::
Growing, Growing ... Gone? China's under control, Europe's finally reforming, and the global economic outlook is rosy, right? Not quite
::
Follow The Stars Forget politicians and titans of industry — celebs like Bono, Sharon Stone and Angelina Jolie set the agenda at the World Economic Forum
::
Davos Identity Have business élites lost touch with their national roots? The WEF annual meeting in Davos this week crystallizes the debate over globalization
ON THE BOARD:
(from left) Paul Achleitner, Moises Naím, Laura D'Andrea Tyson, Jeffrey Sachs and Pascal Blanque
Growing, Growing ...Gone?
China's under control, Europe's finally reforming, and the global economic outlook is rosy, right? Not quite. TIME's experts peer cautiously at the year ahead
Posted Sunday, February 6, 2005; 16.34 GMT 2004 was a year for the record books — the world economy grew at its fastest rate in almost three decades. And most observers predict that growth in 2005 will continue to be relatively robust in Asia, the U.S. and even laggardly Europe. The developed world, to paraphrase British Prime Minister Harold Macmillan's 1957 proclamation to his countrymen, has rarely had it so good. Why, then, are so many economists so nervous? Because even good times harbor real threats. Oil prices remain perilously high, well over $40 a bbl. since July. The dollar, despite some recent signs of life, has dropped by more than 40% against the euro since it began falling three years ago, and interest rates are creeping up: last week, the U.S. Federal Reserve raised rates for the sixth time in seven months. And lurking in the background is a two-headed beast that shows little sign of being tamed: America's soaring budget deficit, which is expected to exceed $400 billion this year (not including the forecast $100 billion-plus costs of military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan), and its record $660 billion current-account deficit, which means that U.S. imports of goods, services and money exceed exports in an amount equal to about 6% of the total U.S. economy. To cover the bill, foreign creditors must invest in that much American debt and assets. If they were to stop doing so, an unprecedented crisis could ensue.
Economists, of course, are famously dismal, so maybe it's no surprise that when Time's annual Board of Economists roundtable met during the World Economic Forum in Davos late last month, the discussion focused less on what is going right in the global economy than on what's wrong — and how serious the longer-term impact could be for everyone. Will the U.S. be able to continue sucking in the savings of people around the world to finance its profligacy? What is the likelihood that President George W. Bush — or the financial markets — will take corrective action? And could the twin deficits ultimately destabilize not just the U.S. but the entire global economy?
These questions were also on the table at last week's meeting of G-7 finance ministers in London, and for some, they have a historical echo. The two Americans on the panel, Jeffrey Sachs, the director of Columbia University's Earth Institute, and Laura D'Andrea Tyson, a former national economic adviser to President Bill Clinton who is now dean of the London Business School, see some eerie similarities with economic conditions of almost 20 years ago. As Ronald Reagan began his second term in 1985, the dollar was sliding and the U.S. was running up big deficits as a result of tax cuts and increased military and other spending. Back then, the American economy entered a turbulent decade of budget consolidation that included a short but potent recession, and bitter battles over spending cuts. Tyson and Sachs today believe President Bush may be in for an equally turbulent ride in his second term. With the Bush Administration doggedly pursuing a massive plan to overhaul the nation's Social Security system, and likely to face stiff resistance, tackling the deficits does not seem high on the agenda. Tyson said that "if there's anyone who believes" the Bush Administration will make a serious effort on the deficits, "I didn't find them." And unless priorities change, she expects interest rates in the U.S. to continue rising steadily until they hit around 5% — double their present level — and both she and Sachs predict painful budget cuts and a U.S. recession in the medium-term. "There'll be a wearing and exhausting process ahead. We're only in the first stage and it'll get ugly before it gets better," Sachs said.
Sachs and Tyson are both Democrats, although Sachs insists his work is strictly nonpartisan; their Republican counterparts argue that the U.S. economy is going to keep humming along despite red ink and higher rates. That view was seconded last week by Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, who suggested in London that tighter U.S. fiscal policy could stabilize or even shrink the U.S. current account deficit. Time's economists don't buy that — but, mindful of the alarmist predictions of two decades ago that turned out to be wrong, neither Sachs nor Tyson is forecasting a calamity such as a market crash or a full-scale depression. They also expect that the wider damage will remain limited. "The U.S. deficit is really bad news for Americans, but it's absorbable in the world economy," said Tyson.
:: Building Bridges Feb. 08, 2001
Much of Davos was devoted to closing the gap between the technology haves and have-nots
:: Doubts At Davos Jan. 27, 2003
At 2003's World Economic Forum meeting, misgivings about America are the talk of the town
:: What The World Needs Now Jan. 19, 2004
Smaller nations have the chance to put poverty, AIDS and the environment back on the table
:: Voices Of A New Generation Jan. 19, 2003
Eight young leaders with huge hopes for Europe and big ideas about how to make a difference.
:: Rotten At The Core? Jan. 27, 2004
Germany and France have always driven E.U. integration, but smaller states say Berlin and Paris should move over
::
The War On PovertyApr. 15, 2003
In office just two months, President Lula da Silva and his team have begun to tackle inequality in Brazil
::
Can't Stand The Heat Mar. 22, 2001
Global warming is making many winter-sports lovers hot under the collar
Mogadishu at 60 Miles an Hour Arms merchants are once again doing brisk business after a rapid change of power in this tough town, but so far the peace has held
The Year of The Nuke A rundown of the world's nuclear powerhouses, and what to expect in the coming months
2004 was a year for the record books — the world economy grew at its fastest rate in almost three decades. And most observers predict that growth in 2005 will continue to be relatively robust in Asia, the U.S. and even laggardly Europe. The developed world, to paraphrase British Prime Minister Harold Macmillan's 1957 proclamation to his countrymen, has rarely had it so good. Why, then, are so many economists so nervous? Because even good times harbor real threats. Oil prices remain perilously high, well over $40 a bbl. since July. The dollar, despite some recent signs of life, has dropped by more than 40% against the euro since it began falling three years ago, and interest rates are creeping up: last week, the U.S. Federal Reserve raised rates for the sixth time in seven months. And lurking in the background is a two-headed beast that shows little sign of being tamed: America's soaring budget deficit, which is expected to exceed $400 billion this year (not including the forecast $100 billion-plus costs of military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan), and its record $660 billion current-account deficit, which means that U.S. imports of goods, services and money exceed exports in an amount equal to about 6% of the total U.S. economy. To cover the bill, foreign creditors must invest in that much American debt and assets. If they were to stop doing so, an unprecedented crisis could ensue. 
