girls score 438, and in TIMSS, Asian boys in the US score 614, Asian girls in the US score 580, Caucasian boys score 573, Caucasian girls score 538, etc. This is consistent with the very low test scores of Miami-Dade, Florida which has such a high population of jews that the main boulevard is now called "Yitzahk Rabin Blvd".
This correlation can then be used to establish an "actual" IQ which more accurately reflects the race and sex differences shown by all these standardized tests, as well as cranial capacity, than do the Wechsler and other "IQ tests" which have removed the major portion that tests for intelligence:
To verify this Actual IQ score, the known racial and sex differences demonstrated by differences in the NAEP Math, ACT Math, and GRE (Graduate Record Exam) Quantitative scores are compared, showing remarkably high correlation (r-squared of 0.96, 0.94, and 0.95, respectively):
Now that we've established some level of confidence that this Actual IQ is an accurate and reliable measurement of the actual differences in intelligence, or at least in test performance, between races and sexes, the real challenge is to correlate this to brain size:
The one outlier which throws r-squared off so much, to only 0.75, is the one for nigger boys with an average cranial capacity of 1,319, but who score only 78 in IQ, 445 in TIMSS Math, 431 in SAT Math, 17.4 in ACT Math, 247 in NAEP Math, and 446 in GRE Quantitative. All of these scores suggest that nigger boys should have a brain capacity of 1,210 rather than 1,319, suggesting that the actual brain size measurement might be 9% too high. The following is what the chart would look like if the cranial capacity of nigger boys were presumed to be 1210 rather than 1,319. For more discussion on this detail, please click here.
In contrast to the above Actual IQ Score are the Wechsler and Lynn IQ scores which are not consistent with any known standardized tests, achieving at best an r-squared of 0.45:
Where Lynn and Wechsler estimate the IQ of both jew boys and jew girls to be 115, their performance in TIMSS puts jew boys at 85 and jew girls at 80, and where they put Asian boys at 106, TIMSS puts them at 118. Similarly, they overestimate Mexican boys by 2 points, Mexican girls by 12 points, Caucasian girls by 2 points, Indian girls by 8 points, and they underestimate Caucasian boys by 6 points, nigger boys by 8 points, and nigger girls by 5 points. Such a bias is consistent with the obvious, pervasive, and systemic bias of government reports, outrageous media disinformation, and other politically correct persons who almost have heart attacks when someone says "jew boy", "nigger", or "chink" (and perhaps this report will be updated with respect to the name of the Asian classification):
"What IS open to question is whether the tests measure innate, unchangeable abilities. As this chart shows, there are groups with average or better performance out there. However almost every conventional race based intervention in education does not result in equal performance. Only programs based on rigorous academics such as Barclay, and not race such as; conventional desegregation, busing students to expensive surburbs or affirmative action in hiring and multiculturalism in curriculum have been shown to result in superior performance." Arthur Hu The following IQ Spectrum has not yet been corrected for the erroneous IQ data reported by jews like Wechsler and one of the authors of The Bell Curve, but it has been enhanced with data from the SAT and NAEP, by state, sex, and race to demonstrate the relationship between IQs and standardized test scores. This enables the following cross-state, cross-sex, and cross-race comparison to be made between IQ, SAT Math scores, SAT Verbal scores, and NAEP Math scores.
Notes: (1) In many cases, conversions were made from SAT scores to an estimate of the US population based on percentile to IQ conversion. (2) Koreans adopted by Americans, Winick, Meyer and Harris 1975 (3)American men = Asian women at visiospatial tasks (math) (Lynn / Seligman) (4) Blacks in New York and Boston are equal to grade level in some grades, equal to 100 IQ by definition. Some schools that are mostly black in Chicago also perform at the 50th percentile. (5) Study of children of mixed parents of European and Black soldiers found no difference (6) A.Hu Converted 1995 CLAS distribution to IQ with white=100 (7) National Assessment of Educational Progress given to national cross-section of students, 1990 (8) "A better idea" The Economist Dec 2, 1995 p. 23 Barclay public school in Baltimore Md. emulates a tough private school to achieve 85 percentile math scores with 90% black students, 82% free lunch who previously were scoring 20-30 percentile. Superintendent was fired who had opposed "rich black man's curriculum" inappropriate for poor students. (9) Flynn looked at studies that put Asian IQ higher and concluded that after you accounted for increases in IQ since the tests were "normalized", Asian IQs were actually no higher than whites might expected to be at the same time. However, he does not dispute that Asians still have superior academic performance in school, which is just as useful as having a high IQ. This is my latest version -- Arthur Hu's "IQ Spectrum" -- http://www.halcyon.com/arthurhu/ 12422 107th Pl NE Kirkland WA 98034 Note that blacks are, as a group, generally below whites, but it is not difficult to find groups who score 100 average or far above under ideal conditions. Those who say that tests are invalid are implying that performance is equal when every test devised by man shows differences in skills such as vocabulary, abstract reasoning, and mathematics. Date: Fri, 2 Feb 1996 Here's something else you might find helpful - note Asian females have a gender gap, but its nearly erased by the racial gap for Asians.
1993 SAT Scores Ranked by Race and Gender (unpublished special tabulations, College Board)
IQs for 185 countries
Summary of references:
http://christianparty.net/einstein.htm for why Einstein's brain cannot be trusted as a control samplehttp://christianparty.net/gallupsexdifference.htm for American opinion of intelligence by sex. http://christianparty.net/timssphysics.htm for the huge differences between the sexes in physics scores. If you enjoy this open discussion web site, you are welcome to in any amount to enable it to expand |
|
|
Modified Wednesday, August 08, 2007 Copyright @ 2007 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party
|
